search
Back to results

Evaluating Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) and Standard of Care vs. Sham Therapy and Standard Care

Primary Purpose

Diabetic Foot Ulcer

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) Treatment
Sponsored by
SerenaGroup, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetic Foot Ulcer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects of any gender between the ages of 18 and under 90 at the time of consent. The goal will be to enroll 50% of the subjects who are Medicare beneficiaries.
  2. Target ulcer has a minimum area of 0.7 cm2 and a maximum area of 20.0 cm2, measured at randomization after sharp debridement, as assessed by photographic planimetry.
  3. Target ulcer open for a minimum of 4 weeks and a maximum of 52 weeks duration prior to the screening visit.
  4. Target ulcer is located on any aspect of the foot, including the toe, lateral dorsal, medial or plantar aspect of the foot. At least 50% of the ulcer must be below the malleolus.
  5. Target ulcer is Wagner Grade I or Grade II without exposed bone.
  6. Subjects' wound score on IDSA tool is Grade 1 or 2.
  7. Adequate perfusion without critical limb ischemia, confirmed by vascular assessment of the affected foot through any of the following methods within 3 months of the first screening visit:

    Toe pressure ≥ 50 mm Hg; Ankle pressure ≥70 mm Hg; ABI between 0.7 and ≤ 1.3; TCOM ≥ 40 mmHg; Doppler ultrasound scan of peripheral blood flow with wave patterns that are triphasic or biphasic; Skin Perfusion Pressure (SPP) ≥30 mmHg.

  8. Diagnosis of type 1 or 2 Diabetes mellitus,
  9. Subject has a known glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of less than 12% within the last three months.
  10. If subject has two or more ulcers, they must be separated by at least 2 cm and the largest one will be included as the study DFU though all will be similarly treated.
  11. The target ulcer has been offloaded for at least 14 days prior to randomization.
  12. Subject is willing to use prescribed off-loading method for the duration of the study.
  13. Subject is available for the entire study period and all follow up visits. In addition, the subject is able and willing to adhere to the protocol requirements.
  14. Subject able and willing to give written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Target ulcer is due to a non-diabetic etiology.
  2. Presence in target ulcer of cellulitis, osteomyelitis or other clinical evidence of infection.
  3. If the Target ulcer has reduced in area by 20% or more after 2 weeks of standard of care from the first screening visit (S1) to the TV-0/randomization visit.
  4. An ulcer that has healed by more than 20% in the 2 weeks prior to screening: "historical" run-in period.
  5. Presence of any foot ulcer (whether or not on the target foot) for which local or systemic antibiotic treatment is required.
  6. A history of more than 8 weeks' treatment with immunosuppressants (including systemic corticosteroids at doses greater than 5mg of Prednisone or equivalent), cytotoxic chemotherapy, or application of topical steroids to the ulcer surface within one month prior to initial screening, or treatments with such medications during the screening period, or anticipated requirement of such medications during the study.
  7. Subjects with an amputation on the affected foot, only if it impedes proper offloading of the target DFU.
  8. Subjects with active Charcot foot, or inactive Charcot foot, if it impedes proper offloading of the target DFU.
  9. Women who are pregnant or considering becoming pregnant within the next 6 months.
  10. Presence of subject having recent or current alcohol or drug abuse.
  11. Subjects with severe kidney disease who are currently untreated or undergoing dialysis treatment.
  12. Participation in another study involving treatment with an investigational product within the previous 30 days.
  13. Any other medical or psychological conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may make subject's participation unreliable or may interfere with study assessments.
  14. There is a history of radiation to the target ulcer.
  15. Subject has received HBO less than 30 days prior to screening.
  16. Subject has received a cellular tissue product (CTP) less than 30 days prior to screening.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    No Intervention

    Arm Label

    RIC Treatment

    SHAM Comparator

    Arm Description

    Participants will receive active RIC treatment 3 times per week over the course of the study. Each session will last approximately 45 minutes

    Participants will receive sham treatment 3 times per week over the course of the study. Each session will last approximately 45 minutes

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Time to complete wound closure.
    Specifically, to determine the median time to initial wound closure in both the active treatment group and the sham treatment group

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Percentage of target wounds achieving closure
    The proportion of wounds that heal in a 12-week period
    Percentage wound area reduction from TV-0 per week measured with digital planimetry and physical examination
    The percentage of reduction in wound area from baseline
    Change in DFU maximum depth in mm assessed by the Principal Investigator and documented by computer planimetry
    The change in depth in mm over from baseline
    Change in score of each domain on the CWIQ (Cardiff Wound Impact Questionnaire)
    Assess the change in daily quality of life
    Change in pain regarding to the ulcer assessed using PEG (Pain, Enjoyment and General Activity) Scale
    Assess change in pain level
    The percentage of time offloaded
    Offloading compliance with a prescribed offloading boot.
    Change in skin sensitivity on the foot
    Assess change in skin sensitivity on the foot tested by performing standardized monofilament test over a standardized set of points on the foot
    Percentage of time wearing the boot
    Compliance with a prescribed offloading boot
    Change in Foot Infection
    Change in Foot Infection measured by the IDSA (Infectious Diseases Society of America) infection scale
    Change in Wound Drainage
    Qualitatively assess the change in amount of drainage (low, moderate, heavy)
    Change in oxygenation at the wound site
    Assess change in oxygenation at the wound site using Near Infrared Reflectance Oximetry in a sub-group of subjects

    Full Information

    First Posted
    March 30, 2020
    Last Updated
    February 10, 2021
    Sponsor
    SerenaGroup, Inc.
    Collaborators
    LifeCuff Technologies Inc.
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04332003
    Brief Title
    Evaluating Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) and Standard of Care vs. Sham Therapy and Standard Care
    Official Title
    A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Multi-Center Clinical Trial Evaluating Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) and Standard of Care vs. Sham Therapy and Standard Care in the Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    February 2021
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Withdrawn
    Why Stopped
    Sponsor
    Study Start Date
    January 1, 2021 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    February 6, 2021 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    February 6, 2021 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    SerenaGroup, Inc.
    Collaborators
    LifeCuff Technologies Inc.

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    Yes
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
    Yes
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    A double blind, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing wound closure rates of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in subjects receiving active RIC treatment plus standard of care compared to those receiving sham treatment plus standard of care.
    Detailed Description
    The general objective of this double-blind study is to test the effectiveness of RIC in a population of patients with diabetic foot ulcers: Active treatment 3x per week (RIC) plus SOC compared to Sham Comparator 3x per week and SOC Determine median time to initial wound closure in both active and sham group.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Diabetic Foot Ulcer

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Model Description
    LifeCuff device includes a controller attached to a standard inflatable cuff used for blood pressure measurements.The controller includes a controller electronics board connected to a pneumatic assembly designed to automatically inflate and deflate the cuff to desired air pressures while monitoring and analyzing the oscillometric pulsations modulating the cuff pressure as captured by the system's pressure transducer. LifeCuff can be battery-powered or connected by an adaptor to a house electrical outlet.
    Masking
    ParticipantInvestigator
    Masking Description
    The subject and principle investigator will remain blinded throughout the trial. Every site will have a designated unblinded study coordinator. The unblinded coordinator will choose the appropriately labeled device for the subject during the weekly SOC visits. The patient will place the cuff and operate the device under the direction of the unblinded coordinator. The principle investigator is prohibited from entering the room during the treatment. The unblinded coordinator will place a sign on the outside of the study room door stating, "Do not enter. Study in Progress."
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    0 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    RIC Treatment
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Participants will receive active RIC treatment 3 times per week over the course of the study. Each session will last approximately 45 minutes
    Arm Title
    SHAM Comparator
    Arm Type
    No Intervention
    Arm Description
    Participants will receive sham treatment 3 times per week over the course of the study. Each session will last approximately 45 minutes
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) Treatment
    Intervention Description
    RIC treatment will be delivered by an automated device that delivers the RIC treatment (manufactured by LifeCuff Technologies).
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Time to complete wound closure.
    Description
    Specifically, to determine the median time to initial wound closure in both the active treatment group and the sham treatment group
    Time Frame
    12-18 months
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Percentage of target wounds achieving closure
    Description
    The proportion of wounds that heal in a 12-week period
    Time Frame
    12-week healing period
    Title
    Percentage wound area reduction from TV-0 per week measured with digital planimetry and physical examination
    Description
    The percentage of reduction in wound area from baseline
    Time Frame
    12- week
    Title
    Change in DFU maximum depth in mm assessed by the Principal Investigator and documented by computer planimetry
    Description
    The change in depth in mm over from baseline
    Time Frame
    12 week
    Title
    Change in score of each domain on the CWIQ (Cardiff Wound Impact Questionnaire)
    Description
    Assess the change in daily quality of life
    Time Frame
    Day 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks, and 12 weeks
    Title
    Change in pain regarding to the ulcer assessed using PEG (Pain, Enjoyment and General Activity) Scale
    Description
    Assess change in pain level
    Time Frame
    Day 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks, and 12 weeks
    Title
    The percentage of time offloaded
    Description
    Offloading compliance with a prescribed offloading boot.
    Time Frame
    Day 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks, and 12 weeks
    Title
    Change in skin sensitivity on the foot
    Description
    Assess change in skin sensitivity on the foot tested by performing standardized monofilament test over a standardized set of points on the foot
    Time Frame
    Day 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks, and 12 weeks
    Title
    Percentage of time wearing the boot
    Description
    Compliance with a prescribed offloading boot
    Time Frame
    Day 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks, and 12 weeks
    Title
    Change in Foot Infection
    Description
    Change in Foot Infection measured by the IDSA (Infectious Diseases Society of America) infection scale
    Time Frame
    Day 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks, and 12 weeks
    Title
    Change in Wound Drainage
    Description
    Qualitatively assess the change in amount of drainage (low, moderate, heavy)
    Time Frame
    Day 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks, and 12 weeks
    Title
    Change in oxygenation at the wound site
    Description
    Assess change in oxygenation at the wound site using Near Infrared Reflectance Oximetry in a sub-group of subjects
    Time Frame
    Day 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks and 12 weeks

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    90 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Subjects of any gender between the ages of 18 and under 90 at the time of consent. The goal will be to enroll 50% of the subjects who are Medicare beneficiaries. Target ulcer has a minimum area of 0.7 cm2 and a maximum area of 20.0 cm2, measured at randomization after sharp debridement, as assessed by photographic planimetry. Target ulcer open for a minimum of 4 weeks and a maximum of 52 weeks duration prior to the screening visit. Target ulcer is located on any aspect of the foot, including the toe, lateral dorsal, medial or plantar aspect of the foot. At least 50% of the ulcer must be below the malleolus. Target ulcer is Wagner Grade I or Grade II without exposed bone. Subjects' wound score on IDSA tool is Grade 1 or 2. Adequate perfusion without critical limb ischemia, confirmed by vascular assessment of the affected foot through any of the following methods within 3 months of the first screening visit: Toe pressure ≥ 50 mm Hg; Ankle pressure ≥70 mm Hg; ABI between 0.7 and ≤ 1.3; TCOM ≥ 40 mmHg; Doppler ultrasound scan of peripheral blood flow with wave patterns that are triphasic or biphasic; Skin Perfusion Pressure (SPP) ≥30 mmHg. Diagnosis of type 1 or 2 Diabetes mellitus, Subject has a known glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of less than 12% within the last three months. If subject has two or more ulcers, they must be separated by at least 2 cm and the largest one will be included as the study DFU though all will be similarly treated. The target ulcer has been offloaded for at least 14 days prior to randomization. Subject is willing to use prescribed off-loading method for the duration of the study. Subject is available for the entire study period and all follow up visits. In addition, the subject is able and willing to adhere to the protocol requirements. Subject able and willing to give written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Target ulcer is due to a non-diabetic etiology. Presence in target ulcer of cellulitis, osteomyelitis or other clinical evidence of infection. If the Target ulcer has reduced in area by 20% or more after 2 weeks of standard of care from the first screening visit (S1) to the TV-0/randomization visit. An ulcer that has healed by more than 20% in the 2 weeks prior to screening: "historical" run-in period. Presence of any foot ulcer (whether or not on the target foot) for which local or systemic antibiotic treatment is required. A history of more than 8 weeks' treatment with immunosuppressants (including systemic corticosteroids at doses greater than 5mg of Prednisone or equivalent), cytotoxic chemotherapy, or application of topical steroids to the ulcer surface within one month prior to initial screening, or treatments with such medications during the screening period, or anticipated requirement of such medications during the study. Subjects with an amputation on the affected foot, only if it impedes proper offloading of the target DFU. Subjects with active Charcot foot, or inactive Charcot foot, if it impedes proper offloading of the target DFU. Women who are pregnant or considering becoming pregnant within the next 6 months. Presence of subject having recent or current alcohol or drug abuse. Subjects with severe kidney disease who are currently untreated or undergoing dialysis treatment. Participation in another study involving treatment with an investigational product within the previous 30 days. Any other medical or psychological conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may make subject's participation unreliable or may interfere with study assessments. There is a history of radiation to the target ulcer. Subject has received HBO less than 30 days prior to screening. Subject has received a cellular tissue product (CTP) less than 30 days prior to screening.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Thomas E Serena, MD,FACS
    Organizational Affiliation
    SerenaGroup, Inc.
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No

    Learn more about this trial

    Evaluating Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) and Standard of Care vs. Sham Therapy and Standard Care

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs