search
Back to results

Face Photoaging: Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of an Intradermal Injective Treatment

Primary Purpose

Face Skin Photoaging

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
SUNEKOS ® 200
Sponsored by
Derming SRL
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Face Skin Photoaging

Eligibility Criteria

45 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - female sex;
  • age 45-65 years;
  • mild/moderate cutaneous photoaging according to a reference photographic scale (see Appendix 8)
  • skin phototype I, II and III according to Fitzpatrick's classification, with a preference to grade II-III (see par. 8.1)
  • agreeing to present at each study visit without make-up;
  • accepting to not change their habits regarding food, physical activity, make-up use, face cosmetic and cleansing products;
  • accepting not to expose their face to strong UV irradiation (UV session, or sun bathes), during the entire duration of the study;
  • accepting to sign the Informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dependent on the volunteers' characteristics
  • Pregnancy;
  • lactation;
  • subjects not in menopause who do not use adequate contraceptive precautions in order to avoid pregnancies during the study;
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) variation (± 1) during the study period;
  • subjects not in menopause who do not accept to perform the pregnancy test during the basal visit, 30 days (T4i) and 2 months (T2M) after the first biomineralizing treatment execution;
  • performing skin treatments for aesthetic correction (biomaterials implants, face lifting, botox injections, laser, chemical peeling) in the 12 months prior to the study start;
  • performing permanent filler in the past;
  • change in the normal habits regarding food, physical activity, face cosmetic, cleansing and make-up use during the month preceding the test;
  • sensitivity to the test product or its ingredients (to be assessed by the investigator during the baseline visit);
  • subjects whose insufficient adhesion to the study protocol is foreseeable;
  • participation in a similar study actually or during the previous 6 months.
  • Presence of cutaneous disease on the tested area, as lesions, scars, malformations;
  • recurrent facial/labial herpes;
  • clinical and significant skin condition on the test area (e.g. active eczema, dermatitis, psoriasis etc.).
  • Diabetes
  • endocrine disease
  • hepatic disorder
  • renal disorder
  • cardiac disorder
  • pulmonary disease
  • cancer
  • neurological or psychological disease
  • inflammatory/immunosuppressive disease
  • drug allergy.
  • Anti-inflammatory drugs, anti-histaminic, topic and systemic corticosteroids, narcotic, antidepressant, immunosuppressive drugs (with the except of contraceptive or hormonal treatment starting more than 1 year ago);
  • assumption of drugs able to influence the test results in the investigator opinion.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    SUNEKOS ® 200

    Arm Description

    The 1st intradermal treatment (T1i) was performed during the basal visit (T0), after basal evaluations planned by the study procedure and repeated after 10 (T2i), 20 (T3i) and 30 (T4i) days.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Variation of Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) grade
    Reduction of wrinkles severity corresponding to a decrease from the baseline of the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) clinical score where: Grade 1 (absent): no visible nasolabial fold; continuous skin line. Grade 2 (mild): shallow but visible nasolabial fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature. Grade 3 (moderate): moderately deep nasolabial folds; clear facial feature visible at normal appearance but not when stretched. Grade 4 (severe): very long and deep nasolabial folds; prominent facial feature; <2mm visible fold when stretched. Grade 5 (very severe): extremely deep and long nasolabial fold, detrimental to facial appearance; 2-4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched.
    Variation of Facial Volume Loss Scale (FVLS) grade
    Reduction of face volume loss corresponding to a decrease from the baseline of the Facial Volume Loss Scale (FVLS) where Grade 1 Mild flattening or shadowing of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas). No prominent bony landmarks. No visibility of underlying musculature. Grade 2 An intermediate point between grade 1 and grade 3. Grade 3 Moderate concavity of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas. Prominence of bony landmarks. May have visibility of underlying musculature. Grade 4 An intermediate point between grade 3 and grade 5. Grade 5 Severe indentation of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas). Severe prominence of bony landmarks. Clear visibility of underlying musculature.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Superficial skin hydration variation
    Improvement of skin electrical capacitance value measured with Corneometer CM825 (Courage - Khazaka, Köln, Germany). The measure of the skin capacitance properties is an indirect expression of its hydration level.
    Deep skin hydration variation
    Improvement of tissue dielectric constant value of superficial and deep skin layers measured with MoistureMeterD (Delfin Technologies, Kuopio - Finland)
    Skin plastoelasticity variation
    Improvement of the principal torsiometric parameters Ue (immediate extensibility), Uf (final extensibility), Uv (viscoelasticity) and Ur (immediate elastic recovery).Skin firmness is measured with the instrument Dermal Torque Meter (Dia-Stron Ltd., UK).
    Variation of profilometric parameters
    Reduction of the crow's feet lines profilometric parameters versus baseline where Ra is average roughness of the analysed profile, Rt is wrinkles total high, Rv is wrinkles maximum depth.
    Photographic documentation (3D pictures )
    Three-dimensional pictures of the face taken by VECTRA H1 handheld imaging system.
    Face volume variation
    Face volume image analysis was carried on the 3D pictures taken by Vectra H1 thanks to Vectra analysis module (VAM) software

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 31, 2017
    Last Updated
    September 1, 2017
    Sponsor
    Derming SRL
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03274232
    Brief Title
    Face Photoaging: Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of an Intradermal Injective Treatment
    Official Title
    Efficacy and Tolerance of an Injectable Medical Device Containing Hyaluronic Acid and Amino Acids: a Monocentric Six-month Open-label Evaluation
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    July 2017
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    October 27, 2016 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    April 25, 2017 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    April 25, 2017 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Derming SRL

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Efficacy and tolerance evaluation of an intradermal injective treatment
    Detailed Description
    Primary end point of the study was to evaluate clinically and by non-invasive instrumental evaluations tolerance and efficacy of SUNEKOS ® 200 injectable treatment on main sign of face skin photoaging; the micro-injections of the study product were performed by a specialized dermatologist, bilaterally on the face (zygomatic protuberance, nostril's angle, inferior margin of tragus, lip marionette lines, mandibular angle) of female volunteers aged 45-65 years, with photoaging of mild/moderate grade.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Face Skin Photoaging

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Single Group Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    N/A
    Enrollment
    25 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    SUNEKOS ® 200
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    The 1st intradermal treatment (T1i) was performed during the basal visit (T0), after basal evaluations planned by the study procedure and repeated after 10 (T2i), 20 (T3i) and 30 (T4i) days.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    SUNEKOS ® 200
    Intervention Description
    micro-injections of the study product were performed by a specialized dermatologist, bilaterally on the face (zygomatic protuberance, nostril's angle, inferior margin of tragus, lip marionette lines, mandibular angle) of female volunteers aged 45-65 years, with photoaging of mild/moderate grade
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Variation of Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) grade
    Description
    Reduction of wrinkles severity corresponding to a decrease from the baseline of the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) clinical score where: Grade 1 (absent): no visible nasolabial fold; continuous skin line. Grade 2 (mild): shallow but visible nasolabial fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature. Grade 3 (moderate): moderately deep nasolabial folds; clear facial feature visible at normal appearance but not when stretched. Grade 4 (severe): very long and deep nasolabial folds; prominent facial feature; <2mm visible fold when stretched. Grade 5 (very severe): extremely deep and long nasolabial fold, detrimental to facial appearance; 2-4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched.
    Time Frame
    Basal visit (T0), 10 days(T2i), 20 days (T3i), 30 days (T4i), 2 months (T2M) , 3 months (T3M), 6 months (T6M)
    Title
    Variation of Facial Volume Loss Scale (FVLS) grade
    Description
    Reduction of face volume loss corresponding to a decrease from the baseline of the Facial Volume Loss Scale (FVLS) where Grade 1 Mild flattening or shadowing of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas). No prominent bony landmarks. No visibility of underlying musculature. Grade 2 An intermediate point between grade 1 and grade 3. Grade 3 Moderate concavity of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas. Prominence of bony landmarks. May have visibility of underlying musculature. Grade 4 An intermediate point between grade 3 and grade 5. Grade 5 Severe indentation of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas). Severe prominence of bony landmarks. Clear visibility of underlying musculature.
    Time Frame
    Basal visit (T0), 10 days(T2i), 20 days (T3i), 30 days (T4i), 2 months (T2M) , 3 months (T3M), 6 months (T6M)
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Superficial skin hydration variation
    Description
    Improvement of skin electrical capacitance value measured with Corneometer CM825 (Courage - Khazaka, Köln, Germany). The measure of the skin capacitance properties is an indirect expression of its hydration level.
    Time Frame
    Basal visit (T0), 2 months (T2M) , 3 months (T3M), 6 months (T6M)
    Title
    Deep skin hydration variation
    Description
    Improvement of tissue dielectric constant value of superficial and deep skin layers measured with MoistureMeterD (Delfin Technologies, Kuopio - Finland)
    Time Frame
    Basal visit (T0), 2 months (T2M) , 3 months (T3M), 6 months (T6M)
    Title
    Skin plastoelasticity variation
    Description
    Improvement of the principal torsiometric parameters Ue (immediate extensibility), Uf (final extensibility), Uv (viscoelasticity) and Ur (immediate elastic recovery).Skin firmness is measured with the instrument Dermal Torque Meter (Dia-Stron Ltd., UK).
    Time Frame
    Basal visit (T0), 2 months (T2M) , 3 months (T3M), 6 months (T6M)
    Title
    Variation of profilometric parameters
    Description
    Reduction of the crow's feet lines profilometric parameters versus baseline where Ra is average roughness of the analysed profile, Rt is wrinkles total high, Rv is wrinkles maximum depth.
    Time Frame
    Basal visit (T0), 2 months (T2M) , 3 months (T3M), 6 months (T6M)
    Title
    Photographic documentation (3D pictures )
    Description
    Three-dimensional pictures of the face taken by VECTRA H1 handheld imaging system.
    Time Frame
    Basal visit (T0), 2 months (T2M) , 3 months (T3M), 6 months (T6M)
    Title
    Face volume variation
    Description
    Face volume image analysis was carried on the 3D pictures taken by Vectra H1 thanks to Vectra analysis module (VAM) software
    Time Frame
    Basal visit (T0), 2 months (T2M) , 3 months (T3M), 6 months (T6M)

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    Female
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    45 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    65 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: - female sex; age 45-65 years; mild/moderate cutaneous photoaging according to a reference photographic scale (see Appendix 8) skin phototype I, II and III according to Fitzpatrick's classification, with a preference to grade II-III (see par. 8.1) agreeing to present at each study visit without make-up; accepting to not change their habits regarding food, physical activity, make-up use, face cosmetic and cleansing products; accepting not to expose their face to strong UV irradiation (UV session, or sun bathes), during the entire duration of the study; accepting to sign the Informed consent form. Exclusion Criteria: Dependent on the volunteers' characteristics Pregnancy; lactation; subjects not in menopause who do not use adequate contraceptive precautions in order to avoid pregnancies during the study; Body Mass Index (BMI) variation (± 1) during the study period; subjects not in menopause who do not accept to perform the pregnancy test during the basal visit, 30 days (T4i) and 2 months (T2M) after the first biomineralizing treatment execution; performing skin treatments for aesthetic correction (biomaterials implants, face lifting, botox injections, laser, chemical peeling) in the 12 months prior to the study start; performing permanent filler in the past; change in the normal habits regarding food, physical activity, face cosmetic, cleansing and make-up use during the month preceding the test; sensitivity to the test product or its ingredients (to be assessed by the investigator during the baseline visit); subjects whose insufficient adhesion to the study protocol is foreseeable; participation in a similar study actually or during the previous 6 months. Presence of cutaneous disease on the tested area, as lesions, scars, malformations; recurrent facial/labial herpes; clinical and significant skin condition on the test area (e.g. active eczema, dermatitis, psoriasis etc.). Diabetes endocrine disease hepatic disorder renal disorder cardiac disorder pulmonary disease cancer neurological or psychological disease inflammatory/immunosuppressive disease drug allergy. Anti-inflammatory drugs, anti-histaminic, topic and systemic corticosteroids, narcotic, antidepressant, immunosuppressive drugs (with the except of contraceptive or hormonal treatment starting more than 1 year ago); assumption of drugs able to influence the test results in the investigator opinion.

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    Face Photoaging: Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of an Intradermal Injective Treatment

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs