search
Back to results

Evaluation of Groin Lymphadenectomy Extent For Metastatic Melanoma (EAGLE FM)

Primary Purpose

Metastatic Melanoma to the Groin Lymph Nodes

Status
Active
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Inguinal Lymphadenectomy
Ilio-inguinal Lymphadenectomy
Sponsored by
Melanoma and Skin Cancer Trials Limited
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Metastatic Melanoma to the Groin Lymph Nodes focused on measuring metastatic melanoma, groin lymph nodes, surgery, lymphadenectomy

Eligibility Criteria

15 Years - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients may be included in the study only if they meet all of the following criteria:

  1. Must be 15 and above.
  2. Have primary cutaneous melanoma or if the patient presents with stage III melanoma with no known primary tumour then a thorough search for the primary should be documented (including perineal and perianal areas)
  3. Life expectancy of at least 10 years from the time of diagnosis, not considering the melanoma in question, as determined by the PI
  4. Must have one or multiple inguinal node(s) involved, histologically or cytologically proven as metastatic melanoma. This can can be detected:

    • At the time of diagnosis;
    • Or by Ultrasound detection;
    • Or later after relapse when no Sentinel Node Biopsy (SNB) was performed at the time of primary tumour management;
    • Or as a result of SNB;
    • Or at the time of regional recurrence after "false negative" SNB;
  5. Absent distant disease clinically and on PET/CT scan. (Patients must have NO further distant disease or visceral metastases)
  6. ECOG performance status must be between 0 to 2 at randomisation
  7. Whole body PET/CT scan, specifically stating there is NO evidence of pelvic lymph node involvement prior to randomisation and a CT Brain or MRI Brain scan. Scans must be performed within 6 weeks prior to randomisation.
  8. Able to provide written, informed consent
  9. Willing to return to the centre for follow up examinations and procedures, as outlined in the protocol.
  10. All patients must be randomised and undergo lymphadenectomy surgery no more than 120 days following diagnosis of inguinal LN involvement

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Distant metastatic disease on clinical examination or staging imaging (CT/MRI brain or whole body PET/CT scan). Scans must be performed within 6 weeks prior to randomisation
  2. Pelvic LN involvement on SNB or PET/CT scan suggestive of metastatic disease in the pelvis - criteria for diagnosis include normal size or enlarged lymph nodes (> 1 cm) with increased FDG activity on PET (SUV >3). If there are enlarged, necrotic lymph nodes FDG activity on PET is not required to be present. If unsure central review should be sought.
  3. Bilateral inguinal lymph node involvement
  4. Patients with a history of major pelvic surgery and / or regional radiotherapy at any time in the past
  5. Requiring planned radiotherapy following surgery due to macroscopic, bulky and matted nodes.
  6. Unfit for General Anaesthesia
  7. Melanoma-related operative procedures not corresponding to criteria described in the protocol
  8. Patients with prior cancers, except:

    • those with a thin <=1 mm, regionally unrelated melanoma > 5 years ago
    • those with a good prognosis regionally unrelated cancer (>90% probability of 10 years disease specific survival)
    • other cancers diagnosed more than five years ago with no evidence of disease recurrence within this time
    • successfully treated basal cell and squamous cell skin carcinoma
    • carcinoma in-situ of the cervix
    • 1 episode of in transit melanoma > 3 years ago
  9. A medical or psychiatric condition that compromises ability to give informed consent or complete the protocol
  10. Positive urine pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential (+/-7 days of randomisation onto the trial)

Sites / Locations

  • Calvary Public Hospital Bruce
  • Melanoma Institute Australia - The Poche Centre
  • Sydney Adventist Hospital
  • Westmead Hospital
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
  • Mater Hospital Brisbane
  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
  • Hospital de Câncer de Barretos
  • A.C. Camargo Cancer Center
  • Veneto Institute of Oncology - IOV
  • Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center
  • University Medical Center Groningen
  • Institute of Oncology Ljubljana
  • Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital
  • Guy's and St Thomas's Hospitals
  • St George's Hospital
  • St Helen's and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Other

Other

Arm Label

Arm 1: Inguinal Lymphadenectomy

Arm 2: Ilio-inguinal Lymphadenectomy

Arm Description

Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (IL) is removal of the easily accessible superficial groin lymph nodes (LNs) and has a median LN retrieval of 11 lymph nodes

Ilio-inguinal Lymphadenectomy (I-IL) is the removal of the same superficial groin lymp nodes (LN) removed during an IL but also combined with the more surgically complex removal of the ipsilateral pelvic LN. About twice as many LN are removed with I-IL compared to IL.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The primary endpoint of the study will be Disease Free Survival following lymphadenectomy, assessed after 60 months of follow-up.
The difference between IL and I-IL surgery in DFS 5 years after randomisation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Overall Survival
time from randomisation to death from any cause
Distant Disease Free Survival
time to new distant melanoma recurrence
Regional Recurrence Free Survival
time to new regional lymph node recurrence
Morbidity differences
This includes lymphoedema, wound complications (wound infections, dehiscence/necrosis, and seroma) chronic pain, and restriction in mobility
Quality Of Life
Quality Of Life questionnaires completed by patients
Sensitivity / specificity and positive predictive value and negative predictive value of PET/CT for pelvic disease at diagnosis of groin LN involvement by melanoma.
The diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT and CT for detecting pelvic lymph nodes positive for metastatic melanoma as confirmed by histopathology will be assessed in the sub-group of patients screened and shown to have a positive pelvic LN on PET/CT and those patients who had negative pelvic LN on PET/CT and randomised for I-IL treatment.
Resource use and utility based Quality Of Life
Resource use will be identified from the trial case report forms, and valued according the relevant Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups and Medicare Benefits Schedule item numbers.The cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses will calculate total costs and mean per patient costs per surgical group allocation, as well as total and mean benefits per group allocation.

Full Information

First Posted
June 15, 2014
Last Updated
April 6, 2022
Sponsor
Melanoma and Skin Cancer Trials Limited
Collaborators
Cancer Council New South Wales, Melanoma Institute Australia
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02166788
Brief Title
Evaluation of Groin Lymphadenectomy Extent For Metastatic Melanoma
Acronym
EAGLE FM
Official Title
Inguinal or Ilio-inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Patients With Metastatic Melanoma to Groin Lymph Nodes and no Evidence of Pelvic Disease on PET/CT Scan - A Randomised Phase III Trial (EAGLE FM)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
January 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 16, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2030 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Melanoma and Skin Cancer Trials Limited
Collaborators
Cancer Council New South Wales, Melanoma Institute Australia

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
BACKGROUND: Spread of metastatic melanoma to the groin lymph nodes (LN) is a common event affecting about 350 people a year in Australia. Globally it has been shown that patients with involved groin LN, without proven pelvic LN disease on imaging receive 1 of 3 management strategies in equal proportions - inguinal lymphadenectomy (IL); ilio-inguinal lymphadenectomy (I-IL); or variable use of either depending on circumstances. Different experts have strong and polarised opinions favouring either IL or more extensive I-IL with existing cases series reporting conflicting data on best cancer outcomes. No high level evidence proves which operation is best. HYPOTHESIS: There will be no significant difference in DFS between patients having IL or I-IL, conditional on PET/CT scan showing no evidence of pelvic disease at the time of diagnosis of groin LN metastatic melanoma. AIMS: To provide a rational evidence base for management for melanoma to the groin LNs by randomly assessing the effect of each operation on DFS, distant DFS, overall survival (OS), morbidity - including early complications and longer-term rates of lymphedema as well as comprehensively assessed QOL. Also to clarify the reliability of PET/CT scans for staging pelvic LNs and evaluate any health economic benefits of I-IL over IL. TARGET POPULATION: To recruit 634 patients in 5 years. DESIGN: An Australian led, international, multi-centre, non-inferiority, phase III, prospective, randomised clinical trial comparing IL or I-IL for patients with metastatic melanoma to groin LNs and no evidence of pelvic disease on PET/CT. ENDPOINTS: DFS, Distant DFS, OS and QOL at 5 years. Accuracy of PET/CT for pelvic LN metastases. OUTCOMES: International standardization of care, improved cancer outcomes, improved QOL for patients with groin metastatic melanoma. Proof of principle about extent of surgery when PET/CT is clear in adjacent LN areas, leading to clinical trials investigating management of other lymph node fields.
Detailed Description
Background and Rationale Spread of metastatic melanoma to the groin lymph nodes (LN) is a common event for patients with melanoma. In melanoma treatment centres around the world, patients without demonstrated pelvic LN disease receive 1 of 3 strategies of management in relatively equal proportions (Pasquali, Spillane et al. 2012): i. Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (IL) ii. Ilio-inguinal Lymphadenectomy (I-IL) iii. Variable use of either IL or I-IL surgery. Some larger melanoma centres have an institutional policy that all patients have either IL or I-IL for metastatic inguinal node involvement. Nearly all centres would agree that patients with pelvic LN involvement without distant metastatic disease should have I-IL. Study Objectives This study aims to provide a more rational evidence base for appropriate management for metastatic melanoma in the groin LNs, through assessing the effect of the addition of ipsilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy on patient disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), morbidity, and quality of life. In addition, the study will clarify the reliability of PET (Positron Emission Tomography) / CT (Computed Tomography) scans for staging pelvic LNs, clarify morbidity differences between the operations in a balanced cohort, evaluate any health economic benefits of I-IL over IL and provide a tissue and serum resource to be used to identify biological markers of recurrence and progression after inguinal metastases. Study Hypothesis There will be no significant difference in DFS between patients having IL or I-IL, conditional on PET/CT scan showing no evidence of pelvic disease at the time of diagnosis of groin LN metastatic melanoma. Study Population The aim is to recruit 634 patients in 5 years who are 15 years or older with cytologically or histologically confirmed metastatic melanoma in inguinal LNs (H&E & IHC); specifically with no evidence of pelvic node involvement or distant spread of melanoma clinically or on PET/CT staging scans. To be eligible patients must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status 0-2 at randomisation. Study Treatments Eligible patients will be randomised 1:1 to undergo an IL or I-IL. Study Design This is an international, multi-centre, phase III, non-inferiority, prospective, randomised clinical trial.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Metastatic Melanoma to the Groin Lymph Nodes
Keywords
metastatic melanoma, groin lymph nodes, surgery, lymphadenectomy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
634 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm 1: Inguinal Lymphadenectomy
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (IL) is removal of the easily accessible superficial groin lymph nodes (LNs) and has a median LN retrieval of 11 lymph nodes
Arm Title
Arm 2: Ilio-inguinal Lymphadenectomy
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Ilio-inguinal Lymphadenectomy (I-IL) is the removal of the same superficial groin lymp nodes (LN) removed during an IL but also combined with the more surgically complex removal of the ipsilateral pelvic LN. About twice as many LN are removed with I-IL compared to IL.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Inguinal Lymphadenectomy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Ilio-inguinal Lymphadenectomy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The primary endpoint of the study will be Disease Free Survival following lymphadenectomy, assessed after 60 months of follow-up.
Description
The difference between IL and I-IL surgery in DFS 5 years after randomisation
Time Frame
60 Months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall Survival
Description
time from randomisation to death from any cause
Time Frame
0 - 120 months
Title
Distant Disease Free Survival
Description
time to new distant melanoma recurrence
Time Frame
0 - 120 Months
Title
Regional Recurrence Free Survival
Description
time to new regional lymph node recurrence
Time Frame
0 - 120 Months
Title
Morbidity differences
Description
This includes lymphoedema, wound complications (wound infections, dehiscence/necrosis, and seroma) chronic pain, and restriction in mobility
Time Frame
Up to 120 days from lymphadenectomy, and from 0 - 120 months
Title
Quality Of Life
Description
Quality Of Life questionnaires completed by patients
Time Frame
0 - 120 Months
Title
Sensitivity / specificity and positive predictive value and negative predictive value of PET/CT for pelvic disease at diagnosis of groin LN involvement by melanoma.
Description
The diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT and CT for detecting pelvic lymph nodes positive for metastatic melanoma as confirmed by histopathology will be assessed in the sub-group of patients screened and shown to have a positive pelvic LN on PET/CT and those patients who had negative pelvic LN on PET/CT and randomised for I-IL treatment.
Time Frame
0 - 120 Months
Title
Resource use and utility based Quality Of Life
Description
Resource use will be identified from the trial case report forms, and valued according the relevant Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups and Medicare Benefits Schedule item numbers.The cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses will calculate total costs and mean per patient costs per surgical group allocation, as well as total and mean benefits per group allocation.
Time Frame
0 - 60 Months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
15 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients may be included in the study only if they meet all of the following criteria: Must be 15 and above. Have primary cutaneous melanoma or if the patient presents with stage III melanoma with no known primary tumour then a thorough search for the primary should be documented (including perineal and perianal areas) Life expectancy of at least 10 years from the time of diagnosis, not considering the melanoma in question, as determined by the PI Must have one or multiple inguinal node(s) involved, histologically or cytologically proven as metastatic melanoma. This can can be detected: At the time of diagnosis; Or by Ultrasound detection; Or later after relapse when no Sentinel Node Biopsy (SNB) was performed at the time of primary tumour management; Or as a result of SNB; Or at the time of regional recurrence after "false negative" SNB; Absent distant disease clinically and on PET/CT scan. (Patients must have NO further distant disease or visceral metastases) ECOG performance status must be between 0 to 2 at randomisation Whole body PET/CT scan, specifically stating there is NO evidence of pelvic lymph node involvement prior to randomisation and a CT Brain or MRI Brain scan. Scans must be performed within 6 weeks prior to randomisation. Able to provide written, informed consent Willing to return to the centre for follow up examinations and procedures, as outlined in the protocol. All patients must be randomised and undergo lymphadenectomy surgery no more than 120 days following diagnosis of inguinal LN involvement Exclusion Criteria: Distant metastatic disease on clinical examination or staging imaging (CT/MRI brain or whole body PET/CT scan). Scans must be performed within 6 weeks prior to randomisation Pelvic LN involvement on SNB or PET/CT scan suggestive of metastatic disease in the pelvis - criteria for diagnosis include normal size or enlarged lymph nodes (> 1 cm) with increased FDG activity on PET (SUV >3). If there are enlarged, necrotic lymph nodes FDG activity on PET is not required to be present. If unsure central review should be sought. Bilateral inguinal lymph node involvement Patients with a history of major pelvic surgery and / or regional radiotherapy at any time in the past Requiring planned radiotherapy following surgery due to macroscopic, bulky and matted nodes. Unfit for General Anaesthesia Melanoma-related operative procedures not corresponding to criteria described in the protocol Patients with prior cancers, except: those with a thin <=1 mm, regionally unrelated melanoma > 5 years ago those with a good prognosis regionally unrelated cancer (>90% probability of 10 years disease specific survival) other cancers diagnosed more than five years ago with no evidence of disease recurrence within this time successfully treated basal cell and squamous cell skin carcinoma carcinoma in-situ of the cervix 1 episode of in transit melanoma > 3 years ago A medical or psychiatric condition that compromises ability to give informed consent or complete the protocol Positive urine pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential (+/-7 days of randomisation onto the trial)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Andrew Spillane
Organizational Affiliation
The University of Sydney, Northern Clinical School
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Calvary Public Hospital Bruce
City
Canberra
State/Province
Australian Capital Territory
ZIP/Postal Code
2617
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Melanoma Institute Australia - The Poche Centre
City
North Sydney
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2060
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Sydney Adventist Hospital
City
Sydney
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2076
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Westmead Hospital
City
Sydney
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2145
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
City
Sydney
State/Province
New South Wales
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Mater Hospital Brisbane
City
Brisbane
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4101
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Hospital de Câncer de Barretos
City
Barretos
State/Province
SP
ZIP/Postal Code
14784-400
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
A.C. Camargo Cancer Center
City
Sao Paulo
State/Province
SP
ZIP/Postal Code
01508-010
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Veneto Institute of Oncology - IOV
City
Padova
State/Province
Veneto
ZIP/Postal Code
35128
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center
City
Nijmegen
State/Province
Gelderland
ZIP/Postal Code
6525
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
University Medical Center Groningen
City
Groningen
ZIP/Postal Code
9713
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Institute of Oncology Ljubljana
City
Ljubljana
ZIP/Postal Code
1000
Country
Slovenia
Facility Name
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital
City
Norwich
State/Province
Norfolk
ZIP/Postal Code
NR4 7UY
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Guy's and St Thomas's Hospitals
City
London
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
St George's Hospital
City
London
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
St Helen's and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals
City
St Helens
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Links:
URL
https://www.masc.org.au/
Description
Trial Website

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of Groin Lymphadenectomy Extent For Metastatic Melanoma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs