First-Line Chemotherapy With or Without Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Treating Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Primary Purpose
Chemotherapeutic Agent Toxicity, Fatigue, Lung Cancer
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
carboplatin
vinorelbine tartrate
neuromuscular electrical stimulation
physiologic testing
fatigue assessment and management
quality-of-life assessment
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Chemotherapeutic Agent Toxicity focused on measuring chemotherapeutic agent toxicity, musculoskeletal complications, fatigue, stage I non-small cell lung cancer, stage II non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, recurrent non-small cell lung cancer
Eligibility Criteria
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer
- Scheduled to receive 3 or 4 courses of first-line palliative chemotherapy
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- ECOG performance status 0-2
- Life expectancy > 3 months
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Able to use neuromuscular electrical stimulation device
- No implanted cardiac pacemaker
- No epilepsy
- No spinal cord pathology
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- See Disease Characteristics
Sites / Locations
- Nottingham City HospitalRecruiting
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Adherence to neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) therapy
Secondary Outcome Measures
Safety of NMES
Quadriceps muscle strength
Body composition
Physical activity level
Nutritional intake
Fatigue
Quality of life using the EORTC-C30 and LC-13 questionnaire
Overall objective clinical response to chemotherapy
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01097317
First Posted
March 31, 2010
Last Updated
August 5, 2011
Sponsor
Wales Cancer Trials Unit
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01097317
Brief Title
First-Line Chemotherapy With or Without Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Treating Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Official Title
NMES for Patients With NSCLC Receiving Palliative Chemotherapy. Is Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation an Acceptable and Feasible Supportive Therapy for Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Palliative Chemotherapy?
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2010
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
September 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2011 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
Wales Cancer Trials Unit
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as carboplatin and vinorelbine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Chemotherapy can lead to a loss of leg muscle strength. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation may improve muscle strength and quality of life. It is not yet known whether chemotherapy given together with neuromuscular electrical stimulation is more effective than chemotherapy alone in treating patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying first-line chemotherapy given together with neuromuscular electrical stimulation to see how well it works compared with chemotherapy alone in treating patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Detailed Description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
To determine the feasibility of first-line palliative chemotherapy alone versus palliative chemotherapy in combination with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Secondary
To determine if NMES is safe for patients undergoing palliative chemotherapy.
To determine to what extent 3 or 4 courses of palliative chemotherapy impact leg muscle strength, body composition, and physical activity levels and if the use of NMES influence these changes.
To determine the rate of recovery or decline in leg muscle strength, body composition, and physical activity levels following completion of 3 or 4 courses of palliative chemotherapy and if the use of NMES influences these changes.
To assess patient attitudes to the use of NMES during palliative chemotherapy.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
Arm I (control): Patients receive first-line palliative chemotherapy comprising carboplatin and vinorelbine in weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10 as part of usual care at Nottingham University Hospital National Health Service Trust.
Arm II (experimental): Patients receive chemotherapy as in arm I. Patients also undergo, at home, neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in weeks 2-12 (to the anterior thighs) 3 times a week for 30 minutes. NMES treatment increases in duration on a weekly basis from 11% to 18% to 25%, and then remaining constant thereafter.
All patients undergo assessment of quadriceps muscle strength, body composition, physical activity level, nutritional intake, and fatigue at baseline and week 9, and week 17 or 20. Patients complete quality-of-life questionnaires (EORTC-C30 and LC-13) at baseline, at week 9, and at week 17 or 20.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 8 weeks.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chemotherapeutic Agent Toxicity, Fatigue, Lung Cancer, Musculoskeletal Complications
Keywords
chemotherapeutic agent toxicity, musculoskeletal complications, fatigue, stage I non-small cell lung cancer, stage II non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, recurrent non-small cell lung cancer
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Phase 2
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
52 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
carboplatin
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
vinorelbine tartrate
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
neuromuscular electrical stimulation
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
physiologic testing
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
fatigue assessment and management
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
quality-of-life assessment
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Adherence to neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) therapy
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Safety of NMES
Title
Quadriceps muscle strength
Title
Body composition
Title
Physical activity level
Title
Nutritional intake
Title
Fatigue
Title
Quality of life using the EORTC-C30 and LC-13 questionnaire
Title
Overall objective clinical response to chemotherapy
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
16 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
Histologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer
Scheduled to receive 3 or 4 courses of first-line palliative chemotherapy
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
ECOG performance status 0-2
Life expectancy > 3 months
Not pregnant or nursing
Able to use neuromuscular electrical stimulation device
No implanted cardiac pacemaker
No epilepsy
No spinal cord pathology
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
See Disease Characteristics
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Andrew Wilcock, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Nottingham City Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Nottingham City Hospital
City
Nottingham
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
NG5 1PB
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Contact Person
Phone
44-115-9627-778
Email
Andrew.Wilcock@nottingham.ac.uk
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
First-Line Chemotherapy With or Without Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Treating Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs