First-in-man Trial Examining the Safety and Efficacy of BuMA Supreme and Resolute Integrity in Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Stenosis
Primary Purpose
Coronary Artery Disease
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
BuMA Supreme Biodegradable drug coating coronary stent system
Resolute Integrity durable polymer stent system
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Coronary Artery Disease
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- The subject is at least 18 years of age.
- Clinical evidence of ischemic heart disease and/or a positive territorial functional study.
- Documented stable angina pectoris (Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Classification 1, 2, 3 or 4) or unstable angina pectoris with documented ischemia (Braunwald Class IB-C, IIB-C, or IIIB-C), or documented silent ischemia
- The patient has a planned intervention of a single de-novo lesion in one or two separate major epicardial territories (LAD, LCX or RCA).
- Diameter Stenosis≥50 and<100%.
- The visually estimated target lesion must be able to be covered by a single BuMA Supreme stent or a single Resolute Integrity stent (for available sizes refer to tables 1 and 2, page 20 and 21).
- The target lesion reference diameter must be visually estimated to be ≥2.5 mm and ≤4.5 mm in diameter.
- Written informed consent.
- The patient agrees to the follow-up visits including a 9 month angiographic follow-up.
- Patient must have completed the follow-up phase of any previous study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Female of child bearing potential (age <50 years and last menstruation within the last 12 months). Subjects with age <50 who underwent tubal ligation, ovariectomy or hysterectomy can be included.
- Evidence of ongoing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in ECG and/or elevated cardiac biomarkers (according to local standard hospital practice) have not returned within normal limits at the time of procedure
- Patient suffered from stroke/TIA during the last 6 months.
- LVEF <30%
- Platelet count <100,000 cells/mm3 or >400,000 cells/mm3, a WBC of <3,000 cells/mm3, or documented or suspected liver disease (including laboratory evidence of hepatitis)
- Known renal insufficiency (e.g. serum creatinine >2.5mg/dL, or creatinine clearance ≤30 mL/min), or subject on dialysis, or acute kidney failure (as per physician judgment).
- Patient undergoing planned surgery within 6 months with the necessity to stop DAPT.
- Patient requiring oral anticoagulation (Coumadin, Novel Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC))
- History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
- The patient is a recipient of a heart transplant
- Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, antiplatelet medication specified for use in the study, sirolimus, zotarolimus, or cobalt-chromium.
- Other medical illness (e.g. cancer, stroke with neurological deficiency) or known history of substance abuse (alcohol, cocaine, heroin etc.) as per physician judgment that may cause non-compliance with the protocol or confound the data interpretation or is associated with a limited life expectancy
- The patient is simultaneously participating in another investigational device or drug study
Sites / Locations
- Imelda Hospital
- CHU Chaleroi
- Oost-limburg Hospital
- AMC
- OLVG
- UMCG
- Maasstad Hospital
- Hospita; Garcia de Orta
- Santa Maria University Hospital
- Gaia/Espinho Hospital Centers
- University Hospital Madrid
- Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
BuMA Supreme Biodegradable drug coating coronary stent system
Resolute Integrity durable polymer stent system
Arm Description
Implant BuMA Supreme stent only
Implant Resolute stent
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Late Lumen Loss
The primary endpoint is in-stent Late Lumen Loss (LLL) at 9 months after stent implantation as assessed by off-line QCA.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Angiographic endpoint
Acute Lumen Gain (mm);
Angiographic endpoint
MLD (mm) post procedure and at 9 months;
Angiographic endpoint
Diameter Stenosis (%) post procedure and at 9 months;
Angiographic endpoint
Binary Restenosis (DS ≥50%) at 9 months
Clinical endpoint
Acute success (device and procedural success)
Cinical endpoint
Device-oriented Composite Endpoints (DoCE) at 1, 9 and 12 months and its individual components. (Device-oriented Composite Endpoint is defined as Cardiac Death, MI not clearly attributable to a non-intervention vessel, and clinically-indicated Target Lesion Revascularization).
Clinical endpoint
Myocardial infarction (Q-wave, Non q-wave) at all time points.
Clinical endpoint
Any revascularization at all time points.
Clinical endpoint
Stent thrombosis according to the ARC definitions up to 12 months follow-up.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02236975
First Posted
September 4, 2014
Last Updated
July 24, 2020
Sponsor
Sino Medical Sciences Technology Inc.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02236975
Brief Title
First-in-man Trial Examining the Safety and Efficacy of BuMA Supreme and Resolute Integrity in Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Stenosis
Official Title
Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized First-in-man Trial Examining the Safety and Efficacy of BuMA Supreme eG (Electro Grafting) Based Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent and Resolute Integrity Zotarolimus-eluting Durable Polymer Stent in Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Stenosis.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Sino Medical Sciences Technology Inc.
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Prospective, multi-center, randomized 1:1, single blind trial using BuMA Supreme versus Resolute Integrity conducted in approximately 14 interventional cardiology centers in The Netherlands, Belgium, Spain and Portugal.
Clinical follow-up will occur at 1, 9 and 12 months post-stent implantation. All patients will undergo repeat angiography at 9 months follow-up. QCA assessment will be performed at baseline (pre- and post-procedure) and at 9 months follow-up.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Coronary Artery Disease
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
168 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
BuMA Supreme Biodegradable drug coating coronary stent system
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Implant BuMA Supreme stent only
Arm Title
Resolute Integrity durable polymer stent system
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Implant Resolute stent
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
BuMA Supreme Biodegradable drug coating coronary stent system
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Resolute Integrity durable polymer stent system
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Late Lumen Loss
Description
The primary endpoint is in-stent Late Lumen Loss (LLL) at 9 months after stent implantation as assessed by off-line QCA.
Time Frame
Up to 9 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Angiographic endpoint
Description
Acute Lumen Gain (mm);
Time Frame
9 and 12 month
Title
Angiographic endpoint
Description
MLD (mm) post procedure and at 9 months;
Time Frame
9 and 12 month
Title
Angiographic endpoint
Description
Diameter Stenosis (%) post procedure and at 9 months;
Time Frame
9 and 12 month
Title
Angiographic endpoint
Description
Binary Restenosis (DS ≥50%) at 9 months
Time Frame
9 and 12 month
Title
Clinical endpoint
Description
Acute success (device and procedural success)
Time Frame
9 and 12 month
Title
Cinical endpoint
Description
Device-oriented Composite Endpoints (DoCE) at 1, 9 and 12 months and its individual components. (Device-oriented Composite Endpoint is defined as Cardiac Death, MI not clearly attributable to a non-intervention vessel, and clinically-indicated Target Lesion Revascularization).
Time Frame
9 and 12 month
Title
Clinical endpoint
Description
Myocardial infarction (Q-wave, Non q-wave) at all time points.
Time Frame
9 and 12 month
Title
Clinical endpoint
Description
Any revascularization at all time points.
Time Frame
9 and 12 month
Title
Clinical endpoint
Description
Stent thrombosis according to the ARC definitions up to 12 months follow-up.
Time Frame
9 and 12 month
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
The subject is at least 18 years of age.
Clinical evidence of ischemic heart disease and/or a positive territorial functional study.
Documented stable angina pectoris (Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Classification 1, 2, 3 or 4) or unstable angina pectoris with documented ischemia (Braunwald Class IB-C, IIB-C, or IIIB-C), or documented silent ischemia
The patient has a planned intervention of a single de-novo lesion in one or two separate major epicardial territories (LAD, LCX or RCA).
Diameter Stenosis≥50 and<100%.
The visually estimated target lesion must be able to be covered by a single BuMA Supreme stent or a single Resolute Integrity stent (for available sizes refer to tables 1 and 2, page 20 and 21).
The target lesion reference diameter must be visually estimated to be ≥2.5 mm and ≤4.5 mm in diameter.
Written informed consent.
The patient agrees to the follow-up visits including a 9 month angiographic follow-up.
Patient must have completed the follow-up phase of any previous study.
Exclusion Criteria:
Female of child bearing potential (age <50 years and last menstruation within the last 12 months). Subjects with age <50 who underwent tubal ligation, ovariectomy or hysterectomy can be included.
Evidence of ongoing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in ECG and/or elevated cardiac biomarkers (according to local standard hospital practice) have not returned within normal limits at the time of procedure
Patient suffered from stroke/TIA during the last 6 months.
LVEF <30%
Platelet count <100,000 cells/mm3 or >400,000 cells/mm3, a WBC of <3,000 cells/mm3, or documented or suspected liver disease (including laboratory evidence of hepatitis)
Known renal insufficiency (e.g. serum creatinine >2.5mg/dL, or creatinine clearance ≤30 mL/min), or subject on dialysis, or acute kidney failure (as per physician judgment).
Patient undergoing planned surgery within 6 months with the necessity to stop DAPT.
Patient requiring oral anticoagulation (Coumadin, Novel Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC))
History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
The patient is a recipient of a heart transplant
Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, antiplatelet medication specified for use in the study, sirolimus, zotarolimus, or cobalt-chromium.
Other medical illness (e.g. cancer, stroke with neurological deficiency) or known history of substance abuse (alcohol, cocaine, heroin etc.) as per physician judgment that may cause non-compliance with the protocol or confound the data interpretation or is associated with a limited life expectancy
The patient is simultaneously participating in another investigational device or drug study
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clemens von.Birgelen, MD,Phd
Organizational Affiliation
Medisch Spectrum Twente (MST), Enschede, the Netherlands
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Manel Sabate, MD,Phd
Organizational Affiliation
Clinic university hospital Barcelona, Spain
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Patrick W.Serruys, MD,Phd
Organizational Affiliation
Interventional Cardiology, Thorax center, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Imelda Hospital
City
Bonheiden
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
CHU Chaleroi
City
Chaleroi
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Oost-limburg Hospital
City
Genk
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
AMC
City
Amsterdam
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
OLVG
City
Amsterdam
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
UMCG
City
Groningen
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Maasstad Hospital
City
Rotterdam
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Hospita; Garcia de Orta
City
Almada
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Santa Maria University Hospital
City
Lisboa
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Gaia/Espinho Hospital Centers
City
Oporto
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
University Hospital Madrid
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro
City
Vigo
Country
Spain
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34666500
Citation
Wang R, Kawashima H, Hara H, Gao C, Ono M, Takahashi K, Tu S, Soliman O, Garg S, van Geuns RJ, Tao L, Wijns W, Onuma Y, Serruys PW. Comparison of Clinically Adjudicated Versus Flow-Based Adjudication of Revascularization Events in Randomized Controlled Trials. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Nov;14(11):e008055. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008055. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
First-in-man Trial Examining the Safety and Efficacy of BuMA Supreme and Resolute Integrity in Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Stenosis
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs