Face Photoaging: Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of an Intradermal Injective Treatment
Primary Purpose
Face Skin Photoaging
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
SUNEKOS ® 200
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Face Skin Photoaging
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- - female sex;
- age 45-65 years;
- mild/moderate cutaneous photoaging according to a reference photographic scale (see Appendix 8)
- skin phototype I, II and III according to Fitzpatrick's classification, with a preference to grade II-III (see par. 8.1)
- agreeing to present at each study visit without make-up;
- accepting to not change their habits regarding food, physical activity, make-up use, face cosmetic and cleansing products;
- accepting not to expose their face to strong UV irradiation (UV session, or sun bathes), during the entire duration of the study;
- accepting to sign the Informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Dependent on the volunteers' characteristics
- Pregnancy;
- lactation;
- subjects not in menopause who do not use adequate contraceptive precautions in order to avoid pregnancies during the study;
- Body Mass Index (BMI) variation (± 1) during the study period;
- subjects not in menopause who do not accept to perform the pregnancy test during the basal visit, 30 days (T4i) and 2 months (T2M) after the first biomineralizing treatment execution;
- performing skin treatments for aesthetic correction (biomaterials implants, face lifting, botox injections, laser, chemical peeling) in the 12 months prior to the study start;
- performing permanent filler in the past;
- change in the normal habits regarding food, physical activity, face cosmetic, cleansing and make-up use during the month preceding the test;
- sensitivity to the test product or its ingredients (to be assessed by the investigator during the baseline visit);
- subjects whose insufficient adhesion to the study protocol is foreseeable;
- participation in a similar study actually or during the previous 6 months.
- Presence of cutaneous disease on the tested area, as lesions, scars, malformations;
- recurrent facial/labial herpes;
- clinical and significant skin condition on the test area (e.g. active eczema, dermatitis, psoriasis etc.).
- Diabetes
- endocrine disease
- hepatic disorder
- renal disorder
- cardiac disorder
- pulmonary disease
- cancer
- neurological or psychological disease
- inflammatory/immunosuppressive disease
- drug allergy.
- Anti-inflammatory drugs, anti-histaminic, topic and systemic corticosteroids, narcotic, antidepressant, immunosuppressive drugs (with the except of contraceptive or hormonal treatment starting more than 1 year ago);
- assumption of drugs able to influence the test results in the investigator opinion.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
SUNEKOS ® 200
Arm Description
The 1st intradermal treatment (T1i) was performed during the basal visit (T0), after basal evaluations planned by the study procedure and repeated after 10 (T2i), 20 (T3i) and 30 (T4i) days.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Variation of Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) grade
Reduction of wrinkles severity corresponding to a decrease from the baseline of the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) clinical score where:
Grade 1 (absent): no visible nasolabial fold; continuous skin line. Grade 2 (mild): shallow but visible nasolabial fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature.
Grade 3 (moderate): moderately deep nasolabial folds; clear facial feature visible at normal appearance but not when stretched.
Grade 4 (severe): very long and deep nasolabial folds; prominent facial feature; <2mm visible fold when stretched.
Grade 5 (very severe): extremely deep and long nasolabial fold, detrimental to facial appearance; 2-4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched.
Variation of Facial Volume Loss Scale (FVLS) grade
Reduction of face volume loss corresponding to a decrease from the baseline of the Facial Volume Loss Scale (FVLS) where Grade 1 Mild flattening or shadowing of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas). No prominent bony landmarks. No visibility of underlying musculature.
Grade 2 An intermediate point between grade 1 and grade 3. Grade 3 Moderate concavity of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas. Prominence of bony landmarks. May have visibility of underlying musculature.
Grade 4 An intermediate point between grade 3 and grade 5. Grade 5 Severe indentation of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas). Severe prominence of bony landmarks. Clear visibility of underlying musculature.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Superficial skin hydration variation
Improvement of skin electrical capacitance value measured with Corneometer CM825 (Courage - Khazaka, Köln, Germany).
The measure of the skin capacitance properties is an indirect expression of its hydration level.
Deep skin hydration variation
Improvement of tissue dielectric constant value of superficial and deep skin layers measured with MoistureMeterD (Delfin Technologies, Kuopio - Finland)
Skin plastoelasticity variation
Improvement of the principal torsiometric parameters Ue (immediate extensibility), Uf (final extensibility), Uv (viscoelasticity) and Ur (immediate elastic recovery).Skin firmness is measured with the instrument Dermal Torque Meter (Dia-Stron Ltd., UK).
Variation of profilometric parameters
Reduction of the crow's feet lines profilometric parameters versus baseline where Ra is average roughness of the analysed profile, Rt is wrinkles total high, Rv is wrinkles maximum depth.
Photographic documentation (3D pictures )
Three-dimensional pictures of the face taken by VECTRA H1 handheld imaging system.
Face volume variation
Face volume image analysis was carried on the 3D pictures taken by Vectra H1 thanks to Vectra analysis module (VAM) software
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03274232
Brief Title
Face Photoaging: Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of an Intradermal Injective Treatment
Official Title
Efficacy and Tolerance of an Injectable Medical Device Containing Hyaluronic Acid and Amino Acids: a Monocentric Six-month Open-label Evaluation
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 27, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 25, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 25, 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Derming SRL
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Efficacy and tolerance evaluation of an intradermal injective treatment
Detailed Description
Primary end point of the study was to evaluate clinically and by non-invasive instrumental evaluations tolerance and efficacy of SUNEKOS ® 200 injectable treatment on main sign of face skin photoaging; the micro-injections of the study product were performed by a specialized dermatologist, bilaterally on the face (zygomatic protuberance, nostril's angle, inferior margin of tragus, lip marionette lines, mandibular angle) of female volunteers aged 45-65 years, with photoaging of mild/moderate grade.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Face Skin Photoaging
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
25 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
SUNEKOS ® 200
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The 1st intradermal treatment (T1i) was performed during the basal visit (T0), after basal evaluations planned by the study procedure and repeated after 10 (T2i), 20 (T3i) and 30 (T4i) days.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
SUNEKOS ® 200
Intervention Description
micro-injections of the study product were performed by a specialized dermatologist, bilaterally on the face (zygomatic protuberance, nostril's angle, inferior margin of tragus, lip marionette lines, mandibular angle) of female volunteers aged 45-65 years, with photoaging of mild/moderate grade
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Variation of Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) grade
Description
Reduction of wrinkles severity corresponding to a decrease from the baseline of the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) clinical score where:
Grade 1 (absent): no visible nasolabial fold; continuous skin line. Grade 2 (mild): shallow but visible nasolabial fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature.
Grade 3 (moderate): moderately deep nasolabial folds; clear facial feature visible at normal appearance but not when stretched.
Grade 4 (severe): very long and deep nasolabial folds; prominent facial feature; <2mm visible fold when stretched.
Grade 5 (very severe): extremely deep and long nasolabial fold, detrimental to facial appearance; 2-4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched.
Time Frame
Basal visit (T0), 10 days(T2i), 20 days (T3i), 30 days (T4i), 2 months (T2M) , 3 months (T3M), 6 months (T6M)
Title
Variation of Facial Volume Loss Scale (FVLS) grade
Description
Reduction of face volume loss corresponding to a decrease from the baseline of the Facial Volume Loss Scale (FVLS) where Grade 1 Mild flattening or shadowing of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas). No prominent bony landmarks. No visibility of underlying musculature.
Grade 2 An intermediate point between grade 1 and grade 3. Grade 3 Moderate concavity of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas. Prominence of bony landmarks. May have visibility of underlying musculature.
Grade 4 An intermediate point between grade 3 and grade 5. Grade 5 Severe indentation of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas). Severe prominence of bony landmarks. Clear visibility of underlying musculature.
Time Frame
Basal visit (T0), 10 days(T2i), 20 days (T3i), 30 days (T4i), 2 months (T2M) , 3 months (T3M), 6 months (T6M)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Superficial skin hydration variation
Description
Improvement of skin electrical capacitance value measured with Corneometer CM825 (Courage - Khazaka, Köln, Germany).
The measure of the skin capacitance properties is an indirect expression of its hydration level.
Time Frame
Basal visit (T0), 2 months (T2M) , 3 months (T3M), 6 months (T6M)
Title
Deep skin hydration variation
Description
Improvement of tissue dielectric constant value of superficial and deep skin layers measured with MoistureMeterD (Delfin Technologies, Kuopio - Finland)
Time Frame
Basal visit (T0), 2 months (T2M) , 3 months (T3M), 6 months (T6M)
Title
Skin plastoelasticity variation
Description
Improvement of the principal torsiometric parameters Ue (immediate extensibility), Uf (final extensibility), Uv (viscoelasticity) and Ur (immediate elastic recovery).Skin firmness is measured with the instrument Dermal Torque Meter (Dia-Stron Ltd., UK).
Time Frame
Basal visit (T0), 2 months (T2M) , 3 months (T3M), 6 months (T6M)
Title
Variation of profilometric parameters
Description
Reduction of the crow's feet lines profilometric parameters versus baseline where Ra is average roughness of the analysed profile, Rt is wrinkles total high, Rv is wrinkles maximum depth.
Time Frame
Basal visit (T0), 2 months (T2M) , 3 months (T3M), 6 months (T6M)
Title
Photographic documentation (3D pictures )
Description
Three-dimensional pictures of the face taken by VECTRA H1 handheld imaging system.
Time Frame
Basal visit (T0), 2 months (T2M) , 3 months (T3M), 6 months (T6M)
Title
Face volume variation
Description
Face volume image analysis was carried on the 3D pictures taken by Vectra H1 thanks to Vectra analysis module (VAM) software
Time Frame
Basal visit (T0), 2 months (T2M) , 3 months (T3M), 6 months (T6M)
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- female sex;
age 45-65 years;
mild/moderate cutaneous photoaging according to a reference photographic scale (see Appendix 8)
skin phototype I, II and III according to Fitzpatrick's classification, with a preference to grade II-III (see par. 8.1)
agreeing to present at each study visit without make-up;
accepting to not change their habits regarding food, physical activity, make-up use, face cosmetic and cleansing products;
accepting not to expose their face to strong UV irradiation (UV session, or sun bathes), during the entire duration of the study;
accepting to sign the Informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
Dependent on the volunteers' characteristics
Pregnancy;
lactation;
subjects not in menopause who do not use adequate contraceptive precautions in order to avoid pregnancies during the study;
Body Mass Index (BMI) variation (± 1) during the study period;
subjects not in menopause who do not accept to perform the pregnancy test during the basal visit, 30 days (T4i) and 2 months (T2M) after the first biomineralizing treatment execution;
performing skin treatments for aesthetic correction (biomaterials implants, face lifting, botox injections, laser, chemical peeling) in the 12 months prior to the study start;
performing permanent filler in the past;
change in the normal habits regarding food, physical activity, face cosmetic, cleansing and make-up use during the month preceding the test;
sensitivity to the test product or its ingredients (to be assessed by the investigator during the baseline visit);
subjects whose insufficient adhesion to the study protocol is foreseeable;
participation in a similar study actually or during the previous 6 months.
Presence of cutaneous disease on the tested area, as lesions, scars, malformations;
recurrent facial/labial herpes;
clinical and significant skin condition on the test area (e.g. active eczema, dermatitis, psoriasis etc.).
Diabetes
endocrine disease
hepatic disorder
renal disorder
cardiac disorder
pulmonary disease
cancer
neurological or psychological disease
inflammatory/immunosuppressive disease
drug allergy.
Anti-inflammatory drugs, anti-histaminic, topic and systemic corticosteroids, narcotic, antidepressant, immunosuppressive drugs (with the except of contraceptive or hormonal treatment starting more than 1 year ago);
assumption of drugs able to influence the test results in the investigator opinion.
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Face Photoaging: Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of an Intradermal Injective Treatment
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs