search
Back to results

Enhancing Plasticity in Stroke Patients With Severe Motor Deficit

Primary Purpose

Stroke, Cerebrovascular Accident

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
S88 Dual Output Stimulator by Grass Technologies
Sponsored by
Lumy Sawaki
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring motor recovery, neuroplasticity, chronic, human, sensory

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic stroke patients
  • Single stroke
  • Chronic (more than 12 months after from stroke)
  • At least 21 years old, but there is no upper age range for this project.
  • Participants NOT able to extend the affected metacarpophalangeal joints at least 10° and the wrist 20°.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of carpal tunnel syndrome and conditions that commonly cause peripheral neuropathy, including diabetes, uremia, or associated nutritional deficiencies
  • History of head injury with loss of consciousness, severe alcohol or drug abuse, psychiatric illness
  • Within 3 months of recruitment, use of drugs known to exert detrimental effects on motor recovery
  • Cognitive deficit severe enough to preclude informed consent
  • Positive pregnancy test or being of childbearing age and not using appropriate contraception
  • Participants with history of untreated depression.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Active stimulation with motor training

    Sham stimulation with motor training

    Arm Description

    2 hours of active peripheral nerve stimulation (intervention) paired with 4 hours of intensive task-oriented upper extremity training. Peripheral nerve stimulation of Erb's point, radial and median nerves paired with task-oriented therapy. Peripheral nerve stimulation will be delivered using a S88 Dual Output Stimulator by Grass Technologies.

    2 hours of sham peripheral nerve stimulation (intervention) paired with 4 hours of intensive task-oriented upper extremity training. Peripheral nerve stimulation of Erb's point, radial and median nerves paired with task-oriented therapy. Peripheral nerve stimulation will be delivered using a S88 Dual Output Stimulator by Grass Technologies.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Change in Fugl Meyer Assessment Motor Score
    Score after intervention minus baseline score, score at 1-month follow-up minus baseline score. The possible scores range from 0 to 66, with 66 indicating the best performance.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Change in Action Arm Research Test (ARAT)
    Score at post-intervention minus baseline, score at 1-month follow-up minus baseline. The possible scores range from 0 to 57, with higher scores indicating better performance.
    Change in Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)
    Score at post-intervention minus baseline, score at 1-month follow-up minus baseline. Each task is scored as amount of time taken to complete a task, which may range from just over 0 to 120 seconds. If the subject is unable to complete the task within 120 seconds, a score of 121 seconds is given. The scores from the 15 individual tasks are averaged, then the log is taken, resulting in the overall score. Therefore, the larger the score, the longer required to perform the tasks. Negative changes in score indicate that a subject, on average, was able to complete the tasks faster at post-intervention or at 1-month follow-up than at baseline.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    December 11, 2015
    Last Updated
    July 11, 2017
    Sponsor
    Lumy Sawaki
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02633215
    Brief Title
    Enhancing Plasticity in Stroke Patients With Severe Motor Deficit
    Official Title
    Enhancing Cortical Plasticity With Nerve Stimulation in Stroke Patients With Severe Motor Deficit
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    July 2017
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    March 2005 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 2013 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    December 2013 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor-Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Lumy Sawaki

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    This study will evaluate the effectiveness of sustained peripheral nerve stimulation coupled with functional motor training, to improve hand motor function in poorly recovered stroke patients. The central hypothesis is that stroke patients with severe motor deficit receiving hand nerve stimulation and intensive task-oriented therapy will have improved motor function compared to patients receiving sham nerve stimulation and task-oriented therapy.
    Detailed Description
    Stroke is one of the most devastating and prevalent diseases, but efforts to limit the amount of tissue damaged in the acute phase have been disappointing, highlighting the need for effective therapeutic interventions after neurologic damage has occurred. Data from animal and human models have suggested that sensory input plays an important role in motor output, possibly by influencing cortical plasticity. However, in spite of the advances to date, little is known about the extent to which sensory input in the form of peripheral nerve stimulation can be successfully combined to physical training especially in poorly recovered stroke patients. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of sustained peripheral nerve stimulation coupled with functional motor training, to improve hand motor function in stroke patients with severe motor deficit. The central hypothesis is that stroke patients with severe motor deficit receiving hand nerve stimulation and intensive task-oriented therapy will have improved motor function compared to patients receiving sham nerve stimulation and task-oriented therapy, and the degree of this behaviorally-measured effect will correlate with the neurophysiological effect measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Stroke, Cerebrovascular Accident
    Keywords
    motor recovery, neuroplasticity, chronic, human, sensory

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    36 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Active stimulation with motor training
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    2 hours of active peripheral nerve stimulation (intervention) paired with 4 hours of intensive task-oriented upper extremity training. Peripheral nerve stimulation of Erb's point, radial and median nerves paired with task-oriented therapy. Peripheral nerve stimulation will be delivered using a S88 Dual Output Stimulator by Grass Technologies.
    Arm Title
    Sham stimulation with motor training
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    2 hours of sham peripheral nerve stimulation (intervention) paired with 4 hours of intensive task-oriented upper extremity training. Peripheral nerve stimulation of Erb's point, radial and median nerves paired with task-oriented therapy. Peripheral nerve stimulation will be delivered using a S88 Dual Output Stimulator by Grass Technologies.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    S88 Dual Output Stimulator by Grass Technologies
    Intervention Description
    Peripheral nerve stimulation of Erb's point, radial and median nerves paired with task-oriented therapy
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change in Fugl Meyer Assessment Motor Score
    Description
    Score after intervention minus baseline score, score at 1-month follow-up minus baseline score. The possible scores range from 0 to 66, with 66 indicating the best performance.
    Time Frame
    baseline, post-intervention, 1-month follow-up
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change in Action Arm Research Test (ARAT)
    Description
    Score at post-intervention minus baseline, score at 1-month follow-up minus baseline. The possible scores range from 0 to 57, with higher scores indicating better performance.
    Time Frame
    baseline, post-intervention, 1-month follow-up
    Title
    Change in Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)
    Description
    Score at post-intervention minus baseline, score at 1-month follow-up minus baseline. Each task is scored as amount of time taken to complete a task, which may range from just over 0 to 120 seconds. If the subject is unable to complete the task within 120 seconds, a score of 121 seconds is given. The scores from the 15 individual tasks are averaged, then the log is taken, resulting in the overall score. Therefore, the larger the score, the longer required to perform the tasks. Negative changes in score indicate that a subject, on average, was able to complete the tasks faster at post-intervention or at 1-month follow-up than at baseline.
    Time Frame
    baseline, post-intervention, 1-month follow-up

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    21 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Chronic stroke patients Single stroke Chronic (more than 12 months after from stroke) At least 21 years old, but there is no upper age range for this project. Participants NOT able to extend the affected metacarpophalangeal joints at least 10° and the wrist 20°. Exclusion Criteria: History of carpal tunnel syndrome and conditions that commonly cause peripheral neuropathy, including diabetes, uremia, or associated nutritional deficiencies History of head injury with loss of consciousness, severe alcohol or drug abuse, psychiatric illness Within 3 months of recruitment, use of drugs known to exert detrimental effects on motor recovery Cognitive deficit severe enough to preclude informed consent Positive pregnancy test or being of childbearing age and not using appropriate contraception Participants with history of untreated depression.

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    27188405
    Citation
    Carrico C, Chelette KC 2nd, Westgate PM, Powell E, Nichols L, Fleischer A, Sawaki L. Nerve Stimulation Enhances Task-Oriented Training in Chronic, Severe Motor Deficit After Stroke: A Randomized Trial. Stroke. 2016 Jul;47(7):1879-84. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012671. Epub 2016 May 17.
    Results Reference
    derived

    Learn more about this trial

    Enhancing Plasticity in Stroke Patients With Severe Motor Deficit

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs