search
Back to results

Evaluation of Low Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Bariatric Surgery (ELOPES Study)

Primary Purpose

Surgical View, Shoulder Tip Pain, Abdominal Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Malaysia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pneumoperitoneum Pressure
Sponsored by
Universiti Putra Malaysia
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Surgical View

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-70 years
  • Ability to give informed consent
  • Patients who are approved by the anaesthetics to undergo bariatric surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age below 18 and above 70
  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Patient unfit for bariatric surgery including who has poor respiratory, cardiac, renal and liver function.
  • Patient with Body Mass Index (BMI) >50
  • Patient with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) >3

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital Kuala Lumpur

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Low Pressure Group

Standard Pressure Group

Arm Description

Participants will undergo elective bariatric surgery. Participants under this group will be given intra-abdominal pressure of 8-10mmHg. The number of subjects anticipated for this arm will be 47. Participants in this low pressure group are expected to encounter lesser shoulder tip pain and abdominal pain. Operating field for surgeons also expected to be better.

Participants will undergo elective bariatric surgery. Participants under this group will be given intra-abdominal pressure of 12-15mmHg. The number of subjects anticipated for this arm will be 47. Participants in this group are expected to have an increased amount of shoulder tip pain and higher pain score postoperatively compared to low pressure group. Operating fields for surgeons are expected to be less clear.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Operating Field
Numeric rating score will be used to access the operating field during the surgery. The numeric rating score will be recorded after the surgery by the surgeon. The score ranges from 1 to 4 whereby 1 means poor space with excessive muscular contractions and unable to proceed with surgery safely. Numeric rating scale of 4 indicates good surgical space. If there was any compromise of the operating field (NOS score ≥ 3), the pneumoperitoneum pressure will be increased accordingly.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Pain Score
The pain score will be assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) (0-10). A score of 0 means no pain, whereas a score of 10 equals the worst pain ever experienced. Post-operative pain will be rated on a visual analog score at rest. The time of arrival in the postoperative recovery room will be defined as zero hours postoperatively. The patients will be asked about the location of pain, whether at the shoulder, incision sites, and/or inside the abdomen by the medical doctors or nurses.
Duration of Surgery
The duration of surgery or any intraoperative complications will be recorded.

Full Information

First Posted
May 24, 2017
Last Updated
May 4, 2018
Sponsor
Universiti Putra Malaysia
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03179111
Brief Title
Evaluation of Low Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Bariatric Surgery (ELOPES Study)
Official Title
Evaluation of Low Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Bariatric Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 30, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 4, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 4, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Universiti Putra Malaysia

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a prospective study whereby it involves patients who are planned for bariatric surgery. In the bariatric surgery procedure, pneumoperitoneum pressure will be the experimental aspect in this study. The pneumoperitoneum pressure will be adjusted to either 8-10 mmHg of low pressure or to 12-15mmHg of standard pressure.
Detailed Description
This will be a prospective study in patients aged between 18 and 70 years old who have already been screened and planned for elective bariatric surgery. In bariatric surgery, a large portion of the stomach will be removed. Pneumoperitoneum is also known as the abdominal pressure which will be the experimental aspect in this study. Laparoscopy surgery will be performed by introducing the camera (optical trocar) after making an incision at the belly button (umbilicus), and carbon dioxide which will be given at a rate of 5 L/min until the intra-abdominal pressure of either 8-10 mmHg (low-pressure group) or 12-15 mmHg (standard pressure group) is achieved. The remaining three standard ports will be placed and the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy will be performed at an insufflation rate of 15 L/min. The greater omentum will be divided at the greater curvature of the stomach using an ultrasonic dissector, beginning from the proximal antrum until the fundus. The omentum will be divided close to the stomach wall hence preserving the gastro-epiploic vessels. Short gastric vessels will be divided entirely from the stomach and this dissection will continue until the left crus of the diaphragm are exposed. Endoscopic staplers will then be used to staple and divide the stomach until the angle of His. A 39Fr gastric calibration tube will be placed along the lesser curvature of the stomach, acts as a guide during the division of the stomach. Finally, the divided stomach will be removed through a 12mm port site and the incision will be closed with sutures. Towards the end of the surgery, all residual pneumoperitoneum will be evacuated by keeping the trocar valves open under direct telescopic vision. The duration of surgery or any intraoperative complications will be recorded. The starting of surgery will be regarded after the induction of anaesthesia and the end of surgery is regarded when the end of skin closure. Operating field or also known as surgical view is defined as the view of the intra-abdomen. A clear operating field allows a good working space for the surgeon. Numeric rating score will be used to access the operating field during the surgery. Post-operative pain will be rated on a Visual Analog Scale at rest and with movement.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Surgical View, Shoulder Tip Pain, Abdominal Pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
There will be two arms in this study. One arm will be the low pressure pneumoperitoneum group (8-10mmHg) where else the other arm will be the standard pressure pneumoperitoneum group (12-15mmHg).
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Masking Description
This will be a double blind study. Neither the participant (patient) nor the investigator (surgeon) will know which group the particular participant will be assigned.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
94 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Low Pressure Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will undergo elective bariatric surgery. Participants under this group will be given intra-abdominal pressure of 8-10mmHg. The number of subjects anticipated for this arm will be 47. Participants in this low pressure group are expected to encounter lesser shoulder tip pain and abdominal pain. Operating field for surgeons also expected to be better.
Arm Title
Standard Pressure Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will undergo elective bariatric surgery. Participants under this group will be given intra-abdominal pressure of 12-15mmHg. The number of subjects anticipated for this arm will be 47. Participants in this group are expected to have an increased amount of shoulder tip pain and higher pain score postoperatively compared to low pressure group. Operating fields for surgeons are expected to be less clear.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Pneumoperitoneum Pressure
Intervention Description
There will be two arms in this study. The participants recruited for this study are those who have been screened and planned for elective bariatric surgery.The pneumoperitoneum pressure will be adjusted to either 8-10mmHg or 12-15mmHg until a clear operating field is obtained by the surgeon. Low pneumoperitoneum pressure has been expected to give a clearer and better surgical view than standard pneumoperitoneum pressure. Participants under the low pressure group are expected to have lesser pain score on abdominal pain and shoulder tip pain as compared to participants in the standard pressure group.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Operating Field
Description
Numeric rating score will be used to access the operating field during the surgery. The numeric rating score will be recorded after the surgery by the surgeon. The score ranges from 1 to 4 whereby 1 means poor space with excessive muscular contractions and unable to proceed with surgery safely. Numeric rating scale of 4 indicates good surgical space. If there was any compromise of the operating field (NOS score ≥ 3), the pneumoperitoneum pressure will be increased accordingly.
Time Frame
It will be assessed intraoperatively (during the surgery).
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain Score
Description
The pain score will be assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) (0-10). A score of 0 means no pain, whereas a score of 10 equals the worst pain ever experienced. Post-operative pain will be rated on a visual analog score at rest. The time of arrival in the postoperative recovery room will be defined as zero hours postoperatively. The patients will be asked about the location of pain, whether at the shoulder, incision sites, and/or inside the abdomen by the medical doctors or nurses.
Time Frame
The abdomen and shoulder tip pain intensity will be rated up to 48 hours postoperatively.
Title
Duration of Surgery
Description
The duration of surgery or any intraoperative complications will be recorded.
Time Frame
The starting of surgery will be regarded after the induction of anaesthesia and the end of surgery is regarded when the end of skin closure.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 18-70 years Ability to give informed consent Patients who are approved by the anaesthetics to undergo bariatric surgery. Exclusion Criteria: Age below 18 and above 70 Inability to give informed consent Patient unfit for bariatric surgery including who has poor respiratory, cardiac, renal and liver function. Patient with Body Mass Index (BMI) >50 Patient with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) >3
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital Kuala Lumpur
City
Kuala Lumpur
State/Province
Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur
ZIP/Postal Code
50586
Country
Malaysia

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24977638
Citation
Staehr-Rye AK, Rasmussen LS, Rosenberg J, Juul P, Lindekaer AL, Riber C, Gatke MR. Surgical space conditions during low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy with deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade: a randomized clinical study. Anesth Analg. 2014 Nov;119(5):1084-92. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000316. Erratum In: Anesth Analg. 2015 Apr;120(4):957. Dosage error in article text.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12015619
Citation
Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Bergamaschi R, Bonjer HJ, Cuschieri A, Fuchs KH, Jacobi Ch, Jansen FW, Koivusalo AM, Lacy A, McMahon MJ, Millat B, Schwenk W. The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002 Jul;16(7):1121-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9166-7. Epub 2001 May 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9876740
Citation
Litynski GS. Kurt Semm and an automatic insufflator. JSLS. 1998 Apr-Jun;2(2):197-200.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16749570
Citation
Ibraheim OA, Samarkandi AH, Alshehry H, Faden A, Farouk EO. Lactate and acid base changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Feb;18(4):757-68.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15136925
Citation
Schietroma M, Carlei F, Mownah A, Franchi L, Mazzotta C, Sozio A, Amicucci G. Changes in the blood coagulation, fibrinolysis, and cytokine profile during laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2004 Jul;18(7):1090-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8819-0. Epub 2004 May 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17043939
Citation
Esmat ME, Elsebae MM, Nasr MM, Elsebaie SB. Combined low pressure pneumoperitoneum and intraperitoneal infusion of normal saline for reducing shoulder tip pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 2006 Nov;30(11):1969-73. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0752-z.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27073301
Citation
Schietroma M, Pessia B, Stifini D, Lancione L, Carlei F, Cecilia EM, Amicucci G. Effects of low and standard intra-abdominal pressure on systemic inflammation and immune response in laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A prospective randomised study. J Minim Access Surg. 2016 Apr-Jun;12(2):109-17. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.178513.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24639018
Citation
Gurusamy KS, Vaughan J, Davidson BR. Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 18;(3):CD006930. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006930.pub3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15650630
Citation
Nguyen NT, Wolfe BM. The physiologic effects of pneumoperitoneum in the morbidly obese. Ann Surg. 2005 Feb;241(2):219-26. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000151791.93571.70.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15136930
Citation
Buunen M, Gholghesaei M, Veldkamp R, Meijer DW, Bonjer HJ, Bouvy ND. Stress response to laparoscopic surgery: a review. Surg Endosc. 2004 Jul;18(7):1022-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9169-7. Epub 2004 May 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11578282
Citation
Gupta A, Watson DI. Effect of laparoscopy on immune function. Br J Surg. 2001 Oct;88(10):1296-306. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01860.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15619524
Citation
Sylla P, Kirman I, Whelan RL. Immunological advantages of advanced laparoscopy. Surg Clin North Am. 2005 Feb;85(1):1-18, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2004.09.005.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11111169
Citation
Hajri A, Mutter D, Wack S, Bastien C, Gury JF, Marescaux J, Aprahamian M. Dual effect of laparoscopy on cell-mediated immunity. Eur Surg Res. 2000;32(5):261-6. doi: 10.1159/000008773.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8661209
Citation
West MA, Baker J, Bellingham J. Kinetics of decreased LPS-stimulated cytokine release by macrophages exposed to CO2. J Surg Res. 1996 Jun;63(1):269-74. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1996.0259.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24426454
Citation
Umar A, Mehta KS, Mehta N. Evaluation of hemodynamic changes using different intra-abdominal pressures for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indian J Surg. 2013 Aug;75(4):284-9. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0484-x. Epub 2012 May 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
4265051
Citation
Kelman GR, Swapp GH, Smith I, Benzie RJ, Gordon NL. Caridac output and arterial blood-gas tension during laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 1972 Nov;44(11):1155-62. doi: 10.1093/bja/44.11.1155. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10460524
Citation
Helmy SA, Wahby MA, El-Nawaway M. The effect of anaesthesia and surgery on plasma cytokine production. Anaesthesia. 1999 Aug;54(8):733-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00947.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9841758
Citation
Carlei F, Schietroma M, Cianca G, Risetti A, Mattucci S, Ngome Enang G, Simi M. Effects of laparoscopic and conventional (open) cholecystectomy on human leukocyte antigen-DR expression in peripheral blood monocytes: correlations with immunologic status. World J Surg. 1999 Jan;23(1):18-22. doi: 10.1007/s002689900559.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16495701
Citation
Schietroma M, Carlei F, Cappelli S, Amicucci G. Intestinal permeability and systemic endotoxemia after laparotomic or laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2006 Mar;243(3):359-63. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000201455.89037.f6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11685204
Citation
Schietroma M, Carlei F, Rossi M, Mattucci S, Gulla N, Lezoche E. Neutrophil-elastase in patients undergoing open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery. 2001 Nov;130(5):898. doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.117374. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18082551
Citation
Visser BC, Parks RW, Garden OJ. Open cholecystectomy in the laparoendoscopic era. Am J Surg. 2008 Jan;195(1):108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.04.008.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19067057
Citation
Torres K, Torres A, Staskiewicz GJ, Chroscicki A, Los T, Maciejewski R. A comparative study of angiogenic and cytokine responses after laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with standard- and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum. Surg Endosc. 2009 Sep;23(9):2117-23. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0234-0. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15711660
Citation
Basgul E, Bahadir B, Celiker V, Karagoz AH, Hamaloglu E, Aypar U. Effects of low and high intra-abdominal pressure on immune response in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Saudi Med J. 2004 Dec;25(12):1888-91.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26275545
Citation
Ozdemir-van Brunschot DM, van Laarhoven KC, Scheffer GJ, Pouwels S, Wever KE, Warle MC. What is the evidence for the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum? A systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):2049-65. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4454-9. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10439730
Citation
Mann C, Boccara G, Pouzeratte Y, Eliet J, Serradel-Le Gal C, Vergnes C, Bichet DG, Guillon G, Fabre JM, Colson P. The relationship among carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum, vasopressin release, and hemodynamic changes. Anesth Analg. 1999 Aug;89(2):278-83. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199908000-00003.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2054832
Citation
Arnolda L, McGrath BP, Johnston CI. Vasopressin and angiotensin II contribute equally to the increased afterload in rabbits with heart failure. Cardiovasc Res. 1991 Jan;25(1):68-72. doi: 10.1093/cvr/25.1.68.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7940173
Citation
Feig BW, Berger DH, Dougherty TB, Dupuis JF, Hsi B, Hickey RC, Ota DM. Pharmacologic intervention can reestablish baseline hemodynamic parameters during laparoscopy. Surgery. 1994 Oct;116(4):733-9; discussion 739-41.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20035347
Citation
Hypolito OH, Azevedo JL, de Lima Alvarenga Caldeira FM, de Azevedo OC, Miyahira SA, Miguel GP, Becker OM Jr, Machado AC, Nunes Filho GP, Azevedo GC. Creation of pneumoperitoneum: noninvasive monitoring of clinical effects of elevated intraperitoneal pressure for the insertion of the first trocar. Surg Endosc. 2010 Jul;24(7):1663-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0827-2. Epub 2009 Dec 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24686347
Citation
Vijayaraghavan N, Sistla SC, Kundra P, Ananthanarayan PH, Karthikeyan VS, Ali SM, Sasi SP, Vikram K. Comparison of standard-pressure and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double blinded randomized controlled study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Apr;24(2):127-33. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182937980.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7748095
Citation
Obeid F, Saba A, Fath J, Guslits B, Chung R, Sorensen V, Buck J, Horst M. Increases in intra-abdominal pressure affect pulmonary compliance. Arch Surg. 1995 May;130(5):544-7; discussion 547-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430050094016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8688262
Citation
O'Leary E, Hubbard K, Tormey W, Cunningham AJ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: haemodynamic and neuroendocrine responses after pneumoperitoneum and changes in position. Br J Anaesth. 1996 May;76(5):640-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/76.5.640.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10449845
Citation
Davides D, Birbas K, Vezakis A, McMahon MJ. Routine low-pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1999 Sep;13(9):887-9. doi: 10.1007/s004649901126.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11905857
Citation
Rosin D, Brasesco O, Varela J, Saber AA, You S, Rosenthal RJ, Cohn SM. Low-pressure laparoscopy may ameliorate intracranial hypertension and renal hypoperfusion. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2002 Feb;12(1):15-9. doi: 10.1089/109264202753486876.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9112891
Citation
Wallace DH, Serpell MG, Baxter JN, O'Dwyer PJ. Randomized trial of different insufflation pressures for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997 Apr;84(4):455-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26945393
Citation
Kim MH, Lee KY, Lee KY, Min BS, Yoo YC. Maintaining Optimal Surgical Conditions With Low Insufflation Pressures is Possible With Deep Neuromuscular Blockade During Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Clinical Trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(9):e2920. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002920.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25125097
Citation
Blobner M, Frick CG, Stauble RB, Feussner H, Schaller SJ, Unterbuchner C, Lingg C, Geisler M, Fink H. Neuromuscular blockade improves surgical conditions (NISCO). Surg Endosc. 2015 Mar;29(3):627-36. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3711-7. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12582754
Citation
Barczynski M, Herman RM. A prospective randomized trial on comparison of low-pressure (LP) and standard-pressure (SP) pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2003 Apr;17(4):533-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9121-2. Epub 2003 Feb 17.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of Low Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Bariatric Surgery (ELOPES Study)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs