search
Back to results

Evaluation of Dupilumab in Chinese Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Primary Purpose

Atopic Dermatitis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dupilumab
Placebo
Emollient (moisturizer)
Sponsored by
Sanofi
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Atopic Dermatitis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria:

  • Male or female, 18 years or older.
  • AD (according to American Academy of Dermatology Consensus Criteria, 2014) that had been present for at least 3 years before the screening visit.
  • Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score greater than or equal to (>=) 16 at the screening and baseline visits.
  • Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score >=3 (on the 0 to 4 IGA scale, in which 3 was moderate and 4 was severe) at the screening and baseline visits.
  • Participants with >=10 percent (%) body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement at the screening and baseline visits.
  • Baseline Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) average score for maximum itch intensity >=4.
  • Documented recent history (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to treatment with topical medications or for whom topical treatments were otherwise medically inadvisable (e.g., because of important side effects or safety risks).

Exclusion criteria:

  • Had used any of the following treatments within 4 weeks before the baseline visit, or any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, was likely to require such treatment(s) during the first 4 weeks of study treatment:

    • Immunosuppressive/immunomodulating drugs (e.g., systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, mycophenolate-mofetil, interferon-gamma [IFN-γ], Janus kinase inhibitors, azathioprine, methotrexate);
    • Phototherapy for AD.
  • Treatment with topical corticosteroids (TCS) or topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) within 1 week before the baseline visit.
  • Treatment with systemic Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) within 4 weeks before the baseline visit or treatment with topical TCM within 1 week before the baseline visit.
  • Treatment with biologics as follows:

    • Any cell-depleting agents including but not limited to rituximab: within 6 months before the baseline visit, or until lymphocyte count returns to normal, whichever is longer;
    • Other biologics: within 5 half-lives (if known) or 16 weeks prior to baseline visit, whichever was longer.
  • Initiation of treatment of AD with prescription moisturizers or moisturizers containing additives such as ceramide, hyaluronic acid, urea, or filaggrin degradation products during the screening period (participants may continue using stable doses of such moisturizers if initiated before the screening visit).
  • Regular use (more than 2 visits per week) of a tanning booth/parlor within 4 weeks of the baseline visit.
  • Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 12 weeks before the baseline visit.
  • Active chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, antiprotozoals, or antifungals within 2 weeks before the baseline visit, or superficial skin infections within 1 week before the baseline visit. NOTE: participants may be rescreened after infection resolves.
  • Known or suspected history of immunosuppression, including history of invasive opportunistic infections (e.g., tuberculosis [TB], histoplasmosis, listeriosis, coccidioidomycosis, pneumocystosis, aspergillosis) despite infection resolution: or unusually frequent, recurrent, or prolonged infections, per investigator judgment.
  • Active TB, latent untreated TB or a history of incompletely treated TB or non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection were excluded from the study unless that was well documented by a specialist that the participants had adequately treated and could then start treatment with a biologic agent, in the medical judgment of the Investigator and/or infectious disease specialist. TB testing would be performed according to local guidelines if required by regulatory authorities or ethics committees.

The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participants potential participation in a clinical trial.

Sites / Locations

  • Investigational Site Number 1560019
  • Investigational Site Number 1560001
  • Investigational Site Number 1560004
  • Investigational Site Number 1560003
  • Investigational Site Number 1560010
  • Investigational Site Number 1560021
  • Investigational Site Number 1560006
  • Investigational Site Number 1560017
  • Investigational Site Number 1560026
  • Investigational Site Number 1560007
  • Investigational Site Number 1560013
  • Investigational Site Number 1560020
  • Investigational Site Number 1560030
  • Investigational Site Number 1560022
  • Investigational Site Number 1560029
  • Investigational Site Number 1560016
  • Investigational Site Number 1560023
  • Investigational Site Number 1560018
  • Investigational Site Number 1560015
  • Investigational Site Number 1560002
  • Investigational Site Number 1560005
  • Investigational Site Number 1560008
  • Investigational Site Number 1560024
  • Investigational Site Number 1560027
  • Investigational Site Number 1560028
  • Investigational Site Number 1560012
  • Investigational Site Number 1560025

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Placebo Q2W

Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W

Arm Description

Placebo matched to dupilumab 600 milligrams (mg) (loading dose), subcutaneously (SC) on Day 1 followed by placebo matched to dupilumab 300 mg once every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 16 weeks.

Dupilumab at a loading dose of 600 mg, SC on Day 1 followed by 300 mg, Q2W for 16 weeks.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of "0" or "1" and Reduction From Baseline of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2 Points at Week 16
The IGA is an assessment instrument used to rate the severity of AD globally based on a 5-point scale ranging from (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe), higher score indicated higher severity.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) - 75 Response (>= 75% Reduction in Score From Baseline) at Week 16
EASI: Measure to assess severity and extent of AD based on 4 AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness [induration, papulation, edema], scratching [excoriation] and lichenification). Each characteristic was assessed for severity by Investigator/designee on scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe) and scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper and lower extremities). Total score range from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum), higher scores indicated greater severity of AD.
Number of Participants Who Achieved >=4 Points With Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]), higher scores indicated greater severity.
Number of Participants Who Achieved >=3 Points With Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale Score at Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]), higher scores indicated greater severity.
Percentage Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]), higher scores indicated greater severity.
Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]), higher scores indicated greater severity.
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 16 in EASI Score
EASI: Measure to assess severity & extent of AD based on 4 AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness [induration, papulation, edema], scratching [excoriation] & lichenification). Each characteristic was assessed for severity by Investigator/designee on scale of "0" (absent) through "3"(severe) & scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper & lower extremities). Total score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum), higher scores indicated greater severity of AD.
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) of AD Involvement
BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck [9%], anterior trunk [18%], back [18%], upper limbs [18%], lower limbs [36%], and genitals [1%]) and reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. The reported percentage of BSA was combined percentage of all major body sections.
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score
The DLQI was a validated questionnaire used to measure the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on health-related quality of life (QOL). DLQI consisting of a set of 10 questions which assess QOL over the past week. Responses to each questions were assessed on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 is "not at all" and 3 is "very much". Scores from all 10 questions added up to give total DLQI scores ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life.
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM)
The POEM is a 7-item self-assessment questionnaire that assesses disease symptoms on a scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0 = no days, 1 = 1 to 2 days, 2 = 3 to 4 days, 3 = 5 to 6 days, 4 = all days). The sum of the 7 items gives the total POEM score of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease). Higher scores indicated more severe disease and poor quality of life.
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]), higher scores indicated greater severity.
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 16 in EuroQoL Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Index Scores
The EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health status which is consists of 2 parts; the descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQVAS). The EQ-5D descriptive system includes 5 dimensions; mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension measured on 3 levels: "no problem" (level 1), "some problems" (level 2), "extreme problems" (level 3). The digits for 5 dimensions can be combined in a 5-digit number describing the respondent's health state. The 5 dimensional 3-level systems was converted into single index utility score between 0 to 1 that quantify health status, where 0 represents "death" and 1 represents "perfect health".
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 16 in EuroQoL Five Dimensions Questionnaire Visual Analog Scale Scores
The EQ-5D VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale ranged from 0-100 where 100 indicated "best imaginable health state" and 0 indicated "worst imaginable health state", higher scores indicated better outcome.
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 16 in EQ-5D Index Scores
The EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health status which consisted of 2 parts; the descriptive system and the EQVAS. The EQ-5D descriptive system includes 5 dimensions; mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension measured on 3 levels: "no problem" (level 1), "some problems" (level 2), "extreme problems" (level 3). The digits for 5 dimensions can be combined in a 5-digit number describing the respondent's health state. The 5 dimensional 3-level systems was converted into single index utility score between 0 to 1 that quantify health status, where 0 represents "death" and 1 represents "perfect health".
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 16 in EuroQoL Five Dimensions Questionnaire Visual Analog Scale Scores
The EQ-5D VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale ranged from 0-100 where 100 indicated "best imaginable health state" and 0 indicated "worst imaginable health state", higher scores indicated better outcome.
Number of Participants Who Achieve Reduction of IGA Score by >=2 From Baseline to Week 16
The IGA is an assessment instrument used to rate the severity of AD globally, based on a 5-point scale ranging from (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe), higher score indicated higher severity. In this outcome measure, number of participants who achieved reduction from baseline of >=2 points in IGA score at Week 16 were reported.
Number of Participants Achieving IGA 0 to 1 and a Reduction of >=2 Points From Baseline Through Week 16
The IGA is an assessment instrument used to rate the severity of AD globally based on a 5-point scale ranging from (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe), higher score indicated higher severity.
Absolute Change in EASI Score From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
EASI: Measure to assess severity & extent of AD based on 4 AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness [induration, papulation, edema], scratching [excoriation] & lichenification). Each characteristic was assessed for severity by Investigator/designee on scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe) & scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper & lower extremities). Total score range from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum), higher scores indicated greater severity of AD. Participants with missing EASI Score at each visit were imputed using MI (Multiple Imputation) method.
Percentage Change in EASI Score From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
EASI: Measure to assess severity & extent of AD based on 4 AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness [induration, papulation, edema], scratching [excoriation] & lichenification). Each characteristic was assessed for severity by Investigator/designee on scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe) & scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper & lower extremities). Total score range from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum), higher scores indicated greater severity of AD.
Number of Participants With EASI-50 (>=50% Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16
EASI: Measure to assess severity & extent of AD based on 4 AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness [induration, papulation, edema], scratching [excoriation] & lichenification). Each characteristic was assessed for severity by Investigator/designee on scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe) & scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper & lower extremities). Total score range from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum), higher scores indicated greater severity of AD.
Number of Participants With EASI-90 (>=90% Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16
EASI: Measure to assess severity & extent of AD based on 4 AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness [induration, papulation, edema], scratching [excoriation] & lichenification). Each characteristic was assessed for severity by Investigator/designee on scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe) & scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper & lower extremities). Total score range from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum), higher scores indicated greater severity of AD.
Absolute Change in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS Score From Baseline Through Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]), higher scores indicated greater severity. Participants with missing Peak Daily Pruritus NRS Score at each visit were imputed using MI method.
Percentage Change in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS Score From Baseline Through Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]), higher scores indicated greater severity. Participants with missing peak NRS scores at each visit were imputed using MI method.
Number of Participants Who Responded "Absence of Pruritus" or "Mild Pruritus" in the Pruritus Categorical Scale at Week 16
The pruritus categorical scale was a 4-point scale used to assess symptoms of AD. The scale is rated as follows: 0: absence of pruritus; 1: mild pruritus (occasional slight itching/scratching); 2: moderate pruritus (constant or intermittent itching/scratching that does not disturb sleep) and 3: severe pruritus (bothersome itching/scratching that disturbs sleep), higher scores indicated worse outcome.
Number of Days of Sick Leave/Missed School Days
Participants who were employed or enrolled in school for full time were asked to report the number of sick leave/missed school days since the last study assessment. Participants were counted as Full time if the participant checked "Full time" at all visits through 16-week treatment period and participants were counted as Part time if the participant checked at least one "Part time" during 16-week treatment period.
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Day Sick Leave/Missed School Days
Participants who were employed or enrolled in school for full time were asked to report the number of sick leave/missed school days since the last study assessment. Participants were counted as Full time if the participant checked "Full time" at all visits through 16-week treatment period and participants were counted as Part time if the participant checked at least one "Part time" during 16-week treatment period.

Full Information

First Posted
December 18, 2018
Last Updated
March 15, 2022
Sponsor
Sanofi
Collaborators
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03912259
Brief Title
Evaluation of Dupilumab in Chinese Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Official Title
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Chinese Adult Patients With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 19, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 14, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 14, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Sanofi
Collaborators
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Primary Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab monotherapy compared to placebo treatment in adult participants with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Secondary Objectives: To evaluate the safety of dupilumab monotherapy compared to placebo treatment in adult participants with moderate-to-severe AD. To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on improving patient reported outcomes (PROs). To evaluate dupilumab immunogenicity.
Detailed Description
The maximum study duration was 33 weeks per participants, including a screening period of up to 5 weeks, a 16-week randomized treatment period, and a 12-week follow-up period.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Atopic Dermatitis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
165 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo Q2W
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Placebo matched to dupilumab 600 milligrams (mg) (loading dose), subcutaneously (SC) on Day 1 followed by placebo matched to dupilumab 300 mg once every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 16 weeks.
Arm Title
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Dupilumab at a loading dose of 600 mg, SC on Day 1 followed by 300 mg, Q2W for 16 weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dupilumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
Dupixent, SAR231893
Intervention Description
Pharmaceutical form: solution, Route of administration: SC
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Pharmaceutical form: solution, Route of administration: SC
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Emollient (moisturizer)
Intervention Description
Pharmaceutical form: cream, Route of administration: topical use
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of "0" or "1" and Reduction From Baseline of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2 Points at Week 16
Description
The IGA is an assessment instrument used to rate the severity of AD globally based on a 5-point scale ranging from (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe), higher score indicated higher severity.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 16
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) - 75 Response (>= 75% Reduction in Score From Baseline) at Week 16
Description
EASI: Measure to assess severity and extent of AD based on 4 AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness [induration, papulation, edema], scratching [excoriation] and lichenification). Each characteristic was assessed for severity by Investigator/designee on scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe) and scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper and lower extremities). Total score range from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum), higher scores indicated greater severity of AD.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 16
Title
Number of Participants Who Achieved >=4 Points With Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16
Description
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]), higher scores indicated greater severity.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 16
Title
Number of Participants Who Achieved >=3 Points With Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale Score at Week 16
Description
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]), higher scores indicated greater severity.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 16
Title
Percentage Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS
Description
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]), higher scores indicated greater severity.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS
Description
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]), higher scores indicated greater severity.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 16
Title
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 16 in EASI Score
Description
EASI: Measure to assess severity & extent of AD based on 4 AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness [induration, papulation, edema], scratching [excoriation] & lichenification). Each characteristic was assessed for severity by Investigator/designee on scale of "0" (absent) through "3"(severe) & scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper & lower extremities). Total score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum), higher scores indicated greater severity of AD.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) of AD Involvement
Description
BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck [9%], anterior trunk [18%], back [18%], upper limbs [18%], lower limbs [36%], and genitals [1%]) and reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. The reported percentage of BSA was combined percentage of all major body sections.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score
Description
The DLQI was a validated questionnaire used to measure the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on health-related quality of life (QOL). DLQI consisting of a set of 10 questions which assess QOL over the past week. Responses to each questions were assessed on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 is "not at all" and 3 is "very much". Scores from all 10 questions added up to give total DLQI scores ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM)
Description
The POEM is a 7-item self-assessment questionnaire that assesses disease symptoms on a scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0 = no days, 1 = 1 to 2 days, 2 = 3 to 4 days, 3 = 5 to 6 days, 4 = all days). The sum of the 7 items gives the total POEM score of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease). Higher scores indicated more severe disease and poor quality of life.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 16
Title
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS
Description
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]), higher scores indicated greater severity.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 2
Title
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 16 in EuroQoL Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Index Scores
Description
The EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health status which is consists of 2 parts; the descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQVAS). The EQ-5D descriptive system includes 5 dimensions; mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension measured on 3 levels: "no problem" (level 1), "some problems" (level 2), "extreme problems" (level 3). The digits for 5 dimensions can be combined in a 5-digit number describing the respondent's health state. The 5 dimensional 3-level systems was converted into single index utility score between 0 to 1 that quantify health status, where 0 represents "death" and 1 represents "perfect health".
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 16
Title
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 16 in EuroQoL Five Dimensions Questionnaire Visual Analog Scale Scores
Description
The EQ-5D VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale ranged from 0-100 where 100 indicated "best imaginable health state" and 0 indicated "worst imaginable health state", higher scores indicated better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 16
Title
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 16 in EQ-5D Index Scores
Description
The EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health status which consisted of 2 parts; the descriptive system and the EQVAS. The EQ-5D descriptive system includes 5 dimensions; mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension measured on 3 levels: "no problem" (level 1), "some problems" (level 2), "extreme problems" (level 3). The digits for 5 dimensions can be combined in a 5-digit number describing the respondent's health state. The 5 dimensional 3-level systems was converted into single index utility score between 0 to 1 that quantify health status, where 0 represents "death" and 1 represents "perfect health".
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 16
Title
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 16 in EuroQoL Five Dimensions Questionnaire Visual Analog Scale Scores
Description
The EQ-5D VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale ranged from 0-100 where 100 indicated "best imaginable health state" and 0 indicated "worst imaginable health state", higher scores indicated better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 16
Title
Number of Participants Who Achieve Reduction of IGA Score by >=2 From Baseline to Week 16
Description
The IGA is an assessment instrument used to rate the severity of AD globally, based on a 5-point scale ranging from (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe), higher score indicated higher severity. In this outcome measure, number of participants who achieved reduction from baseline of >=2 points in IGA score at Week 16 were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 16
Title
Number of Participants Achieving IGA 0 to 1 and a Reduction of >=2 Points From Baseline Through Week 16
Description
The IGA is an assessment instrument used to rate the severity of AD globally based on a 5-point scale ranging from (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe), higher score indicated higher severity.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Title
Absolute Change in EASI Score From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Description
EASI: Measure to assess severity & extent of AD based on 4 AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness [induration, papulation, edema], scratching [excoriation] & lichenification). Each characteristic was assessed for severity by Investigator/designee on scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe) & scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper & lower extremities). Total score range from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum), higher scores indicated greater severity of AD. Participants with missing EASI Score at each visit were imputed using MI (Multiple Imputation) method.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Title
Percentage Change in EASI Score From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Description
EASI: Measure to assess severity & extent of AD based on 4 AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness [induration, papulation, edema], scratching [excoriation] & lichenification). Each characteristic was assessed for severity by Investigator/designee on scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe) & scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper & lower extremities). Total score range from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum), higher scores indicated greater severity of AD.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Title
Number of Participants With EASI-50 (>=50% Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16
Description
EASI: Measure to assess severity & extent of AD based on 4 AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness [induration, papulation, edema], scratching [excoriation] & lichenification). Each characteristic was assessed for severity by Investigator/designee on scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe) & scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper & lower extremities). Total score range from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum), higher scores indicated greater severity of AD.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 16
Title
Number of Participants With EASI-90 (>=90% Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16
Description
EASI: Measure to assess severity & extent of AD based on 4 AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness [induration, papulation, edema], scratching [excoriation] & lichenification). Each characteristic was assessed for severity by Investigator/designee on scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe) & scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper & lower extremities). Total score range from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum), higher scores indicated greater severity of AD.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 16
Title
Absolute Change in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS Score From Baseline Through Week 16
Description
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]), higher scores indicated greater severity. Participants with missing Peak Daily Pruritus NRS Score at each visit were imputed using MI method.
Time Frame
From Baseline Through Week 16
Title
Percentage Change in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS Score From Baseline Through Week 16
Description
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]), higher scores indicated greater severity. Participants with missing peak NRS scores at each visit were imputed using MI method.
Time Frame
From Baseline Through Week 16
Title
Number of Participants Who Responded "Absence of Pruritus" or "Mild Pruritus" in the Pruritus Categorical Scale at Week 16
Description
The pruritus categorical scale was a 4-point scale used to assess symptoms of AD. The scale is rated as follows: 0: absence of pruritus; 1: mild pruritus (occasional slight itching/scratching); 2: moderate pruritus (constant or intermittent itching/scratching that does not disturb sleep) and 3: severe pruritus (bothersome itching/scratching that disturbs sleep), higher scores indicated worse outcome.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Number of Days of Sick Leave/Missed School Days
Description
Participants who were employed or enrolled in school for full time were asked to report the number of sick leave/missed school days since the last study assessment. Participants were counted as Full time if the participant checked "Full time" at all visits through 16-week treatment period and participants were counted as Part time if the participant checked at least one "Part time" during 16-week treatment period.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Day Sick Leave/Missed School Days
Description
Participants who were employed or enrolled in school for full time were asked to report the number of sick leave/missed school days since the last study assessment. Participants were counted as Full time if the participant checked "Full time" at all visits through 16-week treatment period and participants were counted as Part time if the participant checked at least one "Part time" during 16-week treatment period.
Time Frame
Week 16

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: Male or female, 18 years or older. AD (according to American Academy of Dermatology Consensus Criteria, 2014) that had been present for at least 3 years before the screening visit. Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score greater than or equal to (>=) 16 at the screening and baseline visits. Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score >=3 (on the 0 to 4 IGA scale, in which 3 was moderate and 4 was severe) at the screening and baseline visits. Participants with >=10 percent (%) body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement at the screening and baseline visits. Baseline Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) average score for maximum itch intensity >=4. Documented recent history (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to treatment with topical medications or for whom topical treatments were otherwise medically inadvisable (e.g., because of important side effects or safety risks). Exclusion criteria: Had used any of the following treatments within 4 weeks before the baseline visit, or any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, was likely to require such treatment(s) during the first 4 weeks of study treatment: Immunosuppressive/immunomodulating drugs (e.g., systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, mycophenolate-mofetil, interferon-gamma [IFN-γ], Janus kinase inhibitors, azathioprine, methotrexate); Phototherapy for AD. Treatment with topical corticosteroids (TCS) or topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) within 1 week before the baseline visit. Treatment with systemic Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) within 4 weeks before the baseline visit or treatment with topical TCM within 1 week before the baseline visit. Treatment with biologics as follows: Any cell-depleting agents including but not limited to rituximab: within 6 months before the baseline visit, or until lymphocyte count returns to normal, whichever is longer; Other biologics: within 5 half-lives (if known) or 16 weeks prior to baseline visit, whichever was longer. Initiation of treatment of AD with prescription moisturizers or moisturizers containing additives such as ceramide, hyaluronic acid, urea, or filaggrin degradation products during the screening period (participants may continue using stable doses of such moisturizers if initiated before the screening visit). Regular use (more than 2 visits per week) of a tanning booth/parlor within 4 weeks of the baseline visit. Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 12 weeks before the baseline visit. Active chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, antiprotozoals, or antifungals within 2 weeks before the baseline visit, or superficial skin infections within 1 week before the baseline visit. NOTE: participants may be rescreened after infection resolves. Known or suspected history of immunosuppression, including history of invasive opportunistic infections (e.g., tuberculosis [TB], histoplasmosis, listeriosis, coccidioidomycosis, pneumocystosis, aspergillosis) despite infection resolution: or unusually frequent, recurrent, or prolonged infections, per investigator judgment. Active TB, latent untreated TB or a history of incompletely treated TB or non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection were excluded from the study unless that was well documented by a specialist that the participants had adequately treated and could then start treatment with a biologic agent, in the medical judgment of the Investigator and/or infectious disease specialist. TB testing would be performed according to local guidelines if required by regulatory authorities or ethics committees. The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participants potential participation in a clinical trial.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Sciences & Operations
Organizational Affiliation
Sanofi
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560019
City
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100034
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560001
City
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100044
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560004
City
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100050
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560003
City
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100191
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560010
City
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100730
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560021
City
Changchun
ZIP/Postal Code
130021
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560006
City
Changsha
ZIP/Postal Code
410011
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560017
City
Chongqing
ZIP/Postal Code
400038
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560026
City
Hangzhou
ZIP/Postal Code
310006
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560007
City
Hangzhou
ZIP/Postal Code
310009
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560013
City
Jinan
ZIP/Postal Code
250013
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560020
City
Kunming
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560030
City
Lianyungang
ZIP/Postal Code
222002
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560022
City
Nanjing
ZIP/Postal Code
210042
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560029
City
Ningbo
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560016
City
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
200040
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560023
City
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
200092
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560018
City
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
200433
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560015
City
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
200443
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560002
City
Shenyang
ZIP/Postal Code
110001
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560005
City
Shenyang
ZIP/Postal Code
110001
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560008
City
Shenyang
ZIP/Postal Code
110004
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560024
City
Shenzhen
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560027
City
Tianjin
ZIP/Postal Code
300052
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560028
City
Wuxi
ZIP/Postal Code
214002
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560012
City
Xi'An
ZIP/Postal Code
710004
Country
China
Facility Name
Investigational Site Number 1560025
City
Yancheng
Country
China

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of Dupilumab in Chinese Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs