search
Back to results

Exercise as Medicine for People With Cancer Sweden (EX-MED)

Primary Purpose

Prostate Cancer, Breast Cancer, Colorectal Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Sweden
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Exercise
Sponsored by
Karolinska Institutet
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Prostate Cancer focused on measuring Exercise, Cancer, Fitness, Distance-based, Home-based

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • males or females
  • people diagnosed with any type of stage I-IIIa breast, prostate or colorectal cancer who have undergone and completed adjuvant treatment (note: participants are eligible if they are currently receiving/scheduled to receive anti-hormonal therapy) at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden

Exclusion Criteria:

  • currently receiving or scheduled to receive cancer treatment (except anti-hormonal therapy)
  • any medical conditions that may prevent safe participation in the testing or exercise demands of the study
  • performing regular exercise throughout the last month defined as undertaking at least 150 mins moderate intensity aerobic exercise and two or more structured resistance exercise sessions per week
  • unable to read and speak Swedish.

Sites / Locations

  • Karolinska Institute/ Karolinska University HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Exercise

Control

Arm Description

The intervention group will, in addition to routine clinical care according to (inter-) national guidelines, receive an exercise program of resistance and aerobic exercise delivered live online by an upskilled exercise professional in group exercise classes twice weekly for 3 months

The control group will receive routine clinical care according to (inter-) national guidelines

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Health-related quality of life
Assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) (global quality of life summary scale). Patients responds to questions about their quality of life on a scale of 1- (not at all) to 4 (alot).
Health-related quality of life
Assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) (global quality of life summary scale). Patients responds to questions about their quality of life on a scale of 1- (not at all) to 4 (alot).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Cancer related fatigue
Assessed by the Piper Fatigue scale (PFS) (total cancer related fatigue scale). Participants respond to questions about their fatigue on a scale of 1 (being positive)-10 (being bad/negative)
Cancer related fatigue
Assessed by the Piper Fatigue scale (PFS) (total cancer related fatigue scale). Participants respond to questions about their fatigue on a scale of 1 (being positive)-10 (being bad/negative)
Cancer related fatigue
Assessed by the Piper Fatigue scale (PFS) (total cancer related fatigue scale). Participants respond to questions about their fatigue on a scale of 1 (being positive)-10 (being bad/negative)
Symptoms and symptom burden (total symptoms scale)
Assessed by the memorial symptom assessment scale (MSAS) (total symptoms scale). Patients respond to how often the have had the symptoms (1-almost never- 4 almost always), how severe the symptoms have been (1- light - 4- very severe) and how distressing the symptoms were to them (0- not at all- to 4 very)
Symptoms and symptom burden (total symptoms scale)
Assessed by the memorial symptom assessment scale (MSAS) (total symptoms scale). Patients respond to how often the have had the symptoms (1-almost never- 4 almost always), how severe the symptoms have been (1- light - 4- very severe) and how distressing the symptoms were to them (0- not at all- to 4 very)
Symptoms and symptom burden (total symptoms scale)
Assessed by the memorial symptom assessment scale (MSAS) (total symptoms scale). Patients respond to how often the have had the symptoms (1-almost never- 4 almost always), how severe the symptoms have been (1- light - 4- very severe) and how distressing the symptoms were to them (0- not at all- to 4 very)
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Estimated/predicted maximal oxygen uptake, VO2max assessed by the Ekblom-Bak submaximal cycle test
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Estimated/predicted maximal oxygen uptake, VO2max assessed by the Ekblom-Bak submaximal cycle test
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Estimated/predicted maximal oxygen uptake, VO2max assessed by the Ekblom-Bak submaximal cycle test
Physical function of the lower body
Assessed by the 5 sit to stand test (seconds)
Physical function of the lower body
Assessed by the 5 sit to stand test (seconds)
Physical function of the lower body
Assessed by the 5 sit to stand test (seconds)
Upper body muscle strength
Assessed by a hypothetical 12-RM chest press test
Upper body muscle strength
Assessed by a hypothetical 12-RM chest press test
Upper body muscle strength
Assessed by a hypothetical 12-RM chest press test
Lower body muscle strength
Assessed by a hypothetical 12-RM leg press test
Lower body muscle strength
Assessed by a hypothetical 12-RM leg press test
Lower body muscle strength
Assessed by a hypothetical 12-RM leg press test
Whole body muscle mass
Assessed by bio impendence device (InBody770) (kg)
Whole body muscle mass
Assessed by bio impendence device (InBody770) (kg)
Whole body fat mass
Assessed by bio impendence device (InBody770) (kg)
Whole body fat percentage
Assessed by bio impendence device (InBody770) (%)
Whole body fat percentage
Assessed by bio impendence device (InBody770) (%)
Whole body fat percentage
Assessed by bio impendence device (InBody770) (%)
Self reported physical activity
Assessed by the Godin Leisure time physical activity questionnaire (mins). Patients detail how many minutes per week they have performed vigorous, moderate and low intensity physical activity
Self reported physical activity
Assessed by the Godin Leisure time physical activity questionnaire (mins). Patients detail how many minutes per week they have performed vigorous, moderate and low intensity physical activity
Self reported physical activity
Assessed by the Godin Leisure time physical activity questionnaire (mins). Patients detail how many minutes per week they have performed vigorous, moderate and low intensity physical activity
Self efficacy of exercise
Assessed by the Self-Efficacy of Exercise (SEE) questionnaire (total score). Patients respond to questions ranging from 0 (not at all sure) to 10 (completely sure)
Self efficacy of exercise
Assessed by the Self-Efficacy of Exercise (SEE) questionnaire (total score). Patients respond to questions ranging from 0 (not at all sure) to 10 (completely sure)
Self efficacy of exercise
Assessed by the Self-Efficacy of Exercise (SEE) questionnaire (total score). Patients respond to questions ranging from 0 (not at all sure) to 10 (completely sure)
Quality adjusted life years
Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire . Patients rate their health from 0 (worst health you can imagine)-100 (best health you can imagine)
Quality adjusted life years
Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire . Patients rate their health from 0 (worst health you can imagine)-100 (best health you can imagine)
Quality adjusted life years
Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire . Patients rate their health from 0 (worst health you can imagine)-100 (best health you can imagine)
Health-related quality of life
Assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) (global quality of life summary scale). Patients responds to questions about their quality of life on a scale of 1- (not at all) to 4 (alot).

Full Information

First Posted
September 22, 2021
Last Updated
January 4, 2023
Sponsor
Karolinska Institutet
Collaborators
Swedish Cancer Society, SATS
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05064670
Brief Title
Exercise as Medicine for People With Cancer Sweden
Acronym
EX-MED
Official Title
EX-MED Cancer Sweden: A Randomised Controlled Trial of Distance-based Exercise for People Treated for Cancer
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
January 11, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
November 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Karolinska Institutet
Collaborators
Swedish Cancer Society, SATS

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Regular exercise has been shown to have beneficial health effects in cancer survivors, including improving quality of life and other important health outcomes. However, providing people with cancer with easily accessible, high-quality exercise support and programs is a challenge. Therefore, there is a need to develop easily accessible exercise programs that draw upon the current evidence. Supervised, distance-based exercise programs have the benefit of reaching out to many people while providing the support of an exercise professional. The aim of the EX-MED Cancer Sweden trial is to examine the effectiveness of a supervised, distance-based exercise program, in people previously treated for breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer, on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), as well as other physiological and patient-reported health outcomes. Participants will be randomized to a 3-month supervised, distance-based exercise program or to a usual care control group. Testing timepoints are baseline, 3 months (end of intervention) and 6 months (3 month followup). At these timepoints, patients will be asked to fill in online questionaires, and and undergo physical tests. A selection of the particpants and personal trainers involved in the intervention will also be invited to participate in focus group discussion or interviews about the experiences of being involved in the EX-MED Cancer Sweden program.
Detailed Description
The primary aim of the study is to examine the effectiveness of EX-MED Cancer Sweden on health-related quality of life in people diagnosed with breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer. The secondary aims are to examine the effect of the program on other important endpoints such as physical activity level, physical function, muscle strength, exercise capacity, symptoms, and body composition (lean and fat mass). To determine the sustainability of the effects of the supervised program, the study includes a 3-month follow-up time point (6 months post-baseline)

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostate Cancer, Breast Cancer, Colorectal Cancer
Keywords
Exercise, Cancer, Fitness, Distance-based, Home-based

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
200 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Exercise
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The intervention group will, in addition to routine clinical care according to (inter-) national guidelines, receive an exercise program of resistance and aerobic exercise delivered live online by an upskilled exercise professional in group exercise classes twice weekly for 3 months
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
The control group will receive routine clinical care according to (inter-) national guidelines
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Exercise
Intervention Description
A twice weekly, 3-month supervised exercise program of whole body resistance training using body weight and a resistance band, and moderate to high intensity aerobic activities, consisting of a consecutive series of timed exercises performed one after the other (14-18 on the Borg scale). Classes are conducted live in groups through Microsoft Teams. Participants will not receive any contact or exercise support in the 3-month follow-up period following the initial 3-month intervention
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Health-related quality of life
Description
Assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) (global quality of life summary scale). Patients responds to questions about their quality of life on a scale of 1- (not at all) to 4 (alot).
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 months
Title
Health-related quality of life
Description
Assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) (global quality of life summary scale). Patients responds to questions about their quality of life on a scale of 1- (not at all) to 4 (alot).
Time Frame
3 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cancer related fatigue
Description
Assessed by the Piper Fatigue scale (PFS) (total cancer related fatigue scale). Participants respond to questions about their fatigue on a scale of 1 (being positive)-10 (being bad/negative)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Cancer related fatigue
Description
Assessed by the Piper Fatigue scale (PFS) (total cancer related fatigue scale). Participants respond to questions about their fatigue on a scale of 1 (being positive)-10 (being bad/negative)
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Cancer related fatigue
Description
Assessed by the Piper Fatigue scale (PFS) (total cancer related fatigue scale). Participants respond to questions about their fatigue on a scale of 1 (being positive)-10 (being bad/negative)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Symptoms and symptom burden (total symptoms scale)
Description
Assessed by the memorial symptom assessment scale (MSAS) (total symptoms scale). Patients respond to how often the have had the symptoms (1-almost never- 4 almost always), how severe the symptoms have been (1- light - 4- very severe) and how distressing the symptoms were to them (0- not at all- to 4 very)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Symptoms and symptom burden (total symptoms scale)
Description
Assessed by the memorial symptom assessment scale (MSAS) (total symptoms scale). Patients respond to how often the have had the symptoms (1-almost never- 4 almost always), how severe the symptoms have been (1- light - 4- very severe) and how distressing the symptoms were to them (0- not at all- to 4 very)
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Symptoms and symptom burden (total symptoms scale)
Description
Assessed by the memorial symptom assessment scale (MSAS) (total symptoms scale). Patients respond to how often the have had the symptoms (1-almost never- 4 almost always), how severe the symptoms have been (1- light - 4- very severe) and how distressing the symptoms were to them (0- not at all- to 4 very)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Description
Estimated/predicted maximal oxygen uptake, VO2max assessed by the Ekblom-Bak submaximal cycle test
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Description
Estimated/predicted maximal oxygen uptake, VO2max assessed by the Ekblom-Bak submaximal cycle test
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Description
Estimated/predicted maximal oxygen uptake, VO2max assessed by the Ekblom-Bak submaximal cycle test
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Physical function of the lower body
Description
Assessed by the 5 sit to stand test (seconds)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Physical function of the lower body
Description
Assessed by the 5 sit to stand test (seconds)
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Physical function of the lower body
Description
Assessed by the 5 sit to stand test (seconds)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Upper body muscle strength
Description
Assessed by a hypothetical 12-RM chest press test
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Upper body muscle strength
Description
Assessed by a hypothetical 12-RM chest press test
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Upper body muscle strength
Description
Assessed by a hypothetical 12-RM chest press test
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Lower body muscle strength
Description
Assessed by a hypothetical 12-RM leg press test
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Lower body muscle strength
Description
Assessed by a hypothetical 12-RM leg press test
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Lower body muscle strength
Description
Assessed by a hypothetical 12-RM leg press test
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Whole body muscle mass
Description
Assessed by bio impendence device (InBody770) (kg)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Whole body muscle mass
Description
Assessed by bio impendence device (InBody770) (kg)
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Whole body fat mass
Description
Assessed by bio impendence device (InBody770) (kg)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Whole body fat percentage
Description
Assessed by bio impendence device (InBody770) (%)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Whole body fat percentage
Description
Assessed by bio impendence device (InBody770) (%)
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Whole body fat percentage
Description
Assessed by bio impendence device (InBody770) (%)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Self reported physical activity
Description
Assessed by the Godin Leisure time physical activity questionnaire (mins). Patients detail how many minutes per week they have performed vigorous, moderate and low intensity physical activity
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Self reported physical activity
Description
Assessed by the Godin Leisure time physical activity questionnaire (mins). Patients detail how many minutes per week they have performed vigorous, moderate and low intensity physical activity
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Self reported physical activity
Description
Assessed by the Godin Leisure time physical activity questionnaire (mins). Patients detail how many minutes per week they have performed vigorous, moderate and low intensity physical activity
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Self efficacy of exercise
Description
Assessed by the Self-Efficacy of Exercise (SEE) questionnaire (total score). Patients respond to questions ranging from 0 (not at all sure) to 10 (completely sure)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Self efficacy of exercise
Description
Assessed by the Self-Efficacy of Exercise (SEE) questionnaire (total score). Patients respond to questions ranging from 0 (not at all sure) to 10 (completely sure)
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Self efficacy of exercise
Description
Assessed by the Self-Efficacy of Exercise (SEE) questionnaire (total score). Patients respond to questions ranging from 0 (not at all sure) to 10 (completely sure)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Quality adjusted life years
Description
Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire . Patients rate their health from 0 (worst health you can imagine)-100 (best health you can imagine)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Quality adjusted life years
Description
Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire . Patients rate their health from 0 (worst health you can imagine)-100 (best health you can imagine)
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Quality adjusted life years
Description
Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire . Patients rate their health from 0 (worst health you can imagine)-100 (best health you can imagine)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Health-related quality of life
Description
Assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) (global quality of life summary scale). Patients responds to questions about their quality of life on a scale of 1- (not at all) to 4 (alot).
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 18 years or older males or females people diagnosed with any type of stage I-IIIa breast, prostate or colorectal cancer who have undergone and completed curative treatment (note: participants are eligible if they are currently receiving/scheduled to receive anti-hormonal therapy) at the Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Sweden Exclusion Criteria: currently receiving or scheduled to receive cancer treatment (except anti-hormonal therapy) any medical conditions that may prevent safe participation in the testing or exercise demands of the study performing regular exercise throughout the last month defined as undertaking at least 150 mins moderate intensity aerobic exercise and two or more structured resistance exercise sessions per week unable to read and speak Swedish.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Yvonne Wengström, PhD
Phone
+46707528547
Email
yvonne.wengstrom@ki.se
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yvonne Wengström, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Karolinska Institutet
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Karolinska Institute/ Karolinska University Hospital
City
Stockholm
Country
Sweden
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yvonne Wengstrom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The dataset will be stored via the Swedish National Data Service (SND) and provided a Digital Object Identifier (DOI).SND is a trusted digital repository, certified against CoreTrustSeal. Through their system DORIS, an examination of the metadata quality carried out by the KI Data Access Unit will be conducted of the data. When the data description is complete, it is published in the SND research data catalog.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
The data will become available within 5 years of study completion and will be available for visibility and accessibility for 10 years.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Researchers will have to apply through SND using DORIS to access the data. Once approved, the data is released.

Learn more about this trial

Exercise as Medicine for People With Cancer Sweden

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs