search
Back to results

EUS-CPN With and Without Bupivacaine (EUS-NB)

Primary Purpose

Pancreatic Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
EUS-CPN without bupivacaine
EUS-CPN with bupivacaine
Sponsored by
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Pancreatic Cancer focused on measuring Pancreatic Cancer, Celiac plexus neurolysis, Bupivacaine, Endoscopic ultrasound, With Bupivacaine, Without Bupivacaine

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Malignant-appearing pancreatic mass, or proven pancreatic cancer involving the pancreatic genu, body, or tail
  2. Any level of abdominal or back pain considered to be potentially related to the mass:

    1. New onset pain (<3 months)
    2. Constant
    3. Centrally located
    4. With or without irradiation to the back
    5. No obvious other source of pain based on history and physical examination by the attending endosonographer
  3. No possibility of surgical management
  4. Signed, informed consent
  5. Celiac axis accessible for bilateral neurolysis at EUS.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Allergy to bupivacaine

Sites / Locations

  • Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de MontréalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

EUS-CPN with bupivacaine

EUS-CPN without bupivacaine

Arm Description

Endoscopic ultrasound guided celiac plexus neurolysis with absolute alcohol 20 mL preceded by injection of 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.5%.

Endoscopic ultrasound guided celiac plexus neurolysis with absolute alcohol 20 mL only.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Likert pain scores
Pain scale used : 7-point Likert scale for pain (minimum value is 0, maximum value is 6; higher scores mean a worse outcome)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Difference in pain scores at T0 vs all other follow-up time points
The 7-point Likert scale for pain (minimum value is 0, maximum value is 6; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time to discharge from the endoscopy unit
Time spent in the recovery room following the procedure
Narcotic usage
Change in cumulative narcotic usage between Day 0 and Day 60, and between Day 0 and Day 120
Adverse events
Rate of all intervention-specific adverse events (Using the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy classification)
Survival
Number of days between the EUS-CPN intervention and death
Difference in Global Rating Scale of Change at T3 vs all other follow-up time points
The Global Rating Scale of Change will be used to measure subjects' impression of improvement in their health condition after T0 (the day celiac plexus neurolysis is performed) (minimum value is 0, maximum value is 6; higher scores mean a better outcome)

Full Information

First Posted
June 9, 2021
Last Updated
October 17, 2023
Sponsor
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04951804
Brief Title
EUS-CPN With and Without Bupivacaine
Acronym
EUS-NB
Official Title
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis (EUS-CPN) With and Without Bupivacaine
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
October 7, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) allows EUS-guided trans gastric injection of absolute alcohol around the base of the celiac plexus (celiac plexus neurolysis (EUS-CPN)), to help alleviate pain associated with pancreatic cancer. It is standard procedure to inject bupivacaine immediately before injecting absolute alcohol, to theoretically prevent pain that may occur during and after the procedure. However, there are no data showing whether bupivacaine injection has any real influence on intra-procedural, immediate post-procedural, or long-term pain control. The injection of bupivacaine before the alcohol may have no effect, a synergistic effect, or an antagonistic effect, by diluting the alcohol, and reducing its neurolytic capacity. Inadvertent intravascular injection of bupivacaine may also cause irreversible cardiac arrhythmias and death. The investigators therefore propose a randomized clinical trial to determine whether the exclusion of bupivacaine during EUS-guided CPN improves outcomes, or not.
Detailed Description
Pancreatic malignancies are the second most frequent gastrointestinal malignancy in Canada. From cancer mortality statistics in 2014, there were 4,700 new cases of pancreatic malignancies second only to colorectal cancer, representing 2.4% of all cancers. Even with chemotherapy, the median survival for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is 6 to 10 months. Few patients are diagnosed at a resectable stage (12%-20%) so many patients are candidates for palliation only. In this context, one of the most important symptoms is pain because it often affects both quality of life and survival. 70 to 80 % of patients with pancreatic cancer have abdominal pain at the time of diagnosis. Adequate pain control is therefore an essential component of care in these patients. In the initial phase, the pain is visceral, but with disease progression, somatic pain may occur, especially due to the peri-pancreatic invasion of neural structures, such as the celiac plexus. Standard analgesics such as acetaminophen are usually ineffective and the use and effectiveness of opioids is frequently limited by side effects such as nausea, constipation, somnolence, confusion or respiratory depression. The celiac plexus is immediately adjacent to the gastric wall. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) allows EUS-guided trans gastric injection of neurolytic agents around the celiac plexus (celiac plexus neurolysis [CPN]). Under conscious sedation, the echoendoscope is advanced into the stomach, just distal to the gastro-esophageal junction. The region of the celiac plexus is identified around the takeoff of the celiac artery from the aorta. Then, under real-time ultrasound guidance, a 19g needle is used to inject a neurolytic agent such as absolute alcohol around the base of the celiac artery. The entire procedure takes approximately 5 minutes. Absolute alcohol causes the immediate destruction of the celiac plexus neurons, by precipitation of endoneural lipoproteins and mucoproteins. The effectiveness of CPN, is well established. It is safe, produces significant pain reduction, significantly reduces narcotic requirements, and may even increase survival. The investigators were the first to publish a randomized, sham-controlled trial demonstrating the efficacy of EUS-CPN for pain due to pancreatic cancer, and authored the most recent published guidelines on the use of EUS-CPN. Based on our experience in over 1000 neurolysis procedures, patients undergoing EUS-guided CPN may experience pain, acutely during alcohol injection, and sometimes post-procedure, for up to a few hours. (Unpublished observations) It is possible that the presence of pain during injection of alcohol indicates that the celiac plexus has been accurately targeted and may therefore portend better long-term pain control. Currently, during the neurolysis procedure, it is standard procedure to inject bupivacaine immediately before injecting absolute alcohol, to theoretically prevent pain during and after the procedure. The true value of bupivacaine during neurolysis has never been studied. There are no data showing whether bupivacaine injection has any real influence on intra-procedural, immediate post-procedural, or long-term pain control. The injection of bupivacaine before the alcohol may have no effect, a synergistic effect, or an antagonistic effect, by diluting the alcohol, and reducing its neurolytic capacity. Inadvertent intravascular injection of bupivacaine may also cause irreversible cardiac arrhythmias and death. In other words, in the worst case scenario, the injection of bupivacaine may increase procedural risk, without any associated benefit in terms of pain reduction. The EUS team at the CHUM stopped using bupivacaine during neurolysis approximately 2 years ago and has noticed no obvious difference in pain during the procedure or in the immediate post-procedure recovery period, no increase in complications, and a possible reduction in requests for repeat neurolysis - suggesting that neurolysis without bupivacaine may be more effective. (Unpublished observations) The investigators therefore propose a randomized clinical trial to determine whether the exclusion of bupivacaine during EUS-guided CPN improves outcomes, or not.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pancreatic Cancer
Keywords
Pancreatic Cancer, Celiac plexus neurolysis, Bupivacaine, Endoscopic ultrasound, With Bupivacaine, Without Bupivacaine

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare Provider
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
180 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
EUS-CPN with bupivacaine
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Endoscopic ultrasound guided celiac plexus neurolysis with absolute alcohol 20 mL preceded by injection of 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.5%.
Arm Title
EUS-CPN without bupivacaine
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Endoscopic ultrasound guided celiac plexus neurolysis with absolute alcohol 20 mL only.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
EUS-CPN without bupivacaine
Intervention Description
Under conscious sedation, an echoendoscope is advanced into the stomach, just distal to the gastro-esophageal junction. The region of the celiac plexus is identified around the takeoff of the celiac artery from the aorta. Then, under real-time ultrasound guidance, a 19g needle is used to inject a neurolytic agent such as absolute alcohol around the base of the celiac artery.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
EUS-CPN with bupivacaine
Intervention Description
Under conscious sedation, an echoendoscope is advanced into the stomach, just distal to the gastro-esophageal junction. The region of the celiac plexus is identified around the takeoff of the celiac artery from the aorta. Then, under real-time ultrasound guidance, a 19g needle is used to firstly inject bupivacaine and secondly a neurolytic agent such as absolute alcohol around the base of the celiac artery.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Likert pain scores
Description
Pain scale used : 7-point Likert scale for pain (minimum value is 0, maximum value is 6; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time Frame
Day 0 and Day 30
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Difference in pain scores at T0 vs all other follow-up time points
Description
The 7-point Likert scale for pain (minimum value is 0, maximum value is 6; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time Frame
Days 0, 3, 7, 30, 60, 90, 120
Title
Time to discharge from the endoscopy unit
Description
Time spent in the recovery room following the procedure
Time Frame
From time of arrival in the recovery room after the intervention to time of discharge from the recovery room. The estimated period of time over which the event is assessed is up to two hours
Title
Narcotic usage
Description
Change in cumulative narcotic usage between Day 0 and Day 60, and between Day 0 and Day 120
Time Frame
Narcotic usage for the 3 day-period preceding Days 0, 60 and 120
Title
Adverse events
Description
Rate of all intervention-specific adverse events (Using the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy classification)
Time Frame
Days 0, 3, 7, 30, 60, 90, 120
Title
Survival
Description
Number of days between the EUS-CPN intervention and death
Time Frame
Up to 18 months
Title
Difference in Global Rating Scale of Change at T3 vs all other follow-up time points
Description
The Global Rating Scale of Change will be used to measure subjects' impression of improvement in their health condition after T0 (the day celiac plexus neurolysis is performed) (minimum value is 0, maximum value is 6; higher scores mean a better outcome)
Time Frame
Days 3, 7, 30, 60, 90, 120

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Malignant-appearing pancreatic mass, or proven pancreatic cancer involving the pancreatic genu, body, or tail Any level of abdominal or back pain considered to be potentially related to the mass: New onset pain (<3 months) Constant Centrally located With or without irradiation to the back No obvious other source of pain based on history and physical examination by the attending endosonographer No possibility of surgical management Signed, informed consent Celiac axis accessible for bilateral neurolysis at EUS. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Allergy to bupivacaine
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
CHARLES MACKAY, RN
Phone
514-890-8000
Ext
36484
Email
charles.mackay.chum@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
ANAND V SAHAI, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H2X 0A9
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
CHARLES MACKAY, RN
Phone
514-890-8000
Ext
36484
Email
charles.mackay.chum@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anand V Sahai, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sarto Paquin, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

EUS-CPN With and Without Bupivacaine

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs