Feasibility of Mindfulness Meditation Training and Home Practice in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury
Primary Purpose
Spinal Cord Injuries
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
mindfulness meditation(MM)
Health Education (active control)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional other trial for Spinal Cord Injuries
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Traumatic SCI of at least 6 months duration
- Chronic pain [defined as pain lasting at least 3 months with a pain intensity rating of 4 or higher on a 10-point visual analog scale]
- Understand spoken and written English sufficiently to provide informed consent
- participate in the intervention and complete study surveys
Exclusion Criteria:
- Lack of daily access to the internet using a smart phone or smart tablet
- Cognitive impairment (determined by their inability to demonstrate comprehension of informed consent by correctly answering 4 out of 5 questions pertaining to the study)
- Significant visual/hearing impairment that does not allow use of the MM app's audiovisual presentations or health education presentations on Ted-talk
- Use of any kind of meditation more than once a week in the last 3 months
- Inability to provide or obtain an email address for communication with study staff
Sites / Locations
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonRecruiting
- TIRR Memorial HermannRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
mindfulness meditation(MM)
Health Education
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Feasibility as assessed by the proportion of eligible people who provide consent
Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants who complete the minimum recommended minutes (i.e., 60 minutes/per week) of using the MM or HE app during the 6 weeks intervention
Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants that complete all visits
Visits include baseline, immediate post-intervention and 6-week follow-up assessments.
Acceptability as assessed by the patient-reported program evaluation questionnaire scale
This questionnaire has 12 questions each is scored form 1(no, definitely not) to 4(yes definitely), a higher score indicating more acceptability. The questionnaire also has 5 open ended questions where the subject can enter any recommendations to improve the app.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Feasibility of collecting patient reported outcomes of pain as assessed by the International SCI pain basic data subset (version 2)
This survey contains 11 questions and each one is measured from 0(no pain) to 10(chronic pain),with a maximum score of 110, a higher number indicating more pain
Feasibility of collecting patient reported outcomes of pain-related distress as assessed by the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-R8)
This is a 20 item questionnaire,each is scored from 0(never true) to 6(always true), a higher number indicating higher acceptance
Feasibility of collecting patient reported outcomes of brief pain as assessed by the Brief Pain Catastrophizing Scale (Brief PCS)
This measures three aspects of catastrophic cognitions about pain-rumination, magnification, and helplessness. This is a 13 item questionnaire. Each question has five response options ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) scale, with a maximum score of 52
Feasibility of collecting patient reported outcomes of anxiety as assessed by the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) questionnaire
This is an 7 item questionnaire, each is scored from 0(not at all) to 3(nearly every day), a higher score indicating more anxiety
Feasibility of collecting patient reported outcomes of depression as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8)
This is an 8 item questionnaire.Each question is scored from 0 to 1 day = "not at all," 2 to 6 days = "several days," 7 to 11 days = "more than half the days," and 12 to 14 days = "nearly every day". Total score is determined by adding together the scores of each of the four items. Scores are rated as normal (0-2), mild (3-5), moderate (6-8), and severe (9-12).
feasibility of collecting patient reported outcomes of mindfulness, as assessed by the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-15 (FFMQ-15)
This is a 15 item questionnaire, each is scored from 1(never or very rarely true) to 5(very often or always true) for a maximum score of 120, higher score indicating more mindfulness
Feasibility of collecting patient reported outcomes of quality of life as assessed by the SCI-quality of life (QOL): Positive Affect and Well Being-Short Form (PAWB-SF)
This is a 10 item scale each scored from (1)never to (5)always, with a maximum score of 50 a higher number indicating a better outcome
Feasibility of collecting perceived stress as assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4)
A four-item scale , each is scored from 0(never) to 4(very often) for a maximum score of 16 a higher score indicating more stress
Feasibility of collecting fatigue as assessed by the PROMIS Fatigue- Short Form 4a
Each question has five response options ranging in value from five (very poor) to one (very good), a higher number indicating more fatigue.XX
Feasibility of collecting psychological inflexibility/experiential avoidance as assessed by the acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-2)
This contains 7 items and answers are given on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (never true) to 7 (always true). High scores on the AAQ-2 are reflective of greater experiential avoidance and immobility, while low scores reflect greater acceptance and action.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT05556057
First Posted
September 22, 2022
Last Updated
January 20, 2023
Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Collaborators
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), Sam Houston State University, TIRR Memorial Hermann
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05556057
Brief Title
Feasibility of Mindfulness Meditation Training and Home Practice in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury
Official Title
Feasibility of Mindfulness Meditation Training and Home Practice in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
December 6, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 15, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 30, 2024 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Collaborators
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), Sam Houston State University, TIRR Memorial Hermann
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a 6-week app-guided Mindfulness meditation training (MM) intervention and health education (active control) condition in people with spinal cord injury (SCI) who have chronic pain and to examine the feasibility of data collection procedures
Detailed Description
Our multidisciplinary, interinstitutional team of investigators proposes to randomize 60 SCI patients experiencing chronic pain to practice audio-guided MM for ≥ 10 minutes daily for 6 weeks using the free app "Mindfulness Coach" developed by the Department of Veteran Affairs, or to listen or view health education presentations (active control) ≥ 10 minutes daily for 6 weeks on the free TED app (active control). Primary outcomes are the feasibility and acceptability of proposed interventions in people with SCI and chronic pain. Secondary outcomes include the feasibility of collecting patient-reported outcomes of pain, anxiety, depression, mindfulness, quality of life, stress, fatigue and sleep disturbance.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Spinal Cord Injuries
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Investigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
mindfulness meditation(MM)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Health Education
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
mindfulness meditation(MM)
Intervention Description
Participants will be provided with a unique invitation code that will allow them to download and use the free research version of the Mindfulness Coach app that is designed to deliver mindfulness training developed by the Veteran Affairs' National Center for PTSD.The app is tailored to users who may be skeptical about meditation practices by providing simple instructions and brief meditation exercises. The app offers written information about mindfulness as well as 12 audio-guided meditations each lasting 8-13 minutes, with an average length of 10 minutes
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Health Education (active control)
Intervention Description
Participants will be asked to download and use the free TED Talk app.Each participant's account will include a list of over 80 TED Talks related to the six broad categories of sleep, nutrition, mood, relationships, chronic pain, and health behaviors. These talks range from 4 to 18 minutes and were reviewed/selected by the investigator team. The research coordinator(RC) will instruct them to watch or listen to these videos for ≥ 10 minutes daily for 6 days per week. The RC will ask participants to complete weekly logs of their TED Talk app use
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Feasibility as assessed by the proportion of eligible people who provide consent
Time Frame
end of study at 3 years
Title
Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants who complete the minimum recommended minutes (i.e., 60 minutes/per week) of using the MM or HE app during the 6 weeks intervention
Time Frame
post-intervention (6 weeks post-enrollment)
Title
Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants that complete all visits
Description
Visits include baseline, immediate post-intervention and 6-week follow-up assessments.
Time Frame
end of study (12 weeks post enrollment)
Title
Acceptability as assessed by the patient-reported program evaluation questionnaire scale
Description
This questionnaire has 12 questions each is scored form 1(no, definitely not) to 4(yes definitely), a higher score indicating more acceptability. The questionnaire also has 5 open ended questions where the subject can enter any recommendations to improve the app.
Time Frame
post-intervention (6 weeks post-enrollment)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Feasibility of collecting patient reported outcomes of pain as assessed by the International SCI pain basic data subset (version 2)
Description
This survey contains 11 questions and each one is measured from 0(no pain) to 10(chronic pain),with a maximum score of 110, a higher number indicating more pain
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (6 weeks post-enrollment), and end of study (12 weeks post enrollment)
Title
Feasibility of collecting patient reported outcomes of pain-related distress as assessed by the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-R8)
Description
This is a 20 item questionnaire,each is scored from 0(never true) to 6(always true), a higher number indicating higher acceptance
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (6 weeks post-enrollment), and end of study (12 weeks post enrollment)
Title
Feasibility of collecting patient reported outcomes of brief pain as assessed by the Brief Pain Catastrophizing Scale (Brief PCS)
Description
This measures three aspects of catastrophic cognitions about pain-rumination, magnification, and helplessness. This is a 13 item questionnaire. Each question has five response options ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) scale, with a maximum score of 52
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (6 weeks post-enrollment), and end of study (12 weeks post enrollment)
Title
Feasibility of collecting patient reported outcomes of anxiety as assessed by the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) questionnaire
Description
This is an 7 item questionnaire, each is scored from 0(not at all) to 3(nearly every day), a higher score indicating more anxiety
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (6 weeks post-enrollment), and end of study (12 weeks post enrollment)
Title
Feasibility of collecting patient reported outcomes of depression as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8)
Description
This is an 8 item questionnaire.Each question is scored from 0 to 1 day = "not at all," 2 to 6 days = "several days," 7 to 11 days = "more than half the days," and 12 to 14 days = "nearly every day". Total score is determined by adding together the scores of each of the four items. Scores are rated as normal (0-2), mild (3-5), moderate (6-8), and severe (9-12).
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (6 weeks post-enrollment), and end of study (12 weeks post enrollment)
Title
feasibility of collecting patient reported outcomes of mindfulness, as assessed by the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-15 (FFMQ-15)
Description
This is a 15 item questionnaire, each is scored from 1(never or very rarely true) to 5(very often or always true) for a maximum score of 120, higher score indicating more mindfulness
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (6 weeks post-enrollment), and end of study (12 weeks post enrollment)
Title
Feasibility of collecting patient reported outcomes of quality of life as assessed by the SCI-quality of life (QOL): Positive Affect and Well Being-Short Form (PAWB-SF)
Description
This is a 10 item scale each scored from (1)never to (5)always, with a maximum score of 50 a higher number indicating a better outcome
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (6 weeks post-enrollment), and end of study (12 weeks post enrollment)
Title
Feasibility of collecting perceived stress as assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4)
Description
A four-item scale , each is scored from 0(never) to 4(very often) for a maximum score of 16 a higher score indicating more stress
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (6 weeks post-enrollment), and end of study (12 weeks post enrollment)
Title
Feasibility of collecting fatigue as assessed by the PROMIS Fatigue- Short Form 4a
Description
Each question has five response options ranging in value from five (very poor) to one (very good), a higher number indicating more fatigue.XX
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (6 weeks post-enrollment), and end of study (12 weeks post enrollment)
Title
Feasibility of collecting psychological inflexibility/experiential avoidance as assessed by the acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-2)
Description
This contains 7 items and answers are given on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (never true) to 7 (always true). High scores on the AAQ-2 are reflective of greater experiential avoidance and immobility, while low scores reflect greater acceptance and action.
Time Frame
Baseline, post-intervention (6 weeks post-enrollment), and end of study (12 weeks post enrollment)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Traumatic SCI of at least 6 months duration
Chronic pain [defined as pain lasting at least 3 months with a pain intensity rating of 4 or higher on a 10-point visual analog scale]
Understand spoken and written English sufficiently to provide informed consent
participate in the intervention and complete study surveys
Exclusion Criteria:
Lack of daily access to the internet using a smart phone or smart tablet
Cognitive impairment (determined by their inability to demonstrate comprehension of informed consent by correctly answering 4 out of 5 questions pertaining to the study)
Significant visual/hearing impairment that does not allow use of the MM app's audiovisual presentations or health education presentations on Ted-talk
Use of any kind of meditation more than once a week in the last 3 months
Inability to provide or obtain an email address for communication with study staff
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Radha Korupolu, MD
Phone
713-797-5233
Email
Radha.Korupolu@uth.tmc.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Shrasti Lohiya
Phone
713-797-7132
Email
Shrasti.Lohiya@uth.tmc.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Radha Korupolu, MD
Organizational Affiliation
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Chelsea Ratcliff, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Sam Houston State University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shrasti Lohiya, MBBS
Phone
713-797-7920
Email
scipainstudy@uth.tmc.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Radha Korupolu, MD
Phone
713-797-7024
Email
scipainstudy@uth.tmc.edu
Facility Name
TIRR Memorial Hermann
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shrasti Lohiya, MBBS
Phone
713-797-7120
Email
scipainstudy@uth.tmc.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Radha Korupolu, MD
Phone
713-799-7024
Email
scipainstudy@uth.tmc.edu
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Feasibility of Mindfulness Meditation Training and Home Practice in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs