Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Dry Needling Versus Foam Roller
Myofascial Pain Syndromes, Dry Needling
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Myofascial Pain Syndromes focused on measuring Dry needling, Myofascial pain syndromes, Ankle joint
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Students of physiotherapy degree of the university
- All participants who present restriction on active ankle dorsiflexion (<35º).
- They must be diagnosed through manual therapy of latent PG in the gastro-soleus complex.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects suffering from belonephobia
- Pathology of connective tissue
- Coagulation problems
- Lymphatic disorders
- Diabetes
- Surgical history in the lower limb (last 12 months)
- Prior treatment with dry needling (last 6 months)
Sites / Locations
- Juan Vicente Mampel
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Experimental
Active Comparator
Dry Needling Group
Foam Roller Group
Dry needling will be applied to the myofascial trigger points of the gastrocnemius muscle. With the dry needle (0.3 x 40 mm. Myofib, Toledo, Spain). Thus, insert the needle until you get the first twitch response. Once the first twitch response is obtained, the needle will move about 2-3 mm vertically quickly. Twenty-five insertions without leaving the skin. The approximate frequency of 1 Hz for 25 to 30 seconds.
The myofascial self-release technique with the FR Black Roll PRO (Bottighogen, Switzerland). The subject will move his body in the same direction as the muscle fibers, using his hands to propel and get the roller to slide back and forth. The device will only be applied at the muscular level, avoid the area of the Achilles tendon. It will be repeated on the contralateral leg. A total of three 60-second steps is executed on each leg and a 30-second break between both.