Fluid Restriction Keeps Children Dry (LESSER)
Primary Purpose
Respiratory Infection, Fluid Overload, Critical Illness
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Restrictive fluid regimen
Liberal fluid regimen
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Respiratory Infection
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Signed informed consent by parents or legal caretakers
- Admitted to the PICU of the Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Intubated and mechanically ventilated, with an anticipated duration of mechanical ventilation of at least 72 hours at enrolment (as judged by investigator or pediatrician on duty)
- Patients with an acute infectious lung disease, including (suspected) viral, bacterial or fungal infection
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients in need of a particular fluid regimen (either restrictive or liberal) due to their medical history (e.g. cardiovascular disease and/or congenital (cyanotic) heart disease)
- Use of previous and/or maintenance diuretic treatment
- Ongoing (fluid) resuscitation on admission
- Acute kidney injury with need for renal replacement therapy
Sites / Locations
- Academic Medical CenterRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Restrictive fluid treatment
Liberal fluid treatment
Arm Description
Restrictive fluid regimen
This is seen as current standard clinical treatment, wherein patients will receive a more liberal fluid regimen.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Cumulative fluid balance
Body weight
Secondary Outcome Measures
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Oxygenation indices
Mortality
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02989051
First Posted
December 5, 2016
Last Updated
December 7, 2016
Sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02989051
Brief Title
Fluid Restriction Keeps Children Dry
Acronym
LESSER
Official Title
Fluids in Mechanically Ventilated Children With Acute Infectious Lung Disease: How Dry Should They be?
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
September 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2018 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
November 2018 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Rationale: Fluid overload is a common complication in children who are admitted to the pediatric intensive care for mechanical ventilation. Acute lung infection is a frequent cause for admission to the PICU and forms an uniform group with a single organ failure. In these critically ill children, fluid overload is associated with adverse outcome. Restricting the volume of fluids already in an early stage of ICU admission may prevent fluid overload during mechanical ventilation and thus improve clinical outcome. However, at the same time fluid restriction may interfere with appropriate energy and macronutrient intake that is needed for recovery.
Objective: The main goal of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility of a restrictive fluid management protocol and investigate its effect on the occurrence of fluid overload in mechanically ventilated children with acute infectious lung disease.
Study design: Single-center prospective randomized feasibility and pilot study in preparation of a multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Study population: Mechanically ventilated children with (suspicion of) acute infectious lung disease admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of the Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam.
Intervention: Patients receive either liberal (control group) or a restrictive (experimental group) fluid treatment, while ensuring appropriate caloric intake.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcomes are cumulative fluid balance and body weight during the first week of mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes (in preparation of the larger multi-center RCT) include: mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation and oxygenation indices. To determine the feasibility, in- and exclusion rate, adherence to treatment arms, need for fluid bolus, need for diuretics and hemodynamic indices as well as energy and protein intake are studied.
Both fluid management protocols reflect a variant of current clinical practice, hence will not provide extra burden or risk to patients included in the study. Patients will be randomized to either of the fluid protocol arms on admission to the PICU (at start of mechanical ventilation). Patients included in the restrictive fluid treatment arm might have direct benefit from the study if indeed fluid overload is less common in this group.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Respiratory Infection, Fluid Overload, Critical Illness, Respiratory Insufficiency
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
34 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Restrictive fluid treatment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Restrictive fluid regimen
Arm Title
Liberal fluid treatment
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
This is seen as current standard clinical treatment, wherein patients will receive a more liberal fluid regimen.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Restrictive fluid regimen
Intervention Description
In this treatment arm, patients will receive a maximal daily fluid intake of 70% of normal requirements (for a healthy child).
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Liberal fluid regimen
Intervention Description
This is considered current standard clinical treatment, wherein patients will receive a fluid regimen of >85% of normal fluid recommendations (for a healthy child).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cumulative fluid balance
Time Frame
First week of mechanical ventilation
Title
Body weight
Time Frame
First week of mechanical ventilation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 week
Title
Oxygenation indices
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 week
Title
Mortality
Time Frame
Up to 90 days after admission
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
In- and exclusion rate
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 week
Title
Adherence to treatment arms
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 week
Title
Need for fluid bolus
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 week
Title
Need for diuretics
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 week
Title
Need for vasopressors or inotropic drugs
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 week
Title
Energy and protein intake
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 week
Title
Gastrointestinal complaints
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 week
Title
Hemodynamic indices
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 week
Title
Occurrence of electrolyte imbalances
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 week
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
1 Week
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
10 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Signed informed consent by parents or legal caretakers
Admitted to the PICU of the Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Intubated and mechanically ventilated, with an anticipated duration of mechanical ventilation of at least 72 hours at enrolment (as judged by investigator or pediatrician on duty)
Patients with an acute infectious lung disease, including (suspected) viral, bacterial or fungal infection
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients in need of a particular fluid regimen (either restrictive or liberal) due to their medical history (e.g. cardiovascular disease and/or congenital (cyanotic) heart disease)
Use of previous and/or maintenance diuretic treatment
Ongoing (fluid) resuscitation on admission
Acute kidney injury with need for renal replacement therapy
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Job BM van Woensel, Professor
Phone
0031-20-5665769
Email
ic.kinderen@amc.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Sarah A Ingelse, MD
Phone
0031-20-5665675
Email
s.a.ingelse@amc.nl
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Academic Medical Center
City
Amsterdam
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Job BM van Woensel, Professor
Phone
0031-20-566579
Email
ic.kinderen@amc.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sarah A Ingelse, MD
Phone
0031-20-5665675
Email
s.a.ingelse@amc.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sarah A Ingelse, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Reinout A Bem, MD PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Job BM van Woensel, Professor (MD PhD)
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31921715
Citation
Ingelse SA, Geukers VG, Dijsselhof ME, Lemson J, Bem RA, van Woensel JB. Less Is More?-A Feasibility Study of Fluid Strategy in Critically Ill Children With Acute Respiratory Tract Infection. Front Pediatr. 2019 Dec 10;7:496. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00496. eCollection 2019.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Fluid Restriction Keeps Children Dry
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs