search
Back to results

Endoscopy Every 2 Years or Only as Needed in Monitoring Patients With Barrett Esophagus

Primary Purpose

Esophageal Cancer, Precancerous Condition

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
2 yearly endoscopy
comparison of screening methods
diagnostic endoscopic procedure
endoscopic biopsy
endoscopic procedure
quality-of-life assessment
screening method
Sponsored by
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional screening trial for Esophageal Cancer focused on measuring esophageal cancer, adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, Barrett esophagus

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 120 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed circumferential Barrett metaplasia meeting 1 of the following criteria:

    • At least 1 cm from the gastro-esophageal junction
    • At least a 2 cm non-circumferential tongue of Barrett metaplasia
  • Undergone endoscopy within the last 2 years to confirm Barrett metaplasia and exclude high-grade dysplasia and carcinoma
  • No known high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Resident of the United Kingdom
  • Informed of the risk of Barrett esophagus developing into esophageal cancer, either at the visit when the invitation letter is issued or on a documented previous occasion
  • Able to undergo endoscopy
  • No medical conditions that would make endoscopy difficult or hazardous

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics

Sites / Locations

  • Gloucestershire Royal Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

2 yearly endoscopies

endoscopy at need

Arm Description

Two years endoscopies

Endoscopy only when patient reports symptoms

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Overall survival

Secondary Outcome Measures

Cost-effectiveness
Incidence of esophageal cancer, gastric or esophageal cancer, or all cancers
Time to diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma
Stage of esophageal adenocarcinoma at diagnosis using TNM staging
Morbidity and mortality related to endoscopy, esophageal surgery, and other endoscopy-related interventions
Frequency of endoscopy

Full Information

First Posted
September 30, 2009
Last Updated
August 17, 2017
Sponsor
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00987857
Brief Title
Endoscopy Every 2 Years or Only as Needed in Monitoring Patients With Barrett Esophagus
Official Title
Barrett's Oesophagus Two Yearly Surveillance Versus Endoscopy at Need: a Randomised Controlled Trial to Estimate Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness Study (BOSS)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
March 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
May 2022 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Screening tests may help doctors find cancer cells early and plan better treatment. It is not yet known whether endoscopy every 2 years is more effective than endoscopy only as needed in finding esophageal cancer in patients with Barrett esophagus. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying endoscopy every 2 years to see how well it works compared with endoscopy only as needed in monitoring patients with Barrett esophagus.
Detailed Description
OBJECTIVES: Primary To establish whether endoscopic surveillance every 2 years or endoscopy at need only is superior in terms of overall survival and, if neither is superior, whether endoscopy at need only is non-inferior to surveillance every 2 years in patients with Barrett esophagus. Secondary To estimate the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic surveillance every 2 years as compared to endoscopy at need only. To establish whether there is a significant difference between endoscopic surveillance every 2 years or endoscopy at need only in terms of the incidence of esophageal cancer, gastric or esophageal cancer, or all cancers. To establish whether there is a significant difference between endoscopic surveillance every 2 years or endoscopy at need only in terms of the time to diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma. To establish whether there is a significant difference between endoscopic surveillance every 2 years or endoscopy at need only in terms of the stage of esophageal adenocarcinoma at diagnosis using TNM staging. To establish whether there is a significant difference between endoscopic surveillance every 2 years or endoscopy at need only in terms of morbidity and mortality related to endoscopy, esophageal surgery, and other endoscopy-related interventions (e.g., ablation). To establish whether there is a significant difference between endoscopic surveillance every 2 years or endoscopy at need only in terms of the frequency of endoscopy. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to age at diagnosis (< 65 years vs ≥ 65 years), length of Barrett metaplasia segment including tongues (< 2 cm vs ≥ 2 cm and ≤ 3 cm vs > 3 cm and ≤ 8 cm vs > 8 cm), and newly diagnosed disease (defined as the date of endoscopy confirming Barrett metaplasia was within the past 4 months) (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 intervention arms. Arm I: Patients undergo surveillance endoscopy with quadrantic biopsies taken every 2 cm. Patients undergo endoscopy every 2 years for a total of 6 endoscopies over 10 years. Arm II: Patients undergo endoscopy as needed over 10 years. All patients may undergo urgent endoscopy if they develop dysphagia, unexplained weight loss of > 7 lb, iron-deficiency anemia, recurrent vomiting, or worsening upper gastrointestinal symptoms. All patients complete a questionnaire that includes a quality-of-life measure and questions about medication at baseline, every 2 years, and following key events (e.g., diagnosis of any cancer or high-grade dysplasia).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Esophageal Cancer, Precancerous Condition
Keywords
esophageal cancer, adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, Barrett esophagus

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Screening
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
3400 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
2 yearly endoscopies
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Two years endoscopies
Arm Title
endoscopy at need
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Endoscopy only when patient reports symptoms
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
2 yearly endoscopy
Intervention Description
2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
comparison of screening methods
Intervention Description
2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
diagnostic endoscopic procedure
Intervention Description
2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
endoscopic biopsy
Intervention Description
2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
endoscopic procedure
Intervention Description
2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
quality-of-life assessment
Intervention Description
QOL aims to elicit any differences in QOL between 2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
screening method
Intervention Description
All Barretts patients to be screened
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall survival
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cost-effectiveness
Title
Incidence of esophageal cancer, gastric or esophageal cancer, or all cancers
Title
Time to diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma
Title
Stage of esophageal adenocarcinoma at diagnosis using TNM staging
Title
Morbidity and mortality related to endoscopy, esophageal surgery, and other endoscopy-related interventions
Title
Frequency of endoscopy

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
120 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically confirmed circumferential Barrett metaplasia meeting 1 of the following criteria: At least 1 cm from the gastro-esophageal junction At least a 2 cm non-circumferential tongue of Barrett metaplasia Undergone endoscopy within the last 2 years to confirm Barrett metaplasia and exclude high-grade dysplasia and carcinoma No known high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Resident of the United Kingdom Informed of the risk of Barrett esophagus developing into esophageal cancer, either at the visit when the invitation letter is issued or on a documented previous occasion Able to undergo endoscopy No medical conditions that would make endoscopy difficult or hazardous PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: See Disease Characteristics
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hugh Barr
Organizational Affiliation
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Gloucestershire Royal Hospital
City
Gloucester
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
GL1 3NN
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Endoscopy Every 2 Years or Only as Needed in Monitoring Patients With Barrett Esophagus

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs