Epidural Clonidine for Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
Primary Purpose
Lumbar and Other Intervertebral Disc Disorders With Radiculopathy
Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Clonidine
Triamcinolone hexacetonide
Lidocaine HCl
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Lumbar and Other Intervertebral Disc Disorders With Radiculopathy focused on measuring herniated disk, radiculopathy, clonidine, epidural, steroid, corticosteroid, nucleus pulposus, transforaminal
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Residents 18 years or older of Olmsted or contiguous counties and identified as having an acute unilateral radicular syndrome of less than 3 months duration (leg pain>back, discogenic cause, one or more of the following:
- Positive Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test
- Myotomal weakness
- Dermatomal sensory loss) and with concordant
- Confirmatory findings on recent MRI or CT myelogram
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of recent spinal trauma
- Cauda equina syndrome (This is a serious neurologic condition in which there is acute loss of function of the lumbar plexus, neurologic elements of the spinal canal below the termination of the spinal cord.)
- Progressive neurological deficit
- Motor deficit
- Pathological or infectious etiology
- Involvement in workers' compensation claim
- History of adverse reaction to corticosteroids, local anesthetic or clonidine
- History of one or more corticosteroid injection(s) (equivalent to 40 mg of triamcinolone acetate) in the preceding 4 months
- Pregnant
- Severe medical disease
Sites / Locations
- Mayo Clinic
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Clonidine
Steroid
Arm Description
Transforaminal epidural clonidine injection
Transforaminal epidural steroid injection
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Pain Intensity Score at 4 Weeks as Measured by Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS)
11-point ordinal scale measuring patient pain, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe/disabling pain).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Pain Intensity Score at 2 Weeks as Measured by Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS)
11-point ordinal scale measuring patient pain, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe/disabling pain).
Pain Disability Score at 2 Weeks as Measured by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
This scale measures functional disability due to back pain. The score of the scale is the total number of items checked, from a minimum of 0 (no disability) to a maximum of 24 (great disability). Roland MO, Morris RW. A study of the natural history of back Pain. Part 1: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine 1983; 8:141-144.
Pain Disability Score at 4 Weeks as Measured by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
This scale measures functional disability due to back pain. The score of the scale is the total number of items checked, from a minimum of 0 (no disability) to a maximum of 24 (great disability). Roland MO, Morris RW. A study of the natural history of back Pain. Part 1: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine 1983; 8:141-144.
Pain Disability Score at 2 Weeks as Measured by Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI)
This questionnaire measures a patient's permanent functional disability. The questionnaire consists of 10 sections with 6 statements each of increasing point value (from 0 to 5). The score is a percentage of the total, with higher score showing greater disability. Minimum detectable change is 10%, with a 90% CI. Change of less than this may be attributable to error in measurement.
Pain Disability Score at 4 Weeks as Measured by Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire
This questionnaire measures a patient's permanent functional disability. The questionnaire consists of 10 sections with 6 statements each of increasing point value (from 0 to 5). The score is a percentage of the total, with higher score showing greater disability. Minimum detectable change is 10%, with a 90% CI. Change of less than this may be attributable to error in measurement.
Pain Score at 2 Weeks as Measured by the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI)
The MPI is a comprehensive instrument comprised of 12 scales divided into three parts for assessing a number of dimensions of the chronic pain experience including pain intensity, emotional distress, cognitive and functional adaptation, and social support. Reference: Kearns RO, Turk DC, Rudy TC. The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI). Pain 1985; 23:345-356. Subscales were not used; the DOS WHYMPI computer program version 2.1 was used to score the instrument. Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 100 (highest pain). A score of 50 is the mean for patients with chronic pain.
Pain Score at 4 Weeks as Measured by the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI)
The MPI is a comprehensive instrument comprised of 12 scales divided into three parts for assessing a number of dimensions of the chronic pain experience including pain intensity, emotional distress, cognitive and functional adaptation, and social support. Reference: Kearns RO, Turk DC, Rudy TC. The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI). Pain 1985; 23:345-356. Subscales were not used; the DOS WHYMPI computer program version 2.1 was used to score the instrument. Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 100 (highest pain). A score of 50 is the mean for patients with chronic pain.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00588354
First Posted
December 26, 2007
Last Updated
December 6, 2011
Sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Collaborators
National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00588354
Brief Title
Epidural Clonidine for Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
Official Title
Pilot Study of Transforaminal Epidural Injection of Clonidine for the Treatment of Acute Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2011
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Targeted enrollment was not reached.
Study Start Date
October 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2009 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Collaborators
National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This was a randomized, blinded study of transforaminal epidural injection of clonidine versus a similar injection of corticosteroid for acute lumbosacral radiculopathy. The hypothesis was that clonidine will be as effective as steroid for this condition.
Detailed Description
Patients with approximately 3 months of low back pain and leg pain due to intervertebral disc herniation were randomized to transforaminal epidural injections of 2% lidocaine and either clonidine (200 or 400 micrograms) or triamcinolone (40 mg) (corticosteroid). Patients received one to three injections administered at about 2 weeks apart. Patients, investigators, and study coordinators were blinded to the treatment. The primary outcome was an 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale at 1 month. The hypothesis was that clonidine will be as effective as steroid for this condition.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lumbar and Other Intervertebral Disc Disorders With Radiculopathy
Keywords
herniated disk, radiculopathy, clonidine, epidural, steroid, corticosteroid, nucleus pulposus, transforaminal
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
26 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Clonidine
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Transforaminal epidural clonidine injection
Arm Title
Steroid
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Transforaminal epidural steroid injection
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Clonidine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Catapres, Kapvay, Nexiclon
Intervention Description
200 or 400 micrograms clonidine
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Triamcinolone hexacetonide
Other Intervention Name(s)
Aristocort, Kenacort, Tri-Nasal, Triaderm, Azmacort, Trilone, Volon A, Tristoject, Tricortone
Intervention Description
40 or 80 milligrams triamcinolone
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lidocaine HCl
Other Intervention Name(s)
Xylocaine, lignocaine
Intervention Description
1 ml 2% lidocaine (20 mg/mL)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain Intensity Score at 4 Weeks as Measured by Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS)
Description
11-point ordinal scale measuring patient pain, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe/disabling pain).
Time Frame
4 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain Intensity Score at 2 Weeks as Measured by Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS)
Description
11-point ordinal scale measuring patient pain, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe/disabling pain).
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Pain Disability Score at 2 Weeks as Measured by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
Description
This scale measures functional disability due to back pain. The score of the scale is the total number of items checked, from a minimum of 0 (no disability) to a maximum of 24 (great disability). Roland MO, Morris RW. A study of the natural history of back Pain. Part 1: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine 1983; 8:141-144.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Pain Disability Score at 4 Weeks as Measured by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
Description
This scale measures functional disability due to back pain. The score of the scale is the total number of items checked, from a minimum of 0 (no disability) to a maximum of 24 (great disability). Roland MO, Morris RW. A study of the natural history of back Pain. Part 1: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine 1983; 8:141-144.
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Pain Disability Score at 2 Weeks as Measured by Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI)
Description
This questionnaire measures a patient's permanent functional disability. The questionnaire consists of 10 sections with 6 statements each of increasing point value (from 0 to 5). The score is a percentage of the total, with higher score showing greater disability. Minimum detectable change is 10%, with a 90% CI. Change of less than this may be attributable to error in measurement.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Pain Disability Score at 4 Weeks as Measured by Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire
Description
This questionnaire measures a patient's permanent functional disability. The questionnaire consists of 10 sections with 6 statements each of increasing point value (from 0 to 5). The score is a percentage of the total, with higher score showing greater disability. Minimum detectable change is 10%, with a 90% CI. Change of less than this may be attributable to error in measurement.
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Pain Score at 2 Weeks as Measured by the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI)
Description
The MPI is a comprehensive instrument comprised of 12 scales divided into three parts for assessing a number of dimensions of the chronic pain experience including pain intensity, emotional distress, cognitive and functional adaptation, and social support. Reference: Kearns RO, Turk DC, Rudy TC. The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI). Pain 1985; 23:345-356. Subscales were not used; the DOS WHYMPI computer program version 2.1 was used to score the instrument. Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 100 (highest pain). A score of 50 is the mean for patients with chronic pain.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Pain Score at 4 Weeks as Measured by the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI)
Description
The MPI is a comprehensive instrument comprised of 12 scales divided into three parts for assessing a number of dimensions of the chronic pain experience including pain intensity, emotional distress, cognitive and functional adaptation, and social support. Reference: Kearns RO, Turk DC, Rudy TC. The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI). Pain 1985; 23:345-356. Subscales were not used; the DOS WHYMPI computer program version 2.1 was used to score the instrument. Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 100 (highest pain). A score of 50 is the mean for patients with chronic pain.
Time Frame
4 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Residents 18 years or older of Olmsted or contiguous counties and identified as having an acute unilateral radicular syndrome of less than 3 months duration (leg pain>back, discogenic cause, one or more of the following:
Positive Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test
Myotomal weakness
Dermatomal sensory loss) and with concordant
Confirmatory findings on recent MRI or CT myelogram
Exclusion Criteria:
History of recent spinal trauma
Cauda equina syndrome (This is a serious neurologic condition in which there is acute loss of function of the lumbar plexus, neurologic elements of the spinal canal below the termination of the spinal cord.)
Progressive neurological deficit
Motor deficit
Pathological or infectious etiology
Involvement in workers' compensation claim
History of adverse reaction to corticosteroids, local anesthetic or clonidine
History of one or more corticosteroid injection(s) (equivalent to 40 mg of triamcinolone acetate) in the preceding 4 months
Pregnant
Severe medical disease
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marc A Huntoon, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Mayo Clinic
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21192304
Citation
Burgher AH, Hoelzer BC, Schroeder DR, Wilson GA, Huntoon MA. Transforaminal epidural clonidine versus corticosteroid for acute lumbosacral radiculopathy due to intervertebral disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Mar 1;36(5):E293-300. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ddd597.
Results Reference
result
Links:
URL
http://clinicaltrials.mayo.edu
Description
Mayo Clinic Clinical Trials
Learn more about this trial
Epidural Clonidine for Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs