search
Back to results

Fracture Gap After Herbert Screw Insertion by 3d Stents Vs Titanium Plate(Minimally Displaced Mandibular Angle Fracture)

Primary Purpose

Minimally Displaced Mandibular Angle Fracture

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
3D stent in Herbert screw insertion vs titanium plate
Sponsored by
Cairo University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Minimally Displaced Mandibular Angle Fracture

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - 45 Years (Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient age between 20 to 45

    • Patients with minimally displaced angular fracture
    • Patients free from any systemic disease that delay bone healing
    • Patients free from any metabolic bone disease delaying the healing
    • Patients who approved to be included in the trial and signed the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • .Patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy "due to the risk of low bone quality and healing.(Hopewell, 2003)

    • Patients who refused to be included in the trial

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    No Intervention

    Arm Label

    intervention group

    control group

    Arm Description

    3D stent in Herbert screw insertion vs titanium plate

    titanium plate

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    inertfragmentary gap
    will be measured using the panoramic xray film on the panoramic radiograph a line was drawn along the fracture and it was divided into 3 equal parts in mm. Perpendicular lines were projected onto the fracture line for reproducible measure points. Measurements of the fracture gap were conducted on these 4 defined points

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    pain relief
    measuring the pain using visual analogue scale (scale fom 0 -10) the patient is asked to pick a number from 0(no pain) till 10(unbearable pain)
    nerve sensitivity
    nerve sensitivity through neurosensory examination score (score from 1-5) 1means absent to 5 which is intense
    maximum incisal opening
    using a caliper the measuring unit is in millimeters more opening means better result

    Full Information

    First Posted
    September 27, 2018
    Last Updated
    October 25, 2018
    Sponsor
    Cairo University
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03692260
    Brief Title
    Fracture Gap After Herbert Screw Insertion by 3d Stents Vs Titanium Plate(Minimally Displaced Mandibular Angle Fracture)
    Official Title
    Interfragmentary Gap Following Cannulated Headless Herbert Screw Insertion Using Customized 3-D Surgical Templates Versus Titanium Plate In Reduction & Fixation of Unilateral Minimally Displaced Mandibular Angle Fracture. RCT
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2018
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Unknown status
    Study Start Date
    October 25, 2018 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    July 1, 2019 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    July 1, 2019 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Cairo University

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    interfragmentary gap measurement using Herbert cannulated headless screw using a 3D surgical customized template versus titanuim plate
    Detailed Description
    Intervention for each group Diagnosis for group I and II According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, patients are selected after a comprehensive clinical and radiographic examination and understanding of participant s chief complains. Inspection for the soft tissue laceration, edema, ecchymosis, hemorrhage, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, gingival lacerations, mandible contour deformity, facial asymmetry and the other facial bones bilateral palpation starting from the condylar region descending towards the posterior border of the mandible to look for any tenderness, step deformities or crepitus. Examination of the integrity of the neurosensory and motor function of the injured area. Checking the amount of occlusal discrepancy with complete and comprehensive examination of the dentition. Mandibular movements will also be checked with emphasis on maximal Interincisal opening and midline shift in opening and closing positions. Surgical planning Group I :participants will be treated using Herbert headless cannulated screw(Zimmer® Herbert™ ,united states of America )Cannulated Bone Screw) using 3d template GroupII :patients are treated using titanium plates (4 or 6 holes according to each case) orthomed ,6th of October,Egypt) Intra-operative procedures: -All of the participants will be treated under general anaesthesia using nasal intubation The occlusion was secured with temporary IMF and the fracture line was exposed and manually reduced. Infiltration Local anesthesia with vasoconstrictor will be injected intraorally at the incision site for hemostatic purposes and pain control. Scrubbing and draping of the patient will be carried out in a standard fashion. An intraoral incision to expose the fracture line. Dissection and reflection to reach the bone For the intervention group planning using the ct software to produce a guiding template of the mandible in the normal position for the insertion of the Herbert screw. Reduction of the fracture -Fixation of the fractured segments through Herbert screw using the 3D template fabricated by Plastycad 3diemme Italy(group I), or by using titanium the plate (groupII) -Double checking and verification of the occlusion before wound closure. -Wounds are debrided and sutured. Postoperative - Cold application at the site of surgery in the form of ice packs 10 minutes every hour in the first 6 hours. -Broad spectrum antibiotic therapy in the form of Unasyn 1500 mg vials was given as an IV shot to the patient every 12 hours for 5 days to reduce the risk of infection. (Unasyn®: manufactured by Pfizer, Egypt S.A.E Cairo, A.R.E) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug will be administered in the form of Voltaren 75mg ampoule 3 times daily for 3 days to relief the pain. (Voltaren®: NOVARTIS PHARMA S.A.E. Cairo, under license from: Novartis Pharma AG, Basle, Switzerland.) Follow up & Evaluation Clinical follow up parameters: For group I and group II - Dehiscence of the soft tissue and hardware exposure. - Pain over visual analogue scale over first 72 hours. Maximum incisal opening (MIO) Stability of the fractured segments. Radiographic follow up parameters: - Bone union/nonunion and malunion (OPG). Bone to bone contact via mandible form & border contour (OPG) (3diagnosys 3diemme Italy version 4.2 Any participant that can cause an adverse effect to the intervention/control group will be excluded the patients will receive their panoramic x-ray at the accurate indicated intervals. The the MIO will be tested for all patients under the same chair postion using the same caliper, the visual analogue scale to measure the pain will be explained to the patient to prevent any misunderstanding and for the sensory function the patients will be asked to close their eyes before we start to prevent any misleading data as he will not be able to see area we are checking. Those Strategies will be used to improve adherence to intervention protocols.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Minimally Displaced Mandibular Angle Fracture

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    20 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    intervention group
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    3D stent in Herbert screw insertion vs titanium plate
    Arm Title
    control group
    Arm Type
    No Intervention
    Arm Description
    titanium plate
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    3D stent in Herbert screw insertion vs titanium plate
    Intervention Description
    benefit of 3d template in fracture gap
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    inertfragmentary gap
    Description
    will be measured using the panoramic xray film on the panoramic radiograph a line was drawn along the fracture and it was divided into 3 equal parts in mm. Perpendicular lines were projected onto the fracture line for reproducible measure points. Measurements of the fracture gap were conducted on these 4 defined points
    Time Frame
    3 months as after that time bone remodeling will happen and measuring the interfragmentary gap will be inaccurate
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    pain relief
    Description
    measuring the pain using visual analogue scale (scale fom 0 -10) the patient is asked to pick a number from 0(no pain) till 10(unbearable pain)
    Time Frame
    3 months
    Title
    nerve sensitivity
    Description
    nerve sensitivity through neurosensory examination score (score from 1-5) 1means absent to 5 which is intense
    Time Frame
    3 months
    Title
    maximum incisal opening
    Description
    using a caliper the measuring unit is in millimeters more opening means better result
    Time Frame
    3 months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    20 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    45 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: patient age between 20 to 45 Patients with minimally displaced angular fracture Patients free from any systemic disease that delay bone healing Patients free from any metabolic bone disease delaying the healing Patients who approved to be included in the trial and signed the informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: .Patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy "due to the risk of low bone quality and healing.(Hopewell, 2003) Patients who refused to be included in the trial
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Nevine AE Fathy mohammed elfath omar, a lecturer
    Phone
    01011180702
    Ext
    202
    Email
    vina.alex@hotmail.com
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    omnia i sultan, lecturer
    Phone
    01001741757
    Ext
    202
    Email
    omom1278@gmail.com
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Hussein h Abd elrahman, a professor
    Organizational Affiliation
    Cairo University
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    Yes
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    Study results are published as partial fulfillment of the requirements for Phd degree in Oral and maxillofacial surgery by the investigator by cairo university

    Learn more about this trial

    Fracture Gap After Herbert Screw Insertion by 3d Stents Vs Titanium Plate(Minimally Displaced Mandibular Angle Fracture)

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs