search
Back to results

Feasibility Study - Neofact

Primary Purpose

Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant, Surfactant Deficiency Syndrome Neonatal

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Neofact application aid
Sponsored by
University Hospital Tuebingen
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional device feasibility trial for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant focused on measuring Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Less Invasive Surfactant Administration, Neofact, Preterm babies

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - 2 Days (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome and the need for Surfactant administration (oxygen requirement with FiO2 ≥ 30% and/or mod. Silverman Andersen Respiratory Severity Score (RSS) ≥ 5)
  • Respiratory support with non-invasive CPAP at the time of Surfactant administration

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preterms with an gestational age < 26+0 weeks
  • Preterms with malformations of the respiratory tract
  • Clinical decision on intubation / surfactant application via endotracheal tube e.g. because of respiratory drive disorder
  • (Missing parental consent)
  • (Attending physician is not delegated by the principal investigator)

Sites / Locations

  • Klinikum Stuttgart - Olgahospital
  • University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Intervention Group

Arm Description

Surfactant administration will be done via videolaryngoscopy and the application aid Neofact in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome and airway support with CPAP. Alveofact is used as Surfactant in its standard dosage of 100 mg / kg

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

feasibility of the application aid Neofact
Feasibility will be defined as a correct intratracheal position of the catheter (visually controlled via videolaryngoscope) OR responsiveness of the child to the surfactant administration (defined as decrease of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of at least 0.05 within 30 minutes after the application OR FiO2 decrease to 0.21 with simultaneous improvement of the modified Silverman Andersen Respiratory Severity Score (RSS) ≥ 2 within 30 minutes after the application) without switching to a conventional LISA method RSS in the modified version of McAdams RM et al. The RSS consists of 5 categories that assess the respiratory work of the child in a range from 0 to 2 in each category. This results in a summarized score of 0 to 10, in which 0 defines a healthy neonate without increased work of breathing and 10 a neonate with maximum respiratory distress.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Duration of the surfactant administration procedure
Measured time from the beginning of the initial insertion of the laryngoscope (plate tip passes the lips) to the removal of the application aid Neofact (Neofact tip passes the lips).
Duration of the laryngoscopy
Measured time from the beginning of the initial insertion of the laryngoscope (plate tip passes the lips) to the removal of the laryngoscope (plate tip passes the lips).
Need for intubation and mechanical ventilation
Number of neonates that need intubation and mechanical ventilation in the observational period of 48 hours after surfactant administration
Number of attempts needed for the correct application
to evaluate how good the handling of the application aid will be
Occurrence of complications
Number of decreases of oxygen saturation (< 80% SpO2), bradycardia (< 80 / min), tachycardia (> 200 / min), arterial hypo- (middle arterial blood pressure < Gestational Age (GA)) or hypertension (middle arterial blood pressure > GA + 20), onset and / or severity of coughing, choking, apnea & laryngospasm during the procedure
Colonization of the catheter tip
Name of germs and their number of colony forming units (CFU) placed on the catheter tip. To evaluate if there is a risk of contamination

Full Information

First Posted
September 3, 2019
Last Updated
November 4, 2019
Sponsor
University Hospital Tuebingen
Collaborators
Klinikum Stuttgart
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04086095
Brief Title
Feasibility Study - Neofact
Official Title
Feasibility Study - Neofact Feasibility Study of the Application Aid Neofact (Formerly: QuickSF) in the Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) in Premature Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 13, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 31, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 31, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital Tuebingen
Collaborators
Klinikum Stuttgart

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
For therapy of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in premature babies, there are several established options. An important therapeutic aspect is the tracheal administration of exogenous surfactant into the child's lung. In the recent years, several methods have been developed. The methods differ in the selected ventilation mode (intubation with mechanical ventilation vs. Continous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)-supported spontaneous breathing) and in the way in which the application of surfactant is technically conducted (via endotracheal tube, endotracheal catheter or nebulization). In selection of ventilation technique, there is an upcoming trend towards less invasive respiratory support via CPAP. While this may increase the rate of complications on the one side (i.e. pneumothorax), it shows much lower oxygen demand and a shorter need for mechanical ventilation on the other side. In the selection of the administration technique, different methods were repeatedly developed to adapt the surfactant administration to the CPAP therapy. In this study, a newly developed and in the European Community now certified (CE-Mark) application aid (Neofact) will be tested for the first time on preterm infants, to verify the feasibility.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant, Surfactant Deficiency Syndrome Neonatal
Keywords
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Less Invasive Surfactant Administration, Neofact, Preterm babies

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Device Feasibility
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
Premature babies with Respiratory Distress Syndrome and the medical need for surfactant administration (defined as FiO2 ≥ 0.3 or mod. Silverman Andersen Respiratory Severity Score ≥ 5) while treated with CPAP-support and in a gestational age >26+0 weeks.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
20 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Surfactant administration will be done via videolaryngoscopy and the application aid Neofact in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome and airway support with CPAP. Alveofact is used as Surfactant in its standard dosage of 100 mg / kg
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Neofact application aid
Intervention Description
The Neofact application aid is a specifically for the LISA procedure designed guide of a soft catheter and replaces the Magill forceps. Catheter (3.5 Fr.) and guide are already combined and packed together sterile. The catheter tip is marked in black (1cm).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
feasibility of the application aid Neofact
Description
Feasibility will be defined as a correct intratracheal position of the catheter (visually controlled via videolaryngoscope) OR responsiveness of the child to the surfactant administration (defined as decrease of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of at least 0.05 within 30 minutes after the application OR FiO2 decrease to 0.21 with simultaneous improvement of the modified Silverman Andersen Respiratory Severity Score (RSS) ≥ 2 within 30 minutes after the application) without switching to a conventional LISA method RSS in the modified version of McAdams RM et al. The RSS consists of 5 categories that assess the respiratory work of the child in a range from 0 to 2 in each category. This results in a summarized score of 0 to 10, in which 0 defines a healthy neonate without increased work of breathing and 10 a neonate with maximum respiratory distress.
Time Frame
Administration of surfactant + 30 minutes
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Duration of the surfactant administration procedure
Description
Measured time from the beginning of the initial insertion of the laryngoscope (plate tip passes the lips) to the removal of the application aid Neofact (Neofact tip passes the lips).
Time Frame
up to 20 minutes
Title
Duration of the laryngoscopy
Description
Measured time from the beginning of the initial insertion of the laryngoscope (plate tip passes the lips) to the removal of the laryngoscope (plate tip passes the lips).
Time Frame
up to 15 minutes
Title
Need for intubation and mechanical ventilation
Description
Number of neonates that need intubation and mechanical ventilation in the observational period of 48 hours after surfactant administration
Time Frame
48 hours after administration
Title
Number of attempts needed for the correct application
Description
to evaluate how good the handling of the application aid will be
Time Frame
during application procedure
Title
Occurrence of complications
Description
Number of decreases of oxygen saturation (< 80% SpO2), bradycardia (< 80 / min), tachycardia (> 200 / min), arterial hypo- (middle arterial blood pressure < Gestational Age (GA)) or hypertension (middle arterial blood pressure > GA + 20), onset and / or severity of coughing, choking, apnea & laryngospasm during the procedure
Time Frame
during application procedure
Title
Colonization of the catheter tip
Description
Name of germs and their number of colony forming units (CFU) placed on the catheter tip. To evaluate if there is a risk of contamination
Time Frame
up to 20 minutes

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
2 Days
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome and the need for Surfactant administration (oxygen requirement with FiO2 ≥ 30% and/or mod. Silverman Andersen Respiratory Severity Score (RSS) ≥ 5) Respiratory support with non-invasive CPAP at the time of Surfactant administration Exclusion Criteria: Preterms with an gestational age < 26+0 weeks Preterms with malformations of the respiratory tract Clinical decision on intubation / surfactant application via endotracheal tube e.g. because of respiratory drive disorder (Missing parental consent) (Attending physician is not delegated by the principal investigator)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christian A. Maiwald, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Neonatology
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Klinikum Stuttgart - Olgahospital
City
Stuttgart
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
70176
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University Hospital
City
Tuebingen
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
72076
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
10224173
Citation
Lindner W, Vossbeck S, Hummler H, Pohlandt F. Delivery room management of extremely low birth weight infants: spontaneous breathing or intubation? Pediatrics. 1999 May;103(5 Pt 1):961-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.5.961.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15173537
Citation
Dani C, Bertini G, Pezzati M, Cecchi A, Caviglioli C, Rubaltelli FF. Early extubation and nasal continuous positive airway pressure after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome among preterm infants <30 weeks' gestation. Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):e560-3. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.e560.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18272893
Citation
Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, Brion LP, Hascoet JM, Carlin JB; COIN Trial Investigators. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 14;358(7):700-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa072788. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 3;358(14):1529.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27842300
Citation
Maiwald CA, Neuberger P, Vochem M, Poets C. QuickSF: A New Technique in Surfactant Administration. Neonatology. 2017;111(3):211-213. doi: 10.1159/000450823. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25389349
Citation
McAdams RM, Hedstrom AB, DiBlasi RM, Mant JE, Nyonyintono J, Otai CD, Lester DA, Batra M. Implementation of Bubble CPAP in a Rural Ugandan Neonatal ICU. Respir Care. 2015 Mar;60(3):437-45. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03438. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32429874
Citation
Maiwald CA, Dick J, Marschal M, Gille C, Franz AR, Poets CF. Microbiological analyses of nasally guided catheters after less invasive surfactant administration - a pilot study. BMC Pediatr. 2020 May 19;20(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02147-0.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Feasibility Study - Neofact

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs