search
Back to results

Evaluation of Prucalopride in Male Subjects With Chronic Constipation.

Primary Purpose

Male Subjects With Chronic Constipation

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Placebo
Prucalopride
Sponsored by
Shire
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Male Subjects With Chronic Constipation focused on measuring Constipation, Male

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is a male out-patient ≥18 years of age (no upper age limit).
  2. Subject has a history of constipation. The subject reports an average of ≤ 2 SBM/week that result in a feeling of complete evacuation (SCBM) and one or more of the following for at least 6 months before the selection visit:

    1. Very hard (little balls) and/or hard stools for at least a quarter of the stools;
    2. Sensation of incomplete evacuation following for at least a quarter of the stools;
    3. Straining at defecation for at least a quarter of the time. This includes subjects who never have SBMs. The above criteria are only applicable for SBMs, i.e. BMs not preceded within a period of 24 hours by the intake of a laxative agent or by the use of an enema.
  3. Subject agrees to stop his current laxative treatment and is willing to use rescue medication according to the rescue rule [Dulcolax® (bisacodyl)/enemas]
  4. Subject's constipation is chronic.
  5. Subject is able and willing to complete the questionnaires (if a validated version in the language of the subject is available) and the e-diary.
  6. Subject voluntarily signs the written Informed Consent Form (ICF) in accordance with the regional laws/regulations, prior to the first trial-related activity.
  7. Subject is willing to adhere to all trial requirements (amongst others colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy, if required).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects in whom constipation is thought to be drug-induced.
  2. Subjects using any disallowed medication
  3. Subjects suffering from secondary causes of chronic constipation, such as:

    Endocrine disorders, e.g. hypopituitarism, hypothyroidism, hypercalcaemia, pseudohypoparathyroidism, pheochromocytoma or glucagon-producing tumours, unless these are controlled by appropriate medical therapy. Subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus should always be excluded, also if the subjects are under appropriate medical therapy; Metabolic disorders (e.g. porphyria, uraemia, hypokalaemia or amyloid neuropathy, unless these are controlled by appropriate medical therapy); Neurological disorders (e.g. Parkinson's disease, cerebral tumours, cerebrovascular accidents, multiple sclerosis, meningocele, aganglionosis, hypoganglionosis, hyperganglionosis, autonomic neuropathy or neuropathy due to chemotherapy, spinal cord injury, Chaga's disease, major depression); Surgery. Subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus should always be excluded, irrespective of whether the constipation started prior to or after the onset of diabetes.

  4. Subjects with a significant history of cancer (i.e. less than a 5-year disease-free survival).
  5. Subjects with intestinal perforation or obstruction due to structural or functional disorder of the gut wall, obstructive ileus, severe inflammatory conditions of the intestinal tract, such as Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis and toxic megacolon/megarectum. Results of an endoscopy or radiologic bowel evaluation is required to rule out polyps, cancer, stricture or other structural or organic disease:

    1. For patients ≤ 50 years: a flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy after the onset of constipation symptoms and within the previous 5 years;
    2. For patients > 50 years: a flexible sigmoidoscopy /double contrast barium enema or colonoscopy after the onset of constipation symptoms and within the previous 5 years.
    3. For subjects, regardless of age, even if results of this test are available within the previous 5 years but if the patient has alarm symptoms such as anemia, weight loss, heme positive stool, or rectal bleeding: a flexible sigmoidoscopy and double contrast barium enema or colonoscopy is needed after the onset of symptoms.
    4. If abnormalities have been detected during the sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy e.g., because of polyps, the subject can be included in the trial if the polyps were removed. If clinically indicated, a repeat colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy needs to be performed at latest within one week after the screening visit. If no barium enema with flexible sigmoidoscopy or a colonoscopic examination has been performed within the period as described above, the assessment is to be scheduled on the screening visit or within the week following screening. When it is clinically indicated that a repeat colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy is needed to confirm results of a colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy performed after the screening visit, the subject should be a screen failure.
  6. Subjects with known serious illness: clinically significant cardiac, vascular, liver, pulmonary, or psychiatric disorders (as evaluated by the Investigator).
  7. Subjects with any condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would complicate or compromise the trial or the well-being of the subject or evidence of clinically relevant pathology that could interfere with the trial results or put the subject's safety at risk.
  8. Subjects known to have human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or AIDS, hepatitis B or hepatitis C.
  9. Subjects with impaired renal function, i.e. serum creatinine concentration >180 μmol/l or calculated creatinine clearance ≤30 ml/min, including subjects requiring dialysis.
  10. Subjects with clinically significant abnormalities of haematology, urinalysis, or blood chemistry as determined by the Investigator. If the results of the haematology, biochemistry or urinalysis tests are not within the laboratory's reference ranges, the subject can be included only on the condition that the Investigator judges that the deviations are not clinically significant. This should be clearly recorded in the electronic Case Report Form (e-CRF).
  11. Subjects with a known history of alcohol or drug abuse in the previous 6 months.
  12. Subjects with lactose intolerance for whom it is expected that low doses of lactose can lead to diarrhoea, or a known allergy to ingredients or excipients of the trial medication.
  13. Subjects who received an investigational drug in the 30 days preceding the run-in period of the trial.
  14. Subjects who previously used prucalopride.

Sites / Locations

  • Gastro-Kliniek cvba
  • Cliniques Universitaires St Luc
  • GP / Huisartsenpraktijk De Regenboog
  • UZ Leuven Gasthuisberg
  • CHU Sart Tilman
  • Private Practice
  • 4 MHAT
  • CCBR Czech Republic Brno
  • KKN a.s.
  • CCBR Czech Republic Pardubice
  • Universtiy Hospital Kralovske Vinhorady
  • MONSE s.r.o.
  • Hospital Slany
  • Orlickoustecka nemocnice
  • Krajska Nemocnice T. Bati a.s., Interni oddeleni - klinika IPVZ; Nemocnicni Lekarna
  • Krajska Nemocnice T. Bati a.s.
  • CCBR DK Aalborg
  • CCBR DK Ballerup
  • CCBR DK Vejle
  • CHU - Hopital Nord, service gastro-enterologie et hepatologie
  • ARK Clinical Research (Jean XXIII)
  • ARK Clinical Research (Proust)
  • ARK Clinical Research - Chanzy
  • ARK Clinical Research
  • Hopital Avicenne, Centre d'exploitation fonctionnelle et reducation digestive
  • Service de Gastroenterologie & INSERM CIC-P 803 - CHU de Dijon
  • ARK Clinical Research
  • Hôpital Edouard Herriot
  • Hopital Archet 2- service gastro-enterologie et hepatologie
  • Hôpital Pontchaillou - Service des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif
  • Cabinet Médical
  • ARK Clinical Research
  • emovis GmbH
  • Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie am Johannisplatz
  • Fachartzpraxis für Innere Medizin
  • Meander Medisch Centrum
  • VU Medisch Centrum
  • PT&R / PreCare Trial & Recruitment
  • Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei
  • Maastricht Universitair medisch Centrum
  • Erasmus MC
  • Ikazia Ziekenhuis
  • Gabinet Lekarski Janusz Rudziński
  • Instytut Medycyny Wsi im. Witolda Chodźki - Zaklad Endoskopowych Badań Kliniczncyh
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny Nr 4 w Lublinie
  • Endoskopia Sp. z o.o.
  • Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska w Dziedzinie Chirurgii Ogólnej i Gastroenterologii
  • Przychodnia Polskiej Fundacji Gastroenterologii Filia Nr 1 NZOZ
  • NZOZ Vivamed
  • CMI Dr. Lenghel Augustin
  • Centrul Medical Valahia SRL
  • Spitalul Universitar de Urgenta Militar Central "Dr. Carol Davila"
  • SC Quantum Medical Center SRL
  • Endocenter Medicina Integrativa SRL
  • SC Cabinet Medical Dr. Blaj Stefan SRL
  • SC Mediclass Sananova SRL
  • Centrul Medical Humanitas
  • Centrul Medical Tuculanu SRL
  • Centrul Medical Sana
  • Spitalul Clinic Judetean Cluj,Clinica Medicala I
  • Gastromedica SRL
  • Cabinet Medical Dr. Lokos Barna-Csaba
  • Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta Sibiu
  • CMI de Gastroenterologie Dobru Daniela
  • Policlinic Algomed SRL
  • Oldfield Surgery
  • Avondale Surgery
  • University Hospital & Warwickshire -
  • County Durham & Darlington NHS Foundation Trust
  • Burbage Surgery
  • Townhead Research
  • Sherbourne Medical Centre
  • Wythenshawe Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Placebo

Prucalopride

Arm Description

Placebo

1 milligram (mg) or 2 mg

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The Percentage of Subjects With an Average of ≥3 Spontaneous Complete Bowel Movements (SCBM) Per Week
Spontaneous Bowel Movements defined as a bowel movement that is not preceded within a period of 24 hours by the intake of a laxative agent or by the use of an enema.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Subjects With an Average Weekly Frequency of at Least 3 SCBM Per Week and an Increase of ≥ 1 SCBM Per Week for ≥ 75% of the 12-week Treatment Period and ≥ 75% of the Last Third of the 12-week Treatment Period
Percentage of Subjects With an Increase of at Least 1 SCBM Per Week
SCBM Per Week
Percent SBM With a Consistency of Normal and Hard/Very Hard
Consistency measured using the 7-point Bristol scale where 1-2 indicate constipation (=hard/very hard), 3-4 are ideal stools (=normal), and 5-7 tending toward diarrhea.
Percent SCBM With No Straining and Severe/Very Severe Straining
Straining was evaluated on a 5-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, or 4=very severe)
Percent SBM With Sensation of Complete Evacuation
Time to First SCBM After Investigational Product Intake on Day 1
Bisacodyl Tablets Taken Per Week
Days With Rescue Medication Taken Per Week
Percent of Subjects With an Improvement of ≥ 1 Point on the Patient Assessment of Constipation - Symptom (PAC-SYM) Questionnaire Total Score at Final On Treatment Assessment
The PAC-SYM is a validated 12-item questionnaire for the evaluation of severity of symptoms of constipation in subjects with constipation. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale: 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe. Total score ranges from 0 to 48. Lower scores indicate improvement in symptoms. A 1-point improvement in PAC-SYM total score was considered clinically meaningful.
Percent of Subjects With an Improvement of ≥ 1 Point on the Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) Total Score at Final On Treatment Assessment
The PAC-QOL is a validated 28-item questionnaire for the evaluation of quality of life in subjects with constipation. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale: 0=not at all/none of the time, 1=a little bit/a little bit of the time, 2=moderately/some of the time, 3=quite a bit/most of the time, 4=extremely/all of the time. Total score ranges from 0-112. Lower scores indicate improvement in symptoms. A 1-point improvement in PAC-QOL total score was considered clinically meaningful.
Percent of Subjects on the Subject Global Evaluation on Severity of Constipation Score Rating Constipation as Severe to Very Severe at Final On-Treatment Assessment
Subject was asked to rate the severity of his constipation using a 5-point Likert scale: 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe
Percent of Subjects on the Subject Global Evaluation on Efficacy of Treatment Score Rating Treatment as Quite a Bit to Extremely Effective at Final On-Treatment Assessment
The subject was asked to rate his global evaluation of the efficacy of treatment using the following 5-point scale: 0=not at all effective 1=a little bit effective 2=moderately effective 3=quite a bit effective 4=extremely effective.

Full Information

First Posted
June 17, 2010
Last Updated
May 26, 2021
Sponsor
Shire
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01147926
Brief Title
Evaluation of Prucalopride in Male Subjects With Chronic Constipation.
Official Title
A 12-week, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Quality of Life, Safety and Tolerability of Prucalopride in Male Subjects With Chronic Constipation
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 23, 2010 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 25, 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 25, 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Shire

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a multi-centre, randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy of prucalopride versus placebo over 12 weeks of treatment in male subjects with chronic constipation. Furthermore the safety, tolerability, effect on quality of life and effect on symptoms of prucalopride will be assessed.
Detailed Description
In this phase III trial subjects will be screened and enter a 2-week run-in period (or a 3-week run-in period if the subject is using agents that influence bowel habit) during which the presence of constipation will be confirmed [the subject will complete an electronic daily diary (e-diary)]. At the start of run-in, all existing laxative medication will be withdrawn and subjects will be instructed not to change their diet or lifestyle during the trial. Subjects will be allowed to take a laxative [Dulcolax (bisacodyl)] as rescue medication during the trial, but only if they have not had a bowel movement (BM) for 3 or more consecutive days. An enema can only be used after unsuccessful use of Dulcolax (bisacodyl). No Dulcolax (bisacodyl) should be taken or enemas used between 48 hours before and 48 hours after the first intake of study medication. After the run-in subjects will be randomly assigned to placebo or prucalopride in an equal ratio (1:1) if the subject fulfils the constipation criteria for inclusion. Randomisation will be stratified by country and by the average number of complete bowel movements (CBM) during run-in: 0 CBM/week and > 0 CBM/week. Adult subjects (i.e. subjects ≥18 to <65 years of age) will take 2 mg prucalopride or matching placebo once daily before breakfast during the entire 12-week treatment period. Elderly subjects (i.e. subjects ≥65 years of age) will start at a dose of 1 mg prucalopride or matching placebo once daily before breakfast. In case of insufficient response, defined as an average of <3 spontaneous complete bowel movements (SCBM)/week during the preceding 2 weeks of treatment (i.e. since the previous visit) at Week 2 or Week 4, the daily dose has to be increased to 2 mg (or matching placebo). Once the dose is increased to 2 mg once daily the subject will stay on this dose for the remainder of the trial. After Week 4 (Visit 4) no changes in dose are allowed anymore.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Male Subjects With Chronic Constipation
Keywords
Constipation, Male

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
374 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo
Arm Title
Prucalopride
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
1 milligram (mg) or 2 mg
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo matched to Prucalopride tablet orally once daily.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Prucalopride
Intervention Description
Prucalopride 2 mg tablet orally once daily for subjects greater than or equal to (≥) 18 to less than (<) 65 years; 1 mg once daily orally for subjects ≥65 years, and in case of insufficient response, increased to 2 mg once daily orally at Week 2 or Week 4.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Percentage of Subjects With an Average of ≥3 Spontaneous Complete Bowel Movements (SCBM) Per Week
Description
Spontaneous Bowel Movements defined as a bowel movement that is not preceded within a period of 24 hours by the intake of a laxative agent or by the use of an enema.
Time Frame
Over 12 week treatment period
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Subjects With an Average Weekly Frequency of at Least 3 SCBM Per Week and an Increase of ≥ 1 SCBM Per Week for ≥ 75% of the 12-week Treatment Period and ≥ 75% of the Last Third of the 12-week Treatment Period
Time Frame
Over 12 week treatment period
Title
Percentage of Subjects With an Increase of at Least 1 SCBM Per Week
Time Frame
Over 12 week treatment period
Title
SCBM Per Week
Time Frame
Over 12 week treatment period
Title
Percent SBM With a Consistency of Normal and Hard/Very Hard
Description
Consistency measured using the 7-point Bristol scale where 1-2 indicate constipation (=hard/very hard), 3-4 are ideal stools (=normal), and 5-7 tending toward diarrhea.
Time Frame
Over 12 week treatment period
Title
Percent SCBM With No Straining and Severe/Very Severe Straining
Description
Straining was evaluated on a 5-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, or 4=very severe)
Time Frame
Over 12 week treatment period
Title
Percent SBM With Sensation of Complete Evacuation
Time Frame
Over 12 week treatment period
Title
Time to First SCBM After Investigational Product Intake on Day 1
Time Frame
Day 1
Title
Bisacodyl Tablets Taken Per Week
Time Frame
Over 12 week treatment period
Title
Days With Rescue Medication Taken Per Week
Time Frame
Over 12 week treatment period
Title
Percent of Subjects With an Improvement of ≥ 1 Point on the Patient Assessment of Constipation - Symptom (PAC-SYM) Questionnaire Total Score at Final On Treatment Assessment
Description
The PAC-SYM is a validated 12-item questionnaire for the evaluation of severity of symptoms of constipation in subjects with constipation. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale: 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe. Total score ranges from 0 to 48. Lower scores indicate improvement in symptoms. A 1-point improvement in PAC-SYM total score was considered clinically meaningful.
Time Frame
Over 12 week treatment period
Title
Percent of Subjects With an Improvement of ≥ 1 Point on the Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) Total Score at Final On Treatment Assessment
Description
The PAC-QOL is a validated 28-item questionnaire for the evaluation of quality of life in subjects with constipation. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale: 0=not at all/none of the time, 1=a little bit/a little bit of the time, 2=moderately/some of the time, 3=quite a bit/most of the time, 4=extremely/all of the time. Total score ranges from 0-112. Lower scores indicate improvement in symptoms. A 1-point improvement in PAC-QOL total score was considered clinically meaningful.
Time Frame
Over 12 week treatment period
Title
Percent of Subjects on the Subject Global Evaluation on Severity of Constipation Score Rating Constipation as Severe to Very Severe at Final On-Treatment Assessment
Description
Subject was asked to rate the severity of his constipation using a 5-point Likert scale: 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe
Time Frame
Over 12 week treatment period
Title
Percent of Subjects on the Subject Global Evaluation on Efficacy of Treatment Score Rating Treatment as Quite a Bit to Extremely Effective at Final On-Treatment Assessment
Description
The subject was asked to rate his global evaluation of the efficacy of treatment using the following 5-point scale: 0=not at all effective 1=a little bit effective 2=moderately effective 3=quite a bit effective 4=extremely effective.
Time Frame
Over 12 week treatment period

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subject is a male out-patient ≥18 years of age (no upper age limit). Subject has a history of constipation. The subject reports an average of ≤ 2 SBM/week that result in a feeling of complete evacuation (SCBM) and one or more of the following for at least 6 months before the selection visit: Very hard (little balls) and/or hard stools for at least a quarter of the stools; Sensation of incomplete evacuation following for at least a quarter of the stools; Straining at defecation for at least a quarter of the time. This includes subjects who never have SBMs. The above criteria are only applicable for SBMs, i.e. BMs not preceded within a period of 24 hours by the intake of a laxative agent or by the use of an enema. Subject agrees to stop his current laxative treatment and is willing to use rescue medication according to the rescue rule [Dulcolax® (bisacodyl)/enemas] Subject's constipation is chronic. Subject is able and willing to complete the questionnaires (if a validated version in the language of the subject is available) and the e-diary. Subject voluntarily signs the written Informed Consent Form (ICF) in accordance with the regional laws/regulations, prior to the first trial-related activity. Subject is willing to adhere to all trial requirements (amongst others colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy, if required). Exclusion Criteria: Subjects in whom constipation is thought to be drug-induced. Subjects using any disallowed medication Subjects suffering from secondary causes of chronic constipation, such as: Endocrine disorders, e.g. hypopituitarism, hypothyroidism, hypercalcaemia, pseudohypoparathyroidism, pheochromocytoma or glucagon-producing tumours, unless these are controlled by appropriate medical therapy. Subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus should always be excluded, also if the subjects are under appropriate medical therapy; Metabolic disorders (e.g. porphyria, uraemia, hypokalaemia or amyloid neuropathy, unless these are controlled by appropriate medical therapy); Neurological disorders (e.g. Parkinson's disease, cerebral tumours, cerebrovascular accidents, multiple sclerosis, meningocele, aganglionosis, hypoganglionosis, hyperganglionosis, autonomic neuropathy or neuropathy due to chemotherapy, spinal cord injury, Chaga's disease, major depression); Surgery. Subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus should always be excluded, irrespective of whether the constipation started prior to or after the onset of diabetes. Subjects with a significant history of cancer (i.e. less than a 5-year disease-free survival). Subjects with intestinal perforation or obstruction due to structural or functional disorder of the gut wall, obstructive ileus, severe inflammatory conditions of the intestinal tract, such as Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis and toxic megacolon/megarectum. Results of an endoscopy or radiologic bowel evaluation is required to rule out polyps, cancer, stricture or other structural or organic disease: For patients ≤ 50 years: a flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy after the onset of constipation symptoms and within the previous 5 years; For patients > 50 years: a flexible sigmoidoscopy /double contrast barium enema or colonoscopy after the onset of constipation symptoms and within the previous 5 years. For subjects, regardless of age, even if results of this test are available within the previous 5 years but if the patient has alarm symptoms such as anemia, weight loss, heme positive stool, or rectal bleeding: a flexible sigmoidoscopy and double contrast barium enema or colonoscopy is needed after the onset of symptoms. If abnormalities have been detected during the sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy e.g., because of polyps, the subject can be included in the trial if the polyps were removed. If clinically indicated, a repeat colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy needs to be performed at latest within one week after the screening visit. If no barium enema with flexible sigmoidoscopy or a colonoscopic examination has been performed within the period as described above, the assessment is to be scheduled on the screening visit or within the week following screening. When it is clinically indicated that a repeat colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy is needed to confirm results of a colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy performed after the screening visit, the subject should be a screen failure. Subjects with known serious illness: clinically significant cardiac, vascular, liver, pulmonary, or psychiatric disorders (as evaluated by the Investigator). Subjects with any condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would complicate or compromise the trial or the well-being of the subject or evidence of clinically relevant pathology that could interfere with the trial results or put the subject's safety at risk. Subjects known to have human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or AIDS, hepatitis B or hepatitis C. Subjects with impaired renal function, i.e. serum creatinine concentration >180 μmol/l or calculated creatinine clearance ≤30 ml/min, including subjects requiring dialysis. Subjects with clinically significant abnormalities of haematology, urinalysis, or blood chemistry as determined by the Investigator. If the results of the haematology, biochemistry or urinalysis tests are not within the laboratory's reference ranges, the subject can be included only on the condition that the Investigator judges that the deviations are not clinically significant. This should be clearly recorded in the electronic Case Report Form (e-CRF). Subjects with a known history of alcohol or drug abuse in the previous 6 months. Subjects with lactose intolerance for whom it is expected that low doses of lactose can lead to diarrhoea, or a known allergy to ingredients or excipients of the trial medication. Subjects who received an investigational drug in the 30 days preceding the run-in period of the trial. Subjects who previously used prucalopride.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Study Director
Organizational Affiliation
Takeda
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Gastro-Kliniek cvba
City
Antwerpen 7
ZIP/Postal Code
2018
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Cliniques Universitaires St Luc
City
Bruxelles
ZIP/Postal Code
1200
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
GP / Huisartsenpraktijk De Regenboog
City
Deurne
ZIP/Postal Code
2100
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
UZ Leuven Gasthuisberg
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
CHU Sart Tilman
City
Liege
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Private Practice
City
Wetteren
ZIP/Postal Code
9230
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
4 MHAT
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
CCBR Czech Republic Brno
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
60200
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
KKN a.s.
City
Karlovy Vary
ZIP/Postal Code
36001
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
CCBR Czech Republic Pardubice
City
Pardubice
ZIP/Postal Code
530 02
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Universtiy Hospital Kralovske Vinhorady
City
Prague 10
ZIP/Postal Code
100 34
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
MONSE s.r.o.
City
Prague
ZIP/Postal Code
118 33
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Hospital Slany
City
Slany
ZIP/Postal Code
274 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Orlickoustecka nemocnice
City
Usti nad Orlici
ZIP/Postal Code
562 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Krajska Nemocnice T. Bati a.s., Interni oddeleni - klinika IPVZ; Nemocnicni Lekarna
City
Zlin
ZIP/Postal Code
762 75
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Krajska Nemocnice T. Bati a.s.
City
Zlin
ZIP/Postal Code
762 75
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
CCBR DK Aalborg
City
Aalborg
ZIP/Postal Code
9000
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
CCBR DK Ballerup
City
Ballerup
ZIP/Postal Code
2750
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
CCBR DK Vejle
City
Vejle
ZIP/Postal Code
7100
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
CHU - Hopital Nord, service gastro-enterologie et hepatologie
City
Amiens
ZIP/Postal Code
80054
Country
France
Facility Name
ARK Clinical Research (Jean XXIII)
City
Angers
ZIP/Postal Code
49000
Country
France
Facility Name
ARK Clinical Research (Proust)
City
Angers
ZIP/Postal Code
49000
Country
France
Facility Name
ARK Clinical Research - Chanzy
City
Angers
ZIP/Postal Code
49000
Country
France
Facility Name
ARK Clinical Research
City
Avrille
ZIP/Postal Code
49000
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Avicenne, Centre d'exploitation fonctionnelle et reducation digestive
City
Bobigny
ZIP/Postal Code
93009
Country
France
Facility Name
Service de Gastroenterologie & INSERM CIC-P 803 - CHU de Dijon
City
Dijon Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
21079
Country
France
Facility Name
ARK Clinical Research
City
Le Plessis-Grammoire
ZIP/Postal Code
49124
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Edouard Herriot
City
Lyon cedex 3
ZIP/Postal Code
69437
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Archet 2- service gastro-enterologie et hepatologie
City
Nice
ZIP/Postal Code
06002
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Pontchaillou - Service des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif
City
Rennes
ZIP/Postal Code
35000
Country
France
Facility Name
Cabinet Médical
City
Thouars
Country
France
Facility Name
ARK Clinical Research
City
Vendome
ZIP/Postal Code
41100
Country
France
Facility Name
emovis GmbH
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
10629
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie am Johannisplatz
City
Leipzig
ZIP/Postal Code
04103
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Fachartzpraxis für Innere Medizin
City
Wiesbaden
ZIP/Postal Code
65285
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Meander Medisch Centrum
City
Amersfoort
ZIP/Postal Code
3818 ES
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
VU Medisch Centrum
City
Amsterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
1081 HV
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
PT&R / PreCare Trial & Recruitment
City
Beek
ZIP/Postal Code
6191JW
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei
City
Ede
ZIP/Postal Code
6716 RP
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Maastricht Universitair medisch Centrum
City
Maastricht
ZIP/Postal Code
6229 HX
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Erasmus MC
City
Rotterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
3015 CE
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Ikazia Ziekenhuis
City
Rotterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
3083 AN
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Gabinet Lekarski Janusz Rudziński
City
Bydgoszcz
ZIP/Postal Code
85-681
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Instytut Medycyny Wsi im. Witolda Chodźki - Zaklad Endoskopowych Badań Kliniczncyh
City
Lublin
ZIP/Postal Code
20-950
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny Nr 4 w Lublinie
City
Lublin
ZIP/Postal Code
20-954
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Endoskopia Sp. z o.o.
City
Sopot
ZIP/Postal Code
81-756
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska w Dziedzinie Chirurgii Ogólnej i Gastroenterologii
City
Torun
ZIP/Postal Code
87-100
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Przychodnia Polskiej Fundacji Gastroenterologii Filia Nr 1 NZOZ
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-653
Country
Poland
Facility Name
NZOZ Vivamed
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
03-580
Country
Poland
Facility Name
CMI Dr. Lenghel Augustin
City
Oradea
State/Province
Bihor
ZIP/Postal Code
410163
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Centrul Medical Valahia SRL
City
Ploiesti
State/Province
Prahova
ZIP/Postal Code
100410
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Spitalul Universitar de Urgenta Militar Central "Dr. Carol Davila"
City
Bucuresti
State/Province
Sector 1
ZIP/Postal Code
010825
Country
Romania
Facility Name
SC Quantum Medical Center SRL
City
Bucuresti
State/Province
Sector 1
ZIP/Postal Code
011426
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Endocenter Medicina Integrativa SRL
City
Bucuresti
State/Province
Sector 2
ZIP/Postal Code
021978
Country
Romania
Facility Name
SC Cabinet Medical Dr. Blaj Stefan SRL
City
Bucuresti,
State/Province
Sector 5
ZIP/Postal Code
40101
Country
Romania
Facility Name
SC Mediclass Sananova SRL
City
Bucuresti
State/Province
Sector 5
ZIP/Postal Code
050524
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Centrul Medical Humanitas
City
Bucuresti,
State/Province
Sector 6
ZIP/Postal Code
062272
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Centrul Medical Tuculanu SRL
City
Timisoara
State/Province
Timis
ZIP/Postal Code
300158
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Centrul Medical Sana
City
Bucuresti
ZIP/Postal Code
11025
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Spitalul Clinic Judetean Cluj,Clinica Medicala I
City
Cluj
ZIP/Postal Code
400006
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Gastromedica SRL
City
Iasi
ZIP/Postal Code
700506
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Cabinet Medical Dr. Lokos Barna-Csaba
City
Miercurea Ciuc
ZIP/Postal Code
530174
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta Sibiu
City
Sibiu
ZIP/Postal Code
550245
Country
Romania
Facility Name
CMI de Gastroenterologie Dobru Daniela
City
Targu-Mures
ZIP/Postal Code
540130
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Policlinic Algomed SRL
City
Timisoara
ZIP/Postal Code
300002
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Oldfield Surgery
City
Bath
ZIP/Postal Code
BA2 3HT
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Avondale Surgery
City
Chesterfield
ZIP/Postal Code
S40 4TE
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
University Hospital & Warwickshire -
City
Coventry
ZIP/Postal Code
CV2 2DX
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
County Durham & Darlington NHS Foundation Trust
City
Durham
ZIP/Postal Code
DH1 5GA
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Burbage Surgery
City
Hinckley
ZIP/Postal Code
LE10 2SE
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Townhead Research
City
Irvine
ZIP/Postal Code
KA12 0AY
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Sherbourne Medical Centre
City
Leamington Spa
ZIP/Postal Code
CV32 4RA
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Wythenshawe Hospital
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M23 9LT
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34585675
Citation
Staller K, Hinson J, Kerstens R, Spalding W, Lembo A. Efficacy of Prucalopride for Chronic Idiopathic Constipation: An Analysis of Participants With Moderate to Very Severe Abdominal Bloating. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 1;117(1):184-188. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001521.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25869393
Citation
Yiannakou Y, Piessevaux H, Bouchoucha M, Schiefke I, Filip R, Gabalec L, Dina I, Stephenson D, Kerstens R, Etherson K, Levine A. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of prucalopride in men with chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 May;110(5):741-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.115. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of Prucalopride in Male Subjects With Chronic Constipation.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs