Evaluation of Programs of Reeducation for Urinary Incontinence in Woman (ReedPerinee)
Primary Purpose
Urinary Incontinence
Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Reference method
CMP ® method
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Urinary Incontinence
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients more than 18 years old and less than 75 years
- Patients presenting an urinary incontinence of effort or mixed symptomatic associated with a pelvic statics disorder
- Patients with a perineale reeducation prescription
- Patients affiliated to a national insurance scheme or benefiting from such a program
- Patients having given her written consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- Nulliparous woman
- Patients already operated for their incontinence
- Patients with a prolapse of higher level at the stage II of the classification POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification)
- Pregnant women
- Patients presenting an associated anal incontinence,
- Patients presenting a cancellation (section of marrow, syringomyelia for example) or an inversion of perineum control
- Patients having given birth less than 6 months before the care
- Patients having benefited from a pelvi-périnéale reeducation in the previous 12 months,
- Patients presenting psychiatric disease
- Patients presenting a vaginismus,
- Patients presenting a contraindication to the practice of the electrostimulation.
Sites / Locations
- Hopital Foch
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Group A
Group B
Arm Description
Reference method
CMP ® method (Knowledge and Control of Perineum)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
USP (Urinary Symptoms Profile) score
Urinary Symptoms Profile score
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02899520
Brief Title
Evaluation of Programs of Reeducation for Urinary Incontinence in Woman
Acronym
ReedPerinee
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Change in the clinical practices
Study Start Date
November 10, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 18, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 18, 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hopital Foch
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare two methods of pelvic floor muscle training: reference method versus CMP ® method ( (Connaissance et Maîtrise de Périnée : Knowledge and Control of Perineum)
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Urinary Incontinence
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Group A
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Reference method
Arm Title
Group B
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
CMP ® method (Knowledge and Control of Perineum)
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Reference method
Intervention Description
Electrostimulation associated to perineal training
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
CMP ® method
Intervention Description
Method based on Knowledge and Control of Perineum
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
USP (Urinary Symptoms Profile) score
Description
Urinary Symptoms Profile score
Time Frame
38 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients more than 18 years old and less than 75 years
Patients presenting an urinary incontinence of effort or mixed symptomatic associated with a pelvic statics disorder
Patients with a perineale reeducation prescription
Patients affiliated to a national insurance scheme or benefiting from such a program
Patients having given her written consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
Nulliparous woman
Patients already operated for their incontinence
Patients with a prolapse of higher level at the stage II of the classification POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification)
Pregnant women
Patients presenting an associated anal incontinence,
Patients presenting a cancellation (section of marrow, syringomyelia for example) or an inversion of perineum control
Patients having given birth less than 6 months before the care
Patients having benefited from a pelvi-périnéale reeducation in the previous 12 months,
Patients presenting psychiatric disease
Patients presenting a vaginismus,
Patients presenting a contraindication to the practice of the electrostimulation.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sophie FLANDIN-CRETINON
Organizational Affiliation
Hopital Foch
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hopital Foch
City
Suresnes
ZIP/Postal Code
92150
Country
France
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Evaluation of Programs of Reeducation for Urinary Incontinence in Woman
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs