search
Back to results

Endoscopical Dilation of Benign Esophageal Strictures

Primary Purpose

Dysphagia

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dilation 10 sec
Dilation 2 min
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Umeå
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Dysphagia focused on measuring Benign, Esophageal strictures, Esophagus, Balloon Dilation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic dysphagia with an endoscopic picture suggestive of a benign disease

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspicion of achalasia or malignancy. If the patients needed more than 3 dilations the first month this was also a considered an exclusion criterion

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Group A

    Group B

    Arm Description

    Dilation 10 sec

    Dilation 2 min

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Relief from dysphagia

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    November 28, 2012
    Last Updated
    November 29, 2012
    Sponsor
    University Hospital, Umeå
    Collaborators
    Uppsala University, Boston Scientific Corporation
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT01738997
    Brief Title
    Endoscopical Dilation of Benign Esophageal Strictures
    Official Title
    Endoscopical Dilation of Benign Esophageal Strictures - a Randomized, Clinical Trial, Comparing Two Different Inflation Times.
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    November 2012
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    December 2003 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 2006 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    undefined (undefined)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    University Hospital, Umeå
    Collaborators
    Uppsala University, Boston Scientific Corporation

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Although balloon dilatation is the primary treatment for benign dysphagia, information about the optimal inflation time is lacking. The aim of the current pilot study was to compare 10 seconds inflation time, with 2 minutes inflation time, regarding the efficacy

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Dysphagia
    Keywords
    Benign, Esophageal strictures, Esophagus, Balloon Dilation

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    20 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Group A
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Dilation 10 sec
    Arm Title
    Group B
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Dilation 2 min
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Dilation 10 sec
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    CRE, Controlled Radial Expansion, Boston Scientific Cork Ltd
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Dilation 2 min
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    CRE, Controlled Radial Expansion, Boston Scientific Cork Ltd
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Relief from dysphagia
    Time Frame
    1 year from dilation

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    80 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Symptomatic dysphagia with an endoscopic picture suggestive of a benign disease Exclusion Criteria: Suspicion of achalasia or malignancy. If the patients needed more than 3 dilations the first month this was also a considered an exclusion criterion

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    Endoscopical Dilation of Benign Esophageal Strictures

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs