Fenestrated Screw Study (FNS)
Primary Purpose
Degenerative Spinal Disease, Deformity of Spine
Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CD HORIZON® Fenestrated Screw System with Fenestrated Screw Cement
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Degenerative Spinal Disease
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
A subject must meet the following inclusion criteria to participate in this trial:
One or more of the following diagnostic indications:
- Degenerative Spinal Disease (e.g. degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis and/or spinal stenosis)
- Deformity (e.g. degenerative deformity)
- Degenerative Spinal Disease patients only: Patient has been unresponsive to non-operative treatment for at least three months or has progressive symptoms or signs of nerve root/spinal cord compression while undergoing continued non-operative management.
- Compromised bone quality defined as a hip DXA scan T-score less than or equal to -1.0 or spine quantitative CT (qCT) actual volumetric bone mineral density threshold of ≤ 120 mg/cm3.
- Requires a procedure with an instrumented, posterior thoracic and/or lumbar spinal stabilization and/or immobilization.
- Is scheduled to receive a construct using CD Horizon® Spinal System components with at least one Fenestrated Screw cemented with Fenestrated Screw Cement.
- At least 22 years old or greater at the time of informed consent.
- Is able to understand and willing to sign the Patient Informed Consent Form.
- Is willing and able to undergo the study procedure and perform the follow up visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
A subject will be excluded from participating in this trial for any of the following reasons:
- Has undergone stabilization and/or fusion procedure at the index or adjacent levels.
- Will undergo vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty procedure during surgery.
- Has been diagnosed with cauda equina syndrome.
- Has been previously diagnosed with clinically significant peripheral neuropathy.
- Has any degree of permanent neurologic deficit due to the presenting spinal disease (e.g. drop foot or gait deficit).
- Has obesity defined by BMI greater than or equal to 35kg/m2.
- Has documented allergy to the materials that will be used in the surgical or any imaging procedure (e.g. titanium alloys, cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloys and PMMA Fenestrated Screw Cement, contrast medium)
- Has overt or active bacterial infection, local or systemic, and/or potential for bacteremia.
- Has a non-correctable spontaneous or therapeutic coagulation disorder or history of coagulation disorder associated with bleeding.
- Has evolutive cardiac disease (e.g. symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia) nonreactive to medical treatment.
- Has any disease (e.g., neuromuscular disease, etc.) that would preclude the potential benefit and/or accurate clinical evaluation of the safety of the spinal implant surgery.
- Is pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study duration.
- Is illiterate or considered vulnerable as per the Investigator's assessment (e.g., participants incapable of judgment, or participants under tutelage).
- Concurrent participation in another clinical study that may add additional safety risks and/or confound study results*.
Sites / Locations
- UZ Leuven - Campus Gasthuisberg
- Tyks Surgical Hospital
- Hôpital de la Pitié Salpétrière
- Athens Medical Center
- Mediterraneo Hospital
- IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas di Milano
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Fenestrated Screw System
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) at 12 Months Compared to Baseline
Disability associated with thoracic/lumbar spine conditions was assessed using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, which yields the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Version 2.1a.This validated instrument is considered one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. ODI is composed by 10 sections.
Each section can be scored 0 to 5, 5 being the worst case. The score is calculated by summing the different sections and then doubling the total. Maximum score is 100.
The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline and 2 subjects who completed the 12 month follow-up visit. The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported. The reported ODI was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months time point.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in ODI From Baseline at 3 Months Visit
Disability associated with thoracic/lumbar spine conditions was assessed using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, which yields the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Version 2.1a. [23]. This validated instrument is considered one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders.
ODI is composed by 10 sections. Each section can be scored 0 to 5, 5 being the worst case. The score is calculated by summing the different sections and then doubling the total. Maximum score is 100.
The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline and 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow-up visit. The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported. The reported ODI was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline time point minus the value of the 3 months time point.
Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline
Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.
The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.
The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.
Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline
The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).
EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.
The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.
Rate of Neurological Success at 12-month Visit
Neurological status is based on 4 sections: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising, each comprising several elements. Following scales were used to evaluate neurological status: reflexes (0 = Absent or Trace, 1 = Hyper-reflexic, 2 = Normal), sensory function (Light Touch or Pin Prick L1 to S1; 1 = Absent, 2 = Impaired, 3 = Normal), motor function (using 0-5 scores 0-5 whereas 0= Total Paralysis, 1 = Palpable or Visible Contraction, 2 = Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated, 3 = Active Movement, Against Gravity, 4 = Active Movement, Against Some Resistance and 5 = Active Movement, Against Full Resistance (full strength) and straight leg raise (1 = Positive. Patient experiences radiating leg pain below the knee on elevating the leg between 15° and 70° with the knee extended, 2 = Negative. No pain experienced).
Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections for time period evaluated (each element must remain the same or improve).
Rate of Intraoperative Cement Extravasation/Leakage. Patients
The rate of intraoperative cement extravasation/leakage as directly assessed by the physician during the surgery or in the post-operative follow-up with imaging procedures.
Rate of Intraoperative Cement Extravasation/Leakage. Screws
The rate of intraoperative cement extravasation/leakage as directly assessed by the physician during the surgery or in the post-operative follow-up with imaging procedures.
Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months.
The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.
For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment
21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.
Rate of Secondary Spinal Surgeries at Index and/or Adjacent Level(s), Resulting From an AE up to 12 Months After Surgery
When a patient requires additional surgery at the index and/or adjacent level(s), it can be an indicator of insufficient outcomes of the initial surgery.
Secondary spinal surgical procedures resulted from AE(s) could be classified into four categories: revision, removal, reoperation, and other.
One subject belonging to the Deformity group underwent a reoperation for a foraminal stenosis at index level L5-S1.
Radiographic Confirmation of Stabilization of the Pedicle Screw Instrumentation at 12-month Visit.
The surgeon or hospital radiologist reviewed radiographs and or CT's to assess for evidence of instability of the pedicle screw instrumentation at 12 months.
The following were considered as signs of instrumentation instability:
Screw pullout
Screw loosening
Screw toggle
Radiographic Fusion at 12-month Visit for Those Subjects Where Fusion Was Intended.
The surgeon or hospital radiologist determined fusion status for those subjects where fusion was intended. The fusion assessment for each subject was collected at 12 months, preferably by collecting a CT-scan, alternatively fusion could also be collected through X-rays.
The criterion for fusion when assessed through a CT-scan is bony bridging and when assessed through X-rays the criteria bony bridging, no motion (<4˚) in Flexion/Extension views, and integrity of the instrumentation (implanted devices). A partial fusion (not meeting these criteria) should have been recorded as "No fusion success". For multi-level subjects, fusion success was assessed for each level and overall fusion status was defined as achieving fusion at all treated levels. If one level's fusion status could not be determined, then the subject level was considered unable to determine.
For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters From Baseline at the 12-month Visit.
Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.
Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.
The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:
Sagittal alignment - Regional parameters: Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and Lumbar lordosis (LL).
Sagittal spinopelvic parameters: Pelvic Incidence (PI): Pelvic Tilt (PT) and Sacral Slope (SS)
For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Coronal Alignment and Sagittal Vertical Axis From Baseline at the 12-month Visit.
Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.
Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.
The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:
Coronal alignment : Distance between C7 plumb line and the central sacral vertical line
Sagittal alignment - Global parameter: Sagittal vertical axis (SVA)
For Deformity Subjects Only: Number of Participants With Coronal Curve Type (T, L, D or N) at Baseline and 12 Months
Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.
Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.
The following spinopelvic alignment parameter was assessed in the deformity patients on standing frontal full spine X-ray:
- Coronal Curve Type
Coronal curve type is determined on the basis of maximal coronal angle measured according to standard Cobb technique and is classified as:
Curve type L: patients with a lumbar or thoracolumbar major curve >30˚ (apical level of T10 or lower)
Curve type T: patients with a thoracic major curve of >30˚ (apical level of T9 or higher)
Curve type D: patients with a double major curve, with each curve >30˚.
Curve type N: patients with no coronal curve >30˚.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03797144
First Posted
December 14, 2018
Last Updated
July 29, 2021
Sponsor
Medtronic Spinal and Biologics
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03797144
Brief Title
Fenestrated Screw Study
Acronym
FNS
Official Title
A Prospective, Multicenter Evaluation of the CD HORIZON® Fenestrated Screw Spinal System With Fenestrated Screw Cement When Used in the Treatment of Spinal Conditions in Subjects With Compromised Bone Quality
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Delay in enrollment as compared to plan (impacted by COVID-19 pandemic) and availability of data from other data sources to support the products in scope.
Study Start Date
April 18, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 15, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 15, 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Medtronic Spinal and Biologics
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this post-market study is to demonstrate that Oswestry disability index (ODI) score improved significantly at 12 months post-operatively as compared to baseline for each indication (degenerative spinal disease and deformity) in subjects with compromised bone quality, who will receive a surgical procedure requiring posterior stabilization and/or immobilization of one or more spinal segments using CD HORIZON® Fenestrated Screw Spinal System with Fenestrated Screw Cement.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Degenerative Spinal Disease, Deformity of Spine
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
27 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Fenestrated Screw System
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
CD HORIZON® Fenestrated Screw System with Fenestrated Screw Cement
Intervention Description
The CD HORIZON® Legacy™ and Solera™ Fenestrated Screw Spinal System consists of a variety of cannulated screws with a series of fenestrations to allow polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement (Fenestrated Screw Cement) to be injected into the treated site. The Fenestrated Screw Cement is used to augment screw fixation in subjects with compromised bone quality.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) at 12 Months Compared to Baseline
Description
Disability associated with thoracic/lumbar spine conditions was assessed using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, which yields the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Version 2.1a.This validated instrument is considered one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. ODI is composed by 10 sections.
Each section can be scored 0 to 5, 5 being the worst case. The score is calculated by summing the different sections and then doubling the total. Maximum score is 100.
The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline and 2 subjects who completed the 12 month follow-up visit. The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported. The reported ODI was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months time point.
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in ODI From Baseline at 3 Months Visit
Description
Disability associated with thoracic/lumbar spine conditions was assessed using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, which yields the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Version 2.1a. [23]. This validated instrument is considered one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders.
ODI is composed by 10 sections. Each section can be scored 0 to 5, 5 being the worst case. The score is calculated by summing the different sections and then doubling the total. Maximum score is 100.
The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline and 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow-up visit. The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported. The reported ODI was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline time point minus the value of the 3 months time point.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 months
Title
Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline
Description
Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.
The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.
The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 12 months
Title
Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline
Description
The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).
EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.
The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 12 months
Title
Rate of Neurological Success at 12-month Visit
Description
Neurological status is based on 4 sections: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising, each comprising several elements. Following scales were used to evaluate neurological status: reflexes (0 = Absent or Trace, 1 = Hyper-reflexic, 2 = Normal), sensory function (Light Touch or Pin Prick L1 to S1; 1 = Absent, 2 = Impaired, 3 = Normal), motor function (using 0-5 scores 0-5 whereas 0= Total Paralysis, 1 = Palpable or Visible Contraction, 2 = Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated, 3 = Active Movement, Against Gravity, 4 = Active Movement, Against Some Resistance and 5 = Active Movement, Against Full Resistance (full strength) and straight leg raise (1 = Positive. Patient experiences radiating leg pain below the knee on elevating the leg between 15° and 70° with the knee extended, 2 = Negative. No pain experienced).
Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections for time period evaluated (each element must remain the same or improve).
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months.
Title
Rate of Intraoperative Cement Extravasation/Leakage. Patients
Description
The rate of intraoperative cement extravasation/leakage as directly assessed by the physician during the surgery or in the post-operative follow-up with imaging procedures.
Time Frame
Surgery to 12 months.
Title
Rate of Intraoperative Cement Extravasation/Leakage. Screws
Description
The rate of intraoperative cement extravasation/leakage as directly assessed by the physician during the surgery or in the post-operative follow-up with imaging procedures.
Time Frame
Surgery to 12 months.
Title
Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months.
Description
The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.
For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment
21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.
Time Frame
Surgery to 12 months.
Title
Rate of Secondary Spinal Surgeries at Index and/or Adjacent Level(s), Resulting From an AE up to 12 Months After Surgery
Description
When a patient requires additional surgery at the index and/or adjacent level(s), it can be an indicator of insufficient outcomes of the initial surgery.
Secondary spinal surgical procedures resulted from AE(s) could be classified into four categories: revision, removal, reoperation, and other.
One subject belonging to the Deformity group underwent a reoperation for a foraminal stenosis at index level L5-S1.
Time Frame
Surgery to 12 months.
Title
Radiographic Confirmation of Stabilization of the Pedicle Screw Instrumentation at 12-month Visit.
Description
The surgeon or hospital radiologist reviewed radiographs and or CT's to assess for evidence of instability of the pedicle screw instrumentation at 12 months.
The following were considered as signs of instrumentation instability:
Screw pullout
Screw loosening
Screw toggle
Time Frame
Surgery to 12 months.
Title
Radiographic Fusion at 12-month Visit for Those Subjects Where Fusion Was Intended.
Description
The surgeon or hospital radiologist determined fusion status for those subjects where fusion was intended. The fusion assessment for each subject was collected at 12 months, preferably by collecting a CT-scan, alternatively fusion could also be collected through X-rays.
The criterion for fusion when assessed through a CT-scan is bony bridging and when assessed through X-rays the criteria bony bridging, no motion (<4˚) in Flexion/Extension views, and integrity of the instrumentation (implanted devices). A partial fusion (not meeting these criteria) should have been recorded as "No fusion success". For multi-level subjects, fusion success was assessed for each level and overall fusion status was defined as achieving fusion at all treated levels. If one level's fusion status could not be determined, then the subject level was considered unable to determine.
Time Frame
Surgery to 12 months.
Title
For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters From Baseline at the 12-month Visit.
Description
Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.
Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.
The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:
Sagittal alignment - Regional parameters: Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and Lumbar lordosis (LL).
Sagittal spinopelvic parameters: Pelvic Incidence (PI): Pelvic Tilt (PT) and Sacral Slope (SS)
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Coronal Alignment and Sagittal Vertical Axis From Baseline at the 12-month Visit.
Description
Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.
Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.
The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:
Coronal alignment : Distance between C7 plumb line and the central sacral vertical line
Sagittal alignment - Global parameter: Sagittal vertical axis (SVA)
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
For Deformity Subjects Only: Number of Participants With Coronal Curve Type (T, L, D or N) at Baseline and 12 Months
Description
Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.
Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.
The following spinopelvic alignment parameter was assessed in the deformity patients on standing frontal full spine X-ray:
- Coronal Curve Type
Coronal curve type is determined on the basis of maximal coronal angle measured according to standard Cobb technique and is classified as:
Curve type L: patients with a lumbar or thoracolumbar major curve >30˚ (apical level of T10 or lower)
Curve type T: patients with a thoracic major curve of >30˚ (apical level of T9 or higher)
Curve type D: patients with a double major curve, with each curve >30˚.
Curve type N: patients with no coronal curve >30˚.
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
22 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
A subject must meet the following inclusion criteria to participate in this trial:
One or more of the following diagnostic indications:
Degenerative Spinal Disease (e.g. degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis and/or spinal stenosis)
Deformity (e.g. degenerative deformity)
Degenerative Spinal Disease patients only: Patient has been unresponsive to non-operative treatment for at least three months or has progressive symptoms or signs of nerve root/spinal cord compression while undergoing continued non-operative management.
Compromised bone quality defined as a hip DXA scan T-score less than or equal to -1.0 or spine quantitative CT (qCT) actual volumetric bone mineral density threshold of ≤ 120 mg/cm3.
Requires a procedure with an instrumented, posterior thoracic and/or lumbar spinal stabilization and/or immobilization.
Is scheduled to receive a construct using CD Horizon® Spinal System components with at least one Fenestrated Screw cemented with Fenestrated Screw Cement.
At least 22 years old or greater at the time of informed consent.
Is able to understand and willing to sign the Patient Informed Consent Form.
Is willing and able to undergo the study procedure and perform the follow up visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
A subject will be excluded from participating in this trial for any of the following reasons:
Has undergone stabilization and/or fusion procedure at the index or adjacent levels.
Will undergo vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty procedure during surgery.
Has been diagnosed with cauda equina syndrome.
Has been previously diagnosed with clinically significant peripheral neuropathy.
Has any degree of permanent neurologic deficit due to the presenting spinal disease (e.g. drop foot or gait deficit).
Has obesity defined by BMI greater than or equal to 35kg/m2.
Has documented allergy to the materials that will be used in the surgical or any imaging procedure (e.g. titanium alloys, cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloys and PMMA Fenestrated Screw Cement, contrast medium)
Has overt or active bacterial infection, local or systemic, and/or potential for bacteremia.
Has a non-correctable spontaneous or therapeutic coagulation disorder or history of coagulation disorder associated with bleeding.
Has evolutive cardiac disease (e.g. symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia) nonreactive to medical treatment.
Has any disease (e.g., neuromuscular disease, etc.) that would preclude the potential benefit and/or accurate clinical evaluation of the safety of the spinal implant surgery.
Is pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study duration.
Is illiterate or considered vulnerable as per the Investigator's assessment (e.g., participants incapable of judgment, or participants under tutelage).
Concurrent participation in another clinical study that may add additional safety risks and/or confound study results*.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
UZ Leuven - Campus Gasthuisberg
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Tyks Surgical Hospital
City
Turku
ZIP/Postal Code
20700
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Hôpital de la Pitié Salpétrière
City
Paris Cedex 13
ZIP/Postal Code
75651
Country
France
Facility Name
Athens Medical Center
City
Marousi
State/Province
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
15125
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Mediterraneo Hospital
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
16675
Country
Greece
Facility Name
IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas di Milano
City
Rozzano
ZIP/Postal Code
20086
Country
Italy
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Fenestrated Screw Study
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs