Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of the RefluxStop Device in the Management of GERD
Primary Purpose
GERD
Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Treatment with RefluxStop
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for GERD focused on measuring GERD, Implantable medical device, RefluxStop, Reflux, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Laparoscopy, pH-Monitoring, PPI proton pump inhibitors
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject's age >= 18 years and <= 75 years
- Subject is able to undergo general anaesthesia and is a suitable laparoscopic surgical candidate
- Subject is willing and able to participate
- Subject has provided written informed consent after being informed of the study procedure and risks prior to any study-related events
- Subject has documented typical GERD symptoms present for > 6 months which respond to PPIs as anti-GERD medication. Typical symptom of GERD is defined as heartburn, which is a burning epigastric or substernal pain
- Subject requires daily PPI anti GERD medication
- Subject has a 24-hour pH monitoring proven GERD performed taken off any anti reflux medication or after discontinuation for at least 7 days prior to testing. Total distal esophageal pH must be <= 4 for >= 4.5% if time during a 24-hour monitoring
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject is currently participating in another study involving investigational drugs or devices
- Subject has a history of gastro esophageal surgery, anti-reflux or bariatric procedure
- Subject has a history of endoscopic anti-reflux intervention
- Subject has a history or a suspicion of esophageal or gastric cancer
- Subject has a history of major psychiatric disorder
- Presence of a para-esophageal hernia or sliding hernia of > 3cm determined on endoscopy
- Presence of an esophagitis grade C or D according to the Los Angeles classification
- Presence of esophageal dysmotility disorder such as but not limited to scleroderma, achalasia, Nutcracker oesophagus
- Presence of esophageal stricture or stenosis
- Presence of delayed gastric emptying
- Presence of esophageal or gastric varies
- Subject has a body mass index (BMI) > 35kg/m2
- Female subjects who are pregnant or nursing
- Known sensitivity or allergies to silicone materials
- Subjects who are unable to comply with the protocol requirements
- Subjects with limited life expectancy (< 3 years)
- Intra-operative findings that may preclude conduct of the study procedures
Sites / Locations
- Semmelweis University
- University of Debrecen, Kenezy Gyula Teaching Hospital, General Surgery Department
- Fejer County Szent Gyorgy University Teaching Hospital, Surgical Department
- Clinical Center of Serbia, Clinic for Digestive Surgery
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Treatment with RefluxStop device
Arm Description
All enrolled subjects will receive treatment for their GERD using the RefluxStop device intervention
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary safety endpoint
Assessment of incidence of serious adverse device effects (SADEs) and procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs)
Primary efficacy endpoint
Percent reduction from baseline of GERD symptoms based on the GERD-HRQL score (questions 1-10). The data will also be presented as the number of subjects obtaining a 50% improvement of the baseline figures, with success defined as 60% of the subjects to reach such score improvement. Thus, the aim of this analysis is to show that the lower limit of the confidence interval exceeds 60%.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary safety endpoint
Assessment of incidence of serious adverse device effects (SADEs) and procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs). Incidence of adverse device effects (ADEs) and procedure-related adverse events (AEs)
Secondary efficacy endpoint: HRQL all other timepoints
Percent reduction from baseline of GERD symptoms based on the GERD-HRQL score (questions 1-10)
Secondary efficacy endpoint: additional questions
Reduction from baseline of GERD symptoms based on the total GERD-HRQL score (questions 1-10) and individual symptom questions
Secondary efficacy endpoint: 24-hr pH monitoring
Reduction or normalisation from baseline of the total acid (pH<4) exposure time on 24-hour pH monitoring
Secondary efficacy endpoint: PPI usage
Reduction from baseline of the percentage of subjects with regular daily PPI usage
Secondary efficacy endpoint: Foregut
Reduction from baseline of individual foregut questionnaire scores focusing on regurgitation and additional information on dysphagia and odynophagia reported as AEs, or alternatively GERD-HRQL questions >2 and/or >3
Secondary efficacy endpoint: Endoscopy
Improvement in esophagitis on upper endoscopy
Secondary efficacy endpoint: device location
Location and function of the device evaluated by a simplified contrast swallow x-ray with overview pictures of device and LES position during swallowing
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02759094
First Posted
April 15, 2016
Last Updated
April 5, 2023
Sponsor
Implantica CE Reflux Ltd.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02759094
Brief Title
Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of the RefluxStop Device in the Management of GERD
Official Title
Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of the RefluxStop Device in the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
December 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Implantica CE Reflux Ltd.
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Prospective, open-label, multi-centre, single arm treatment only trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of RefluxStop for the treatment of GERD.
The used medical device "RefluxStop" is an implantable single use sterile device to ensure maintenance of gastro oesophageal junction (GEJ) in an intra-abdominal position to reduce or eliminate GERD.
Detailed Description
The study plan will include a screening/baseline visit, a surgical procedure phase with hospital stay until discharge, and study visits at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after device implantation.
A follow-up will be performed annually from years 1-5 to evaluate long-term safety and performance with the intention to collect post-market long-term data using the GERD-HRQL score as a screening tool. Data of subjects who agreed to participate in the long-term safety and performance will be analysed after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years.
At the screening/baseline visit, after signing the informed consent, the eligibility of subjects to receive treatment with the study device will be determined. Eligible subjects will then undergo the device implant procedure.
A standard laparoscopic approach will be used to reposition the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) to its intra-abdominal position. The RefluxStop™ device will then be positioned and fixed in the gastric fundus to ensure intra-abdominal positioning of the GEJ at all time. After confirming proper placement, the laparoscopic implant procedure will be completed and access points will be closed. The procedure will be recorded and saved only with study identification number and without subject ID information. The same applies for images on contrast swallow controlling the device.
Evaluations will be performed daily during hospitalisation and in an additional 3 study visits in the outpatient setting at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Subjects who have given their consent to participate in the long-term safety and performance follow-up part of the study will be followed annually from year 1-5.
A pathologically low pH in the lower esophagus is correlated to the development of precancerous changes/ Barrett's esophagus and fulminant cancer, as shown in the literature. Barrett's esophagus occurs in 1-2% of the total population while daily acid reflux patients have an incidence of 10-20% depending on the severity of the acid reflux [Modiano, Gerson 2007; Cossentino, Wong 2003]. As many as 48,000 people p.a. die in Europe and the US alone of esophageal adenocarcinoma, the primary cause of which is acid reflux. Therefore, in order to determine whether treatment is maintained in the longer-term, an additional 24-hour pH monitoring and simplified contrast swallow x-ray to verify the position of the device will be performed at 5 years for the benefit of the patients.
These long-term results have also been requested by the U.S. FDA. A quality control of the placement of the device will be categorized for subjects at after surgery, 6 months and 5 year follow-up and at therapy failure.
The position of the device is of utmost importance and will be categorized in the case of therapy failure.
To ensure a proper quality control, the contrast swallow x-ray determining eventual hiatal hernia performed before surgery is repeated at hospital stay after surgery and during the 6-month surgical outcome control and at 5-year follow-up. This x-ray is also used for categorizing the position of the device in a four-graded scale if therapy failure occurs and should be performed by the radiologist using the standard of care post-op contrast swallow.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
GERD
Keywords
GERD, Implantable medical device, RefluxStop, Reflux, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Laparoscopy, pH-Monitoring, PPI proton pump inhibitors
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
50 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Treatment with RefluxStop device
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
All enrolled subjects will receive treatment for their GERD using the RefluxStop device intervention
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Treatment with RefluxStop
Intervention Description
A standard laparoscopic approach will be used to reposition the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) to its intra-abdominal position. The RefluxStop device will be then positioned and fixed in the gastric funds to ensure intra-abdominal positioning of the GEJ (Gastro-oesophageal Junction) at all time. After confirming proper placement, the laparoscopic implant procedure will be completed and access points will be closed.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Primary safety endpoint
Description
Assessment of incidence of serious adverse device effects (SADEs) and procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs)
Time Frame
at 6 months
Title
Primary efficacy endpoint
Description
Percent reduction from baseline of GERD symptoms based on the GERD-HRQL score (questions 1-10). The data will also be presented as the number of subjects obtaining a 50% improvement of the baseline figures, with success defined as 60% of the subjects to reach such score improvement. Thus, the aim of this analysis is to show that the lower limit of the confidence interval exceeds 60%.
Time Frame
at 6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Secondary safety endpoint
Description
Assessment of incidence of serious adverse device effects (SADEs) and procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs). Incidence of adverse device effects (ADEs) and procedure-related adverse events (AEs)
Time Frame
at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months (ADEs and AEs only) and annually years 1-5
Title
Secondary efficacy endpoint: HRQL all other timepoints
Description
Percent reduction from baseline of GERD symptoms based on the GERD-HRQL score (questions 1-10)
Time Frame
measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and follow-up years 1-5
Title
Secondary efficacy endpoint: additional questions
Description
Reduction from baseline of GERD symptoms based on the total GERD-HRQL score (questions 1-10) and individual symptom questions
Time Frame
measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and follow up years 1-5
Title
Secondary efficacy endpoint: 24-hr pH monitoring
Description
Reduction or normalisation from baseline of the total acid (pH<4) exposure time on 24-hour pH monitoring
Time Frame
measured at baseline, 6 months, 5 years and if therapy failure
Title
Secondary efficacy endpoint: PPI usage
Description
Reduction from baseline of the percentage of subjects with regular daily PPI usage
Time Frame
measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and follow up years 1-5
Title
Secondary efficacy endpoint: Foregut
Description
Reduction from baseline of individual foregut questionnaire scores focusing on regurgitation and additional information on dysphagia and odynophagia reported as AEs, or alternatively GERD-HRQL questions >2 and/or >3
Time Frame
measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and follow up years 1-5
Title
Secondary efficacy endpoint: Endoscopy
Description
Improvement in esophagitis on upper endoscopy
Time Frame
measured at baseline, 6 months and if therapy failure
Title
Secondary efficacy endpoint: device location
Description
Location and function of the device evaluated by a simplified contrast swallow x-ray with overview pictures of device and LES position during swallowing
Time Frame
measured at hospital stay, 6 weeks, 6 months, 5 years and if therapy failure
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Secondary efficacy subgroup endpoint
Description
Reduction or change comparison based on the following subgroups: age, gender, weight and result of baseline total GERD-HRQL score, comparing the following secondary endpoints: the total acid (pH<4) exposure time on routine 24-hour pH monitoring at month 6 and the number and percentage of subjects having verified therapy failure
Time Frame
per patient any point in the study triggered either by regular daily PPI usage or a GERD-HRQL score with less than 50% improvement compared to baseline, and having been verified as therapy failure via 24-hr pH monitoring and x-ray results
Title
Exploratory endpoint: procedure complications
Description
Assess any procedure-related complications
Time Frame
during procedure
Title
Exploratory endpoint: Procedure time
Description
Assess time to perform the procedure
Time Frame
during procedure
Title
Exploratory endpoint: length of hospital stay
Description
Assess length of the subject's hospital stay
Time Frame
from date of admission to date of discharge, assessed up to 100 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject's age >= 18 years and <= 75 years
Subject is able to undergo general anaesthesia and is a suitable laparoscopic surgical candidate
Subject is willing and able to participate
Subject has provided written informed consent after being informed of the study procedure and risks prior to any study-related events
Subject has documented typical GERD symptoms present for > 6 months which respond to PPIs as anti-GERD medication. Typical symptom of GERD is defined as heartburn, which is a burning epigastric or substernal pain
Subject requires daily PPI anti GERD medication
Subject has a 24-hour pH monitoring proven GERD performed taken off any anti reflux medication or after discontinuation for at least 7 days prior to testing. Total distal esophageal pH must be <= 4 for >= 4.5% if time during a 24-hour monitoring
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject is currently participating in another study involving investigational drugs or devices
Subject has a history of gastro esophageal surgery, anti-reflux or bariatric procedure
Subject has a history of endoscopic anti-reflux intervention
Subject has a history or a suspicion of esophageal or gastric cancer
Subject has a history of major psychiatric disorder
Presence of a para-esophageal hernia or sliding hernia of > 3cm determined on endoscopy
Presence of an esophagitis grade C or D according to the Los Angeles classification
Presence of esophageal dysmotility disorder such as but not limited to scleroderma, achalasia, Nutcracker oesophagus
Presence of esophageal stricture or stenosis
Presence of delayed gastric emptying
Presence of esophageal or gastric varies
Subject has a body mass index (BMI) > 35kg/m2
Female subjects who are pregnant or nursing
Known sensitivity or allergies to silicone materials
Subjects who are unable to comply with the protocol requirements
Subjects with limited life expectancy (< 3 years)
Intra-operative findings that may preclude conduct of the study procedures
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
László Harsányi, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Semmelweis University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Semmelweis University
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1082
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
University of Debrecen, Kenezy Gyula Teaching Hospital, General Surgery Department
City
Debrecen
ZIP/Postal Code
4031
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Fejer County Szent Gyorgy University Teaching Hospital, Surgical Department
City
Székesfehérvár
ZIP/Postal Code
H-8000
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Clinical Center of Serbia, Clinic for Digestive Surgery
City
Belgrade
ZIP/Postal Code
11000
Country
Serbia
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32689979
Citation
Bjelovic M, Harsanyi L, Altorjay A, Kincses Z, Forsell P; Investigators of the RefluxStop Clinical Investigation Study Group. Non-active implantable device treating acid reflux with a new dynamic treatment approach: 1-year results : RefluxStop device; a new method in acid reflux surgery obtaining CE mark. BMC Surg. 2020 Jul 20;20(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00794-9.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of the RefluxStop Device in the Management of GERD
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs