search
Back to results

Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens: An RCT (FHF-T)

Primary Purpose

Child Abuse, Child Neglect, Risk Behavior

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
FHF-T
Sponsored by
University of Denver
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Child Abuse focused on measuring Mentoring, Positive Youth Development, Skills training, Relationships, Child Welfare

Eligibility Criteria

13 Years - 16 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Teens with open child welfare cases placed in foster care, kinship care or living at home
  • Starting 8th or 9th grade
  • History of child maltreatment according to child welfare and court records
  • Live within 35 minutes of the University of Denver (for mentoring feasibility)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Youth with a known history of severe violent behavior and/or sexual perpetration
  • Youth who are deemed unsafe or unable to participate in a community-based mentoring program by their caseworker
  • Incarcerated at baseline
  • Moderate or severe developmental delay or physical disability
  • Youth who are/will be parenting during the prevention program

Sites / Locations

  • University of Denver

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

FHF-T Intervention Group

Control group

Arm Description

9 months of 1:1 youth mentoring by graduate-student mentors; workshops; educational advocacy

Services as usual

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Court filings for delinquency immediately post intervention
Presence of a court filing in administrative records for delinquent behavior
Court filings for delinquency 15 months-post intervention
Presence of a court filing in administrative records for delinquent behavior
Self-reported delinquency immediately post intervention
The Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors, will assess any delinquency, number of types of delinquency, any violent delinquency, and any non-violent delinquency
Self-reported delinquency 15 months-post intervention
The Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors, will assess any delinquency, number of types of delinquency, any violent delinquency, and any non-violent delinquency
School suspensions immediately post intervention
Any youth reported school suspensions, assessed by the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors
School suspensions 15 months-post intervention
Any youth reported school suspensions, assessed by the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors
Substance use immediately post intervention
Self-reported number of types and frequency of substance use as assessed by the substance use scale of the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors
Substance use 15 months-post intervention
Self-reported number of types and frequency of substance use as assessed by the substance use scale of the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors
Passing grades immediately post intervention
Youth report of passing all core academic courses, as assessed via researcher developed educational measure
Passing grades 15 months-post intervention
Youth report of passing all core academic courses, as assessed via researcher developed educational measure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Quality of Life
Self-reported mean quality of life as measured by the Life Satisfaction Scale (Andrews & Withey, 1976)
Extracurricular activity involvement
Self-reported number and frequency of extracurricular activity involvement will be measured by The Activities Scale, a project-designed measure.
Connectedness to school
Self-reported school connection will be measured by the mean score on the Psychological Sense of School Membership Scale (Goodenow, 1993) which assesses attachment and emotional response to a school environment.
Academic achievement
Academic Achievement will be assessed using standard scores on The Wechsler Individual Achievement Test Screener (WIAT Screener; Psychological Corporation, 1992).
Perceived Opportunities
Self-reported perceived opportunities will be assessed using mean scores on the Perceived Opportunities scale of the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors
Trauma symptoms
Self-reported trauma symptoms will be assessed using mean total and subscale scores of the Trauma Symptom Checklist (TSC; Briere, 1996).
Internalizing symptoms
Self-reported internalizing symptoms will be assessed using the mean score on the internalizing subscale of The Youth Self Report (YSR; Achenbach, 2001).
Externalizing symptoms
Self-reported externalizing symptoms will be assessed using the mean score on the externalizing subscale of The Youth Self Report (YSR; Achenbach, 2001).
Dating violence
Self-reported dating violence will be measured by The Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI; Wolfe, Scott, Wekerle, & Pittman, 2001).
Coping skills
Self-reported coping skills will be measured using the mean scores on the subscales of the Children's Coping Strategies Checklist (Program for Prevention Research, 1999).
Conflict management skills
Self-reported conflict management skills will be measured using the mean score on the conflict management subscale of the Safe Dates Evaluation Questionnaire (Foshee, Bauman, Bennett, Suchindran, Benefield, & Linder, 2005).
Self-efficacy
Self-reported self-efficacy will be measured by the mean score on the Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale (Cowen, Work, Hightower, Wyman, Parker, & Ltyczewski, 1991).
Resiliency
Self-reported resiliency will be measured using standardized scores on The Resiliency Scales for Children and Adolescents (RSCA; Prince-Embury, 2006, 2007).
Help seeking behaviors
Self-reported help seeking will be measured by the number of identified social network members from whom the youth seek help and the frequency of seeking help on The Help Seeking Behaviors Scale (Pham, Y. K., McWhirter, E. H., & Murray, C., 2014).
Use of protection while having sex
Self-report of using protection while having sex, assessed by the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors

Full Information

First Posted
May 23, 2017
Last Updated
November 4, 2022
Sponsor
University of Denver
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03707366
Brief Title
Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens: An RCT
Acronym
FHF-T
Official Title
Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
June 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 1, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Denver

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will implement and evaluate a mentoring program designed to promote positive youth development and reduce adverse outcomes among maltreated adolescents with open child welfare cases. Teenagers who have been maltreated are at heightened risk for involvement in delinquency, substance use, and educational failure as a result of disrupted attachments with caregivers and exposure to violence within their homes and communities. Although youth mentoring is a widely used prevention approach nationally, it has not been rigorously studied for its effects in preventing these adverse outcomes among maltreated youth involved in the child welfare system. This randomized controlled trial will permit us to implement and evaluate the Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens (FHF-T) program, which will use mentoring and skills training within an innovative positive youth development (PYD) framework to promote adaptive functioning and prevent adverse outcomes. Graduate student mentors will deliver 9 months of prevention programming in teenagers' homes and communities. Mentors will focus on helping youth set and reach goals that will improve their functioning in five targeted "REACH" domains: Relationships, Education, Activities, Career, and Health. In reaching those goals, mentors will help youth build social-emotional skills associated with preventing adverse outcomes (e.g., emotion regulation, communication, problem solving). The randomized controlled trial will enroll 234 racially and ethnically diverse 8th and 9th grade youth (117 intervention, 117 control), who will provide data at baseline prior to randomization, immediately post-program and 15 months post program follow-up. The aims of the study include testing the efficacy of FHF-T for high-risk 8th and 9th graders in preventing adverse outcomes and examining whether better functioning in positive youth development domains mediates intervention effects. It is hypothesized that youth randomly assigned to the FHF-T prevention condition, relative to youth assigned to the control condition, will evidence better functioning on indices of positive youth development in the REACH domains leading to better long-term outcomes, including adaptive functioning, high school graduation, career attainment/employment, healthy relationships, and quality of life.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Child Abuse, Child Neglect, Risk Behavior, Delinquency, Mental Health Impairment, Substance Use, Educational Problems, Adolescent Development, Adolescent Behavior, Sexual Behavior, Child Maltreatment
Keywords
Mentoring, Positive Youth Development, Skills training, Relationships, Child Welfare

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized controlled trial with 2 groups
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Research assistants who conduct the interviews are masked to condition.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
234 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
FHF-T Intervention Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
9 months of 1:1 youth mentoring by graduate-student mentors; workshops; educational advocacy
Arm Title
Control group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Services as usual
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
FHF-T
Intervention Description
FHF-T employs mentoring, consisting of relationship development, advocating for and empowering youth, and skill-building activities to promote positive youth development. Mentors meet individually for 2-3 hours per week for 30 weeks with each teen they mentor, in order to engage teens in positive youth development activities and provide skills training in areas including emotion recognition, perspective-taking, problem solving, effective communication, managing anger, healthy coping and resisting peer pressure for deviant activities. Youth also attend group workshops over the course of the program, in which they engage with other participants and mentors in skill-building activities.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Court filings for delinquency immediately post intervention
Description
Presence of a court filing in administrative records for delinquent behavior
Time Frame
immediately post-intervention (T2)
Title
Court filings for delinquency 15 months-post intervention
Description
Presence of a court filing in administrative records for delinquent behavior
Time Frame
15-months-post intervention (T3)
Title
Self-reported delinquency immediately post intervention
Description
The Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors, will assess any delinquency, number of types of delinquency, any violent delinquency, and any non-violent delinquency
Time Frame
immediately post-intervention (T2)
Title
Self-reported delinquency 15 months-post intervention
Description
The Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors, will assess any delinquency, number of types of delinquency, any violent delinquency, and any non-violent delinquency
Time Frame
15-months-post intervention (T3)
Title
School suspensions immediately post intervention
Description
Any youth reported school suspensions, assessed by the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors
Time Frame
immediately post-intervention (T2)
Title
School suspensions 15 months-post intervention
Description
Any youth reported school suspensions, assessed by the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors
Time Frame
15-months-post intervention (T3)
Title
Substance use immediately post intervention
Description
Self-reported number of types and frequency of substance use as assessed by the substance use scale of the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors
Time Frame
immediately post-intervention (T2)
Title
Substance use 15 months-post intervention
Description
Self-reported number of types and frequency of substance use as assessed by the substance use scale of the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors
Time Frame
15-months-post intervention (T3)
Title
Passing grades immediately post intervention
Description
Youth report of passing all core academic courses, as assessed via researcher developed educational measure
Time Frame
immediately post-intervention (T2)
Title
Passing grades 15 months-post intervention
Description
Youth report of passing all core academic courses, as assessed via researcher developed educational measure
Time Frame
15-months-post intervention (T3)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Quality of Life
Description
Self-reported mean quality of life as measured by the Life Satisfaction Scale (Andrews & Withey, 1976)
Time Frame
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)
Title
Extracurricular activity involvement
Description
Self-reported number and frequency of extracurricular activity involvement will be measured by The Activities Scale, a project-designed measure.
Time Frame
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)
Title
Connectedness to school
Description
Self-reported school connection will be measured by the mean score on the Psychological Sense of School Membership Scale (Goodenow, 1993) which assesses attachment and emotional response to a school environment.
Time Frame
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)
Title
Academic achievement
Description
Academic Achievement will be assessed using standard scores on The Wechsler Individual Achievement Test Screener (WIAT Screener; Psychological Corporation, 1992).
Time Frame
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)
Title
Perceived Opportunities
Description
Self-reported perceived opportunities will be assessed using mean scores on the Perceived Opportunities scale of the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors
Time Frame
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)
Title
Trauma symptoms
Description
Self-reported trauma symptoms will be assessed using mean total and subscale scores of the Trauma Symptom Checklist (TSC; Briere, 1996).
Time Frame
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)
Title
Internalizing symptoms
Description
Self-reported internalizing symptoms will be assessed using the mean score on the internalizing subscale of The Youth Self Report (YSR; Achenbach, 2001).
Time Frame
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)
Title
Externalizing symptoms
Description
Self-reported externalizing symptoms will be assessed using the mean score on the externalizing subscale of The Youth Self Report (YSR; Achenbach, 2001).
Time Frame
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)
Title
Dating violence
Description
Self-reported dating violence will be measured by The Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI; Wolfe, Scott, Wekerle, & Pittman, 2001).
Time Frame
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)
Title
Coping skills
Description
Self-reported coping skills will be measured using the mean scores on the subscales of the Children's Coping Strategies Checklist (Program for Prevention Research, 1999).
Time Frame
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)
Title
Conflict management skills
Description
Self-reported conflict management skills will be measured using the mean score on the conflict management subscale of the Safe Dates Evaluation Questionnaire (Foshee, Bauman, Bennett, Suchindran, Benefield, & Linder, 2005).
Time Frame
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)
Title
Self-efficacy
Description
Self-reported self-efficacy will be measured by the mean score on the Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale (Cowen, Work, Hightower, Wyman, Parker, & Ltyczewski, 1991).
Time Frame
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)
Title
Resiliency
Description
Self-reported resiliency will be measured using standardized scores on The Resiliency Scales for Children and Adolescents (RSCA; Prince-Embury, 2006, 2007).
Time Frame
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)
Title
Help seeking behaviors
Description
Self-reported help seeking will be measured by the number of identified social network members from whom the youth seek help and the frequency of seeking help on The Help Seeking Behaviors Scale (Pham, Y. K., McWhirter, E. H., & Murray, C., 2014).
Time Frame
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)
Title
Use of protection while having sex
Description
Self-report of using protection while having sex, assessed by the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors
Time Frame
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
13 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
16 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Teens with open child welfare cases placed in foster care, kinship care or living at home Starting 8th or 9th grade History of child maltreatment according to child welfare and court records Live within 35 minutes of the University of Denver (for mentoring feasibility) Exclusion Criteria: Youth with a known history of severe violent behavior and/or sexual perpetration Youth who are deemed unsafe or unable to participate in a community-based mentoring program by their caseworker Incarcerated at baseline Moderate or severe developmental delay or physical disability Youth who are/will be parenting during the prevention program
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Heather Taussig, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Denver
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kimberly Bender, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Denver
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Denver
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80208
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27019678
Citation
Taussig H, Weiler L, Rhodes T, Hambrick E, Wertheimer R, Fireman O, Combs M. Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens: Adaptation of an Evidence-Based Program. J Soc Social Work Res. 2015 Dec;6(4):617-642. doi: 10.1086/684021.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Taussig, H.N., Bender, K., Bennett, R. Massey Combs, K., Fireman, O, & Wertheimer, R. (2020). Mentoring for teens with child welfare involvement: Permanency outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of the Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens program. Child Welfare, 97(5), 1-24.
Results Reference
result
Citation
Taussig, H., Bender, K., Racz, S. & Evidence Based Policy Team, A. V. (2022, April 7). Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens. Retrieved from osf.io/673eu.
Results Reference
result
Available IPD and Supporting Information:
Available IPD/Information Type
Individual Participant Data Set
Available IPD/Information URL
https://osf.io/673eu/

Learn more about this trial

Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens: An RCT

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs