search
Back to results

Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Mediated Fusion (PEG Fusion)

Primary Purpose

Peripheral Nerve Injuries

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
NTX-001
Sponsored by
Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Peripheral Nerve Injuries

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Ages 18-80
  2. Sustained a complete peripheral nerve injury resulting from upper extremity trauma presenting within 48 hours of injury
  3. Involves injury or dysfunction to motor and/or sensory function of the axillary, radial, median, ulnar, or musculocutaneous nerve with injury localized between the proximal humerus and the distal flexion crease of the wrist
  4. Involves a "mixed" nerve segment (i.e., involves a location of any of the above specified nerves that can be expected to have both sensory and motor axons present).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients beginning surgery within hours after injury.
  2. Injury to the brachial plexus nerves
  3. Injury to the nerves distal to the distal flexion crease of the wrist
  4. Injury that involves a distal extension of the parent nerve that is considered sensory only (superficial radial nerve, lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, etc.) or the posterior interosseus or anterior interosseus nerve distal to the midpoint of the forearm (i.e., distal to what can be considered the main motor branches of the PIN and AIN).
  5. Previous peripheral nerve injury resulting from trauma, stroke, muscular, neurologic, or neuromuscular disorder
  6. Documented psychiatric disorder that is expected to result in high probability of self-harm or interfere with study follow-up.
  7. Severe problems with maintaining follow up (e.g., patients who are prisoners or homeless at time of injury or who are intellectually challenged without adequate family support).
  8. Not expected to survive the next 30 days due to their injuries/health condition.
  9. The subject has a known allergy to polyethylene glycol (PEG).
  10. If any of the assessments cannot be done on the contralateral side (CL) or the MRCC sensory 2PD value is > 10 mm on the CL side during baseline period, the subject is a screen failure.
  11. The subject is pregnant and/or is breastfeeding.
  12. The subject has a significant medical comorbidity precluding immediate repair.
  13. The subject is not able to strictly adhere to the rules of the current clinical protocol.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Maryland Medical Center Shock Trauma Center
  • Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineRecruiting
  • Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
  • OrthoCarolina
  • Wellspan Health
  • San Antonio Military Medical Center (SAMMC)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

PEG mediated reconstruction

Conventional nerve reconstruction

Arm Description

NTX-001 will be administered topically via isolation chamber medical device. Dose Unit: 2.5 mL NTX-001 is a single use surgical product intended for use as adjunct treatment in the repair of severed peripheral nerves in patients requiring standard suture neurorrhaphy.

Conventional nerve reconstruction

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Complications or problems that occur with in the first 30 days.
Complications or problems include surgical site infections, wound dehiscence/breakdown, exposure of nerves and/or their repairs and reconstructions, breakdown of nerve repair or reconstruction, seroma/hematoma requiring an additional procedure to treat, and any other local wound complications related to the zone of nerve injury that require an additional surgical procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Sensory Function
Sensory function will be evaluated using the the touch test mono-filament hand evaluation kit.
Motor Function
Motor function will be evaluated using the British Medical Research Council motor grading scale. Motor is evaluated on a scale of M0 and M5, where M5 is the highest score and M0 is the lowest.
Range of Motion
ROM will be measured using a standard goniometer.
Grip Strength
Grip strength is assessed using a hand-held Jamar dynamometer.
Pain Score
Self reported outcomes using the Brief Pain Inventory.
Patient Satisfaction with Treatment
Patient Satisfaction with Treatment is measured using the Short Form Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18) at 24 months following injury.

Full Information

First Posted
February 22, 2021
Last Updated
August 10, 2023
Sponsor
Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium
Collaborators
United States Department of Defense
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04789044
Brief Title
Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Mediated Fusion (PEG Fusion)
Official Title
A Phase 2a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Mediated Fusion (PEG Fusion) Compared to Standard of Care in the Repair of Mixed Motor-sensory Acute Peripheral Nerve Injuries (PNI) for Rapid and Immediate Improvement in Outcome
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
June 1, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 1, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium
Collaborators
United States Department of Defense

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The overall objective of this study is to determine the safety of PEG fusion when used with primary repair or reconstruction in patients with an acute upper extremity peripheral nerve injury. PEG is safe and effective for extending the half-life of circulating pharmaceutical products, when used in conjunction with a topical hemostatic agent in surgical wounds, and when used as a colon cleanser for endoscopic surgical procedures. However, PEG fusion has not been rigorously tested as a safe reagent to promote nerve regeneration in humans. Therefore, the goal of this Phase 2a clinical trial is to establish safety data and to examine the effect of PEG fusion on clinical outcomes including recovery of sensory and motor function. Results will be externally validated using data collected in the DoD funded prospective NERVE study and will provide preliminary evidence to power a larger phase II efficacy trial.
Detailed Description
The study will enroll 40 patients receiving autograft reconstruction within 24 hours of injury. Patients will be randomized to either PEG mediated reconstruction (n=20); or conventional nerve reconstruction (n=20). The investigators hypothesize that (1) the rate of complications within 1 month of surgery in patients treated with PEG fusion will be comparable to that of patients treated with conventional autograft reconstruction, (2) there will be no detrimental effects from PEG fusion on nerve regeneration over 2 years compared to patients treated with conventional nerve reconstruction, ((3) recovery of sensory and motor function will occur earlier (within 6 months) among patients treated with PEG fusion compared to patients treated with conventional autograft reconstruction (4) patients treated with PEG fusion will have better range of motion, greater hand strength, less disability, less pain, and higher rates of treatment satisfaction compared with patients treated with conventional autograft reconstruction.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Peripheral Nerve Injuries

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
The study will enroll 40 patients receiving autograft reconstruction within 24 hours of injury. Patients within each group will be randomized to either PEG mediated reconstruction (n=20); or conventional nerve reconstruction (n=20).
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
PEG mediated reconstruction
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
NTX-001 will be administered topically via isolation chamber medical device. Dose Unit: 2.5 mL NTX-001 is a single use surgical product intended for use as adjunct treatment in the repair of severed peripheral nerves in patients requiring standard suture neurorrhaphy.
Arm Title
Conventional nerve reconstruction
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Conventional nerve reconstruction
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
NTX-001
Intervention Description
• PEG fusion is the application of a polyethylene glycol (PEG) using a combination of sequenced reagents to a freshly performed nerve coaptation, or neurorrhaphy, to allow the axonal membranes of the proximal and distal axonal stumps to fuse back together and re-establish full axonal continuity.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Complications or problems that occur with in the first 30 days.
Description
Complications or problems include surgical site infections, wound dehiscence/breakdown, exposure of nerves and/or their repairs and reconstructions, breakdown of nerve repair or reconstruction, seroma/hematoma requiring an additional procedure to treat, and any other local wound complications related to the zone of nerve injury that require an additional surgical procedure
Time Frame
Up to 2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Sensory Function
Description
Sensory function will be evaluated using the the touch test mono-filament hand evaluation kit.
Time Frame
Up to 2 years
Title
Motor Function
Description
Motor function will be evaluated using the British Medical Research Council motor grading scale. Motor is evaluated on a scale of M0 and M5, where M5 is the highest score and M0 is the lowest.
Time Frame
Up to 2 years
Title
Range of Motion
Description
ROM will be measured using a standard goniometer.
Time Frame
Up to 2 years
Title
Grip Strength
Description
Grip strength is assessed using a hand-held Jamar dynamometer.
Time Frame
Up to 2 years
Title
Pain Score
Description
Self reported outcomes using the Brief Pain Inventory.
Time Frame
Up to 2 years
Title
Patient Satisfaction with Treatment
Description
Patient Satisfaction with Treatment is measured using the Short Form Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18) at 24 months following injury.
Time Frame
Up to 2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Ages 18-80 Sustained a complete peripheral nerve injury resulting from upper extremity trauma presenting within 48 hours of injury Involves injury or dysfunction to motor and/or sensory function of the axillary, radial, median, ulnar, or musculocutaneous nerve with injury localized between the proximal humerus and the distal flexion crease of the wrist Involves a "mixed" nerve segment (i.e., involves a location of any of the above specified nerves that can be expected to have both sensory and motor axons present). Exclusion Criteria: Patients beginning surgery within hours after injury. Injury to the brachial plexus nerves Injury to the nerves distal to the distal flexion crease of the wrist Injury that involves a distal extension of the parent nerve that is considered sensory only (superficial radial nerve, lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, etc.) or the posterior interosseus or anterior interosseus nerve distal to the midpoint of the forearm (i.e., distal to what can be considered the main motor branches of the PIN and AIN). Previous peripheral nerve injury resulting from trauma, stroke, muscular, neurologic, or neuromuscular disorder Documented psychiatric disorder that is expected to result in high probability of self-harm or interfere with study follow-up. Severe problems with maintaining follow up (e.g., patients who are prisoners or homeless at time of injury or who are intellectually challenged without adequate family support). Not expected to survive the next 30 days due to their injuries/health condition. The subject has a known allergy to polyethylene glycol (PEG). If any of the assessments cannot be done on the contralateral side (CL) or the MRCC sensory 2PD value is > 10 mm on the CL side during baseline period, the subject is a screen failure. The subject is pregnant and/or is breastfeeding. The subject has a significant medical comorbidity precluding immediate repair. The subject is not able to strictly adhere to the rules of the current clinical protocol.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Elizabeth Wysocki, MS
Phone
410-955-0396
Email
ewysock2@jhu.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Ala Elhelali, Ph.D
Phone
443-220-2537
Email
aelhela1@jhmi.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jaimie Shores, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Johns Hopkins University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Maryland Medical Center Shock Trauma Center
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21201
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ray Pensy, MD
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21213
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jaimie Shores, MD
Facility Name
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
City
Bethesda
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20889
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jason Souza, MD
Facility Name
OrthoCarolina
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28207
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Glenn Gaston, MD
Facility Name
Wellspan Health
City
York
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17403
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Richard Trevino, MD
Facility Name
San Antonio Military Medical Center (SAMMC)
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78234
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jason Alderete, MD
Facility Name
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
City
Richmond
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23219
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jonathan Issacs, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Mediated Fusion (PEG Fusion)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs