Feasibility of a Standardized Video for Patient Education and as a Decision Aid on Code Status for Patients in the Emergency Department Pending Admission to the Hospital
Primary Purpose
Patient Education
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CPR video
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Patient Education
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Any patient in the Emergency Department whose disposition is listed as a full admission to the hospital
- Provider willingness to have patient watch the video and be available to answer questions after.
- Age > 65
- Ability to provide consent
Exclusion Criteria
- Does not speak English
- Hearing or visually impaired
- Prisoner or incarcerated
- Inability to provide consent according to attending Physician or Study Coordinator and legal power of attorney is not present
Sites / Locations
- Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
CPR video
Arm Description
Patient watches a short CPR video
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Satisfaction of patients and family members in watching videos of cardiopulmonary resuscitation
This will be measured through use of a questionnaire asking them to score their comfort with watching the video and how likely they would be to recommend the video to others.
Secondary Outcome Measures
The number of patients/families who will feel that the video was helpful in the decision regarding code status
To assess if watching the standardized video changes patients' code status. This will be measured as what patients' code status was before and after watching the video.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03213197
Brief Title
Feasibility of a Standardized Video for Patient Education and as a Decision Aid on Code Status for Patients in the Emergency Department Pending Admission to the Hospital
Official Title
Feasibility of a Standardized Video for Patient Education and as a Decision Aid on Code Status for Patients in the Emergency Department Pending Admission to the Hospital
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 14, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 22, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 19, 2018 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Mayo Clinic
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The researchers hypothesize that patients and their families will be comfortable watching standardized CPR informational videos and that they would recommend that others watch the videos. Furthermore, the researchers hypothesize that patients and their families will find the videos helpful in their own end-of-life planning.
Detailed Description
The code status video, produced by experts in palliative medicine and end of life care, has been evaluated in a variety of healthcare settings to allow patients to make more informed decisions based on realistic information about resuscitation status. This video could be used as a supplement for clinical discussions and decision making. It is not meant to replace a careful, individualized discussion by the clinician with patients and their families, but appears to be a helpful tool to help educate patients in order for them to be better informed to make complicated decisions about their code status. The Emergency Department is an ideal setting to evaluate the video because they could improve patient understanding in an environment with inherently limited face-to-face provider time.
Specific Aims
To assess the satisfaction of patients and family members who view the video on cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This will be measured through use of a questionnaire asking them to score their comfort with watching the video and how likely they would be to recommend the video to others.
To assess if watching the standardized video changes patients' code status. This will be measured as what patients' code status was before and after watching the video.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Patient Education
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
Feasibility of a Standardized Video for Patient Education and as a Decision Aid on Code Status for Patients in the Emergency Department pending Admission to the Hospital
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
50 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
CPR video
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patient watches a short CPR video
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
CPR video
Intervention Description
Patient watches a short CPR video
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Satisfaction of patients and family members in watching videos of cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Description
This will be measured through use of a questionnaire asking them to score their comfort with watching the video and how likely they would be to recommend the video to others.
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The number of patients/families who will feel that the video was helpful in the decision regarding code status
Description
To assess if watching the standardized video changes patients' code status. This will be measured as what patients' code status was before and after watching the video.
Time Frame
1 year
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
Any patient in the Emergency Department whose disposition is listed as a full admission to the hospital
Provider willingness to have patient watch the video and be available to answer questions after.
Age > 65
Ability to provide consent
Exclusion Criteria
Does not speak English
Hearing or visually impaired
Prisoner or incarcerated
Inability to provide consent according to attending Physician or Study Coordinator and legal power of attorney is not present
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Caitlin E Loprinzi Brauer
Organizational Affiliation
Mayo Clinic
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Not being shared....
Learn more about this trial
Feasibility of a Standardized Video for Patient Education and as a Decision Aid on Code Status for Patients in the Emergency Department Pending Admission to the Hospital
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs