search
Back to results

Episodic Future Thinking and Compassion

Primary Purpose

Compliant Behavior, Self-Control, Impulsive Behavior

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Episodic Future Thinking
Compassion Training
Sham
Sponsored by
Monash University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Compliant Behavior focused on measuring Episodic future thinking, Compassion, Impulsivity, Self-control, Pandemic, Public Health

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Resides in the United Kingdom
  • Fluent in English
  • Must pass attention check in eligibility survey

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 50% compliance with ecological momentary assessment surveys

Sites / Locations

  • Prolific online participant recruitment platform

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Episodic Future Thinking

Compassion

Control

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Average strength of urges in ecological momentary assessment surveys
Throughout each day, participants would receive 5 ecological momentary assessment surveys that were available for 1 hour. In randomised order, they were asked whether since the last survey they had felt an urge to not wash their hands, not cover their mouths when coughing or sneezing, not socially distance (e.g. to hug, shake hands), not leave details for contact tracing, or whether they had felt an urge to leave their house, touch their face, or avoid getting tested when it would have been better to do the opposite - from a COVID-19 standpoint. Participants responded using a slider [0,10], where 0 indicated no urge, 1 indicated a very weak urge, and 10 indicated a very strong urge.
Average probability of controlling urges in ecological momentary assessment surveys
Throughout each day, participants would receive 5 ecological momentary assessment surveys that were available for 1 hour. In randomised order, they were asked whether since the last survey they had felt an urge to not wash their hands, not cover their mouths when coughing or sneezing, not socially distance (e.g. to hug, shake hands), not leave details for contact tracing, or whether they had felt an urge to leave their house, touch their face, or avoid getting tested when it would have been better to do the opposite - from a COVID-19 standpoint. Participants responded using a slider [0,10], where 0 indicated no urge, 1 indicated a very weak urge, and 10 indicated a very strong urge. Following that urge, participants are asked whether they gave in to that urge.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Average number of resisted urges
Throughout each day, participants would receive 5 ecological momentary assessment surveys that were available for 1 hour. In randomised order, they were asked whether since the last survey they had felt an urge to not wash their hands, not cover their mouths when coughing or sneezing, not socially distance (e.g. to hug, shake hands), not leave details for contact tracing, or whether they had felt an urge to leave their house, touch their face, or avoid getting tested when it would have been better to do the opposite - from a COVID-19 standpoint. Participants responded using a slider [0,10], where 0 indicated no urge, 1 indicated a very weak urge, and 10 indicated a very strong urge. Following that urge, participants are asked whether they tried to resist that urge.

Full Information

First Posted
August 23, 2021
Last Updated
August 26, 2021
Sponsor
Monash University
Collaborators
Martin & Loreto Hosking's Three Springs Foundation, Australian Research Council
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05031559
Brief Title
Episodic Future Thinking and Compassion
Official Title
Episodic Future Thinking and Compassion Reduce Public Health Guideline Noncompliance Urges: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 29, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 4, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 4, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Monash University
Collaborators
Martin & Loreto Hosking's Three Springs Foundation, Australian Research Council

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
During the COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) pandemic, public health departments have issued guidelines to limit viral transmission. In this environment, people will feel urges to engage in activities that violate these guidelines, but research on guideline adherence has been reliant on surveys asking people to self-report their typical behaviour, which may fail to capture these urges as they unfold. Guideline adherence could be improved through behaviour change interventions, but considering the wide range of behaviours that COVID-19 guidelines prescribe, there are few methods that allow observing changes of aggregate guideline adherence in the 'wild'. In order to administer interventions and to obtain contemporaneous data on a wide range of behaviours, the researchers use ecological momentary assessment. In this preregistered parallel randomised trial, 95 participants aged 18-65 from the United Kingdom were assigned to three conditions using blinded block randomisation, and engage in episodic future thinking (n = 33), compassion exercises (n = 31), or a sham procedure (n = 31) and report regularly on the intensity of their occurrent urges (min. 1, max. 10) and their ability to control them. The researchers investigate whether state impulsivity and vaccine attitudes predict guideline adherence, while assessing through which mechanism these predictors affect behaviour.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Compliant Behavior, Self-Control, Impulsive Behavior
Keywords
Episodic future thinking, Compassion, Impulsivity, Self-control, Pandemic, Public Health

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
Participants were not made aware whether they were in the control group or in one of the intervention groups.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
95 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Episodic Future Thinking
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Compassion
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Episodic Future Thinking
Intervention Description
Participants are invited to imagine themselves in a positive situation after COVID-19 public health restrictions and guidelines are lifted. They are then reminded that their actions are able to change how soon this future can be achieved.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Compassion Training
Intervention Description
Participants are invited to imagine themselves in someone else's situation, who is in a bad situation due to COVID-19 (e.g., ER nurse, family of someone in ICU). They are then reminded that their decisions have an impact on the occurrence of these situations.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Sham
Intervention Description
Participants are invited to reflect on some COVID-19 related news, and reminded that their actions have bearing on the COVID-19 situation.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Average strength of urges in ecological momentary assessment surveys
Description
Throughout each day, participants would receive 5 ecological momentary assessment surveys that were available for 1 hour. In randomised order, they were asked whether since the last survey they had felt an urge to not wash their hands, not cover their mouths when coughing or sneezing, not socially distance (e.g. to hug, shake hands), not leave details for contact tracing, or whether they had felt an urge to leave their house, touch their face, or avoid getting tested when it would have been better to do the opposite - from a COVID-19 standpoint. Participants responded using a slider [0,10], where 0 indicated no urge, 1 indicated a very weak urge, and 10 indicated a very strong urge.
Time Frame
Multiple times per day, for one week.
Title
Average probability of controlling urges in ecological momentary assessment surveys
Description
Throughout each day, participants would receive 5 ecological momentary assessment surveys that were available for 1 hour. In randomised order, they were asked whether since the last survey they had felt an urge to not wash their hands, not cover their mouths when coughing or sneezing, not socially distance (e.g. to hug, shake hands), not leave details for contact tracing, or whether they had felt an urge to leave their house, touch their face, or avoid getting tested when it would have been better to do the opposite - from a COVID-19 standpoint. Participants responded using a slider [0,10], where 0 indicated no urge, 1 indicated a very weak urge, and 10 indicated a very strong urge. Following that urge, participants are asked whether they gave in to that urge.
Time Frame
Multiple times per day, for one week.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Average number of resisted urges
Description
Throughout each day, participants would receive 5 ecological momentary assessment surveys that were available for 1 hour. In randomised order, they were asked whether since the last survey they had felt an urge to not wash their hands, not cover their mouths when coughing or sneezing, not socially distance (e.g. to hug, shake hands), not leave details for contact tracing, or whether they had felt an urge to leave their house, touch their face, or avoid getting tested when it would have been better to do the opposite - from a COVID-19 standpoint. Participants responded using a slider [0,10], where 0 indicated no urge, 1 indicated a very weak urge, and 10 indicated a very strong urge. Following that urge, participants are asked whether they tried to resist that urge.
Time Frame
Multiple times per day, for one week.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Resides in the United Kingdom Fluent in English Must pass attention check in eligibility survey Exclusion Criteria: Less than 50% compliance with ecological momentary assessment surveys
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Prolific online participant recruitment platform
City
Oxford
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Deidentified data are available on the Open Science Foundation (OSF) website.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
The data are permanently available.
IPD Sharing URL
https://osf.io/5duvx/?view_only=d360db6dd6064aba99ec47b943adf94e

Learn more about this trial

Episodic Future Thinking and Compassion

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs