search
Back to results

Feasibility of Placing Bravo PH Capsule in Proximal Esophagus (bravo)

Primary Purpose

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
BRAVO capsule
Fluoroscopy
sham BRAVO capsule placement
Sponsored by
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion criteria will include the following:
  • Patients greater than or equal to 18 years of age
  • Patients having regularly scheduled upper endoscopy with planned Bravo pH monitor testing
  • Patients with known GERD based on symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation) and response to a proton pump inhibitor or esophagitis on EGD as well as those with extraesophageal GERD (cough, asthma and throat discomfort).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria will include the following:
  • Previous surgical procedures to the upper esophagus
  • History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
  • Stroke or transient ischemic attack within the past 6 months
  • GI bleeding within the previous 6 months
  • Known esophageal varices
  • Significant medical illness (i.e., congestive heart failure)
  • Pregnancy

Sites / Locations

  • The Vanderbilt Clinic/ Endoscopy Lab

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

EGD with proximal BRAVO capsule

EGD with sham BRAVO capsule placement

Arm Description

Subjects have a second BRAVO capsule placed 10cm proximal to prior BRAVO capsule placement. Fluoroscopy is used to confirm detachment of the monitor 7 days after investigational deployment.

Subjects have a EGD with BRAVO delivery introducer positioned 10cm proximal to prior BRAVO capsule placement with no BRAVO placed.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Patients Requiring Endoscopic Removal of BRAVO Because of Reported Discomfort

Secondary Outcome Measures

Subjects Reporting Chest Pain
Edmonton Symptom Assessment is used to measure the presence and change in symptoms.

Full Information

First Posted
September 20, 2006
Last Updated
March 31, 2017
Sponsor
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00378898
Brief Title
Feasibility of Placing Bravo PH Capsule in Proximal Esophagus
Acronym
bravo
Official Title
DUAL BRAVO PH MONITORING: A Feasibility Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2009 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Assessing the feasibility and patient tolerance to placement of Bravo PH capsule in proximal esophagus. There will be no difference in patient-perception of a proximally-placed Bravo esophageal pH monitor compared with a distal monitor.
Detailed Description
24-hour pH monitoring is often considered the "gold standard" in the diagnosis of GERD and is increasingly utilized in patients with extra-esophageal symptoms (1). However, the clinical utility of pH monitoring in this patient population remains controversial. An important limitation of traditional pH catheters is their suboptimal sensitivity especially in patients with extraesophageal GERD. Vaezi et al. tested reproducibility and reliability of the proximal and distal esophageal pH probe in 32 patients (2). Among these patients,11 were controls, 10 had distal reflux, and 11 had both proximal and distal reflux. In this group of patients the sensitivity of distal and proximal pH probes were 70% and 55%, respectively. Additionally, a more recent study by Shaker et al. showed the number and duration of hypopharyngeal reflux events to be similar between the control subjects and patients with reflux laryngitis and vasomotor rhinitis (3). Poor sensitivity of catheter based pH monitoring in detecting acid reflux may be due to day to day variability of test, its less than adequate reliability as well as possible intermittent nature of the reflux events (not recorded in only a 24-hour period) (4). Additionally, since the traditional ambulatory device is commonly placed transnasally through the oropharynx into the esophagus, patients often complain of throat and nose discomfort and usually restrict their daily activity. This potentially leads to false negative findings and reduced test sensitivity. Furthermore, incorrect results may be collected if the pH electrode slips away from the initial manometrically determined placement site. In light of these limitations, a new wireless (catheter free) pH monitoring device was developed to improve patient comfort and increase test sensitivity. The Bravo pH monitoring system (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN) uses a radiotelemetric capsule temporarily attached to the esophageal mucosa which transmits pH data to a receiver carried on patient's belt. Although well studied in the distal esophagus, there are currently no studies in adults assessing the feasibility and patient tolerance to placement of this device more proximally. Such a placement may increase the sensitivity of the test and add to our ability to study potential predictors of treatment response in patients with extraesophageal GERD.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
39 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
EGD with proximal BRAVO capsule
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects have a second BRAVO capsule placed 10cm proximal to prior BRAVO capsule placement. Fluoroscopy is used to confirm detachment of the monitor 7 days after investigational deployment.
Arm Title
EGD with sham BRAVO capsule placement
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects have a EGD with BRAVO delivery introducer positioned 10cm proximal to prior BRAVO capsule placement with no BRAVO placed.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
BRAVO capsule
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Fluoroscopy
Other Intervention Name(s)
one time "xray" to determine evacuation of bravo
Intervention Description
one time "xray" to determine evacuation of bravo
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
sham BRAVO capsule placement
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patients Requiring Endoscopic Removal of BRAVO Because of Reported Discomfort
Time Frame
48 hours
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Subjects Reporting Chest Pain
Description
Edmonton Symptom Assessment is used to measure the presence and change in symptoms.
Time Frame
48 hours

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Inclusion criteria will include the following: Patients greater than or equal to 18 years of age Patients having regularly scheduled upper endoscopy with planned Bravo pH monitor testing Patients with known GERD based on symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation) and response to a proton pump inhibitor or esophagitis on EGD as well as those with extraesophageal GERD (cough, asthma and throat discomfort). Exclusion Criteria: Exclusion criteria will include the following: Previous surgical procedures to the upper esophagus History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy Stroke or transient ischemic attack within the past 6 months GI bleeding within the previous 6 months Known esophageal varices Significant medical illness (i.e., congestive heart failure) Pregnancy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael F Vaezi, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Vanderbilt University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The Vanderbilt Clinic/ Endoscopy Lab
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37232-5280
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Feasibility of Placing Bravo PH Capsule in Proximal Esophagus

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs