search
Back to results

Far Infrared Therapy on Arteriovenous Fistulas in Hemodialysis Patients

Primary Purpose

Arterio-venous Fistula

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Far infrared radiation
Sponsored by
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Arterio-venous Fistula focused on measuring Hemodialysis, Infrared therapy, Stenosis, Maturation, Arteriovenous fistula survival

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

For incident AVF:

  • Patients of 18 years of age or above
  • Patients on chronic hemodialysis with a central venous catheter, who is having an AVF placed
  • An AVF, that are maximum 3 weeks old

For prevalent AVF:

  • Patients in chronic hemodialysis with a functioning AVF
  • Patients of 18 yeas of age or above

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not obtainable informed consent
  • Non compliant patients
  • Patients who use both a CVC and an AVF as their vascular access
  • Patient on both hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis
  • Planned living donor kidney transplantation
  • Short life expectancy, less than a 1 year
  • Patients on hemodialysis less than 3 times per week

Sites / Locations

  • Frederiksberg HospitalRecruiting
  • Herlev HospitalRecruiting
  • Hilleroed HospitalRecruiting
  • Holbæk Hospital
  • Hvidovre HospitalRecruiting
  • Rigshospitalet
  • Nykøbing Falster HospitalRecruiting
  • Roskilde Hospital
  • Slagelse Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

Infrared treatment arm

Control arm

Arm Description

Far infrared radiation will be given for 40 minutes on the skin above the patients fistula in each dialysis session for one year

The control group will not receive any intervention, but will be followed with the same data as the treatment group

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Time to fistula maturation for the incident fistulae
Time from placement of the fistula to successful cannulation with 2 needles and successful hemodialysis treatment
Difference in number of fistula intervention for the prevalent fistulae
For the fistulae with or without previous interventions we expect to find a decrease in the number of interventions in the treatment group compared to the control group

Secondary Outcome Measures

Difference in number of fistula interventions in the incident fistula group
Difference in the number of fistula intervention in the groups with a newly places fistula
Difference in the fistula diameter in the incident fistula group
Is there a difference in the diameter measured by ultrasound between the 2 groups with patients with a newly places fistula
Number of abandoned fistulae in incident and prevalent groups
For patients with a new fistula and patients with a fistula with/without interventions how many will loose their fistula and receive a new vascular access
The incidence of primary patency in the incident group
How many of the fistulas in the group with a new fistula needs an intervention in order to get a functioning fistula
Number of patients with a never functioning fistula in the incident group
How many patients in the newly places fistula group will never have a functioning fistula
Change in access flow in the incident and prevalent group
Does the access flow change between the control and treatment group
Baseline value in serum amyloid A as a predictor for AVF survival and stenosis
Before study start the following markers will be explored : Serum Amyloid A (in Ug/ml),
Baseline value in adhesion molecules, heme-oxygenase and ADMA and selectin as a predictor for AVF survival stenosis
Before study start the following change in markers will be explored: vascular cell adhesion molecule (in ng/ml), intercellular adhesion molecule (in ng/ml), sE-selectin (in ng/ml), assymetric dimethylarginine (in ng/ml), heme-oxygenase-1 (in ng/ml)
Baseline value in von willebrand factor as a predictor for AVF survival stenosis
Before study start the following change in markers will be explored: vWF in ml-1)
Baseline in nitrite and nitrate as a predictor for AVF survival stenosis
Before study start the following change in markers will be explored: nitrite (in uM), nitrate (in uM)
Baseline in different biomarkers as a predictor for AVF survival stenosis
Before study start the following change in markers will be explored: endothelin (in pg/ml), prostaglandin E2 (in pg/ml, Interleukin-beta (pg/ml), Interleukin-6 (in pg/ml), Interleukin-8 (in pg/ml), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (in pg/ml), transformin growth factor-beta (in pg/ml) and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (in pg/ml).

Full Information

First Posted
June 27, 2019
Last Updated
March 17, 2022
Sponsor
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
Collaborators
Rigshospitalet, Denmark, Hillerod Hospital, Denmark, Holbaek Sygehus, Zealand University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04011072
Brief Title
Far Infrared Therapy on Arteriovenous Fistulas in Hemodialysis Patients
Official Title
Effect of Far Infrared Therapy on Arteriovenous Fistulas Maturation, Survival and Stenosis. A Randomized, Controlled Open-labeled Multicenter Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
October 3, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
Collaborators
Rigshospitalet, Denmark, Hillerod Hospital, Denmark, Holbaek Sygehus, Zealand University Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The number of hemodialysis patients in the world are increasing. In order to receive a sufficient dialysis, the patients needs a well functioning and stable vascular access - preferably an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). Unfortunately, the AVF has a high incidence of stenosis with percutaneous trans luminal angioplasty (PTA) as the only treatment option and a short lifetime. Little do we know of how to improve the survival of the AVF. With this study we want to explore the effect of far infrared therapy on the stenosis, maturation and survival of the arteriovenous fistula. The investigators will divide the patients into 2 groups: A treatment group and a control group. The treatment group will receive infrared therapy on their fistula during their dialysis session. The control group will not receive any infrared therapy. The investigators hope to reduce the risk of stenosis in the fistula and improve the fistula survival with this treatment. Furthermore, the investigators want to explore the change in several biochemical markers during the treatment with infrared therapy.
Detailed Description
Background: The number of hemodialysis patients in the world are increasing. In order to receive an efficient dialysis, the patient needs a well-functioning and stable vascular access. Presently there is three options: an arteriovenous fistula (AVF), an arteriovenous graft (AVG) and a central venous catheter (CVC). CVCs are associated with an increased risk of stenosis of the central vessels, thrombosis in the AVF, infections and death. AVGs are associated with increased risk of infections, stenosis in the AVG and loss of access. This is why, the AVF is the preferred vascular access. But this vascular access does not come without risks. After the creation of an AVF there is a risk of 50 % for never maturing, which means the AVF cannot be used. Furthermore, the risk of stenosis in the AVF is also high, up to 67 % of the AVFs will have a stenosis, that needs an intervention. During this time the patient needs an alternative vascular access, such as a central venous catheter, which is related to an increased risk of infection, more hospital days and death. The maturation of the AVF depends on several patient related, but also surgically related factors. Factors such as comorbidity, female sex, length of end stage renal disease, anatomy of the vessel, surveillance after AVF placement and the operations itself have all been shown to affect the AVF maturation. Fistula stenosis emerges from an endothelial dysfunction, inflammation and smooth muscle cell proliferation leading to intimal hyperplasia and in the end stenosis. Factors such as increased blood flow, inflammation, uremia and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty has been shown to affect the stenosis, It is not well understood, which molecular mechanism are responsible for the intimal hyperplasia. There are few and not well established studies on how to improve the AVF survival and maturation. Far infrared radiation (FIR) is an electromagnetic radiation (heat therapy), that is given directly on the skin above the AVF. In a few single center studies in Taiwan it has been shown to decrease the risk of stenosis and increase the fistula survival and maturation. However another study is disputing this. The mechanism behind FIR and better fistula survival is not fully understood. The infrared light is supposed to have a thermal effect, which leads to vasodilatation and a non-thermal effect, which influence the endothelial function and vasodilation and thereby it may decrease the inflammation and proliferation in the fistula, primarily through the releasing of several anti-inflammatory and vasodilating factors. This is not well documented. Hypothesis: Treatment with FIR for 40 minutes three times a week on the patients AVF will improve the AVF survival and maturation Method: This study is a randomized, controlled multicenter study on western patients There will be 2 patient categories: A group (82 patients) of dialysis patients with a newly created AF A group (104 patients) of dialysis patients with an existing AVF The patients will randomly be randomized 1:1 to either the treatment group or a control group. For group 2 the patients will be block randomized according to their access flow (AF) (above or below 950 ml/min). Furthermore these patients will be stratified according to interventions in there AVF (no interventions >/= 1 intervention) For the FIR treatment Ws Far Infrared Therapy Unit, model TY-102F (Medical device Class 11a CE0434) is being used. The patients will receive 40 minutes of infrared radiation on the skin of their fistula during each dialysis treatment for one year. The control group will not receive any FIR treatment, but will be followed according to the protocol and in line with the treatment group. The patients will be followed until end of study or lost-to-follow-up (death, transplantations, change of renal replacement therapy, abandoned AVF, change of vascular access to CVC, consent withdrawal or if the patients moves away). In order to explore the long term effects of FIR the patients will be followed for an extra 6 months according to the endpoints. In a subset of 2x20 patients of the randomized controlled trial we further wish to explore the influence of infrared therapy on endothelial function and inflammation during a FIR treatment session. Blood samples will be collected before and immediately after infrared treatment directly from the treatment site, since 2 needles are placed in the fistula during the dialysis treatment. The same samples will be collected in the control group and in the intervention group during the dialysis before the first infrared intervention in order to reduce the interindividual variation in the biomarkers.The changes in markers of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation during treatment and control dialysis session will be examined and compared. Furthermore a blood sample from each patient will be collected at study start. The predictive value of the biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation for the treatment response to infrared therapy and the prognosis for fistula maturation, stenosis and survival will be evaluated after the randomised controlled trial has ended. Arterial stiffness (measured by Mobil-O-Graph) will also be evaluated as a marker for fistula survival and maturation. A total of 186 participants will be recruited from 9 dialysis centres. If the study shows positive results, the implication of FIR in the clinic will have a huge beneficial effect for the hemodialysis patients vascular access and perhaps also patient survival. FIR is an easy treatment with a low cost-effectiveness and minimal or no side effects for the patient.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Arterio-venous Fistula
Keywords
Hemodialysis, Infrared therapy, Stenosis, Maturation, Arteriovenous fistula survival

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
187 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Infrared treatment arm
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Far infrared radiation will be given for 40 minutes on the skin above the patients fistula in each dialysis session for one year
Arm Title
Control arm
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
The control group will not receive any intervention, but will be followed with the same data as the treatment group
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Far infrared radiation
Other Intervention Name(s)
FIR
Intervention Description
The treatment group will receive FIR for 40 minutes on the skin above the fistula during each dialysis session for one year.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to fistula maturation for the incident fistulae
Description
Time from placement of the fistula to successful cannulation with 2 needles and successful hemodialysis treatment
Time Frame
After 12 months
Title
Difference in number of fistula intervention for the prevalent fistulae
Description
For the fistulae with or without previous interventions we expect to find a decrease in the number of interventions in the treatment group compared to the control group
Time Frame
After 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Difference in number of fistula interventions in the incident fistula group
Description
Difference in the number of fistula intervention in the groups with a newly places fistula
Time Frame
After 12 months
Title
Difference in the fistula diameter in the incident fistula group
Description
Is there a difference in the diameter measured by ultrasound between the 2 groups with patients with a newly places fistula
Time Frame
After 12 months
Title
Number of abandoned fistulae in incident and prevalent groups
Description
For patients with a new fistula and patients with a fistula with/without interventions how many will loose their fistula and receive a new vascular access
Time Frame
After 12 months
Title
The incidence of primary patency in the incident group
Description
How many of the fistulas in the group with a new fistula needs an intervention in order to get a functioning fistula
Time Frame
After 12 months
Title
Number of patients with a never functioning fistula in the incident group
Description
How many patients in the newly places fistula group will never have a functioning fistula
Time Frame
After 12 months
Title
Change in access flow in the incident and prevalent group
Description
Does the access flow change between the control and treatment group
Time Frame
After 12 moths
Title
Baseline value in serum amyloid A as a predictor for AVF survival and stenosis
Description
Before study start the following markers will be explored : Serum Amyloid A (in Ug/ml),
Time Frame
After 12 months
Title
Baseline value in adhesion molecules, heme-oxygenase and ADMA and selectin as a predictor for AVF survival stenosis
Description
Before study start the following change in markers will be explored: vascular cell adhesion molecule (in ng/ml), intercellular adhesion molecule (in ng/ml), sE-selectin (in ng/ml), assymetric dimethylarginine (in ng/ml), heme-oxygenase-1 (in ng/ml)
Time Frame
After 12 months
Title
Baseline value in von willebrand factor as a predictor for AVF survival stenosis
Description
Before study start the following change in markers will be explored: vWF in ml-1)
Time Frame
After 12 months
Title
Baseline in nitrite and nitrate as a predictor for AVF survival stenosis
Description
Before study start the following change in markers will be explored: nitrite (in uM), nitrate (in uM)
Time Frame
After 12 months
Title
Baseline in different biomarkers as a predictor for AVF survival stenosis
Description
Before study start the following change in markers will be explored: endothelin (in pg/ml), prostaglandin E2 (in pg/ml, Interleukin-beta (pg/ml), Interleukin-6 (in pg/ml), Interleukin-8 (in pg/ml), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (in pg/ml), transformin growth factor-beta (in pg/ml) and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (in pg/ml).
Time Frame
After 12 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Difference in cannulation pain in the incident and prevalent group compared with visual analogue scale
Description
Do the patients receiving FIR treatment experience less pain during cannulation compared to the control group evaluated by the VAS (visual analogue scale) score
Time Frame
After 12 months
Title
Difference in number with steal symptoms in the incident and prevalent group
Description
Is there a difference in patients with steal symptoms in the two groups
Time Frame
After 12 months
Title
Acute changes in serum amyloid A after a single FIR treatment
Description
In a subgroup of patients we want to study the acute changes of the following markers during a FIR treatment Analysing Serum Amyloid A (in Ug/ml)
Time Frame
After 40 minutes of FIR treatment
Title
Acute changes in adhesion molecules, heme-oxygenase and ADMA and selectin as a predictor for AVF survival stenosis after a single FIR treatment
Description
In a subgroup of patients we want to study the acute changes of the following markers during a FIR treatment, analysing: vascular cell adhesion molecule (in ng/ml), intercellular adhesion molecule (in ng/ml), sE-selectin (in ng/ml), assymetric dimethylarginine (in ng/ml), heme-oxygenase-1 (in ng/ml)
Time Frame
After 40 minutes of FIR treatment
Title
Acute changes in von willebrand factor after a single FIR treatment
Description
In a subgroup of patients we want to study the acute changes of the following markers during a FIR treatment Analysing: von WillebrandFactor (in ml-1)
Time Frame
After 40 minutes of FIR treatment
Title
Acute changes in nitrite and nitrate after a single FIR treatment
Description
In a subgroup of patients we want to study the acute changes of the following markers during a FIR treatment Analysing: nitrite (in uM), nitrate (in uM)
Time Frame
After 40 minutes of FIR treatment
Title
Acute changes in different biomarkers after a single FIR treatment
Description
In a subgroup of patients we want to study the acute changes of the following markers during a FIR treatment Analysing: endothelin (in pg/ml), prostaglandin E2 (in pg/ml), Interleukin-beta (pg/ml), Interleukin-6 (in pg/ml), Interleukin-8 (in pg/ml), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (in pg/ml), transformin growth factor-beta (in pg/ml) and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (in pg/ml).
Time Frame
After 40 minutes of FIR treatment

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: For incident AVF: Patients of 18 years of age or above Patients on chronic hemodialysis with a central venous catheter, who is having an AVF placed An AVF, that are maximum 3 weeks old For prevalent AVF: Patients in chronic hemodialysis with a functioning AVF Patients of 18 yeas of age or above Exclusion Criteria: Not obtainable informed consent Non compliant patients Patients who use both a CVC and an AVF as their vascular access Patient on both hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis Planned living donor kidney transplantation Short life expectancy, less than a 1 year Patients on hemodialysis less than 3 times per week
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Kristine Lindhard, Doctor
Phone
+4538681977
Email
kristine.lindhard.rasmussen@regionh.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Ditte Hansen, Doctor
Phone
+45 3868
Email
ditte.hansen.04@regionh.dk
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ditte Hansen, Doctor
Organizational Affiliation
Herlev Hospital, Department of Nephrology
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Frederiksberg Hospital
City
Frederiksberg
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ylian Liam, Dr
Facility Name
Herlev Hospital
City
Herlev
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kristine Lindhard, Dr
Facility Name
Hilleroed Hospital
City
Hillerød
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marianne Berthelsen, Dr
Facility Name
Holbæk Hospital
City
Holbæk
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kristine Hommel, Dr
Facility Name
Hvidovre Hospital
City
Hvidovre
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kristine Lindhard, Dr
Facility Name
Rigshospitalet
City
København
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marianne Rix, Dr
Facility Name
Nykøbing Falster Hospital
City
Nykøbing Falster
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kirstine Gliese, Dr
Facility Name
Roskilde Hospital
City
Roskilde
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kirstine Gliese, Dr
Facility Name
Slagelse Hospital
City
Slagelse
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kristine Hommel, Dr

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
18930570
Citation
Lacson E Jr, Wang W, Hakim RM, Teng M, Lazarus JM. Associates of mortality and hospitalization in hemodialysis: potentially actionable laboratory variables and vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 Jan;53(1):79-90. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.07.031. Epub 2008 Oct 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22908320
Citation
Bray BD, Boyd J, Daly C, Donaldson K, Doyle A, Fox JG, Innes A, Khan I, Peel RK, Severn A, Shilliday I, Simpson K, Stewart GA, Traynor J, Metcalfe W; Scottish Renal Registry. Vascular access type and risk of mortality in a national prospective cohort of haemodialysis patients. QJM. 2012 Nov;105(11):1097-103. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcs143. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16813991
Citation
Vascular Access Work Group. Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Jul;48 Suppl 1:S248-73. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.04.040. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30792802
Citation
Vanholder R, Canaud B, Fluck R, Jadoul M, Labriola L, Marti-Monros A, Tordoir J, Van Biesen W. Diagnosis, prevention and treatment of haemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI): a position statement of European Renal Best Practice (ERBP). NDT Plus. 2010 Jun;3(3):234-246. doi: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfq041. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11576358
Citation
Dhingra RK, Young EW, Hulbert-Shearon TE, Leavey SF, Port FK. Type of vascular access and mortality in U.S. hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2001 Oct;60(4):1443-51. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00947.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12472799
Citation
Rayner HC, Pisoni RL, Gillespie BW, Goodkin DA, Akiba T, Akizawa T, Saito A, Young EW, Port FK; Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Creation, cannulation and survival of arteriovenous fistulae: data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Kidney Int. 2003 Jan;63(1):323-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00724.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24183112
Citation
Al-Jaishi AA, Oliver MJ, Thomas SM, Lok CE, Zhang JC, Garg AX, Kosa SD, Quinn RR, Moist LM. Patency rates of the arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Mar;63(3):464-78. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.08.023. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22070937
Citation
Smith GE, Gohil R, Chetter IC. Factors affecting the patency of arteriovenous fistulas for dialysis access. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Mar;55(3):849-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.095. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26988630
Citation
Bashar K, Conlon PJ, Kheirelseid EA, Aherne T, Walsh SR, Leahy A. Arteriovenous fistula in dialysis patients: Factors implicated in early and late AVF maturation failure. Surgeon. 2016 Oct;14(5):294-300. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26806833
Citation
Brahmbhatt A, Remuzzi A, Franzoni M, Misra S. The molecular mechanisms of hemodialysis vascular access failure. Kidney Int. 2016 Feb;89(2):303-316. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2015.12.019.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18202320
Citation
Lin CC, Liu XM, Peyton K, Wang H, Yang WC, Lin SJ, Durante W. Far infrared therapy inhibits vascular endothelial inflammation via the induction of heme oxygenase-1. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008 Apr;28(4):739-45. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.160085. Epub 2008 Jan 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25716016
Citation
Shui S, Wang X, Chiang JY, Zheng L. Far-infrared therapy for cardiovascular, autoimmune, and other chronic health problems: A systematic review. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2015 Oct;240(10):1257-65. doi: 10.1177/1535370215573391. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23474008
Citation
Lin CC, Yang WC, Chen MC, Liu WS, Yang CY, Lee PC. Effect of far infrared therapy on arteriovenous fistula maturation: an open-label randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013 Aug;62(2):304-11. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.01.015. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17267744
Citation
Lin CC, Chang CF, Lai MY, Chen TW, Lee PC, Yang WC. Far-infrared therapy: a novel treatment to improve access blood flow and unassisted patency of arteriovenous fistula in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Mar;18(3):985-92. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006050534. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24119468
Citation
Lai CC, Fang HC, Mar GY, Liou JC, Tseng CJ, Liu CP. Post-angioplasty far infrared radiation therapy improves 1-year angioplasty-free hemodialysis access patency of recurrent obstructive lesions. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Dec;46(6):726-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.09.018. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29076519
Citation
McGrogan DG, Stringer S, Cockwell P, Jesky M, Ferro C, Maxwell AP, Inston NG. Arterial stiffness alone does not explain arteriovenous fistula outcomes. J Vasc Access. 2018 Jan;19(1):63-68. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000791.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27451463
Citation
Dember LM, Imrey PB, Duess MA, Hamburg NM, Larive B, Radeva M, Himmelfarb J, Kraiss LW, Kusek JW, Roy-Chaudhury P, Terry CM, Vazquez MA, Vongpatanasin W, Beck GJ, Vita JA; Hemodialysis Fistula Maturation Study GroupFeldmanH.FarberA.KaufmanJ.SternL.LeSageP.KivorkC.SoaresD.MalikovaM.AllonM.YoungC.TaylorM.WoodardL.MangadiK.MundaR.LeeT.AllowayR.El-KhatibM.CanaanT.PflumA.ThiekenL.Campos-NaciffB.HuberT.BerceliS.JansenM.McCaslinG.TrahanY.DavidsonI.HwangC.LightfootT.LivingstonC.ValenciaA.DolmatchB.FenvesA.HawkinsN.CheungA.KinikiniD.TreimanG.IhnatD.SarfatiM.LavasaniI.MaloneyM.SchlotfeldtL.BuchananC.ClarkC.CrawfordC.HamlettJ.KundzinsJ.ManahanL.WiseJ.GassmanJ.GreeneT.LiL. Vascular Function at Baseline in the Hemodialysis Fistula Maturation Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jul 22;5(7):e003227. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003227.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16565259
Citation
Roy-Chaudhury P, Sukhatme VP, Cheung AK. Hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction: a cellular and molecular viewpoint. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Apr;17(4):1112-27. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005050615.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27401527
Citation
Lee T, Misra S. New Insights into Dialysis Vascular Access: Molecular Targets in Arteriovenous Fistula and Arteriovenous Graft Failure and Their Potential to Improve Vascular Access Outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Aug 8;11(8):1504-1512. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02030216. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34419006
Citation
Lindhard K, Rix M, Heaf JG, Hansen HP, Pedersen BL, Jensen BL, Hansen D. Effect of far infrared therapy on arteriovenous fistula maturation, survival and stenosis in hemodialysis patients, a randomized, controlled clinical trial: the FAITH on fistula trial. BMC Nephrol. 2021 Aug 21;22(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12882-021-02476-x.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Far Infrared Therapy on Arteriovenous Fistulas in Hemodialysis Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs