Evaluation of Cilostazol in Combination With L-Carnitine (ECLECTIC)
Primary Purpose
Peripheral Vascular Disease, Intermittent Claudication, Peripheral Arterial Disease
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Levocarnitine tartrate
cilostazol
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional other trial for Peripheral Vascular Disease focused on measuring Peripheral Vascular Disease, Peripheral Arterial Disease, Intermittent Claudication, Peak Walking Time, Claudication Onset Time, Cilostazol, Carnitine
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- The subject is >40 years old.
- The subject has a diagnosis of Intermittent Claudication (IC) due to Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD).
- Ankle brachial index (ABI) < 0.90 in at least one extremity, or if Ankle brachial index (ABI)is ≥ 0.90 to ≤ 1.0, a reduction of at least 20% in Ankle brachial index (ABI), in at least one extremity, when measured within 1 minute after claudication-limiting treadmill testing. If the subject has non-compressible arteries then a toe brachial index (TBI) < 0.70 is required in at least one extremity.
- Symptoms of Intermittent Claudication (IC)must be stable for at least 3 months prior to Screening 1.
- Peak Walking Time (PWT) of ≥ 1 to ≤ 12 minutes on a Gardner protocol at Screening 2.
- If the subject is currently on statin therapy, they need to have been on statin therapy for at least 3 months prior to Screening 1. Subjects who have recently discontinued statin therapy must "wash-out" for at least one month prior to Screening 1.
- Tolerance to background therapy of cilostazol (approximately 2 weeks of 50 mg by mouth (PO) twice daily (BID), approximately 1 week of 100 mg PO BID) between Screening 2 and Baseline Visit.
- Subjects must be either male or females that are post-menopausal, surgically incapable of bearing children or if they are of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at Screening 1 and a negative urine pregnancy test at Day 0 and must agree to use double-barrier contraceptive methods until the end of investigational therapy (Day 180 Visit).
- The subject is able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan and laboratory tests.
- The subject is willing to participate in this study as documented by written informed consent.
- During the tolerance phase of the Screening period, the subject demonstrates at least 70% compliance with cilostazol and is willing to continue treatment.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of critical limb ischemia (CLI) (e.g., ischemic rest pain or ischemic ulceration).
- The subject has had a major amputation of the leg or any other amputation that limits walking ability.
- The subject has diabetes mellitus type 1 or poorly controlled diabetes mellitus type 2 (hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) > 10).
- The subject has had a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or deep vein thrombosis in the last 3 months.
- The subject has had a stroke within the last 6 months.
- The subject has participated in an angiogenic gene therapy study, unless known to be given placebo.
The subject has any of the following laboratory parameters at Screening 1:
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or total bilirubin >3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dL
- Hemoglobin (Hb) <10 g/dL
- White blood cell (WBC) count <3.0 x 103/µL; or > 15 x 103/µL
- Platelet count <100 x 103/µL
- The subject walks less than 1 minute at 2 miles per hour (mph), 0% grade as determined during the Screening 1 treadmill familiarization.
- The subject has clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities at rest or changes during exercise or post-exercise at Screening 2 or Day 0.
- The subject has any history or clinical evidence of congestive heart failure (CHF), with which the clinician-investigator concurs.
- The subject has uncontrolled hypertension (resting blood pressure (BP) > 180/100 mmHg) or uncontrolled arrhythmic disorders at Screening 1.
- History of coronary or peripheral revascularization within 6 months prior to Screening 1.
- The subject plans to undergo coronary or peripheral revascularization during the course of the study.
- The subject is currently taking L-carnitine or medication for claudication (including pentoxifylline or cilostazol). In this situation, the subject would become eligible for Screening 1 after a 6 week washout of the medication.
- Subjects currently taking or those who anticipate taking ketoconazole, itraconazole, or erythromycin. The subject would become eligible for Screening 1 immediately after completion of therapy or discontinuation of the drug(s).
- The subject has a known, active malignancy that requires active anti-neoplastic therapy. (stable basal cell skin cancer allowed. Cancer being treated soley with hormonal therapy is allowed.)
- The subject has a severe co-morbidity with an expected survival of less than 2 years.
- The subject's Peak Walking Time (PWT) is limited by symptoms other than claudication (e.g., shortness of breath (SOB), fatigue, angina, arthritis, etc.). If, in the opinion of the investigator, the subject were to improve their Peak Walking Time (PWT) from study therapy to the extent that his or her walking would then be limited by a symptom other than claudication, the subject should not be enrolled.
- The subject has a history of alcohol or other substance abuse within 6 months of Screening 1.
- The subject has an inability to tolerate oral medication administration.
- The subject has a known or suspected allergy to the study medication(s) or class of study medication(s) (cilostazol or L-carnitine) to be administered.
- The subject has initiated an exercise training program within 3 months of Screening 1, has the inability to maintain his or her current level of physical activity throughout the study, or the subject plans on enrolling in an exercise training program during the study.
- The subject plans to change his/her smoking status during the planned duration of this study (subjects will be advised that stopping smoking is best for his/her health).
- The subject is currently pregnant or breastfeeding.
- The subject has received an investigational drug or biological agent within 30 days prior to Screening 1.
- The subject is currently participating in or plans to enroll in another clinical trial during this study.
- The subject has any other clinically significant medical or psychiatric condition that in the opinion of the Investigator could impact the subject's ability to successfully complete this trial.
- In the Investigator's opinion, the subject experienced any Adverse Events (AEs) during the tolerance phase of the Screening period that present a potential ongoing safety concern.
Sites / Locations
- Internal Medicine Physicians Associates
- Tatum Ridge Internal Medicine
- Central Arkansas Veteran's Healthcare System
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System
- University of California at Davis Vascular Center
- Sacramento Heart and Vascular Research Center
- Apex Research Institute
- Aurora Denver Cardiology Associates
- Aurora Denver Cardiology Associates
- Pensacola Research Consultants, Inc.
- DMI Healthcare Group, Inc.
- Meridian Research
- Ochsner Medical Center
- HPV Heart, PA
- University of Massachusetts Medical Center
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
- University of Rochester Medical Center
- Durham VA-Medical Center
- Radiant Research, Inc
- Jobst Vascular Center
- Peripheral Vascular Associates
- Clinical Trials of Texas, Inc.
- Radiant Research- Salt Lake City
- Beloit Clinic Research Office
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Cilostazol + L-Carnitine
Cilostazol + Placebo
Arm Description
1 tablet cilostazol 100 mg PO BID and 3 capsules L-carnitine 334 mg PO BID
1 tablet cilostazol 100 mg PO BID and 3 capsules placebo PO BID
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change From Baseline in Peak Walking Time (PWT) at Day 180
Subjects were asked to complete a standardized exercise treadmill test using a modified Gardner protocol. Subjects walked on the treadmill until they were physically unable to walk further either as a result of their peripheral artery disease (PAD) symptoms or other non-PAD symptoms. This maximum time walked is referred to as the peak walking time (PWT) and reported in minutes/seconds. The exercise treadmill test was conducted at Screening, Baseline, Day 90, and Day 180 visits. The log transformation is used to make highly skewed distributions less skewed.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change From Baseline in Peak Walking Time at Day 180
Subjects were asked to complete a standardized exercise treadmill test using a modified Gardner protocol. Subjects walked on the treadmill until they were physically unable to walk further either as a result of their peripheral artery disease (PAD) symptoms or other non-PAD symptoms. This maximum time walked is referred to as the peak walking time (PWT) and reported in minutes/seconds. The exercise treadmill test was conducted at Screening, Baseline, Day 90, and Day 180 visits. The log transformation is used to make highly skewed distributions less skewed.
Change From Baseline in Peak Walking Time at Day 90
Subjects were asked to complete a standardized exercise treadmill test using a modified Gardner protocol. Subjects walked on the treadmill until they were physically unable to walk further either as a result of their peripheral artery disease (PAD) symptoms or other non-PAD symptoms. This maximum time walked is referred to as the peak walking time (PWT) and reported in minutes/seconds. The exercise treadmill test was conducted at Screening, Baseline, Day 90, and Day 180 visits. The log transformation is used to make highly skewed distributions less skewed.
Change From Baseline in Claudication Onset Time at Day 180
Subjects were asked to complete a standardized exercise treadmill test using a modified Gardner protocol. Subjects walked on the treadmill until they were physically unable to walk further either as a result of their peripheral artery disease (PAD) symptoms or other non-PAD symptoms. The time during the conduct of the exercise treadmill test at which the subject first reported claudication symptoms is referred to as the claudication onset time (COT) and reported in minutes/seconds. The exercise treadmill test was conducted at Screening, Baseline, Day 90, and Day 180 visits. The log transformation is used to make highly skewed distributions less skewed.
Change From Baseline in Claudication Onset Time at Day 90
Subjects were asked to complete a standardized exercise treadmill test using a modified Gardner protocol. Subjects walked on the treadmill until they were physically unable to walk further either as a result of their peripheral artery disease (PAD) symptoms or other non-PAD symptoms. The time during the conduct of the exercise treadmill test at which the subject first reported claudication symptoms is referred to as the claudication onset time (COT) and reported in minutes/seconds. The exercise treadmill test was conducted at Screening, Baseline, Day 90, and Day 180 visits. The log transformation is used to make highly skewed distributions less skewed.
Change From Baseline in Walking Impairment Questionnaire for Walking Distance at Day 180
Subjects completed the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) whereby they were asked about their maximal walking distance before having to rest as a result of claudication symptoms associated with their peripheral artery disease (PAD). The WIQ was administered at the Baseline, Day 90, and Day 180 visits. On the WIQ subjects were asked a series of questions related to their degree of physical difficulty that best described how hard it was for the subject to walk on level ground without stopping to rest. The questions began by asking the degree of difficulty walking around indoors, then 50 feet, 150 feet, 300 feet, 600 feet, 900 feet, and lastly 1500 feet. The responses range from None (best outcome) to Slight, then Some, then Much, then lastly Unable (worst outcome). The walking distance score was calculated from the 7 questions in the section by way of a weighted sum. A score of 100 indicated no walking impairment. A score of 0 corresponded to the highest degree of walking impairment
Change From Baseline in Walking Impairment Questionnaire for Walking Distance at Day 90
Subjects completed the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) whereby they were asked about their maximal walking distance before having to rest as a result of claudication symptoms associated with their peripheral artery disease (PAD). The WIQ was administered at the Baseline, Day 90, and Day 180 visits. On the WIQ subjects were asked a series of questions related to their degree of physical difficulty that best described how hard it was for the subject to walk on level ground without stopping to rest. The questions began by asking the degree of difficulty walking around indoors, then 50 feet, 150 feet, 300 feet, 600 feet, 900 feet, and lastly 1500 feet. The responses range from None (best outcome) to Slight, then Some, then Much, then lastly Unable (worst outcome). The walking distance score was calculated from the 7 questions in the section by way of a weighted sum. A score of 100 indicated no walking impairment. A score of 0 corresponded to the highest degree of walking impairment
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00822172
First Posted
January 13, 2009
Last Updated
November 11, 2019
Sponsor
Colorado Prevention Center
Collaborators
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00822172
Brief Title
Evaluation of Cilostazol in Combination With L-Carnitine
Acronym
ECLECTIC
Official Title
Evaluation of Cilostazol in Combination With L-Carnitine in Subjects With Intermittent Claudication
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2010 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Colorado Prevention Center
Collaborators
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to see how safe and effective L carnitine taken with cilostazol is compared to placebo taken with cilostazol for people with intermittent claudication. A second purpose of the study is to see if L-carnitine is absorbed into the blood stream.
Detailed Description
Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) is a narrowing of the blood vessels that supply the leg with blood. It is caused by atherosclerosis (hardening of the arteries).
Muscles require oxygen carried by the blood. When the leg muscles do not get enough blood and oxygen, this can cause pain, cramping, fatigue, and/or discomfort in the leg muscles during walking or exercise. These symptoms are called intermittent claudication (IC). In more severe cases, tissues do not get enough blood and oxygen at rest, and pain may also be present when the legs are resting. Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD)is one of the most common causes of pain and disability in people between 55 and 75 years of age.
Cilostazol is a medication currently available by prescription for intermittent claudication. L-carnitine is an over-the-counter supplement. It is a natural substance in the human body and is also in some red meats, nuts, and energy drinks.
Some subjects in the study will take L-carnitine with cilostazol and others will take placebo with cilostazol. The purpose of this study is to see how safe and effective L carnitine taken with cilostazol is compared to placebo taken with cilostazol for people with intermittent claudication. A placebo is a tablet or pill that looks like regular medication, but it doesn't have any actual medicine in it. A second purpose of the study is to see if L-carnitine is absorbed into the blood stream.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Peripheral Vascular Disease, Intermittent Claudication, Peripheral Arterial Disease
Keywords
Peripheral Vascular Disease, Peripheral Arterial Disease, Intermittent Claudication, Peak Walking Time, Claudication Onset Time, Cilostazol, Carnitine
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
164 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Cilostazol + L-Carnitine
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
1 tablet cilostazol 100 mg PO BID and 3 capsules L-carnitine 334 mg PO BID
Arm Title
Cilostazol + Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
1 tablet cilostazol 100 mg PO BID and 3 capsules placebo PO BID
Intervention Type
Dietary Supplement
Intervention Name(s)
Levocarnitine tartrate
Other Intervention Name(s)
Carnitine, L-carnitine, Levocarnitine
Intervention Description
Capsule form, 1,002 mg (3 capsules) taken by mouth two times per day (morning and evening). L-carnitine will be taken from Day 0 to Day 180.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
cilostazol
Other Intervention Name(s)
Pletal
Intervention Description
Background therapy beginning at 50mg (1 pill) taken by mouth two times per day for two to three weeks. Then 100 mg (1 pill) to be taken by mouth two times per day (morning and evening) for one to two weeks.
Randomized therapy will consist of 100 mg (1 pill) to be taken by mouth two times per day (morning and evening) for approximately 180 days.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Peak Walking Time (PWT) at Day 180
Description
Subjects were asked to complete a standardized exercise treadmill test using a modified Gardner protocol. Subjects walked on the treadmill until they were physically unable to walk further either as a result of their peripheral artery disease (PAD) symptoms or other non-PAD symptoms. This maximum time walked is referred to as the peak walking time (PWT) and reported in minutes/seconds. The exercise treadmill test was conducted at Screening, Baseline, Day 90, and Day 180 visits. The log transformation is used to make highly skewed distributions less skewed.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 180
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Peak Walking Time at Day 180
Description
Subjects were asked to complete a standardized exercise treadmill test using a modified Gardner protocol. Subjects walked on the treadmill until they were physically unable to walk further either as a result of their peripheral artery disease (PAD) symptoms or other non-PAD symptoms. This maximum time walked is referred to as the peak walking time (PWT) and reported in minutes/seconds. The exercise treadmill test was conducted at Screening, Baseline, Day 90, and Day 180 visits. The log transformation is used to make highly skewed distributions less skewed.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 180
Title
Change From Baseline in Peak Walking Time at Day 90
Description
Subjects were asked to complete a standardized exercise treadmill test using a modified Gardner protocol. Subjects walked on the treadmill until they were physically unable to walk further either as a result of their peripheral artery disease (PAD) symptoms or other non-PAD symptoms. This maximum time walked is referred to as the peak walking time (PWT) and reported in minutes/seconds. The exercise treadmill test was conducted at Screening, Baseline, Day 90, and Day 180 visits. The log transformation is used to make highly skewed distributions less skewed.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 90
Title
Change From Baseline in Claudication Onset Time at Day 180
Description
Subjects were asked to complete a standardized exercise treadmill test using a modified Gardner protocol. Subjects walked on the treadmill until they were physically unable to walk further either as a result of their peripheral artery disease (PAD) symptoms or other non-PAD symptoms. The time during the conduct of the exercise treadmill test at which the subject first reported claudication symptoms is referred to as the claudication onset time (COT) and reported in minutes/seconds. The exercise treadmill test was conducted at Screening, Baseline, Day 90, and Day 180 visits. The log transformation is used to make highly skewed distributions less skewed.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 180
Title
Change From Baseline in Claudication Onset Time at Day 90
Description
Subjects were asked to complete a standardized exercise treadmill test using a modified Gardner protocol. Subjects walked on the treadmill until they were physically unable to walk further either as a result of their peripheral artery disease (PAD) symptoms or other non-PAD symptoms. The time during the conduct of the exercise treadmill test at which the subject first reported claudication symptoms is referred to as the claudication onset time (COT) and reported in minutes/seconds. The exercise treadmill test was conducted at Screening, Baseline, Day 90, and Day 180 visits. The log transformation is used to make highly skewed distributions less skewed.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 90
Title
Change From Baseline in Walking Impairment Questionnaire for Walking Distance at Day 180
Description
Subjects completed the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) whereby they were asked about their maximal walking distance before having to rest as a result of claudication symptoms associated with their peripheral artery disease (PAD). The WIQ was administered at the Baseline, Day 90, and Day 180 visits. On the WIQ subjects were asked a series of questions related to their degree of physical difficulty that best described how hard it was for the subject to walk on level ground without stopping to rest. The questions began by asking the degree of difficulty walking around indoors, then 50 feet, 150 feet, 300 feet, 600 feet, 900 feet, and lastly 1500 feet. The responses range from None (best outcome) to Slight, then Some, then Much, then lastly Unable (worst outcome). The walking distance score was calculated from the 7 questions in the section by way of a weighted sum. A score of 100 indicated no walking impairment. A score of 0 corresponded to the highest degree of walking impairment
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 180
Title
Change From Baseline in Walking Impairment Questionnaire for Walking Distance at Day 90
Description
Subjects completed the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) whereby they were asked about their maximal walking distance before having to rest as a result of claudication symptoms associated with their peripheral artery disease (PAD). The WIQ was administered at the Baseline, Day 90, and Day 180 visits. On the WIQ subjects were asked a series of questions related to their degree of physical difficulty that best described how hard it was for the subject to walk on level ground without stopping to rest. The questions began by asking the degree of difficulty walking around indoors, then 50 feet, 150 feet, 300 feet, 600 feet, 900 feet, and lastly 1500 feet. The responses range from None (best outcome) to Slight, then Some, then Much, then lastly Unable (worst outcome). The walking distance score was calculated from the 7 questions in the section by way of a weighted sum. A score of 100 indicated no walking impairment. A score of 0 corresponded to the highest degree of walking impairment
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 90
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
The subject is >40 years old.
The subject has a diagnosis of Intermittent Claudication (IC) due to Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD).
Ankle brachial index (ABI) < 0.90 in at least one extremity, or if Ankle brachial index (ABI)is ≥ 0.90 to ≤ 1.0, a reduction of at least 20% in Ankle brachial index (ABI), in at least one extremity, when measured within 1 minute after claudication-limiting treadmill testing. If the subject has non-compressible arteries then a toe brachial index (TBI) < 0.70 is required in at least one extremity.
Symptoms of Intermittent Claudication (IC)must be stable for at least 3 months prior to Screening 1.
Peak Walking Time (PWT) of ≥ 1 to ≤ 12 minutes on a Gardner protocol at Screening 2.
If the subject is currently on statin therapy, they need to have been on statin therapy for at least 3 months prior to Screening 1. Subjects who have recently discontinued statin therapy must "wash-out" for at least one month prior to Screening 1.
Tolerance to background therapy of cilostazol (approximately 2 weeks of 50 mg by mouth (PO) twice daily (BID), approximately 1 week of 100 mg PO BID) between Screening 2 and Baseline Visit.
Subjects must be either male or females that are post-menopausal, surgically incapable of bearing children or if they are of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at Screening 1 and a negative urine pregnancy test at Day 0 and must agree to use double-barrier contraceptive methods until the end of investigational therapy (Day 180 Visit).
The subject is able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan and laboratory tests.
The subject is willing to participate in this study as documented by written informed consent.
During the tolerance phase of the Screening period, the subject demonstrates at least 70% compliance with cilostazol and is willing to continue treatment.
Exclusion Criteria:
Evidence of critical limb ischemia (CLI) (e.g., ischemic rest pain or ischemic ulceration).
The subject has had a major amputation of the leg or any other amputation that limits walking ability.
The subject has diabetes mellitus type 1 or poorly controlled diabetes mellitus type 2 (hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) > 10).
The subject has had a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or deep vein thrombosis in the last 3 months.
The subject has had a stroke within the last 6 months.
The subject has participated in an angiogenic gene therapy study, unless known to be given placebo.
The subject has any of the following laboratory parameters at Screening 1:
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or total bilirubin >3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)
Serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dL
Hemoglobin (Hb) <10 g/dL
White blood cell (WBC) count <3.0 x 103/µL; or > 15 x 103/µL
Platelet count <100 x 103/µL
The subject walks less than 1 minute at 2 miles per hour (mph), 0% grade as determined during the Screening 1 treadmill familiarization.
The subject has clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities at rest or changes during exercise or post-exercise at Screening 2 or Day 0.
The subject has any history or clinical evidence of congestive heart failure (CHF), with which the clinician-investigator concurs.
The subject has uncontrolled hypertension (resting blood pressure (BP) > 180/100 mmHg) or uncontrolled arrhythmic disorders at Screening 1.
History of coronary or peripheral revascularization within 6 months prior to Screening 1.
The subject plans to undergo coronary or peripheral revascularization during the course of the study.
The subject is currently taking L-carnitine or medication for claudication (including pentoxifylline or cilostazol). In this situation, the subject would become eligible for Screening 1 after a 6 week washout of the medication.
Subjects currently taking or those who anticipate taking ketoconazole, itraconazole, or erythromycin. The subject would become eligible for Screening 1 immediately after completion of therapy or discontinuation of the drug(s).
The subject has a known, active malignancy that requires active anti-neoplastic therapy. (stable basal cell skin cancer allowed. Cancer being treated soley with hormonal therapy is allowed.)
The subject has a severe co-morbidity with an expected survival of less than 2 years.
The subject's Peak Walking Time (PWT) is limited by symptoms other than claudication (e.g., shortness of breath (SOB), fatigue, angina, arthritis, etc.). If, in the opinion of the investigator, the subject were to improve their Peak Walking Time (PWT) from study therapy to the extent that his or her walking would then be limited by a symptom other than claudication, the subject should not be enrolled.
The subject has a history of alcohol or other substance abuse within 6 months of Screening 1.
The subject has an inability to tolerate oral medication administration.
The subject has a known or suspected allergy to the study medication(s) or class of study medication(s) (cilostazol or L-carnitine) to be administered.
The subject has initiated an exercise training program within 3 months of Screening 1, has the inability to maintain his or her current level of physical activity throughout the study, or the subject plans on enrolling in an exercise training program during the study.
The subject plans to change his/her smoking status during the planned duration of this study (subjects will be advised that stopping smoking is best for his/her health).
The subject is currently pregnant or breastfeeding.
The subject has received an investigational drug or biological agent within 30 days prior to Screening 1.
The subject is currently participating in or plans to enroll in another clinical trial during this study.
The subject has any other clinically significant medical or psychiatric condition that in the opinion of the Investigator could impact the subject's ability to successfully complete this trial.
In the Investigator's opinion, the subject experienced any Adverse Events (AEs) during the tolerance phase of the Screening period that present a potential ongoing safety concern.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Neil Goldenberg, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Colorado Heather Sciences Center
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Internal Medicine Physicians Associates
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85006
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tatum Ridge Internal Medicine
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85032
Country
United States
Facility Name
Central Arkansas Veteran's Healthcare System
City
Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72205
Country
United States
Facility Name
VA Palo Alto Health Care System
City
Palo Alto
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94304
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California at Davis Vascular Center
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95817
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sacramento Heart and Vascular Research Center
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95825
Country
United States
Facility Name
Apex Research Institute
City
Santa Ana
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Aurora Denver Cardiology Associates
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80012
Country
United States
Facility Name
Aurora Denver Cardiology Associates
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80218
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pensacola Research Consultants, Inc.
City
Pensacola
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32504
Country
United States
Facility Name
DMI Healthcare Group, Inc.
City
Pinellas Park
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33782
Country
United States
Facility Name
Meridian Research
City
Saint Petersburg
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33709
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ochsner Medical Center
City
New Orleans
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70121
Country
United States
Facility Name
HPV Heart, PA
City
Columbia
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21044
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Massachusetts Medical Center
City
Worcester
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01605
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
City
Lebanon
State/Province
New Hampshire
ZIP/Postal Code
03756
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Rochester Medical Center
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14623
Country
United States
Facility Name
Durham VA-Medical Center
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research, Inc
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43212
Country
United States
Facility Name
Jobst Vascular Center
City
Toledo
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43606
Country
United States
Facility Name
Peripheral Vascular Associates
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Trials of Texas, Inc.
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research- Salt Lake City
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84107
Country
United States
Facility Name
Beloit Clinic Research Office
City
Beloit
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53511
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
15591006
Citation
Hiatt WR. Carnitine and peripheral arterial disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Nov;1033:92-8. doi: 10.1196/annals.1320.008.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3610932
Citation
Hiatt WR, Nawaz D, Brass EP. Carnitine metabolism during exercise in patients with peripheral vascular disease. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1987 Jun;62(6):2383-7. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1987.62.6.2383.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Hiatt WR. Management of Intermittent Claudication. Contemporary Diagnosis and management of Peripheral arterial Disease. 1 ed. Newtown: Handvbooks in Healthcare Co., Inc., 2004:51-9
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17532651
Citation
Rowlands TE, Donnelly R. Medical therapy for intermittent claudication. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Sep;34(3):314-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.04.001. Epub 2007 May 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9715861
Citation
Dawson DL, Cutler BS, Meissner MH, Strandness DE Jr. Cilostazol has beneficial effects in treatment of intermittent claudication: results from a multicenter, randomized, prospective, double-blind trial. Circulation. 1998 Aug 18;98(7):678-86. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.7.678.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9510281
Citation
Money SR, Herd JA, Isaacsohn JL, Davidson M, Cutler B, Heckman J, Forbes WP. Effect of cilostazol on walking distances in patients with intermittent claudication caused by peripheral vascular disease. J Vasc Surg. 1998 Feb;27(2):267-74; discussion 274-5. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70357-x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9848888
Citation
Elam MB, Heckman J, Crouse JR, Hunninghake DB, Herd JA, Davidson M, Gordon IL, Bortey EB, Forbes WP. Effect of the novel antiplatelet agent cilostazol on plasma lipoproteins in patients with intermittent claudication. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998 Dec;18(12):1942-7. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.18.12.1942.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10510990
Citation
Beebe HG, Dawson DL, Cutler BS, Herd JA, Strandness DE Jr, Bortey EB, Forbes WP. A new pharmacological treatment for intermittent claudication: results of a randomized, multicenter trial. Arch Intern Med. 1999 Sep 27;159(17):2041-50. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.17.2041.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11063952
Citation
Dawson DL, Cutler BS, Hiatt WR, Hobson RW 2nd, Martin JD, Bortey EB, Forbes WP, Strandness DE Jr. A comparison of cilostazol and pentoxifylline for treating intermittent claudication. Am J Med. 2000 Nov;109(7):523-30. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00569-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11951094
Citation
Strandness DE Jr, Dalman RL, Panian S, Rendell MS, Comp PC, Zhang P, Forbes WP. Effect of cilostazol in patients with intermittent claudication: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2002 Mar-Apr;36(2):83-91. doi: 10.1177/153857440203600202.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12473004
Citation
Regensteiner JG, Ware JE Jr, McCarthy WJ, Zhang P, Forbes WP, Heckman J, Hiatt WR. Effect of cilostazol on treadmill walking, community-based walking ability, and health-related quality of life in patients with intermittent claudication due to peripheral arterial disease: meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Dec;50(12):1939-46. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50604.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12480040
Citation
Thompson PD, Zimet R, Forbes WP, Zhang P. Meta-analysis of results from eight randomized, placebo-controlled trials on the effect of cilostazol on patients with intermittent claudication. Am J Cardiol. 2002 Dec 15;90(12):1314-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02869-2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11434897
Citation
Pratt CM. Analysis of the cilostazol safety database. Am J Cardiol. 2001 Jun 28;87(12A):28D-33D. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01719-2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18155871
Citation
Hiatt WR, Money SR, Brass EP. Long-term safety of cilostazol in patients with peripheral artery disease: the CASTLE study (Cilostazol: A Study in Long-term Effects). J Vasc Surg. 2008 Feb;47(2):330-336. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.10.009. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11382369
Citation
Hiatt WR, Regensteiner JG, Creager MA, Hirsch AT, Cooke JP, Olin JW, Gorbunov GN, Isner J, Lukjanov YV, Tsitsiashvili MS, Zabelskaya TF, Amato A. Propionyl-L-carnitine improves exercise performance and functional status in patients with claudication. Am J Med. 2001 Jun 1;110(8):616-22. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00704-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12404185
Citation
Muller DM, Seim H, Kiess W, Loster H, Richter T. Effects of oral L-carnitine supplementation on in vivo long-chain fatty acid oxidation in healthy adults. Metabolism. 2002 Nov;51(11):1389-91. doi: 10.1053/meta.2002.35181.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17174195
Citation
Brass EP, Anthony R, Cobb FR, Koda I, Jiao J, Hiatt WR. The novel phosphodiesterase inhibitor NM-702 improves claudication-limited exercise performance in patients with peripheral arterial disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Dec 19;48(12):2539-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.064. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7634476
Citation
Hiatt WR, Hirsch AT, Regensteiner JG, Brass EP. Clinical trials for claudication. Assessment of exercise performance, functional status, and clinical end points. Vascular Clinical Trialists. Circulation. 1995 Aug 1;92(3):614-21. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.3.614. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Rizza v, Lorefice R, Rizza N et al. Pharmacokinetics of L-Carnitine in Human Subjects. In: Ferrari R, DiMauro S, Sherwood G, eds. L-Carnitine and its Role in Medicine: From Function to Therapy. 1 ed San Diego: Academic Press, Inc., 1992:63-77.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1506390
Citation
Hiatt WR, Wolfel EE, Regensteiner JG, Brass EP. Skeletal muscle carnitine metabolism in patients with unilateral peripheral arterial disease. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1992 Jul;73(1):346-53. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1992.73.1.346.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1914091
Citation
Brevetti G, Angelini C, Rosa M, Carrozzo R, Perna S, Corsi M, Matarazzo A, Marcialis A. Muscle carnitine deficiency in patients with severe peripheral vascular disease. Circulation. 1991 Oct;84(4):1490-5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.84.4.1490.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15337878
Citation
Bauer TA, Brass EP, Hiatt WR. Impaired muscle oxygen use at onset of exercise in peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. 2004 Sep;40(3):488-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.06.025.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17310391
Citation
Bauer TA, Brass EP, Barstow TJ, Hiatt WR. Skeletal muscle StO2 kinetics are slowed during low work rate calf exercise in peripheral arterial disease. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 May;100(2):143-51. doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0412-0. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11158957
Citation
Brass EP, Hiatt WR, Gardner AW, Hoppel CL. Decreased NADH dehydrogenase and ubiquinol-cytochrome c oxidoreductase in peripheral arterial disease. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001 Feb;280(2):H603-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2001.280.2.H603.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10919968
Citation
Brass EP. Supplemental carnitine and exercise. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Aug;72(2 Suppl):618S-23S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/72.2.618S.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2794054
Citation
Hiatt WR, Regensteiner JG, Wolfel EE, Ruff L, Brass EP. Carnitine and acylcarnitine metabolism during exercise in humans. Dependence on skeletal muscle metabolic state. J Clin Invest. 1989 Oct;84(4):1167-73. doi: 10.1172/JCI114281.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15830915
Citation
Eder K, Felgner J, Becker K, Kluge H. Free and total carnitine concentrations in pig plasma after oral ingestion of various L-carnitine compounds. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2005 Jan;75(1):3-9. doi: 10.1024/0300-9831.75.1.3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11726261
Citation
Rubin MR, Volek JS, Gomez AL, Ratamess NA, French DN, Sharman MJ, Kraemer WJ. Safety measures of L-carnitine L-tartrate supplementation in healthy men. J Strength Cond Res. 2001 Nov;15(4):486-90.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8858401
Citation
Giamberardino MA, Dragani L, Valente R, Di Lisa F, Saggini R, Vecchiet L. Effects of prolonged L-carnitine administration on delayed muscle pain and CK release after eccentric effort. Int J Sports Med. 1996 Jul;17(5):320-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-972854.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11788381
Citation
Volek JS, Kraemer WJ, Rubin MR, Gomez AL, Ratamess NA, Gaynor P. L-Carnitine L-tartrate supplementation favorably affects markers of recovery from exercise stress. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Feb;282(2):E474-82. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00277.2001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12930169
Citation
Kraemer WJ, Volek JS, French DN, Rubin MR, Sharman MJ, Gomez AL, Ratamess NA, Newton RU, Jemiolo B, Craig BW, Hakkinen K. The effects of L-carnitine L-tartrate supplementation on hormonal responses to resistance exercise and recovery. J Strength Cond Res. 2003 Aug;17(3):455-62. doi: 10.1519/1533-4287(2003)0172.0.co;2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17313301
Citation
Spiering BA, Kraemer WJ, Vingren JL, Hatfield DL, Fragala MS, Ho JY, Maresh CM, Anderson JM, Volek JS. Responses of criterion variables to different supplemental doses of L-carnitine L-tartrate. J Strength Cond Res. 2007 Feb;21(1):259-64. doi: 10.1519/00124278-200702000-00046.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3280157
Citation
Brevetti G, Chiariello M, Ferulano G, Policicchio A, Nevola E, Rossini A, Attisano T, Ambrosio G, Siliprandi N, Angelini C. Increases in walking distance in patients with peripheral vascular disease treated with L-carnitine: a double-blind, cross-over study. Circulation. 1988 Apr;77(4):767-73. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.77.4.767.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1555624
Citation
Brevetti G, Perna S, Sabba C, Rossini A, Scotto di Uccio V, Berardi E, Godi L. Superiority of L-propionylcarnitine vs L-carnitine in improving walking capacity in patients with peripheral vascular disease: an acute, intravenous, double-blind, cross-over study. Eur Heart J. 1992 Feb;13(2):251-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060155.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10551714
Citation
Brevetti G, Diehm C, Lambert D. European multicenter study on propionyl-L-carnitine in intermittent claudication. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Nov 1;34(5):1618-24. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00373-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22615190
Citation
Goldenberg NA, Krantz MJ, Hiatt WR. L-Carnitine plus cilostazol versus cilostazol alone for the treatment of claudication in patients with peripheral artery disease: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Vasc Med. 2012 Jun;17(3):145-54. doi: 10.1177/1358863X12442264.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.cpcmed.org/
Description
CPC Home Page
Learn more about this trial
Evaluation of Cilostazol in Combination With L-Carnitine
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs