search
Back to results

Esophagus-sparing Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression. (ESO-SPARE)

Primary Purpose

Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression, Radiation Toxicity, Esophagitis

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Esophagus sparring radiotherapy treatment
Sponsored by
Herlev Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression focused on measuring Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression, Radiation Toxicity, Esophagitis, Patient reported outcome measures, Palliative radiotherapy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histology or cytology proven cancer
  • Referred for palliative radiotherapy of the cervical or thoracic vertebra for

    • epidural ingrowth
    • metastatic spinal cord compression
    • metastatic spinal nerve root compression
    • post-operative radiotherapy after decompressive surgery for spinal cord or nerve root compression
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document
  • Referred for the following dose prescriptions 5 Gy x 5, 5 Gy x 4, 3 Gy x 10, 10 Gy x 1, 8 Gy x 1.
  • ≥ 18 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Referred for > 10 fractions

Sites / Locations

  • RigshospitaletRecruiting
  • Herlev HospatalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

Arm A: standard radiotherapy treatment

Arm B: esophagus sparring radiotherapy treatment

Arm Description

Patients in arm A will receive standard radiotherapy treatment for metastatic spinal cord compression.

Patients in arm B will receive esophagus sparring radiotherapy treatment.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Early patient reported gastro-oesophageal toxicity
Measured as a peak score using CTCAE Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Ambulatory function
Preserved ability to walk will be evaluated using the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) mobility dimension. The EQ-5D includes one question for each of the five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five response levels: no problems (Level 1); slight; moderate; severe; and extreme problems (Level 5).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Duration of gastro-oesophageal toxicity
Measured as the time from an increase in gastro-oesophageal symptom score to a return to baseline
Reirradiation rate - Overall survival (OS)
Defined as fraction of patients getting reirradiation, where the same spine levels are included in the irradiated volume
Patient reported physical function
Patient reported physical function will be assessed using answers from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Questions regarding physical function are measured on a four-point scale (1= not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = quite a bit, 4 = very much). All EORTC QLQ-C30 answers will be scored according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual.
Health related Quality of life (QoL)
Health related quality of life measured with EQ-5D-5L European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D includes one question for each of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five response levels: no problems (Level 1); slight; moderate; severe; and extreme problems (Level 5). Health state scores are defined by combining one level from each dimension, ranging from 11111 (full health) to 55555 (worst health). A visual analogue scale indicating the respondent's own assessment of their health status from 0-100 is also included (100 = the best health you can imagine and 0 = the worst health you can imagine).
Health related Quality of life (QoL)
Health related quality of life assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of life Questionnaire - Cancer (QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 questions assessing quality of life issues using a four-point scale (1= not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = quite a bit, 4 = very much) except from the last two questions which are measured between 1 (Very Poor) to 7 (Excellent). The EORTC QLQ-C30 will be scored according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual.
Weight
Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks
Analgesic consumption
Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks
Pain (MSCC site)
Evaluated by "Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)" The scale is composed of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
Pain assessment (MTS site)
Assessment will be performed using International Consensus Pain Response Endpoints (ICPRE). A complete pain response is defined as a pain score of 0 out of 10 at the treated site with no concomitant increase in analgesic intake A partial pain response is defined as a pain reduction of 2 or more at the treated site without analgesic increase, or an analgesic reduction of 25% with no increase in pain score or 1 point above baseline. Pain progression is defined as an increase in pain score of 2 or more above baseline with stable analgesic intake or an analgesic increase of 25% with stable pain score. An indeterminate response is any response not captured in the above definitions. Analysis of pain reduction will only include patients with NPRS ≥ 1 registered at baseline. We intend to report the best response during follow-up.

Full Information

First Posted
October 7, 2021
Last Updated
August 14, 2023
Sponsor
Herlev Hospital
Collaborators
Rigshospitalet, Denmark, Danish Cancer Society, University of Copenhagen
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05109819
Brief Title
Esophagus-sparing Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression.
Acronym
ESO-SPARE
Official Title
ESO-SPARE: Esophagus Sparring Radiotherapy for Thoracic and Cervical Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression. A Randomized Phase III Study.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
May 20, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
May 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Herlev Hospital
Collaborators
Rigshospitalet, Denmark, Danish Cancer Society, University of Copenhagen

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) is a serious complication to metastatic cancer and when diagnosed life expectancy is short. Treatment is palliative radiotherapy (RT). Early esophageal toxicity is underreported but can seriously impact quality of life (QoL). The aim of the ESO-SPARE trial is to investigate if esophagus sparing RT can decrease patient reported esophageal toxicity without compromising ambulatory function or increase other toxicities. 200 patients with MSCC in the thoracic or cervical spine referred for RT will be randomized to either standard or esophagus/pharynx sparing RT. Subsequently participants will be followed with PROM (Patient Reported Outcome Measures) for 9 weeks. PROM-CTCAE questionnaires on upper GI toxicity and pain will be collected daily for 5 weeks and weekly for 4 weeks. Questionnaires evaluating QoL and physical function will be collected weekly for 9 weeks.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression, Radiation Toxicity, Esophagitis, Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Keywords
Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression, Radiation Toxicity, Esophagitis, Patient reported outcome measures, Palliative radiotherapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Patients with metastatic spinal cord compression in the cervical and/or thoracic spine are randomized into two groups. Group A receives standard radiotherapy, group B receives esophagus sparing therapy.
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
The outcome of randomization is not reviled to the patient.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
200 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm A: standard radiotherapy treatment
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients in arm A will receive standard radiotherapy treatment for metastatic spinal cord compression.
Arm Title
Arm B: esophagus sparring radiotherapy treatment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients in arm B will receive esophagus sparring radiotherapy treatment.
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Esophagus sparring radiotherapy treatment
Intervention Description
A radiotherapy plan for metastatic spinal cord compression is conducted with specific constrains sparring the esophagus.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Early patient reported gastro-oesophageal toxicity
Description
Measured as a peak score using CTCAE Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Time Frame
Measured within the first 5 weeks after treatment start
Title
Ambulatory function
Description
Preserved ability to walk will be evaluated using the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) mobility dimension. The EQ-5D includes one question for each of the five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five response levels: no problems (Level 1); slight; moderate; severe; and extreme problems (Level 5).
Time Frame
Measured 9 weeks after treatment start
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Duration of gastro-oesophageal toxicity
Description
Measured as the time from an increase in gastro-oesophageal symptom score to a return to baseline
Time Frame
Assessed 9 weeks after treatment start
Title
Reirradiation rate - Overall survival (OS)
Description
Defined as fraction of patients getting reirradiation, where the same spine levels are included in the irradiated volume
Time Frame
Assessed 6 months after inclusion of the last patient.
Title
Patient reported physical function
Description
Patient reported physical function will be assessed using answers from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Questions regarding physical function are measured on a four-point scale (1= not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = quite a bit, 4 = very much). All EORTC QLQ-C30 answers will be scored according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual.
Time Frame
Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks
Title
Health related Quality of life (QoL)
Description
Health related quality of life measured with EQ-5D-5L European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D includes one question for each of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five response levels: no problems (Level 1); slight; moderate; severe; and extreme problems (Level 5). Health state scores are defined by combining one level from each dimension, ranging from 11111 (full health) to 55555 (worst health). A visual analogue scale indicating the respondent's own assessment of their health status from 0-100 is also included (100 = the best health you can imagine and 0 = the worst health you can imagine).
Time Frame
Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks
Title
Health related Quality of life (QoL)
Description
Health related quality of life assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of life Questionnaire - Cancer (QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 questions assessing quality of life issues using a four-point scale (1= not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = quite a bit, 4 = very much) except from the last two questions which are measured between 1 (Very Poor) to 7 (Excellent). The EORTC QLQ-C30 will be scored according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual.
Time Frame
Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks
Title
Weight
Description
Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks
Time Frame
Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks
Title
Analgesic consumption
Description
Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks
Time Frame
Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks
Title
Pain (MSCC site)
Description
Evaluated by "Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)" The scale is composed of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
Time Frame
Assessed daily for 5 weeks and subsequently weekly for 4 weeks.
Title
Pain assessment (MTS site)
Description
Assessment will be performed using International Consensus Pain Response Endpoints (ICPRE). A complete pain response is defined as a pain score of 0 out of 10 at the treated site with no concomitant increase in analgesic intake A partial pain response is defined as a pain reduction of 2 or more at the treated site without analgesic increase, or an analgesic reduction of 25% with no increase in pain score or 1 point above baseline. Pain progression is defined as an increase in pain score of 2 or more above baseline with stable analgesic intake or an analgesic increase of 25% with stable pain score. An indeterminate response is any response not captured in the above definitions. Analysis of pain reduction will only include patients with NPRS ≥ 1 registered at baseline. We intend to report the best response during follow-up.
Time Frame
Best response during 9 weeks of follow-up

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Histology or cytology proven cancer Referred for palliative radiotherapy of the cervical or thoracic vertebra for epidural ingrowth metastatic spinal cord compression metastatic spinal nerve root compression post-operative radiotherapy after decompressive surgery for spinal cord or nerve root compression Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document Referred for the following dose prescriptions 5 Gy x 5, 5 Gy x 4, 3 Gy x 10, 10 Gy x 1, 8 Gy x 1. ≥ 18 years old. Exclusion Criteria: - Referred for > 10 fractions
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Anna M Nielsen, MD
Phone
00 45 26718136
Email
anna.mann.nielsen@regionh.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Gitte Persson, MD, Ph.d.
Phone
00 45 38689299
Email
Gitte.Persson@regionh.dk
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Rigshospitalet
City
Copenhagen
ZIP/Postal Code
2100
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Morten H Suppli, MD, PhD.
Phone
00 45 35459698
Email
morten.hiul.suppli@regionh.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ivan R Vogelius, Dr. med, clinical proffesor
Phone
00 45 35459885
Email
ivan.richter.vogelius@regionh.dk
Facility Name
Herlev Hospatal
City
Herlev
ZIP/Postal Code
2730
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anna M Nielsen
Phone
+4526718136
Email
anna.mann.nielsen@regionh.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gitte Persson
Phone
+4538689299
Email
Gitte.Persson@regionh.dk

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
8433390
Citation
Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11491192
Citation
Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):337-43. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002087.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Esophagus-sparing Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs