Flu Vaccine Study in Neuromuscular Patients 2011
Primary Purpose
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, Spinal Muscular Atrophy, Congenital Muscular Dystrophy
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
2011-2012 seasonal flu vaccine Subcutaneous
2011-2012 seasonal flu vaccine Intramuscular
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy focused on measuring DMD, SMA, CMD, flu vaccine
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Non-ambulatory;
- Quadriceps muscle strength of MRC (Medical Research Council Scale) grade 3 or below
- Any subject who is between 3 to 8 years of age must have received at least two doses of influenza vaccine last season or at least one dose tow or more years ago.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject must not have a history of severe reactions following previous immunization with influenza vaccine.
- Subject must not have previously received a 2011-2012 influenza vaccine.
- Subject must not have a history of Guillain-Barre syndrome.
- Subject must not have received a live viral vaccine (i.e., MMR, varicella) within 28 days prior to receipt of the study vaccine.
- Subject must not have any condition that the investigator believes would render vaccination unsafe or interfere with successful completion of the study.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Subcutaneous
Intramuscular
Arm Description
0.5 mL of Fluzone (2011-2012 Northern Hemisphere formulation) influenza vaccine administered via subcutaneous route once
0.5 mL of Fluzone (2011-2012 Northern Hemisphere formulation) influenza vaccine administered via intramuscular route once
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Geometric Mean Titer Ratio for Each Vaccine Strain
Serum HI antibody titers for each vaccine strain immediately prior to study vaccine receipt and 21-28 days after study vaccine receipt
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01422200
First Posted
August 22, 2011
Last Updated
October 14, 2020
Sponsor
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01422200
Brief Title
Flu Vaccine Study in Neuromuscular Patients 2011
Official Title
Comparison of the Immunogenicity of Intramuscular Versus Subcutaneous Administration of Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Individuals With Neuromuscular Diseases
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2012 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to compare the immune response of two different injection methods (Intramuscular V.S. Subcutaneous) of the 2011-2012 seasonal Influenza (Flu) vaccine among patients with neuromuscular conditions who have significant muscle degeneration. This research study hypothesizes that the subcutaneous route of vaccine administration, as compared to the intramuscular route, may confer at least comparable, or possibly better, immunogenicity. At least 30 individuals followed by the CCHMC Neuromuscular Comprehensive Care Center will be recruited to participate in this study lasting approximately one to two months with two clinic visits and one follow-up telephone call. Immunogenicity will be assessed by comparing hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titers obtained pre- and post-vaccination.
Detailed Description
Individuals with neuromuscular diseases are more prone to influenza-related morbidity. Vaccination is the most effective measure to reduce the influenza disease burden. In the United States, the recommended route of administration for the inactivated influenza vaccine is intramuscular. In other countries, the subcutaneous, deep subcutaneous, and intramuscular routes are all considered acceptable for influenza vaccine administration. The United States CDC states that subcutaneous influenza vaccine doses, provided they are age-appropriate, may be counted as valid.
Those with neuromuscular diseases have muscle fibrosis that may potentially make intramuscular vaccines more effective. Those with Duchenne muscular dystrophy receive systemic corticosteroids to reduce inflammation. Corticosteroids may suppress antibody responses to vaccines. The goal of this research study is to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of intramuscular and subcutaneous administration of inactivated influenza vaccine in individuals with neuromuscular diseases. This is a single site, open-label, randomized study. At the first visit, a blood sample was collected prior to vaccination. Each subject received either an intramuscular or subcutaneous vaccine administered in the anterolateral aspect of the thigh. Within 30 minutes of vaccination, subjects rated pain at the injection site using a numeric pain scale (0-10). Subjects and their caregivers were also asked to record local and systemic adverse events on diary sheets from day 0 to day 4 after vaccination. Subjects were instructed to notify the study staff by telephone should they develop any serious adverse reactions following vaccination. At a second study visit approximately 28 days later, a repeat blood sample was obtained. The blood samples obtained pre-vaccination and also at day 28 were tested for hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers to the three influenza vaccine strains. rovider's office. The geometric mean titer ratios for each of the three vaccine strains were calculated as the ratios of postvaccination to prevaccination titers at geometric mean scale.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, Spinal Muscular Atrophy, Congenital Muscular Dystrophy
Keywords
DMD, SMA, CMD, flu vaccine
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Participant, care provider, and investigator are not masked. The outcomes assessor (personnel determining the HI titers) is masked.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
22 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Subcutaneous
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
0.5 mL of Fluzone (2011-2012 Northern Hemisphere formulation) influenza vaccine administered via subcutaneous route once
Arm Title
Intramuscular
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
0.5 mL of Fluzone (2011-2012 Northern Hemisphere formulation) influenza vaccine administered via intramuscular route once
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
2011-2012 seasonal flu vaccine Subcutaneous
Other Intervention Name(s)
fluzone
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
2011-2012 seasonal flu vaccine Intramuscular
Other Intervention Name(s)
fluzone
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Geometric Mean Titer Ratio for Each Vaccine Strain
Description
Serum HI antibody titers for each vaccine strain immediately prior to study vaccine receipt and 21-28 days after study vaccine receipt
Time Frame
immediately before vaccination and 21-28 days after vaccination
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Safety: Summary of Local and Systemic Reactogenicity Symptoms
Description
For the 4 days following receipt of study vaccine (days 0 to 4), the following local reactions will be assessed: pain, redness, and swelling. The following systemic reactions will also be assessed: body ache, weakness, irritability, headache, and cough.
Time Frame
4 days following receipt of study vaccine
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
3 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
35 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Non-ambulatory;
Quadriceps muscle strength of MRC (Medical Research Council Scale) grade 3 or below
Any subject who is between 3 to 8 years of age must have received at least two doses of influenza vaccine last season or at least one dose tow or more years ago.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject must not have a history of severe reactions following previous immunization with influenza vaccine.
Subject must not have previously received a 2011-2012 influenza vaccine.
Subject must not have a history of Guillain-Barre syndrome.
Subject must not have received a live viral vaccine (i.e., MMR, varicella) within 28 days prior to receipt of the study vaccine.
Subject must not have any condition that the investigator believes would render vaccination unsafe or interfere with successful completion of the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brenda Wong, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Flu Vaccine Study in Neuromuscular Patients 2011
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs