search
Back to results

Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER® System in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure: FIX-HF-5C (FIX-HF-5C)

Primary Purpose

NYHA Class III Heart Failure, NYHA Class IV Heart Failure

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Optimizer System
No intervention: Optimal medical therapy
Sponsored by
Impulse Dynamics
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for NYHA Class III Heart Failure focused on measuring Heart Failure, Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic heart disease, Cardiac contractility modulation, CCM, CHF

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects who are 18 years of age or older
  2. Subjects who are either male or female. Females of childbearing potential must be using a medically approved method of birth control and must agree to continue to use birth control throughout the study, or must be surgically sterilized (tubal ligation, hysterectomy) or post-menopausal for at least 1 year.
  3. Condition

    1. Subjects who have a baseline ejection fraction greater than or equal to 25% and less than or equal to 45% by echocardiography determined by the echocardiography core laboratory.
    2. Subjects who have been treated for heart failure for at least 90 days (including treatment with a β-blocker for at least 90 days unless the subject is intolerant) and are in New York Heart Association functional Class III and IV at the time of enrollment.
    3. Subjects receiving appropriate, stable medical therapy during the 30 days prior to enrollment for treatment of heart failure according to the region- specific guideline recommendations. For patients with EF≤35%, this regimen shall consist of the appropriate doses of diuretics, ACE-inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker and β-blocker. Stable is defined as no more than a 100% increase or 50% decrease in dose.
    4. Subjects who, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator (based on the current guidelines for clinical practice ), have a clinical indication for an implanted cardiac defibrillator (ICD, e.g., EF≤35%) and/or pacemaker, must have an existing device or agree to undergo implantation of such a device unless the patient refuses to undergo the implantation of such device for personal reasons.
    5. Subjects who are willing and able to return for all follow-up visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects whose baseline peak VO2 is <9 or >20 ml O2/min/kg.
  2. Subjects who have a potentially correctible cause of heart failure, such as valvular heart disease or congenital heart disease.
  3. Subjects who have clinically significant angina pectoris, consisting of angina during daily life (i.e., Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina score of II or more), an episode of unstable angina within 30 days of enrollment, or angina and/or ECG changes during exercise testing performed during baseline evaluation.
  4. Subjects who have been hospitalized for heart failure which required the use of inotropic support within 30 days of enrollment.
  5. Subjects who have a clinically significant amount of ambient ectopy, defined as more than 8,900 PVCs per 24 hours on baseline Holter monitoring.
  6. Subjects having a PR interval greater than 375 ms.
  7. Subjects who have chronic (permanent or persistent) atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter or those cardioverted within 30 days of enrollment.
  8. Subjects whose exercise tolerance is limited by a condition other than heart failure (e.g., angina, COPD, peripheral vascular disease, orthopedic or rheumatologic conditions) or who are unable to perform baseline stress testing.
  9. Subjects who are scheduled for a CABG or a PTCA procedure, or who have undergone a CABG procedure within 90 days or a PTCA procedure within 30 days of enrollment.
  10. Subjects who have a biventricular pacing system, an accepted indication for such a device, or a QRS width of 130ms or greater.
  11. Subjects who have had a myocardial infarction within 90 days of enrollment.
  12. Subjects who have mechanical tricuspid valve.
  13. Subjects who have a prior heart transplant.
  14. Subjects on dialysis.
  15. Subjects who are participating in another experimental protocol.
  16. Subjects who are unable to provide informed consent.

Sites / Locations

  • Cardiovascular Consultants
  • Cardiovascular Associates of Mesa
  • Chan Heart Rhythm Institute
  • Arizona Heart & Rhythm Center
  • Pima Heart
  • University of Arizona Sarver Heart Center
  • Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
  • Yale - New Haven Hospital
  • Florida Hospital
  • Florida Hospital - Pepin Heart Institute
  • Advocate Medical Group - Midwest Heart Foundation
  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
  • Baptist Health Lexington
  • Ochsner Clinic
  • University of Maryland
  • Washington Adventist Hospital
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • St. Elizabeth's Medical Center
  • Detroit Medical Center - Cardiovascular Institute
  • Nebraska Heart Institute
  • Bryan Heart LGH
  • UMDNJ
  • Mt. Sinai Medical Center
  • The Lindner Center
  • The Ohio State University Medical Center
  • Guthrie Medical Group
  • Spartanburg Regional Medical Center
  • Stern Cardiovascular Foundation
  • Dallas VA Medical Center
  • Trinity Clinic
  • Inova Heart & Vascular Institute
  • Aurora Health Care
  • Na Homolce Hospital
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
  • Universitätsklinikum Essen
  • Herz- und Gefässzentrum Bad Bevensen
  • Charité Berlin - Campus Benjamin Franklin
  • Charité Campus-Virchow-Klinikum
  • ASKLEPIOS Klinik St. Georg
  • UKE - Universitäres Herzzentrum GmbH
  • Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
  • Klinikum der Univ. München - Grosshadern

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Other

Arm Label

Treatment

Control

Arm Description

The treatment group receives the OPTIMIZER System implant and continues with optimal heart failure medical therapy.

The Control group will not receive the OPTIMIZER System and will continue with optimal heart failure medical therapy.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Peak VO2
Exercise tolerance quantified by peak VO2 measured with cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX) and evaluated by a blinded core lab.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire
Change in quality of life at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire. The MLWHFQ score could range from 0 to 105, with higher scores indicating more significant impairment in health-related quality of lif
Peak VO2 With Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER)
Peak VO2 with change in respiratory exchange ratio (RER) included as a covariate, as measured by a blinded core lab.
NYHA
Heart failure class, as assessed by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification.
Peak VO2 With a Peak RER of ≥1.05
Peak VO2 in an analysis that only includes tests with a peak RER of ≥1.05.

Full Information

First Posted
June 22, 2011
Last Updated
August 23, 2021
Sponsor
Impulse Dynamics
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01381172
Brief Title
Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER® System in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure: FIX-HF-5C
Acronym
FIX-HF-5C
Official Title
Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER® System in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure With Ejection Fraction Between 25% and 45%: FIX-HF-5C
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 19, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 19, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Impulse Dynamics

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of this investigation is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the OPTIMIZER® System in subjects with medically refractory moderate-to-severe heart failure.
Detailed Description
The Impulse Dynamics FIX-HF-5C Study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) signals delivered by the implantable OPTIMIZER System in patients with NYHA class III and IV heart failure and an ejection fraction 25-45%. The study will involve the recruitment of 160 subjects at a total of up to 60 sites. Those subjects who fulfill all inclusion and exclusion criteria based upon baseline test results will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the OPTIMIZER System plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) or to a control group receiving OMT alone. All randomized subjects will be followed for 24 weeks and shall receive the same study related assessments throughout the course of the study. In addition, all subjects will continue to receive OMT for the treatment of their heart failure. Mortality will be reported out to 2 years.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
NYHA Class III Heart Failure, NYHA Class IV Heart Failure
Keywords
Heart Failure, Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic heart disease, Cardiac contractility modulation, CCM, CHF

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
160 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Treatment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The treatment group receives the OPTIMIZER System implant and continues with optimal heart failure medical therapy.
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
The Control group will not receive the OPTIMIZER System and will continue with optimal heart failure medical therapy.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Optimizer System
Other Intervention Name(s)
CCM therapy
Intervention Description
The OPTIMIZER System delivers non-excitatory cardiac contractility modulating (CCM) electrical signals to the heart muscle. Treatment group subjects receive five non-contiguous one-hour periods of CCM signals per day.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
No intervention: Optimal medical therapy
Intervention Description
The control group receives optimal medical therapy only.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Peak VO2
Description
Exercise tolerance quantified by peak VO2 measured with cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX) and evaluated by a blinded core lab.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire
Description
Change in quality of life at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire. The MLWHFQ score could range from 0 to 105, with higher scores indicating more significant impairment in health-related quality of lif
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Peak VO2 With Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER)
Description
Peak VO2 with change in respiratory exchange ratio (RER) included as a covariate, as measured by a blinded core lab.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
NYHA
Description
Heart failure class, as assessed by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Peak VO2 With a Peak RER of ≥1.05
Description
Peak VO2 in an analysis that only includes tests with a peak RER of ≥1.05.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
6 Minute Hall Walk
Description
Distance walked in 6 minutes
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
VE/VCO2
Description
VE/VCO2 measured during cardiopulmonary stress testing (CPX) and evaluated by a blinded core lab.
Time Frame
24 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subjects who are 18 years of age or older Subjects who are either male or female. Females of childbearing potential must be using a medically approved method of birth control and must agree to continue to use birth control throughout the study, or must be surgically sterilized (tubal ligation, hysterectomy) or post-menopausal for at least 1 year. Condition Subjects who have a baseline ejection fraction greater than or equal to 25% and less than or equal to 45% by echocardiography determined by the echocardiography core laboratory. Subjects who have been treated for heart failure for at least 90 days (including treatment with a β-blocker for at least 90 days unless the subject is intolerant) and are in New York Heart Association functional Class III and IV at the time of enrollment. Subjects receiving appropriate, stable medical therapy during the 30 days prior to enrollment for treatment of heart failure according to the region- specific guideline recommendations. For patients with EF≤35%, this regimen shall consist of the appropriate doses of diuretics, ACE-inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker and β-blocker. Stable is defined as no more than a 100% increase or 50% decrease in dose. Subjects who, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator (based on the current guidelines for clinical practice ), have a clinical indication for an implanted cardiac defibrillator (ICD, e.g., EF≤35%) and/or pacemaker, must have an existing device or agree to undergo implantation of such a device unless the patient refuses to undergo the implantation of such device for personal reasons. Subjects who are willing and able to return for all follow-up visits. Exclusion Criteria: Subjects whose baseline peak VO2 is <9 or >20 ml O2/min/kg. Subjects who have a potentially correctible cause of heart failure, such as valvular heart disease or congenital heart disease. Subjects who have clinically significant angina pectoris, consisting of angina during daily life (i.e., Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina score of II or more), an episode of unstable angina within 30 days of enrollment, or angina and/or ECG changes during exercise testing performed during baseline evaluation. Subjects who have been hospitalized for heart failure which required the use of inotropic support within 30 days of enrollment. Subjects who have a clinically significant amount of ambient ectopy, defined as more than 8,900 PVCs per 24 hours on baseline Holter monitoring. Subjects having a PR interval greater than 375 ms. Subjects who have chronic (permanent or persistent) atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter or those cardioverted within 30 days of enrollment. Subjects whose exercise tolerance is limited by a condition other than heart failure (e.g., angina, COPD, peripheral vascular disease, orthopedic or rheumatologic conditions) or who are unable to perform baseline stress testing. Subjects who are scheduled for a CABG or a PTCA procedure, or who have undergone a CABG procedure within 90 days or a PTCA procedure within 30 days of enrollment. Subjects who have a biventricular pacing system, an accepted indication for such a device, or a QRS width of 130ms or greater. Subjects who have had a myocardial infarction within 90 days of enrollment. Subjects who have mechanical tricuspid valve. Subjects who have a prior heart transplant. Subjects on dialysis. Subjects who are participating in another experimental protocol. Subjects who are unable to provide informed consent.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Daniel Burkhoff, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Impulse Dynamics
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cardiovascular Consultants
City
Glendale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85306
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiovascular Associates of Mesa
City
Mesa
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85206
Country
United States
Facility Name
Chan Heart Rhythm Institute
City
Mesa
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85206
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arizona Heart & Rhythm Center
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85013
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pima Heart
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85712
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Arizona Sarver Heart Center
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85724
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
City
Newport Beach
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92663
Country
United States
Facility Name
Yale - New Haven Hospital
City
New Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06519
Country
United States
Facility Name
Florida Hospital
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32803
Country
United States
Facility Name
Florida Hospital - Pepin Heart Institute
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33613
Country
United States
Facility Name
Advocate Medical Group - Midwest Heart Foundation
City
Naperville
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60540
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52242
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baptist Health Lexington
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40503
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ochsner Clinic
City
New Orleans
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70121
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Maryland
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington Adventist Hospital
City
Takoma Park
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20912
Country
United States
Facility Name
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02215
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Elizabeth's Medical Center
City
Brighton
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02135
Country
United States
Facility Name
Detroit Medical Center - Cardiovascular Institute
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Nebraska Heart Institute
City
Lincoln
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68526
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bryan Heart LGH
City
Lincoln
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
69506
Country
United States
Facility Name
UMDNJ
City
Newark
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mt. Sinai Medical Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Lindner Center
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45219
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Ohio State University Medical Center
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Guthrie Medical Group
City
Sayre
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
18840
Country
United States
Facility Name
Spartanburg Regional Medical Center
City
Spartanburg
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29303
Country
United States
Facility Name
Stern Cardiovascular Foundation
City
Germantown
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38138
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dallas VA Medical Center
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75216
Country
United States
Facility Name
Trinity Clinic
City
Tyler
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Inova Heart & Vascular Institute
City
Falls Church
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22042
Country
United States
Facility Name
Aurora Health Care
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Na Homolce Hospital
City
Prague
ZIP/Postal Code
15030
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
City
Hanover
State/Province
Göttingen
ZIP/Postal Code
37075
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Essen
City
Essen
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
45122
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Herz- und Gefässzentrum Bad Bevensen
City
Bad Bevensen
ZIP/Postal Code
29549
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Charité Berlin - Campus Benjamin Franklin
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
12203
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Charité Campus-Virchow-Klinikum
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13353
Country
Germany
Facility Name
ASKLEPIOS Klinik St. Georg
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20099
Country
Germany
Facility Name
UKE - Universitäres Herzzentrum GmbH
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20246
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
City
Mannheim
ZIP/Postal Code
68167
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikum der Univ. München - Grosshadern
City
München
ZIP/Postal Code
81377
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21315216
Citation
Kadish A, Nademanee K, Volosin K, Krueger S, Neelagaru S, Raval N, Obel O, Weiner S, Wish M, Carson P, Ellenbogen K, Bourge R, Parides M, Chiacchierini RP, Goldsmith R, Goldstein S, Mika Y, Burkhoff D, Abraham WT. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in advanced heart failure. Am Heart J. 2011 Feb;161(2):329-337.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.10.025. Erratum In: Am Heart J. 2011 Jun;161(6):1220.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18926146
Citation
Abraham WT, Burkhoff D, Nademanee K, Carson P, Bourge R, Ellenbogen KA, Parides M, Kadish A; FIX-HF-5 Investigators and Coordinators. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in patients with systolic heart failure: rationale, design, and baseline patient characteristics. Am Heart J. 2008 Oct;156(4):641-648.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.05.019.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17018340
Citation
Neelagaru SB, Sanchez JE, Lau SK, Greenberg SM, Raval NY, Worley S, Kalman J, Merliss AD, Krueger S, Wood M, Wish M, Burkhoff D, Nademanee K. Nonexcitatory, cardiac contractility modulation electrical impulses: feasibility study for advanced heart failure in patients with normal QRS duration. Heart Rhythm. 2006 Oct;3(10):1140-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.06.031. Epub 2006 Jul 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21872139
Citation
Abraham WT, Nademanee K, Volosin K, Krueger S, Neelagaru S, Raval N, Obel O, Weiner S, Wish M, Carson P, Ellenbogen K, Bourge R, Parides M, Chiacchierini RP, Goldsmith R, Goldstein S, Mika Y, Burkhoff D, Kadish A; FIX-HF-5 Investigators and Coordinators. Subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in advanced heart failure. J Card Fail. 2011 Sep;17(9):710-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2011.05.006. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25285748
Citation
Abraham WT, Lindenfeld J, Reddy VY, Hasenfuss G, Kuck KH, Boscardin J, Gibbons R, Burkhoff D; FIX-HF-5C Investigators and Coordinators. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in patients with moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and a narrow QRS duration: study rationale and design. J Card Fail. 2015 Jan;21(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2014.09.011. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29754812
Citation
Abraham WT, Kuck KH, Goldsmith RL, Lindenfeld J, Reddy VY, Carson PE, Mann DL, Saville B, Parise H, Chan R, Wiegn P, Hastings JL, Kaplan AJ, Edelmann F, Luthje L, Kahwash R, Tomassoni GF, Gutterman DD, Stagg A, Burkhoff D, Hasenfuss G. A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Cardiac Contractility Modulation. JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Oct;6(10):874-883. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 May 10. Erratum In: JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Jan;11(1):132.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
http://www.impulse-dynamics.com/us/
Description
Impulse Dynamics Website

Learn more about this trial

Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER® System in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure: FIX-HF-5C

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs