search
Back to results

Evaluation of Triage Options After HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening Among HIV-infected Women (AIMA-CC)

Primary Purpose

HIV Infections, HPV - Anogenital Human Papilloma Virus Infection

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
HPV test with partial genotyping and VIA triage
Sponsored by
ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional screening trial for HIV Infections focused on measuring HIV infection, HPV infection, cervical cancer, screening algorithms, recurrence

Eligibility Criteria

30 Years - 49 Years (Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women
  • HIV-1 infection
  • Age 30 to 49 years
  • In care for HIV infection, receiving or initiating antiretroviral therapy
  • Written informed consent given

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HIV-2 infection
  • Ongoing pregnancy (evidenced by self-report or clinical examination)
  • Previous total hysterectomy
  • Severe concomitant disease that, according to the investigators, may contraindicate or compromise participation to the study
  • History of cervical cancer screening with treatment for precancerous lesions within the last 12 months

Differed inclusion

  • Ongoing heavy menstruation
  • Immediate post-partum (<12 weeks post delivery)
  • Sign of ongoing genital infection (e.g. mucopurulante discharge)

Sites / Locations

  • HIV day care centerRecruiting
  • Calmette HospitalRecruiting
  • CEPREF

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

Triage with different options

Arm Description

All women will have an HPV test, partial genotyping (16/18/45 versus other high-risk HPV [hr-HPV]) and VIA. The different options for triage that will be compared are: Participants hr-HVP+ and VIA+ participants selected for treatment; Participants HPV 16/18/45+ selected for treatment; Participant HPV 16/18/45+ and/or VIA+ selected for treatment;

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Sensitivity of the triage options
Sensitivity of the triage options to detect CIN2+ and CIN3+ lesions with histology as the reference standard
Specificity of the triage options
Specificity of the triage options to detect CIN2+ and CIN3+ lesions with histology as the reference standard

Secondary Outcome Measures

Positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) of the triage options
PPV and NPV of the triage options to detect CIN2+ and CIN3+ lesions with histology as the reference standard
Positive and negative diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR) of the triage options
Positive and negative DLR of the triage options to detect CIN2+ and CIN3+ lesions with histology as the reference standard
Acceptability and feasibility
Acceptability and feasibility of the self-sampling, of the different triage options and of the treatment cervical lesions
Prevalence of CIN2+ lesions
Prevalence of CIN2 lesions, overall and by sub-groups defined by age categories, current CD4-cell count, nadir CD4-cell count and treatment history
Prevalence of CIN3+ lesions
Prevalence of CIN3 lesions overall and by sub-groups defined by age categories, current CD4-cell count, nadir CD4-cell count and treatment history
Prevalence of cervical cancer
Prevalence of cervical cancer overall and by sub-groups defined by age categories, current CD4-cell count, nadir CD4-cell count and treatment history
Adverse events
Rate and nature of adverse events and protocol violations
Proportion of the women eligible to HPV screening who were actually screened and treated (if required)
Proportion of the women eligible for the study who were actually screened, treated (if required)
Evaluation of the micro-costing
Evaluation of the micro-costing of the various components of the screening strategies
Evaluation of post-treatment HPV clearance
Evaluation of the HPV clearance at M6 and M12 after thermal-ablation
Evaluation of post-treatment cervical lesion
Evaluation of the proportion of CIN2 and CIN3 at M12 after treatment

Full Information

First Posted
September 3, 2018
Last Updated
February 15, 2022
Sponsor
ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases
Collaborators
Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Programme PAC-CI, Site ANRS-MIE de Côte d'Ivoire, University Hospital, Geneva, University of Bordeaux
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03789513
Brief Title
Evaluation of Triage Options After HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening Among HIV-infected Women
Acronym
AIMA-CC
Official Title
Evaluation of Screening Algorithms Based on Self-collection and HPV Testing With Partial Genotyping for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer Among HIV-infected Women in Low-income Countries
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
March 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 1, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 2022 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases
Collaborators
Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Programme PAC-CI, Site ANRS-MIE de Côte d'Ivoire, University Hospital, Geneva, University of Bordeaux

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Cervical cancer is the most common cause of cancer and a leading cause of death among HIV-infected women living in resource-limited settings. Although screening for premalignant lesions is an effective way of reducing cervical cancer incidence, its uptake in low-resource settings to date is low. The use of HPV testing for primary screening is currently recommended by many guidelines - including the WHO guidelines for cervical cancer screening in resource-limited settings - because of its greater sensitivity and ease of use compared to other options. However, these WHO guidelines have both highlighted the need to conduct more research on appropriate HPV-based algorithms among HIV-infected women, as immunodeficiency may affect the screening performance. Indeed, HPV infections in HIV-infected women are very common, so there is a need for additional triage to identify women most at risk and there remains considerable uncertainty on the optimal option for such triage. Most of the evidence available comes from HIV-negative populations living in high-resource settings and is not necessarily relevant for low-resource contexts where the epidemiological background is different, women access late to screening and may not have follow up visits, where financial constraints are important and health service resources limited. Hence, the proposed project aims to provide evidence on the effectiveness and feasibility of HPV-based screening algorithms among HIV-infected women in low-resource settings. This multicenter cross-sectional study will include 3,000 HIV-infected women (30-49 years old) receiving HAART and followed in Abidjan (Ivory Coast), Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso) and Phnom Penh (Cambodia). After self-collection of cervico-vaginal samples, each participant will have an HPV test with partial genotyping primary using the Xpert HPV assay, a real-time PCR assay that provides the possibility of identifying 14 HR-HPV types within one hour. The Xpert HPV test has been chosen because of the wide availability of the Genexpert platform in HIV care centers from resource-limited settings. Furthermore, it can specifically detect HPV-16, 18 and 45, the most carcinogenic HPV types in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive women, separately from other high-risk HPV types. VIA will be another triage option either alone or combined to HPV DNA genotyping. In addition, participants treated for cervical lesion will be followed over 12 months to assess the risk of post-treatment lesions (CIN2+/HSIL) and to identify associated risk-factors.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
HIV Infections, HPV - Anogenital Human Papilloma Virus Infection
Keywords
HIV infection, HPV infection, cervical cancer, screening algorithms, recurrence

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Screening
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
3000 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Triage with different options
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
All women will have an HPV test, partial genotyping (16/18/45 versus other high-risk HPV [hr-HPV]) and VIA. The different options for triage that will be compared are: Participants hr-HVP+ and VIA+ participants selected for treatment; Participants HPV 16/18/45+ selected for treatment; Participant HPV 16/18/45+ and/or VIA+ selected for treatment;
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
HPV test with partial genotyping and VIA triage
Intervention Description
HPV testing with the GenXpert platform VIA Biopsies of VIA+ lesions or random Treatment with thermal ablation of women with precancerous lesions
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Sensitivity of the triage options
Description
Sensitivity of the triage options to detect CIN2+ and CIN3+ lesions with histology as the reference standard
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Specificity of the triage options
Description
Specificity of the triage options to detect CIN2+ and CIN3+ lesions with histology as the reference standard
Time Frame
Day 0
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) of the triage options
Description
PPV and NPV of the triage options to detect CIN2+ and CIN3+ lesions with histology as the reference standard
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Positive and negative diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR) of the triage options
Description
Positive and negative DLR of the triage options to detect CIN2+ and CIN3+ lesions with histology as the reference standard
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Acceptability and feasibility
Description
Acceptability and feasibility of the self-sampling, of the different triage options and of the treatment cervical lesions
Time Frame
Day 0 and Week 1
Title
Prevalence of CIN2+ lesions
Description
Prevalence of CIN2 lesions, overall and by sub-groups defined by age categories, current CD4-cell count, nadir CD4-cell count and treatment history
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Prevalence of CIN3+ lesions
Description
Prevalence of CIN3 lesions overall and by sub-groups defined by age categories, current CD4-cell count, nadir CD4-cell count and treatment history
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Prevalence of cervical cancer
Description
Prevalence of cervical cancer overall and by sub-groups defined by age categories, current CD4-cell count, nadir CD4-cell count and treatment history
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Adverse events
Description
Rate and nature of adverse events and protocol violations
Time Frame
Day 0 and Week 1 up to 24 weeks
Title
Proportion of the women eligible to HPV screening who were actually screened and treated (if required)
Description
Proportion of the women eligible for the study who were actually screened, treated (if required)
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Evaluation of the micro-costing
Description
Evaluation of the micro-costing of the various components of the screening strategies
Time Frame
Day 0 up to Week 26
Title
Evaluation of post-treatment HPV clearance
Description
Evaluation of the HPV clearance at M6 and M12 after thermal-ablation
Time Frame
Week 24 and 48 post treatment
Title
Evaluation of post-treatment cervical lesion
Description
Evaluation of the proportion of CIN2 and CIN3 at M12 after treatment
Time Frame
Week 48 post treatment

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
30 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
49 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Women HIV-1 infection Age 30 to 49 years In care for HIV infection, receiving or initiating antiretroviral therapy Written informed consent given Exclusion Criteria: HIV-2 infection Ongoing pregnancy (evidenced by self-report or clinical examination) Previous total hysterectomy Severe concomitant disease that, according to the investigators, may contraindicate or compromise participation to the study History of cervical cancer screening with treatment for precancerous lesions within the last 12 months Differed inclusion Ongoing heavy menstruation Immediate post-partum (<12 weeks post delivery) Sign of ongoing genital infection (e.g. mucopurulante discharge)
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Pierre Debeaudrap, PhD
Phone
(0) 1 76 53 34 53
Ext
+33
Email
pierre.debeaudrap@ird.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Apollinaire Horo, PhD
Email
horoapollinaire@gmail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pierre Debeaudrap, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
CEPED - UMR196
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Apollinaire Debeaudrap, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
PACCI - Ivory Coast
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
HIV day care center
City
Bobo-Dioulasso
Country
Burkina Faso
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Armel Poda
Facility Name
Calmette Hospital
City
Phnom Penh
Country
Cambodia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kim Sothea
Facility Name
CEPREF
City
Abidjan
Country
Côte D'Ivoire
Individual Site Status
Enrolling by invitation

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of Triage Options After HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening Among HIV-infected Women

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs