Extended Support for Persons With Pituitary Tumours After Surgery
Primary Purpose
Pituitary Tumor Benign, Surgery
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Sweden
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
person-centred practice
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Pituitary Tumor Benign focused on measuring Person-centred care, Clinical pathway, Intervention, Quasi-experimental
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pituitary tumour; adenoma or craniopharyngioma
- Planned neurosurgery due to pituitary tumour
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pituitary carcinomas
- Health conditions which may restrain the understanding of the study and/or the ability to adhere to the protocol for example decreased cognitive functions or drug addiction.
Sites / Locations
- Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University HospitalRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Other
Arm Label
Person-centred practice
Arm Description
Person-centred care
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Self- perceived psychological wellbeing
The outcome is assessed with The Psychological General Well-being scale (PGWB), a questionnaire with 22 items, comprising six subscales: anxiety, depression, positive well-being, self-control, general health and vitality. The Swedish version of the questionnaire is valid. Total score of 132 is an overall score of the values from each item (score 1-6 for each item). Higher value is indicative for better psychological well-being. A sum score for each subscale can be calculated, minimum and maximum score; anxiety (5-30), depression (3-18), positive well-being (4-24), self-control (3-18), general health (3-18) and vitality (4-24).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Person-centred content in medical records
Degree of person-centredness in medical records according to dimensions in a protocol to review content in medical records.
Self-reported health assessed with EQ-5D-5L
Self-reported health is measured with the EuroQual-5Dimensions-5Levels questionnaire (EQ- 5D- 5L). The questionnaire comprises 1 item per dimension. The dimensions of importance for health which are included are; mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Patients rate each item on a scale ranging from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems/unable to). A unique health state is defined by combining 1 level from each of the 5 dimensions. The questionnaire also includes EQ-VAS, in which the patients grade their current health status on an analogue scale from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health).
Fatigue assessed with the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20)
Within MFI-20 general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced activity, reduced motivation, and mental fatigue comprises five dimensions of fatigue. Fatigue in the preceding seven days is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from "yes, that is accurate to "no, that is not accurate". Subscale scores range from 4-20, where a high score represents greater fatigue.
Quality of care assessed with the Quality from the Patient Perspective questionnaire
The outcome is assessed with the questionnaire Quality from the Patient Perspective. The questionnaire comprises four dimension Identity-oriented approach (13 items) and the sociocultural atmosphere (5 items), medical- technical competence (4 items) and physical-technical condition (3 items). Two kinds of assessments are being made at each item: whether things were being done (perceived reality) and whether the right things were being done (subjective significance). Items are rated on a four-point response scale ranging from 1 (do not agree at all) to 4 (completely agree). Each item also has a response option of "not applicable". Subscales can be reported item by item or combined in a subscale score (average of all responses within the subscale).
Level of general self-efficacy assessed with the General Self-Efficacy scale
General self-efficacy measures confidence in one's ability to handle difficult challenges in life. It includes 10 items, which are rated on a four- point Likert scale giving a summary score of 40 for the total scale (10-40).
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03927183
Brief Title
Extended Support for Persons With Pituitary Tumours After Surgery
Official Title
Extended Support Within a Person-centred Practice After Surgery: a Quasi- Experimental Study for Persons With Pituitary Tumours
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
December 6, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 28, 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
February 28, 2021 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Göteborg University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Patients with pituitary tumours often live with life-long consequences of their disease. Treatment options include surgery, radiotherapy and medical therapy. Symptoms associated with the tumour and/or its treatment affects several areas of life. The year after pituitary surgery constitutes an important time-period with medical evaluations of surgery and decisions on hormonal substitution. The development and evaluation of extended patient support during this time-point is limited. Care based on person-centredness has exclusively been promoted which comprises a care where care providers inquire how patients view their health situation and what their needs, resources, and preferences are. Person-centredness focuses on preserving patient autonomy, function, and well-being and strives to emphasize patient involvement through equalizing power between health care professionals and the patient with the main goal of an enhanced health situation. The aim of the study is to evaluate if a support within a person-centered care practice one year after surgery increases wellbeing for patients with pituitary tumours.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pituitary Tumor Benign, Surgery
Keywords
Person-centred care, Clinical pathway, Intervention, Quasi-experimental
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
A quasi- experimental study with non-equivalent control group design, pretest-posttest study
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
90 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Person-centred practice
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Person-centred care
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
person-centred practice
Intervention Description
The structure and content of the intervention is constructed on principles for person-centredness. Each patients in the intervention are allocated a hospital-initiated nurse care manager during one year after surgery. Self-management support is primarily conducted between the patient and the nurse care manager. The primary goal of the support is to facilitate patients own resources in managing illness and health education on e.g. physical activity and diet. The support also comprises patient-held documentation and health plan. Other components of the intervention comprise accessibility and continuity which is secured by a structured clinical care pathway with planned care and defined care contacts. The patient has continuous access to the nurse care manager by telephone and face-to-face contact according to a structured follow-up plan. An interdisciplinary team as well as a patient education program constitutes distinct parts of the support during the year after surgery.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Self- perceived psychological wellbeing
Description
The outcome is assessed with The Psychological General Well-being scale (PGWB), a questionnaire with 22 items, comprising six subscales: anxiety, depression, positive well-being, self-control, general health and vitality. The Swedish version of the questionnaire is valid. Total score of 132 is an overall score of the values from each item (score 1-6 for each item). Higher value is indicative for better psychological well-being. A sum score for each subscale can be calculated, minimum and maximum score; anxiety (5-30), depression (3-18), positive well-being (4-24), self-control (3-18), general health (3-18) and vitality (4-24).
Time Frame
From date of inclusion until the date of one year follow up after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Person-centred content in medical records
Description
Degree of person-centredness in medical records according to dimensions in a protocol to review content in medical records.
Time Frame
From date of inclusion until the date of one year follow up after surgery
Title
Self-reported health assessed with EQ-5D-5L
Description
Self-reported health is measured with the EuroQual-5Dimensions-5Levels questionnaire (EQ- 5D- 5L). The questionnaire comprises 1 item per dimension. The dimensions of importance for health which are included are; mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Patients rate each item on a scale ranging from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems/unable to). A unique health state is defined by combining 1 level from each of the 5 dimensions. The questionnaire also includes EQ-VAS, in which the patients grade their current health status on an analogue scale from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health).
Time Frame
From date of inclusion until the date of one year follow up after surgery.
Title
Fatigue assessed with the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20)
Description
Within MFI-20 general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced activity, reduced motivation, and mental fatigue comprises five dimensions of fatigue. Fatigue in the preceding seven days is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from "yes, that is accurate to "no, that is not accurate". Subscale scores range from 4-20, where a high score represents greater fatigue.
Time Frame
From date of inclusion until the date of one year follow up after surgery.
Title
Quality of care assessed with the Quality from the Patient Perspective questionnaire
Description
The outcome is assessed with the questionnaire Quality from the Patient Perspective. The questionnaire comprises four dimension Identity-oriented approach (13 items) and the sociocultural atmosphere (5 items), medical- technical competence (4 items) and physical-technical condition (3 items). Two kinds of assessments are being made at each item: whether things were being done (perceived reality) and whether the right things were being done (subjective significance). Items are rated on a four-point response scale ranging from 1 (do not agree at all) to 4 (completely agree). Each item also has a response option of "not applicable". Subscales can be reported item by item or combined in a subscale score (average of all responses within the subscale).
Time Frame
From date of inclusion until the date of one year follow up after surgery
Title
Level of general self-efficacy assessed with the General Self-Efficacy scale
Description
General self-efficacy measures confidence in one's ability to handle difficult challenges in life. It includes 10 items, which are rated on a four- point Likert scale giving a summary score of 40 for the total scale (10-40).
Time Frame
From date of inclusion until the date of one year follow up after surgery
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Clinical observations of pulse rate
Description
Frequency of documented pulse rate during hospitalization. The medical records are reviewed retrospectively.
Time Frame
From date of admission to inpatient care after surgery until the date of discharge, up to 60 days of hospitalization
Title
Quality of care assessed as documented information in medical records on current medication at a daily basis and at discharge: rating
Description
All information in the medical records during hospitalization are reviewed retrospectively. Rating is made regarding the presence (yes or no) of information on current medication at a daily basis and at discharge.
Time Frame
From date of admission to inpatient care after surgery until the date of discharge, up to 60 days of hospitalization
Title
Quality of care assessed as documented information in medical records on planned medical care at discharge: rating
Description
All information in the medical records during hospitalization are reviewed retrospectively. Rating is made regarding the presence (yes or no) of information on planned medical care at discharge.
Time Frame
From date of admission to inpatient care after surgery until the date of discharge, up to 60 days of hospitalization
Title
Clinical observations of weight
Description
Frequency of documented clinical observations of weight (kg) during hospitalization. The medical records are reviewed retrospectively.
Time Frame
From date of admission to inpatient care after surgery until the date of discharge, up to 60 days of hospitalization
Title
Clinical observations of respiratory rate
Description
Frequency of documented clinical observations of respiratory rate during hospitalization. The medical records are reviewed retrospectively.
Time Frame
From date of admission to inpatient care after surgery until the date of discharge, up to 60 days of hospitalization
Title
Clinical observations of body temperature
Description
Frequency of documented clinical observations of body temperature (degrees celsius) during hospitalization. The medical records are reviewed retrospectively.
Time Frame
From date of admission to inpatient care after surgery until the date of discharge, up to 60 days of hospitalization
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Pituitary tumour; adenoma or craniopharyngioma
Planned neurosurgery due to pituitary tumour
Exclusion Criteria:
Pituitary carcinomas
Health conditions which may restrain the understanding of the study and/or the ability to adhere to the protocol for example decreased cognitive functions or drug addiction.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Eva Jakobsson Ung, professor
Phone
+46734028521
Email
eva.jakobsson@fhs.gu.se
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eva Jakobsson Ung, professor
Organizational Affiliation
Göteborg University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
City
Gothenburg
ZIP/Postal Code
413 46
Country
Sweden
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eva Jakobsson Ung, professor
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gudmundur Johannsson, Professor
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Extended Support for Persons With Pituitary Tumours After Surgery
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs