search
Back to results

Four Models of Telephone Support for Stimulant Recovery

Primary Purpose

Drug Addiction

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Continuing Care Telephone Support
Sponsored by
University of California, Los Angeles
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Drug Addiction focused on measuring Stimulant, Drug treatment, Continuing care, Telephone support, Aftercare

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males or females, 18-65 years of age.
  • Meet DSM-IV criteria (at the time of treatment admission) for cocaine or methamphetamine abuse/dependence.
  • Have completed the primary phase of treatment at a Matrix outpatient clinic.
  • Have telephone access throughout the study procedures.
  • Be able to understand and complete rating scales and to follow instructions.
  • Be willing to sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have participated in a treatment-related study conducted by the PI and colleagues during the previous 3 years and/or is currently enrolled in a treatment-related study.
  • Have any medical, legal, housing or transportation problem which would preclude either safe or consistent participation.
  • Have dropped out of the primary phase of treatment prior to completion.

Sites / Locations

  • Twin Town Treatment Center
  • Matrix Institute on Addictions
  • UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs
  • Matrix Institute on Addictions
  • Twin Town Treatment Center
  • Matrix Institute on Addicitions

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

1

2

3

4

5

Arm Description

Structured Directive Telephone Support Calls

Structured Non-Directive Telephone Continuing Care Support

Unstructured Directive Telephone Support

Unstructured Non-Directive Telephone Support

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Urinalyses
Breathalyzer tests
Self-report of drug or alcohol use
Amount of Treatment Activities
Length of Treatment Episode

Secondary Outcome Measures

Addiction Severity Index (ASI)
HIV Risk-taking Behavior Scale
Concurrent Psychosocial Treatments
Drug Avoidance Activities (DAA) Survey

Full Information

First Posted
August 28, 2008
Last Updated
November 23, 2016
Sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00744068
Brief Title
Four Models of Telephone Support for Stimulant Recovery
Official Title
Four Models of Telephone Support for Stimulant Recovery
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2011 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The overall objective of this research is to develop and refine empirically supported continuing care interventions that promote healthy behavior and sustained abstinence from illicit drug use.
Detailed Description
For treatment interventions to provide the desired result of long term abstinence, it is important to develop strategies to enhance the effectiveness of continued care approaches. We plan to conduct a prospective, randomized comparison of four models of counselor-provided telephone support as strategies to promote patient aftercare attendance and sustained abstinence from stimulant use. To this end, we will develop and compare the efficacy of four low-cost telephone support protocols for patients who have completed the intensive phase of a structured, outpatient stimulant abuse treatment program. Some 500 participants completing a 4-month Matrix Outpatient Model of stimulant abuse treatment will be randomly assigned to one of four counseling groups (n=100 per group): (1) unstructured/non-directive, (2) structured/non-directive, (3) unstructured/directive, or (4) structured/directive telephone counseling, or (5) a control group consisting of standard referral to Matrix aftercare, for a total sample size of 500. The two structured conditions will be based on the behavioral "prompts" identified by Farabee et al. (2002)* as being associated with drug avoidance. In the non-directive conditions, subjects will be allowed to state their own goals and how they intend to achieve them. In the directive conditions, the counselor will provide specific recommendations to help the subject adopt as many of the drug-avoidance activities as possible. Outcomes will be tracked for 12 months following completion of primary treatment (a total of 16 months after treatment admission) and will include measurement of participation in drug-avoidance activities (including aftercare participation) as well as self-reported and objective measures of substance use and related behavior change. *Farabee, D., Rawson, R.A., & McCann, M. (2002). Adoption of drug avoidance activities among patients in contingency management and cognitive-behavioral treatments. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 23, 343-350.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Drug Addiction
Keywords
Stimulant, Drug treatment, Continuing care, Telephone support, Aftercare

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
302 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Structured Directive Telephone Support Calls
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Structured Non-Directive Telephone Continuing Care Support
Arm Title
3
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Unstructured Directive Telephone Support
Arm Title
4
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Unstructured Non-Directive Telephone Support
Arm Title
5
Arm Type
No Intervention
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Continuing Care Telephone Support
Intervention Description
Counselor-provided telephone support as strategies to promote patient aftercare attendance and sustained abstinence from stimulant use. To this end, we will develop and compare the efficacy of four low-cost telephone support protocols for patients who have completed the intensive phase of a structured, outpatient stimulant abuse treatment program.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Urinalyses
Time Frame
At 3 months and 12 months
Title
Breathalyzer tests
Time Frame
At 3 months and 12 months
Title
Self-report of drug or alcohol use
Time Frame
At 3 months and 12 months
Title
Amount of Treatment Activities
Time Frame
At 3 months and 12 months
Title
Length of Treatment Episode
Time Frame
At 3 months and 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Addiction Severity Index (ASI)
Time Frame
At 3 months and 12 months
Title
HIV Risk-taking Behavior Scale
Time Frame
At 3 months and 12 months
Title
Concurrent Psychosocial Treatments
Time Frame
At 3 months and 12 months
Title
Drug Avoidance Activities (DAA) Survey
Time Frame
At 3 months and 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Males or females, 18-65 years of age. Meet DSM-IV criteria (at the time of treatment admission) for cocaine or methamphetamine abuse/dependence. Have completed the primary phase of treatment at a Matrix outpatient clinic. Have telephone access throughout the study procedures. Be able to understand and complete rating scales and to follow instructions. Be willing to sign an informed consent form. Exclusion Criteria: Have participated in a treatment-related study conducted by the PI and colleagues during the previous 3 years and/or is currently enrolled in a treatment-related study. Have any medical, legal, housing or transportation problem which would preclude either safe or consistent participation. Have dropped out of the primary phase of treatment prior to completion.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Farabee, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Twin Town Treatment Center
City
Los Alamitos
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90720
Country
United States
Facility Name
Matrix Institute on Addictions
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90025
Country
United States
Facility Name
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90025
Country
United States
Facility Name
Matrix Institute on Addictions
City
Rancho Cucamonga
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91730
Country
United States
Facility Name
Twin Town Treatment Center
City
West Hollywood
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90069
Country
United States
Facility Name
Matrix Institute on Addicitions
City
Woodland Hills
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91364
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
6308970
Citation
Ahles TA, Schlundt DG, Prue DM, Rychtarik RG. Impact of aftercare arrangements on the maintenance of treatment success in abusive drinkers. Addict Behav. 1983;8(1):53-8. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(83)90056-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7473850
Citation
Allen K. Barriers to treatment for addicted African-American women. J Natl Med Assoc. 1995 Oct;87(10):751-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7863375
Citation
Ashery RS, Carlson RG, Falck RS, Siegal HA. Injection drug users, crack-cocaine users, and human services utilization: an exploratory study. Soc Work. 1995 Jan;40(1):75-82.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3806354
Citation
Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10392794
Citation
Battjes RJ, Onken LS, Delany PJ. Drug abuse treatment entry and engagement: report of a meeting on treatment readiness. J Clin Psychol. 1999 May;55(5):643-57. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199905)55:53.0.co;2-s.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11777667
Citation
Brown BS, O'Grady KE, Battjes RJ, Farrell EE, Smith NP, Nurco DN. Effectiveness of a stand-alone aftercare program for drug-involved offenders. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2001 Dec;21(4):185-92. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(01)00201-x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9670414
Citation
Burton P, Gurrin L, Sly P. Extending the simple linear regression model to account for correlated responses: an introduction to generalized estimating equations and multi-level mixed modelling. Stat Med. 1998 Jun 15;17(11):1261-91. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980615)17:113.0.co;2-z.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7832182
Citation
De Leon G, Melnick G, Kressel D, Jainchill N. Circumstances, motivation, readiness, and suitability (the CMRS scales): predicting retention in therapeutic community treatment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1994 Nov;20(4):495-515. doi: 10.3109/00952999409109186.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10718162
Citation
De Leon G, Melnick G, Thomas G, Kressel D, Wexler HK. Motivation for treatment in a prison-based therapeutic community. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2000 Feb;26(1):33-46. doi: 10.1081/ada-100100589.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1919960
Citation
Dees SM, Dansereau DF, Peel JL, Boatler JG, Knight K. Using conceptual matrices, knowledge maps, and scripted cooperation to improve personal management strategies. J Drug Educ. 1991;21(3):211-30. doi: 10.2190/KJKM-F0UR-RDPH-8NUK.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10884951
Citation
Diez-Roux AV. Multilevel analysis in public health research. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:171-92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.171.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12495796
Citation
Farabee D, Rawson R, McCann M. Adoption of drug avoidance activities among patients in contingency management and cognitive-behavioral treatments. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002 Dec;23(4):343-50. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(02)00297-0.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12064431
Citation
Fischer B, Chin AT, Kuo I, Kirst M, Vlahov D. Canadian illicit opiate users' views on methadone and other opiate prescription treatment: an exploratory qualitative study. Subst Use Misuse. 2002 Mar;37(4):495-522. doi: 10.1081/ja-120002807.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2999514
Citation
Fitzgerald JL, Mulford HA. An experimental test of telephone aftercare contacts with alcoholics. J Stud Alcohol. 1985 Sep;46(5):418-24. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1985.46.418.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7484987
Citation
Fortney JC, Booth BM, Blow FC, Bunn JY. The effects of travel barriers and age on the utilization of alcoholism treatment aftercare. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1995 Aug;21(3):391-406. doi: 10.3109/00952999509002705.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12472330
Citation
Haynes RB, McDonald HP, Garg AX. Helping patients follow prescribed treatment: clinical applications. JAMA. 2002 Dec 11;288(22):2880-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.22.2880.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10908002
Citation
Huber A, Lord RH, Gulati V, Marinelli-Casey P, Rawson R, Ling W. The CSAT methamphetamine treatment program: research design accommodations for "real world" application. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2000 Apr-Jun;32(2):149-56. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2000.10400223.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9328808
Citation
Huber A, Ling W, Shoptaw S, Gulati V, Brethen P, Rawson R. Integrating treatments for methamphetamine abuse: a psychosocial perspective. J Addict Dis. 1997;16(4):41-50. doi: 10.1080/10550889709511142.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
5115648
Citation
Hunt WA, Barnett LW, Branch LG. Relapse rates in addiction programs. J Clin Psychol. 1971 Oct;27(4):455-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197110)27:43.0.co;2-r. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8317951
Citation
Hser YI, Anglin D, Powers K. A 24-year follow-up of California narcotics addicts. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;50(7):577-84. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820190079008.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11343531
Citation
Hser YI, Hoffman V, Grella CE, Anglin MD. A 33-year follow-up of narcotics addicts. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 May;58(5):503-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.5.503.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9170765
Citation
Iguchi MY, Belding MA, Morral AR, Lamb RJ, Husband SD. Reinforcing operants other than abstinence in drug abuse treatment: an effective alternative for reducing drug use. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997 Jun;65(3):421-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.65.3.421.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
185468
Citation
Intagliata J. A telephone follow-up procedure for increasing the effectiveness of a treatment program for alcoholics. J Stud Alcohol. 1976 Sep;37(9):1330-5. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1976.37.1330.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12201384
Citation
Karno MP, Beutler LE, Harwood TM. Interactions between psychotherapy procedures and patient attributes that predict alcohol treatment effectiveness: a preliminary report. Addict Behav. 2002 Sep-Oct;27(5):779-97. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(01)00209-x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
6078383
Citation
Koumans AJ, Muller JJ, Miller CF. Use of telephone calls to increase motivation for treatment in alcoholics. Psychol Rep. 1967 Aug;21(1):327-8. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1967.21.1.327. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9888122
Citation
Lash SJ, Blosser SL. Increasing adherence to substance abuse aftercare group therapy. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1999 Jan;16(1):55-60. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(98)00015-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8909084
Citation
Lash SJ, Dillard W. Encouraging participation in aftercare group therapy among substance-dependent men. Psychol Rep. 1996 Oct;79(2):585-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1996.79.2.585.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8830154
Citation
Lovejoy M, Rosenblum A, Magura S, Foote J, Handelsman L, Stimmel B. Patients' perspective on the process of change in substance abuse treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1995 Jul-Aug;12(4):269-82. doi: 10.1016/0740-5472(95)00027-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11928892
Citation
MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods. 2002 Mar;7(1):83-104. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12472329
Citation
McDonald HP, Garg AX, Haynes RB. Interventions to enhance patient adherence to medication prescriptions: scientific review. JAMA. 2002 Dec 11;288(22):2868-79. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.22.2868. Erratum In: JAMA. 2003 Jun 25;289(24):3242.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11317717
Citation
McKay JR. Effectiveness of continuing care interventions for substance abusers. Implications for the study of long-term treatment effects. Eval Rev. 2001 Apr;25(2):211-32. doi: 10.1177/0193841X0102500205.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9500302
Citation
McKay JR, McLellan AT, Alterman AI, Cacciola JS, Rutherford MJ, O'Brien CP. Predictors of participation in aftercare sessions and self-help groups following completion of intensive outpatient treatment for substance abuse. J Stud Alcohol. 1998 Mar;59(2):152-62. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1998.59.152.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11384786
Citation
Pan W. Sample size and power calculations with correlated binary data. Control Clin Trials. 2001 Jun;22(3):211-27. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(01)00131-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8189773
Citation
Peterson KA, Swindle RW, Phibbs CS, Recine B, Moos RH. Determinants of readmission following inpatient substance abuse treatment: a national study of VA programs. Med Care. 1994 Jun;32(6):535-50. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199406000-00001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9718103
Citation
Ouimette PC, Moos RH, Finney JW. Influence of outpatient treatment and 12-step group involvement on one-year substance abuse treatment outcomes. J Stud Alcohol. 1998 Sep;59(5):513-22. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1998.59.513.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7623389
Citation
Rawson RA, Shoptaw SJ, Obert JL, McCann MJ, Hasson AL, Marinelli-Casey PJ, Brethen PR, Ling W. An intensive outpatient approach for cocaine abuse treatment. The Matrix model. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1995 Mar-Apr;12(2):117-27. doi: 10.1016/0740-5472(94)00080-b.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15139869
Citation
Rawson RA, Marinelli-Casey P, Anglin MD, Dickow A, Frazier Y, Gallagher C, Galloway GP, Herrell J, Huber A, McCann MJ, Obert J, Pennell S, Reiber C, Vandersloot D, Zweben J; Methamphetamine Treatment Project Corporate Authors. A multi-site comparison of psychosocial approaches for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. Addiction. 2004 Jun;99(6):708-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00707.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8289906
Citation
Rawson RA, Obert JL, McCann MJ, Ling W. Neurobehavioral treatment for cocaine dependency: a preliminary evaluation. NIDA Res Monogr. 1993;135:92-115.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11166505
Citation
Richter KP, Bammer G. A hierarchy of strategies heroin-using mothers employ to reduce harm to their children. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2000 Dec;19(4):403-13. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(00)00137-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9699236
Citation
Rochon J. Application of GEE procedures for sample size calculations in repeated measures experiments. Stat Med. 1998 Jul 30;17(14):1643-58. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980730)17:143.0.co;2-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7734464
Citation
Shoptaw S, Rawson RA, McCann MJ, Obert JL. The Matrix model of outpatient stimulant abuse treatment: evidence of efficacy. J Addict Dis. 1994;13(4):129-41. doi: 10.1300/j069v13n04_02.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12530702
Citation
Shrout PE, Bolger N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2002 Dec;7(4):422-45.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8624184
Citation
Silverman K, Higgins ST, Brooner RK, Montoya ID, Cone EJ, Schuster CR, Preston KL. Sustained cocaine abstinence in methadone maintenance patients through voucher-based reinforcement therapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996 May;53(5):409-15. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830050045007.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
426744
Citation
Sobell LC, Maisto SA, Sobell MB, Cooper AM. Reliability of alcohol abusers' self-reports of drinking behavior. Behav Res Ther. 1979;17(2):157-60. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(79)90025-1. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1637252
Citation
Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Gibbon M, First MB. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). I: History, rationale, and description. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992 Aug;49(8):624-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820080032005.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10636600
Citation
Stahler GJ, Cohen E. Using ethnographic methodology in substance abuse treatment outcome research. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2000 Jan;18(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(99)00029-x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7723001
Citation
Stout RL, Wirtz PW, Carbonari JP, Del Boca FK. Ensuring balanced distribution of prognostic factors in treatment outcome research. J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 1994 Dec;12:70-5. doi: 10.15288/jsas.1994.s12.70.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22867295
Citation
Farabee D, Cousins SJ, Brecht ML, Antonini VP, Lee AB, Brummer J, Hemberg J, Karno M, Rawson RA. A comparison of four telephone-based counseling styles for recovering stimulant users. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Mar;27(1):223-9. doi: 10.1037/a0029572. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
Results Reference
result
Links:
URL
http://www.uclaisap.org
Description
Related Info

Learn more about this trial

Four Models of Telephone Support for Stimulant Recovery

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs