search
Back to results

Exercise and Diet Counseling Program in Improving Quality of Life in Stage I-III Breast Cancer Survivors

Primary Purpose

Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IA Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IB Breast Cancer AJCC v8

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Aerobic Exercise
Exercise Counseling
Nutritional Assessment
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Questionnaire Administration
Resistance Training
Sponsored by
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8

Eligibility Criteria

30 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female breast cancer (stage I-III), within (w/in) 60 months after cessation of active treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation), and may be on continued hormone therapy.
  • Overweight/obese (body mass index [BMI] > 25).
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent.
  • Willing and physically able to participate in physical activity.
  • Obtain physician consent via primary care physician and/or treating oncologist.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • > 60 months post breast cancer therapy.
  • Contraindications to exercise.
  • Diagnosis of cancer other than breast that is receiving active treatment.
  • Currently receiving chemotherapy/radiation.
  • Musculoskeletal/neurological disorder inhibiting them from safe exercise.
  • Pregnant or nursing women.
  • Unable to give informed consent.

Sites / Locations

  • Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Supportive care (exercise program, counseling)

Arm Description

Patients undergo aerobic exercise over 10-30 minutes and resistance exercise comprising 1-3 sets of 8-12 repetitions of 10 different exercises over 1 hour for 24 weeks. Patients also receive behavioral activity counseling once a week and nutritional counseling over 30 minutes for 10 sessions after center-based exercise sessions during months 1-2.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Mobility disability
Assessed with the 400-meter walk test. Will be analyzed using paired samples t-tests. Statistical significance will be assumed at p =< 0.05, and results will be based on two-tailed statistical tests. Mean change from baseline, paired sample t-test, and effect size estimates will be calculated for each outcome measure. Analyses will be conducted using the intent-to-treat principle to account for missing data with the last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach, used to impute change across time to be zero. Additionally, effect sizes (Cohen?s d) will be calculated by taking the mean difference and dividing by the pooled standard deviation to determine the magnitude of differences observed for each outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Self-reported physical function
Measure with the abbreviated Late-Life Function and Disability Inventory. Will be analyzed using paired samples t-tests. Statistical significance will be assumed at p =< 0.05, and results will be based on two-tailed statistical tests. Mean change from baseline, paired sample t-test, and effect size estimates will be calculated for each outcome measure. Analyses will be conducted using the intent-to-treat principle to account for missing data with the LOCF approach, used to impute change across time to be zero. Additionally, effect sizes (Cohen?s d) will be calculated by taking the mean difference and dividing by the pooled standard deviation to determine the magnitude of differences observed for each outcome.
Objective functional performance
Using 3 valid and reliable timed performance-related mobility tasks: 400-meter walk (the primary outcome), stair-climb, and lift and carry task. Assessments of Mobility-Related Self-Efficacy to complete each functional task will also be completed with the tests. Will be analyzed using paired samples t-tests. Statistical significance will be assumed at p =< 0.05, and results will be based on two-tailed statistical tests. Mean change from baseline, paired sample t-test, and effect size estimates will be calculated for each outcome measure. Analyses will be conducted using the intent-to-treat principle to account for missing data with the LOCF approach, used to impute change across time to be zero. Additionally, effect sizes (Cohen?s d) will be calculated by taking the mean difference and dividing by the pooled standard deviation to determine the magnitude of differences observed for each outcome.
Balance deficits assessment
Estimate standing and reaching balance using a balance plate. Will be analyzed using paired samples t-tests. Statistical significance will be assumed at p =< 0.05, and results will be based on two-tailed statistical tests. Mean change from baseline, paired sample t-test, and effect size estimates will be calculated for each outcome measure. Analyses will be conducted using the intent-to-treat principle to account for missing data with the LOCF approach, used to impute change across time to be zero. Additionally, effect sizes (Cohen?s d) will be calculated by taking the mean difference and dividing by the pooled standard deviation to determine the magnitude of differences observed for each outcome.
Muscular strength assessement
Using standardized one-repetition maximum testing protocols for the chest press and leg extension exercises. Will be analyzed using paired samples t-tests. Statistical significance will be assumed at p =< 0.05, and results will be based on two-tailed statistical tests. Mean change from baseline, paired sample t-test, and effect size estimates will be calculated for each outcome measure. Analyses will be conducted using the intent-to-treat principle to account for missing data with the LOCF approach, used to impute change across time to be zero. Additionally, effect sizes (Cohen?s d) will be calculated by taking the mean difference and dividing by the pooled standard deviation to determine the magnitude of differences observed for each outcome.
Body composition
Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) for all outcome measures. The DEXA scans were used to determine total body composition including bone-mineral density, as well as, percentage body fat and fat-free mass for all body regions. Will be analyzed using paired samples t-tests. Statistical significance will be assumed at p =< 0.05, and results will be based on two-tailed statistical tests. Mean change from baseline, paired sample t-test, and effect size estimates will be calculated for each outcome measure. Analyses will be conducted using the intent-to-treat principle to account for missing data with the LOCF approach, used to impute change across time to be zero. Additionally, effect sizes (Cohen?s d) will be calculated by taking the mean difference and dividing by the pooled standard deviation to determine the magnitude of differences observed for each outcome.
Body weight
Measured to the nearest 0.1 kilogram using a calibrated and certified balance beam scale. Will be analyzed using paired samples t-tests. Statistical significance will be assumed at p =< 0.05, and results will be based on two-tailed statistical tests. Mean change from baseline, paired sample t-test, and effect size estimates will be calculated for each outcome measure. Analyses will be conducted using the intent-to-treat principle to account for missing data with the LOCF approach, used to impute change across time to be zero. Additionally, effect sizes (Cohen?s d) will be calculated by taking the mean difference and dividing by the pooled standard deviation to determine the magnitude of differences observed for each outcome.
Quality of life (QOL) surveys using the Rand Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)
The SF-12 questionnaire is a 12 -item scale that assesses the Physical (PCS) and Mental Health (MCS) composite summary scales composed of 6 items each on a 5-point rating scale. PCS and MCS scores range from 0-30 with higher scores indicating more favorable outcomes.
Quality of life (QOL) survey using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- breast (FACT-B).
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast is a disease specific measures including the satisfaction with life scale. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-breast will be used to analyze sample T-tests.
Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)
The Brief Fatigue Inventory is a 9-item scale scored on an 11-point rating scale ranging from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). Higher scores represent greater levels of fatigue. In this form, there are 5 overarching questions. The first one asks, "Have you felt unusually tired or fatigued in the last week?" which is simply a Yes or No response. The next 4 questions then have answers in terms of a scale. The next 3 have the following sliding scale: 0= No Fatigue, 10= As bad as you can imagine, with 1-9 each representing intermediate responses. For the last question, the scale is: 0= Does not interfere, 10= Completely interferes, with 1-9 representing individual intermediate responses.
Adherence assessment
Will be defined via attendance at prescribed sessions and will be assessed using exercise logs, upon which participants will record all exercise performed at the center or independently. Will be analyzed using paired samples t-tests. Statistical significance will be assumed at p =< 0.05, and results will be based on two-tailed statistical tests. Mean change from baseline, paired sample t-test, and effect size estimates will be calculated for each outcome measure. Analyses will be conducted using the intent-to-treat principle to account for missing data with the LOCF approach, used to impute change across time to be zero. Additionally, effect sizes (Cohen?s d) will be calculated by taking the mean difference and dividing by the pooled standard deviation to determine the magnitude of differences observed for each outcome.
Feasibility measures
Descriptive statistics for assessments of recruitment rates, adverse events, and retention rates will be calculated prospectively throughout the trial. Feasibility assessments of participants? satisfaction with the exercise and dietary intervention will also be completed at the end of the 24-week intervention. Will be analyzed using paired samples t-tests. Statistical significance will be assumed at p =< 0.05, and results will be based on two-tailed statistical tests. Mean change from baseline, paired sample t-test, and effect size estimates will be calculated for each outcome measure. Analyses will be conducted using the intent-to-treat principle to account for missing data with the LOCF approach, used to impute change across time to be zero. Additionally, effect sizes (Cohen?s d) will be calculated by taking the mean difference and dividing by the pooled standard deviation to determine the magnitude of differences observed for each outcome.

Full Information

First Posted
July 16, 2019
Last Updated
February 6, 2023
Sponsor
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04454086
Brief Title
Exercise and Diet Counseling Program in Improving Quality of Life in Stage I-III Breast Cancer Survivors
Official Title
Healthy New Albany: Breast Cancer Project
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
March 6, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This trial studies the benefits of an exercise and diet counseling program in improving quality of life in stage I-III breast cancer survivors. Exercise and diet counseling may help improve weight loss and relevant clinical and patient-reported outcomes in overweight or obese breast cancer survivors.
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the feasibility of delivering a community-based, comprehensive lifestyle weight management (LWM) intervention to 20 overweight or obese breast cancer (BC) survivors. II. Explore preliminary efficacy of the community-based, comprehensive LWM intervention for producing meaningful improvements in select clinically-relevant anthropometric, fitness, functional, and patient-reported outcomes in BC survivors. III. Provide the effect size estimates necessary to inform the design of a subsequent R01 application addressing a large scale, optimally powered, randomized controlled, community-based LWM comparative efficacy intervention trial targeting weight loss in BC survivors. OUTLINE: Patients undergo aerobic exercise over 10-30 minutes and resistance exercise comprising 1-3 sets of 8-12 repetitions of 10 different exercises over 1 hour for 24 weeks. Patients also receive behavioral activity counseling once a week and nutritional counseling over 30 minutes for 10 sessions after center-based exercise sessions during months 1-2. After completion of study, patients are followed up at 3 and 6 months.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IA Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IB Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIB Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIB Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIC Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Cancer Survivor, Obesity, Overweight, Prognostic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Prognostic Stage IA Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Prognostic Stage IB Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Prognostic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Prognostic Stage IIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Prognostic Stage IIB Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Prognostic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Prognostic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Prognostic Stage IIIB Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Prognostic Stage IIIC Breast Cancer AJCC v8

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
30 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Supportive care (exercise program, counseling)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients undergo aerobic exercise over 10-30 minutes and resistance exercise comprising 1-3 sets of 8-12 repetitions of 10 different exercises over 1 hour for 24 weeks. Patients also receive behavioral activity counseling once a week and nutritional counseling over 30 minutes for 10 sessions after center-based exercise sessions during months 1-2.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Aerobic Exercise
Other Intervention Name(s)
Aerobic Activity
Intervention Description
Undergo aerobic exercise
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Exercise Counseling
Intervention Description
Receive behavioral activity counseling
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Nutritional Assessment
Other Intervention Name(s)
Dietary Assessment, dietary counseling, nutritional counseling
Intervention Description
Receive nutritional counseling
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Other Intervention Name(s)
Quality of Life Assessment
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Questionnaire Administration
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Resistance Training
Other Intervention Name(s)
Strength Training
Intervention Description
Undergo resistance exercises
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mobility disability
Description
Assessed with the 400-meter walk test. Will be analyzed using paired samples t-tests. Statistical significance will be assumed at p =< 0.05, and results will be based on two-tailed statistical tests. Mean change from baseline, paired sample t-test, and effect size estimates will be calculated for each outcome measure. Analyses will be conducted using the intent-to-treat principle to account for missing data with the last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach, used to impute change across time to be zero. Additionally, effect sizes (Cohen?s d) will be calculated by taking the mean difference and dividing by the pooled standard deviation to determine the magnitude of differences observed for each outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Self-reported physical function
Description
Measure with the abbreviated Late-Life Function and Disability Inventory. Will be analyzed using paired samples t-tests. Statistical significance will be assumed at p =< 0.05, and results will be based on two-tailed statistical tests. Mean change from baseline, paired sample t-test, and effect size estimates will be calculated for each outcome measure. Analyses will be conducted using the intent-to-treat principle to account for missing data with the LOCF approach, used to impute change across time to be zero. Additionally, effect sizes (Cohen?s d) will be calculated by taking the mean difference and dividing by the pooled standard deviation to determine the magnitude of differences observed for each outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 6 months
Title
Objective functional performance
Description
Using 3 valid and reliable timed performance-related mobility tasks: 400-meter walk (the primary outcome), stair-climb, and lift and carry task. Assessments of Mobility-Related Self-Efficacy to complete each functional task will also be completed with the tests. Will be analyzed using paired samples t-tests. Statistical significance will be assumed at p =< 0.05, and results will be based on two-tailed statistical tests. Mean change from baseline, paired sample t-test, and effect size estimates will be calculated for each outcome measure. Analyses will be conducted using the intent-to-treat principle to account for missing data with the LOCF approach, used to impute change across time to be zero. Additionally, effect sizes (Cohen?s d) will be calculated by taking the mean difference and dividing by the pooled standard deviation to determine the magnitude of differences observed for each outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 6 months
Title
Balance deficits assessment
Description
Estimate standing and reaching balance using a balance plate. Will be analyzed using paired samples t-tests. Statistical significance will be assumed at p =< 0.05, and results will be based on two-tailed statistical tests. Mean change from baseline, paired sample t-test, and effect size estimates will be calculated for each outcome measure. Analyses will be conducted using the intent-to-treat principle to account for missing data with the LOCF approach, used to impute change across time to be zero. Additionally, effect sizes (Cohen?s d) will be calculated by taking the mean difference and dividing by the pooled standard deviation to determine the magnitude of differences observed for each outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 6 months
Title
Muscular strength assessement
Description
Using standardized one-repetition maximum testing protocols for the chest press and leg extension exercises. Will be analyzed using paired samples t-tests. Statistical significance will be assumed at p =< 0.05, and results will be based on two-tailed statistical tests. Mean change from baseline, paired sample t-test, and effect size estimates will be calculated for each outcome measure. Analyses will be conducted using the intent-to-treat principle to account for missing data with the LOCF approach, used to impute change across time to be zero. Additionally, effect sizes (Cohen?s d) will be calculated by taking the mean difference and dividing by the pooled standard deviation to determine the magnitude of differences observed for each outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 6 months
Title
Body composition
Description
Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) for all outcome measures. The DEXA scans were used to determine total body composition including bone-mineral density, as well as, percentage body fat and fat-free mass for all body regions. Will be analyzed using paired samples t-tests. Statistical significance will be assumed at p =< 0.05, and results will be based on two-tailed statistical tests. Mean change from baseline, paired sample t-test, and effect size estimates will be calculated for each outcome measure. Analyses will be conducted using the intent-to-treat principle to account for missing data with the LOCF approach, used to impute change across time to be zero. Additionally, effect sizes (Cohen?s d) will be calculated by taking the mean difference and dividing by the pooled standard deviation to determine the magnitude of differences observed for each outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 6 months
Title
Body weight
Description
Measured to the nearest 0.1 kilogram using a calibrated and certified balance beam scale. Will be analyzed using paired samples t-tests. Statistical significance will be assumed at p =< 0.05, and results will be based on two-tailed statistical tests. Mean change from baseline, paired sample t-test, and effect size estimates will be calculated for each outcome measure. Analyses will be conducted using the intent-to-treat principle to account for missing data with the LOCF approach, used to impute change across time to be zero. Additionally, effect sizes (Cohen?s d) will be calculated by taking the mean difference and dividing by the pooled standard deviation to determine the magnitude of differences observed for each outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 6 months
Title
Quality of life (QOL) surveys using the Rand Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)
Description
The SF-12 questionnaire is a 12 -item scale that assesses the Physical (PCS) and Mental Health (MCS) composite summary scales composed of 6 items each on a 5-point rating scale. PCS and MCS scores range from 0-30 with higher scores indicating more favorable outcomes.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 6 months
Title
Quality of life (QOL) survey using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- breast (FACT-B).
Description
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast is a disease specific measures including the satisfaction with life scale. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-breast will be used to analyze sample T-tests.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 6 months
Title
Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)
Description
The Brief Fatigue Inventory is a 9-item scale scored on an 11-point rating scale ranging from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). Higher scores represent greater levels of fatigue. In this form, there are 5 overarching questions. The first one asks, "Have you felt unusually tired or fatigued in the last week?" which is simply a Yes or No response. The next 4 questions then have answers in terms of a scale. The next 3 have the following sliding scale: 0= No Fatigue, 10= As bad as you can imagine, with 1-9 each representing intermediate responses. For the last question, the scale is: 0= Does not interfere, 10= Completely interferes, with 1-9 representing individual intermediate responses.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 6 months
Title
Adherence assessment
Description
Will be defined via attendance at prescribed sessions and will be assessed using exercise logs, upon which participants will record all exercise performed at the center or independently. Will be analyzed using paired samples t-tests. Statistical significance will be assumed at p =< 0.05, and results will be based on two-tailed statistical tests. Mean change from baseline, paired sample t-test, and effect size estimates will be calculated for each outcome measure. Analyses will be conducted using the intent-to-treat principle to account for missing data with the LOCF approach, used to impute change across time to be zero. Additionally, effect sizes (Cohen?s d) will be calculated by taking the mean difference and dividing by the pooled standard deviation to determine the magnitude of differences observed for each outcome.
Time Frame
Up to 6 months
Title
Feasibility measures
Description
Descriptive statistics for assessments of recruitment rates, adverse events, and retention rates will be calculated prospectively throughout the trial. Feasibility assessments of participants? satisfaction with the exercise and dietary intervention will also be completed at the end of the 24-week intervention. Will be analyzed using paired samples t-tests. Statistical significance will be assumed at p =< 0.05, and results will be based on two-tailed statistical tests. Mean change from baseline, paired sample t-test, and effect size estimates will be calculated for each outcome measure. Analyses will be conducted using the intent-to-treat principle to account for missing data with the LOCF approach, used to impute change across time to be zero. Additionally, effect sizes (Cohen?s d) will be calculated by taking the mean difference and dividing by the pooled standard deviation to determine the magnitude of differences observed for each outcome.
Time Frame
Up to 24 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
30 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Female breast cancer (stage I-III), within (w/in) 60 months after cessation of active treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation), and may be on continued hormone therapy. Overweight/obese (body mass index [BMI] > 25). Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent. Willing and physically able to participate in physical activity. Obtain physician consent via primary care physician and/or treating oncologist. Exclusion Criteria: > 60 months post breast cancer therapy. Contraindications to exercise. Diagnosis of cancer other than breast that is receiving active treatment. Currently receiving chemotherapy/radiation. Musculoskeletal/neurological disorder inhibiting them from safe exercise. Pregnant or nursing women. Unable to give informed consent.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Phone
1-800-293-5066
Email
OSUCCCClinicaltrials@osumc.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brian C Focht, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brian C. Focht
Phone
614-292-2165
Email
focht.10@osu.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brian C. Focht

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Links:
URL
http://cancer.osu.edu
Description
The Jamesline

Learn more about this trial

Exercise and Diet Counseling Program in Improving Quality of Life in Stage I-III Breast Cancer Survivors

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs