search
Back to results

Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Lumason/SonoVue in Subjects Undergoing Pharmacologic Stress BR1-142

Primary Purpose

Coronary Artery Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Lumason
Sponsored by
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Coronary Artery Disease focused on measuring Lumason, Dobutamine stress echo, stress echo, coronary artery disease

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provided written Informed Consent and comply with protocol requirements;
  • Was at least 18 years of age;
  • Had suspected of having CAD and undergoing coronary angiography within 6 months after the LUMASON DSE.
  • Had undergone a previous echocardiography prior to enrollment; resulting in suboptimal unenhanced images at rest, defined as ≥ 2 suboptimal adjacent segments in any apical view.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Was a pregnant or lactating female. Exclude the possibility of pregnancy: by testing on site at the institution (serum or urine βHCG) within 24 hours prior to the start of LUMASON administration(s), by surgical history (e.g., tubal ligation or hysterectomy), post menopausal with a minimum 1 year without menses;

  • Had any known hypersensitivity to 1 or more ingredients of LUMASON (sulfur hexafluoride or to any components of LUMASON);
  • Had any known hypersensitivity to dobutamine;
  • Had an ongoing or recent (within the last 30 days) acute myocardial infarction;
  • Had known right-to-left, bidirectional or transient cardiac shunt (ruled out with agitated saline study performed before administration of LUMASON);
  • Had electrolyte (especially potassium and magnesium) abnormalities;
  • Had unstable pulmonary and/or systemic hemodynamic conditions e.g.:

decompensated or inadequately controlled congestive heart failure (NYHA Class IV);

  • hypovolemia;
  • uncontrolled hypertension, i.e. resting systolic blood pressure >200 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >110 mmHg;
  • unstable angina;
  • acute coronary syndrome;
  • aortic dissection;
  • acute pericarditis,
  • myocarditis, or endocarditis;
  • stenosis of the main left coronary artery;
  • hemodynamically significant outflow obstruction of the left ventricle, including hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy;
  • hemodynamically significant cardiac valvular defect;
  • acute pulmonary embolism;
  • Had uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias;
  • Had significant disturbance in conduction;
  • Had hypertrophic subaortic stenosis;
  • Had an acute illness (e.g., infections, hyperthyroidism, or severe anemia);
  • Was previously entered into this study or received an investigational compound within 30 days before admission into this study;
  • Had been treated with any other contrast agent either intravascularly or orally within 48 hours of the first LUMASON administration;
  • Had any medical condition or other circumstances which would significantly decrease the chances of obtaining reliable data, achieving study objectives, or completing the study and/or postdose follow-up examinations;

In addition, due to the use of Atropine in subjects who had not reached targeted heart rate with peak dobutamine infusion, subjects with the following were excluded:

  • Glaucoma;
  • Pyloric stenosis;
  • Prostatic hypertrophy.

Sites / Locations

  • Coastal Multi-Specialty Research, Coastal Heart Medical Group
  • Alfieri Cardiology
  • Homestead Cardiac and Vein Center
  • Ochsner Clinic Foundation
  • St. Louis University Hospital
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
  • Duke University Medical Center Cardiac Diagnostic Unit
  • University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
  • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Unité de Pathologie Cardio-Vasculaire / Cardiologie
  • Antwerp University Hospital
  • St. Michael's Hospital
  • Northwick Park Hospital
  • Hammersmith Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Lumason

Arm Description

Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres) 2 mL IV injection

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Sensitivity and Specificity of Lumason Enhanced Dobutamine Stress Echo (DSE) for Detection or Exclusion of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
The diagnostic performance of the echocardiographic images was compared to the truth standard to determine sensitivity and specificity. A diagnosis of CAD was determined for both the echo images and truth standard (positive diagnosis for CAD is defined as >/= 50% stenosis of any vessel on coronary angiography or if no coronary angiography was performed the occurence of a cardiac event based on clinical information for up to 6 months post dose; otherwise the diagnosis was negative). Results for sensitivity and specificity are reflected based on difference between contrast enhanced stress echo and unenhanced stress echo. Results for analysis of data based on majority assessment from the three off-site blinded readers are presented. Sensitivity and specificity are the percentages of correctly diagnosed subjects by stress echo over the total positive and negative subjects according to the truth standard respectively.
Reader-Specific Percentages of Participants Identified as Having a Critical Shift From Suboptimal to Optimal Echocardiographic Images
The percentage of subjects with suboptimal images (defined as >= 2 adjacent segments with inadequate LV EBD in any of the 3 apical views) at unenhanced stress echo converted to adequate (reduction of suboptimal segments in any of the 3 apical views) at contrast-enhanced stress echo

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Total LV EBD
Measured as the change in the total LV EBD score based on the 17 segments, from peak stress unenhanced vs. peak stress contrast-enhanced. Total LV EBD score ranges from 0 to 34 and higher score is better outcome.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
To obtain safety data in subjects administered Lumason during echocardiography

Full Information

First Posted
August 11, 2015
Last Updated
June 14, 2021
Sponsor
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02552238
Brief Title
Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Lumason/SonoVue in Subjects Undergoing Pharmacologic Stress BR1-142
Official Title
A Prospective Multicenter Phase III Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Lumason™/SonoVue® in Subjects Undergoing Pharmacologic Stress Echocardiography With Dobutamine for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 12, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 22, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 25, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of Lumason-enhanced dobutamine stress echo (DSE) in subjects having a suboptimal left ventricular endocardial border delineation (LV EBD) at rest and who were scheduled for coronary angiography.
Detailed Description
The study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of Lumason at improving the visualization of the LV EBD during pharmacologic stress echocardiography examinations and for detection or exclusion of the coronary artery disease (CAD). The study population consisted of adult subjects referred for pharmacological stress echocardiography and with suboptimal image quality during unenhanced ultrasound imaging at rest who had known or suspected CAD. Subjects enrolled in the study represented subjects who could benefit most from CEUS stress echocardiography.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Coronary Artery Disease
Keywords
Lumason, Dobutamine stress echo, stress echo, coronary artery disease

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
174 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Lumason
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres) 2 mL IV injection
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lumason
Other Intervention Name(s)
SonoVue
Intervention Description
Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride-type A microspheres) an ultrasound contrast agent was administered as 2 single 2-mL IV injections during rest and stress echocardiography
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Sensitivity and Specificity of Lumason Enhanced Dobutamine Stress Echo (DSE) for Detection or Exclusion of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
Description
The diagnostic performance of the echocardiographic images was compared to the truth standard to determine sensitivity and specificity. A diagnosis of CAD was determined for both the echo images and truth standard (positive diagnosis for CAD is defined as >/= 50% stenosis of any vessel on coronary angiography or if no coronary angiography was performed the occurence of a cardiac event based on clinical information for up to 6 months post dose; otherwise the diagnosis was negative). Results for sensitivity and specificity are reflected based on difference between contrast enhanced stress echo and unenhanced stress echo. Results for analysis of data based on majority assessment from the three off-site blinded readers are presented. Sensitivity and specificity are the percentages of correctly diagnosed subjects by stress echo over the total positive and negative subjects according to the truth standard respectively.
Time Frame
Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography were performed
Title
Reader-Specific Percentages of Participants Identified as Having a Critical Shift From Suboptimal to Optimal Echocardiographic Images
Description
The percentage of subjects with suboptimal images (defined as >= 2 adjacent segments with inadequate LV EBD in any of the 3 apical views) at unenhanced stress echo converted to adequate (reduction of suboptimal segments in any of the 3 apical views) at contrast-enhanced stress echo
Time Frame
Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography was performed
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Total LV EBD
Description
Measured as the change in the total LV EBD score based on the 17 segments, from peak stress unenhanced vs. peak stress contrast-enhanced. Total LV EBD score ranges from 0 to 34 and higher score is better outcome.
Time Frame
Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography was performed
Title
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Description
To obtain safety data in subjects administered Lumason during echocardiography
Time Frame
72 hours post dose

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Provided written Informed Consent and comply with protocol requirements; Was at least 18 years of age; Had suspected of having CAD and undergoing coronary angiography within 6 months after the LUMASON DSE. Had undergone a previous echocardiography prior to enrollment; resulting in suboptimal unenhanced images at rest, defined as ≥ 2 suboptimal adjacent segments in any apical view. Exclusion Criteria: • Was a pregnant or lactating female. Exclude the possibility of pregnancy: by testing on site at the institution (serum or urine βHCG) within 24 hours prior to the start of LUMASON administration(s), by surgical history (e.g., tubal ligation or hysterectomy), post menopausal with a minimum 1 year without menses; Had any known hypersensitivity to 1 or more ingredients of LUMASON (sulfur hexafluoride or to any components of LUMASON); Had any known hypersensitivity to dobutamine; Had an ongoing or recent (within the last 30 days) acute myocardial infarction; Had known right-to-left, bidirectional or transient cardiac shunt (ruled out with agitated saline study performed before administration of LUMASON); Had electrolyte (especially potassium and magnesium) abnormalities; Had unstable pulmonary and/or systemic hemodynamic conditions e.g.: decompensated or inadequately controlled congestive heart failure (NYHA Class IV); hypovolemia; uncontrolled hypertension, i.e. resting systolic blood pressure >200 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >110 mmHg; unstable angina; acute coronary syndrome; aortic dissection; acute pericarditis, myocarditis, or endocarditis; stenosis of the main left coronary artery; hemodynamically significant outflow obstruction of the left ventricle, including hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy; hemodynamically significant cardiac valvular defect; acute pulmonary embolism; Had uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias; Had significant disturbance in conduction; Had hypertrophic subaortic stenosis; Had an acute illness (e.g., infections, hyperthyroidism, or severe anemia); Was previously entered into this study or received an investigational compound within 30 days before admission into this study; Had been treated with any other contrast agent either intravascularly or orally within 48 hours of the first LUMASON administration; Had any medical condition or other circumstances which would significantly decrease the chances of obtaining reliable data, achieving study objectives, or completing the study and/or postdose follow-up examinations; In addition, due to the use of Atropine in subjects who had not reached targeted heart rate with peak dobutamine infusion, subjects with the following were excluded: Glaucoma; Pyloric stenosis; Prostatic hypertrophy.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Melda Dolan, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Coastal Multi-Specialty Research, Coastal Heart Medical Group
City
Santa Ana
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92704
Country
United States
Facility Name
Alfieri Cardiology
City
Wilmington
State/Province
Delaware
ZIP/Postal Code
19803
Country
United States
Facility Name
Homestead Cardiac and Vein Center
City
Homestead
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ochsner Clinic Foundation
City
New Orleans
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70121
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Louis University Hospital
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Nebraska Medical Center
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68198
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University Medical Center Cardiac Diagnostic Unit
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
City
Galveston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77555
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Unité de Pathologie Cardio-Vasculaire / Cardiologie
City
Bruxelles
ZIP/Postal Code
1200
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Antwerp University Hospital
City
Edegem
ZIP/Postal Code
2650
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
St. Michael's Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5B 1W8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Northwick Park Hospital
City
Harrow
State/Province
Middlesex
ZIP/Postal Code
HA1 3UJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Hammersmith Hospital
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
W12 0HS
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Lumason/SonoVue in Subjects Undergoing Pharmacologic Stress BR1-142

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs