search
Back to results

Endovascular Atherectomy Safety and Effectiveness Study (EASE)

Primary Purpose

Peripheral Vascular Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Phoenix Atherectomy System
Sponsored by
AtheroMed, Inc
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Peripheral Vascular Disease focused on measuring Atherectomy, Atherosclerosis, Peripheral artery disease

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject willing and able to give informed consent
  • Subject willing and able to comply with the study protocol
  • Age ≥18 years old
  • Objective hemodynamic criteria that subject has a resting ankle-brachial index (ABI) ≤ 0.90, or ≤ 0.75 after exercise, OR patients with non-compressible arteries (ABI>1.1) must have a toe-brachial index (TBI) of ≤ 0.80
  • Clinical description of lesion as characterized by a Rutherford Clinical Class 2 to 5
  • Subject is a suitable candidate for angiography and endovascular intervention in the opinion of the investigator or per hospital guideline
  • Subject has target lesion/lesions defined as stenosis ≥ 70% as determined by operator visual assessment, distal to the profunda femoral artery. No more than two lesions may be treated with the Phoenix device and one of the treated lesions must include a lesion with the worst percent diameter stenosis.
  • Total treated lesion length with the Phoenix device ≤ 10 cm
  • Popliteal and above, target reference vessel diameter (proximal and distal to target lesion) is ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 4.5 mm
  • At least one patent tibial vessel runoff at baseline.
  • Below popliteal, target reference vessel diameter (proximal and distal to target lesion) is ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 3.5 mm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has an active infection in the target limb
  • Clinical/angiographic complication (other than non-flow limiting dissections) attributed to a currently marketed device prior to introduction of Phoenix System
  • Critical limb ischemia with Rutherford Clinical Class 6
  • Target lesion containing severe calcification that is circumferential and noted in two views
  • Lesion in the contralateral limb requiring intervention during index procedure or within next 30 days
  • In-stent restenosis within the target lesion
  • Flow limiting dissection, Type C or greater
  • Lesion within a native vessel graft or synthetic graft
  • History of an endovascular procedure or open vascular surgery on the index limb within the last 30 days
  • Subject has any planned surgical or interventional procedure within 30 days after the study procedure
  • Significant acute or chronic kidney disease with a creatinine level >2.5 mg/dl, and/or requiring dialysis
  • Unstable coronary artery disease or other uncontrolled comorbidity
  • Myocardial infarction or stroke within 2 months of baseline evaluation
  • Subject is pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Participation in any study of an investigational device, medication, biologic, or other agent within 30 days prior to enrollment that is either a cardiovascular study or could, in the judgment of the investigator, affect the results of this study
  • Subject has significant stenosis or occlusion of inflow tract (upstream disease) not successfully treated before this procedure
  • Subject in whom antiplatelet, anticoagulant, or thrombolytic therapy is contraindicated
  • Uncorrectable bleeding diathesis, platelet dysfunction, thrombocytopenia with platelet count less than 125,000/microliter, known coagulopathy, or INR > 1.5
  • Known allergy to contrast agents or medications used to perform endovascular intervention that cannot be adequately pre-treated
  • History of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)
  • Any thrombolytic therapy within two weeks of enrollment
  • Psychiatric disorder which in the judgment of the investigator could interfere with provision of informed consent, completion of tests, therapy, or follow-up
  • Clinical/angiographic evidence of distal embolization

Sites / Locations

  • Spring Hill Medical Center
  • Arizona Heart Institute
  • Arkansas Heart Hospital
  • Vascular Interventional Center
  • Emory University Hospital Midtown
  • WellStar Health System
  • Methodist Research Imstitute /Cobb Hospital
  • Cardiovascular Institute of the South
  • Cardiovascular Inst The Regional Med Center/Center of Acadia Institute of the South
  • St. John Hospital and Medical Center
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center
  • Hunterdon Cardiovascular Associated
  • Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian
  • The Carl & Eduth Lindner Center for Research & Education at the Christ Hospital
  • Hochrhein-Eggberg-Klinik GmbH
  • Park-Hospital Leipzig

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Phoenix Atherectomy System

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Safety: Freedom from Major Adverse Events
Efficacy: Technical Success
The achievement of acute debulking to achieve a post-Phoenix (prior to any adjunctive therapy) residual diameter stenosis of ≤50%.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Assessment of Major Adverse Events
Procedural success
Procedural success rate is defined as the proportion of the target lesions in which the final stenosis is <30% after treatment with atherectomy and any other adjunctive therapy.
Clinical success
Clinical success rate is defined as the proportion of subjects that have procedural successes in all target lesions with achievement of at least one Rutherford Clinical Scale at 30 days and 6 months post procedure,
Target vessel Revascularization
Incidence of clinically-driven target vessel revascularization or target limb revascularization.

Full Information

First Posted
August 4, 2010
Last Updated
January 29, 2014
Sponsor
AtheroMed, Inc
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01541774
Brief Title
Endovascular Atherectomy Safety and Effectiveness Study
Acronym
EASE
Official Title
A Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Phoenix Atherectomy™ System in Atherectomy of the Peripheral Vasculature
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
AtheroMed, Inc

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the procedural safety and effectiveness of the Phoenix Atherectomy™ System for the treatment of de novo and restenotic atherosclerotic lesions located in the native peripheral arteries. The Phoenix Atherectomy™ System is intended for use in atherectomy of the peripheral vasculature. The intended peripheral vessels include the Superficial Femoral, Popliteal, and Infrapopliteal arteries. The system is not intended for use in the coronary, carotid, iliac or renal vasculature. The results of this study will be used to support a 510(k) submission to the Food and Drug Administration.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Peripheral Vascular Disease
Keywords
Atherectomy, Atherosclerosis, Peripheral artery disease

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
128 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Phoenix Atherectomy System
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Phoenix Atherectomy System
Other Intervention Name(s)
Atherectomy, Percutaneous Transluminal Atherectomy, Transluminal Atherectomy, Percutaneous Atherectomy
Intervention Description
Evaluate the procedural safety and effectiveness of the Phoenix Atherectomy™ System for the treatment of de novo and restenotic atherosclerotic lesions located in native peripheral arteries as assessed through 30 day follow-up. Further evaluations of device performance ensuring no prostenotic response as assessed through six month follow-up.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Safety: Freedom from Major Adverse Events
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Efficacy: Technical Success
Description
The achievement of acute debulking to achieve a post-Phoenix (prior to any adjunctive therapy) residual diameter stenosis of ≤50%.
Time Frame
Day 1
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Assessment of Major Adverse Events
Time Frame
From 1 month to 6 months post procedure
Title
Procedural success
Description
Procedural success rate is defined as the proportion of the target lesions in which the final stenosis is <30% after treatment with atherectomy and any other adjunctive therapy.
Time Frame
Day 1
Title
Clinical success
Description
Clinical success rate is defined as the proportion of subjects that have procedural successes in all target lesions with achievement of at least one Rutherford Clinical Scale at 30 days and 6 months post procedure,
Time Frame
30 days to 6 months
Title
Target vessel Revascularization
Description
Incidence of clinically-driven target vessel revascularization or target limb revascularization.
Time Frame
Treatment through 6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subject willing and able to give informed consent Subject willing and able to comply with the study protocol Age ≥18 years old Objective hemodynamic criteria that subject has a resting ankle-brachial index (ABI) ≤ 0.90, or ≤ 0.75 after exercise, OR patients with non-compressible arteries (ABI>1.1) must have a toe-brachial index (TBI) of ≤ 0.80 Clinical description of lesion as characterized by a Rutherford Clinical Class 2 to 5 Subject is a suitable candidate for angiography and endovascular intervention in the opinion of the investigator or per hospital guideline Subject has target lesion/lesions defined as stenosis ≥ 70% as determined by operator visual assessment, distal to the profunda femoral artery. No more than two lesions may be treated with the Phoenix device and one of the treated lesions must include a lesion with the worst percent diameter stenosis. Total treated lesion length with the Phoenix device ≤ 10 cm Popliteal and above, target reference vessel diameter (proximal and distal to target lesion) is ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 4.5 mm At least one patent tibial vessel runoff at baseline. Below popliteal, target reference vessel diameter (proximal and distal to target lesion) is ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 3.5 mm Exclusion Criteria: Patient has an active infection in the target limb Clinical/angiographic complication (other than non-flow limiting dissections) attributed to a currently marketed device prior to introduction of Phoenix System Critical limb ischemia with Rutherford Clinical Class 6 Target lesion containing severe calcification that is circumferential and noted in two views Lesion in the contralateral limb requiring intervention during index procedure or within next 30 days In-stent restenosis within the target lesion Flow limiting dissection, Type C or greater Lesion within a native vessel graft or synthetic graft History of an endovascular procedure or open vascular surgery on the index limb within the last 30 days Subject has any planned surgical or interventional procedure within 30 days after the study procedure Significant acute or chronic kidney disease with a creatinine level >2.5 mg/dl, and/or requiring dialysis Unstable coronary artery disease or other uncontrolled comorbidity Myocardial infarction or stroke within 2 months of baseline evaluation Subject is pregnant or breast-feeding Participation in any study of an investigational device, medication, biologic, or other agent within 30 days prior to enrollment that is either a cardiovascular study or could, in the judgment of the investigator, affect the results of this study Subject has significant stenosis or occlusion of inflow tract (upstream disease) not successfully treated before this procedure Subject in whom antiplatelet, anticoagulant, or thrombolytic therapy is contraindicated Uncorrectable bleeding diathesis, platelet dysfunction, thrombocytopenia with platelet count less than 125,000/microliter, known coagulopathy, or INR > 1.5 Known allergy to contrast agents or medications used to perform endovascular intervention that cannot be adequately pre-treated History of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) Any thrombolytic therapy within two weeks of enrollment Psychiatric disorder which in the judgment of the investigator could interfere with provision of informed consent, completion of tests, therapy, or follow-up Clinical/angiographic evidence of distal embolization
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thomas P Davis, MD
Organizational Affiliation
St. John Hospital & Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
James McKinsey, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Spring Hill Medical Center
City
Mobile
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36608
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arizona Heart Institute
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85016
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arkansas Heart Hospital
City
Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72211
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vascular Interventional Center
City
Pensacola
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32504
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emory University Hospital Midtown
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30308
Country
United States
Facility Name
WellStar Health System
City
Austell
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Methodist Research Imstitute /Cobb Hospital
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiovascular Institute of the South
City
Houma
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70360
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiovascular Inst The Regional Med Center/Center of Acadia Institute of the South
City
Lafayette
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70506
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. John Hospital and Medical Center
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48236
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Mississippi Medical Center
City
Jackson
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
39216
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hunterdon Cardiovascular Associated
City
Flemington
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08822
Country
United States
Facility Name
Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Carl & Eduth Lindner Center for Research & Education at the Christ Hospital
City
Kingsport
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37660
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hochrhein-Eggberg-Klinik GmbH
City
Bad Sackingen
ZIP/Postal Code
79713
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Park-Hospital Leipzig
City
Leipzig
ZIP/Postal Code
04289
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28950783
Citation
Davis T, Ramaiah V, Niazi K, Martin Gissler H, Crabtree T. Safety and effectiveness of the Phoenix Atherectomy System in lower extremity arteries: Early and midterm outcomes from the prospective multicenter EASE study. Vascular. 2017 Dec;25(6):563-575. doi: 10.1177/1708538117712383. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Endovascular Atherectomy Safety and Effectiveness Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs