Evaluation of Nucleus 6 Sound Coding Algorithms
Primary Purpose
Hearing Loss
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Nucleus 6 sound processor
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Hearing Loss focused on measuring background noise, speech performance, wind noise
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Eight years of age or older
- CI24RE, CI500 or CI422 series Nucleus cochlear implant types (commercially approved)
- At least 3 months experience with the cochlear implant
- Post-linguistic onset of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, with no congenital component to the hearing loss
- Native speaker of English, the language used to assess speech perception performance
- Willingness to participate in and to comply with all requirements of the protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject, regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations that are inherent to the prosthetic device 2. Unwillingness or inability of the candidate to comply with all investigational requirements 3. Additional handicaps that would prevent or restrict participation in the audiological evaluations
-
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Nucleus 6
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Percentage of Words Correct on AzBio Sentences in Noise S0N90
Individuals were tested with AzBio Sentences in Noise using a speech front (0 degrees) and noise presented to the implant ear (90 degrees) using the following features: enhanced Automatic Gain Control (eAGC), Signal to Noise Ratio - Noise Canceller (SNR-NC), Wind Noise Reduction (WNR) and Automatic Scene Analyzer (SCAN).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01854879
Brief Title
Evaluation of Nucleus 6 Sound Coding Algorithms
Official Title
Evaluation of Nucleus 6 Sound Coding Algorithms
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2013 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Cochlear
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the features of the Nucleus 6 Sound Processor (CP900 series) on existing Nucleus recipients who currently use the previous generation sound processor, the Cochlear Nucleus CP810 (also commonly known as the Nucleus 5), with a Cochlear Nucleus CI24RE, CI512 or CI422 cochlear implant. The features evaluated included an enhanced Automatic Gain Control (eAGC), the option to provide acoustic amplification in combination with traditional electric stimulation through an acoustic component, and three input processing algorithms: Signal to Noise Ratio - Noise Canceller (SNR-NC), Wind Noise Reduction (WNR) and Automatic Scene Analyzer (SCAN).
As is customary for a single-subject research design, study results will be analyzed for each subject individually. For evaluations where testing took place under two conditions (i.e. Endpoint 2, 3, 4, and 5) a non-inferiority hypothesis test based on the paired comparisons of the % of words correct will be performed. For each subject, the paired difference (P1 minus P2) will be calculated and the mean difference will be tested statistically against a non-inferiority null hypothesis of 10%. Successful rejection of the null hypothesis allows for a conclusion that the performance under the test condition 2 (based on the Nucleus 6 sound processor) will be non-inferior to the test condition 1 (based on the Nucleus 5 sound processor).
Ho: P1 - P2 ≥ 10% Ha: P1 - P2 < 10%
We hypothesize acceptance of the null hypothesis for the Nucleus 6 features.
Testing will be based on a paired t-test with a one-sided 0.05 alpha level. The value of 10% was selected as the non-inferiority margin as one that can be tested with reasonable power and was clinically meaningful.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hearing Loss
Keywords
background noise, speech performance, wind noise
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
97 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Nucleus 6
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Nucleus 6 sound processor
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Words Correct on AzBio Sentences in Noise S0N90
Description
Individuals were tested with AzBio Sentences in Noise using a speech front (0 degrees) and noise presented to the implant ear (90 degrees) using the following features: enhanced Automatic Gain Control (eAGC), Signal to Noise Ratio - Noise Canceller (SNR-NC), Wind Noise Reduction (WNR) and Automatic Scene Analyzer (SCAN).
Time Frame
Each assessment was completed acutely which equated to approximately 2 hours of testing
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
8 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Eight years of age or older
CI24RE, CI500 or CI422 series Nucleus cochlear implant types (commercially approved)
At least 3 months experience with the cochlear implant
Post-linguistic onset of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, with no congenital component to the hearing loss
Native speaker of English, the language used to assess speech perception performance
Willingness to participate in and to comply with all requirements of the protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject, regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations that are inherent to the prosthetic device 2. Unwillingness or inability of the candidate to comply with all investigational requirements 3. Additional handicaps that would prevent or restrict participation in the audiological evaluations
-
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Evaluation of Nucleus 6 Sound Coding Algorithms
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs