Gadofosveset Trisodium (Ablavar, Gdfos) in Distinguishing Hemangiomas and Metastases: A Prospective Trial
Primary Purpose
Cancer, Metastases, Liver Neoplasms
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Liver MRI with Gdfos
Liver MRI with EcGd
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Cancer focused on measuring Liver metastases, MRI, Contrast Agents
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- known cancer
- referred for MRI of liver to rule out metastases
- has focal liver lesions
- age > 18 yo
Exclusion Criteria:
- contraindication to MRI or MR contrast agents
- pregnancy
- unable to obtain all sequences and/or acceptable quality imaging
Sites / Locations
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Other
Arm Label
Liver MRI with EcGd and with Gdfos
Arm Description
All participants will receive two contrast-enhanced MRI studies of the liver: one with gadofosveset trisodium (Gdfos) and one with gadobutrol (EcGd) at a dose of 0.1 mL/kg body mass up to 10 mL.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Reader diagnostic accuracy using Gdfos vs. EcGd compared to gold standard
Three blinded radiologists of different training levels will read the MRI liver studies done using Gdfos and EcGd and the results of this will be compared to a gold standard (either pathology from surgery or biopsy or long-term follow-up). The diagnostic accuracy of Gdfos vs. EcGd will be compared using area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (with correction for correlation and clustering).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Inter-reader variability for EcGd-enhanced vs. Gdfos-enhanced imaging
Three blinded radiologists of different training levels will read the MRI liver studies done using Gdfos and EcGd and the results of this will be compared to a gold standard (either pathology from surgery or biopsy or long-term follow-up). The difference in accuracy will be compared between readers using kappa statistics.
Reader diagnostic accuracy of EcGd-enhanced imaging vs. Gdfos-enhanced imaging compared to gold standard (subgroup analysis for small lesions less than or equal to 1cm)
Subgroup analysis for small lesions. The same analysis will be done with only a subgroup of small lesions.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02036008
First Posted
October 30, 2013
Last Updated
January 13, 2014
Sponsor
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02036008
Brief Title
Gadofosveset Trisodium (Ablavar, Gdfos) in Distinguishing Hemangiomas and Metastases: A Prospective Trial
Official Title
Gadofosveset Trisodium (Ablavar, Gdfos) in Distinguishing Hemangiomas and Metastases: A Prospective Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
August 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2014 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 2015 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if Gadofosveset Trisodium (Gdfos, Ablavar) is a useful magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent in accurately diagnosing liver metastases compared to the standard agent gadobutrol (EcGd, Gadovist).
Detailed Description
The proposed study will be a single centre, prospective trial comparing the sensitivity and specificity of using Gadofosveset Trisodium (Gdfos, Ablavar) as the MRI contrast agent as compared to gadobutrol (EcGd, Gadovist).
The study population will include cancer patient's referred for an MRI study of the liver to rule out metastases. Those who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will their routine (clinical) MRI of the liver with EcGd. They will also receive an additional MRI with Gdfos within 4 weeks of the original study.
The patient data will be anonymized and the imaging will be read by radiologists and radiology residents and comparison will be made between the diagnostic accuracy of the EcGd-enhanced study and the Gdfos-enhanced study.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cancer, Metastases, Liver Neoplasms
Keywords
Liver metastases, MRI, Contrast Agents
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
150 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Liver MRI with EcGd and with Gdfos
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
All participants will receive two contrast-enhanced MRI studies of the liver: one with gadofosveset trisodium (Gdfos) and one with gadobutrol (EcGd) at a dose of 0.1 mL/kg body mass up to 10 mL.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Liver MRI with Gdfos
Other Intervention Name(s)
Gadofosveset trisodium (Gdfos)
Intervention Description
Participants will receive Gdfos at a dose of 10 mL of 0.25mmol/mL. This will be administered automatically using an MRI-compatible power injector, as a bolus through an intravenous line placed in an antecubital vein at a rate of 1.5 mL/s followed by 25 mL of 0.9% saline flush.
Participants will be imaged using a 3.0 T MRI scanner with an 8 channel body phased array coil utilized covering the entire liver. Images of the liver will be obtained including: axial precontrast phase, axial arterial phase, axial portovenous phase, axial 5 minute delayed phase, axial 10 minute delayed phase, axial 20 minute delayed phase.
This study will be performed within 4 weeks of the MRI study with EcGd.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Liver MRI with EcGd
Other Intervention Name(s)
gadobutrol (Gadovist, EcGd)
Intervention Description
Participants will receive a liver MRI with EcGd as per clinical institutional protocol.
Participants will receive EcGd at a dose of 0.1 mL/kg body mass up to 10 mL. This will be administered automatically using an MRI-compatible power injector, as a bolus through an intravenous line placed in an antecubital vein at a rate of 1.5 mL/s followed by 25 mL of 0.9% saline flush.
Participants will be imaged using a 3.0 T MRI scanner with an 8 channel body phased array coil utilized covering the entire liver. Images of the liver will be obtained including: axial precontrast phase, axial arterial phase, axial portovenous phase, axial 5 minute delayed phase, axial 10 minute delayed phase, axial 20 minute delayed phase. Additional noncontrast images will be obtained as per institutional protocol, including diffusion weighted imaging, in/out of phase imaging, and T2 weighted imaging.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Reader diagnostic accuracy using Gdfos vs. EcGd compared to gold standard
Description
Three blinded radiologists of different training levels will read the MRI liver studies done using Gdfos and EcGd and the results of this will be compared to a gold standard (either pathology from surgery or biopsy or long-term follow-up). The diagnostic accuracy of Gdfos vs. EcGd will be compared using area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (with correction for correlation and clustering).
Time Frame
Participants will receive both Gdfos and EcGd study within 4 weeks of each other. Radiologist reading for the study will be done up to 52 weeks after first MRI has been performed.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Inter-reader variability for EcGd-enhanced vs. Gdfos-enhanced imaging
Description
Three blinded radiologists of different training levels will read the MRI liver studies done using Gdfos and EcGd and the results of this will be compared to a gold standard (either pathology from surgery or biopsy or long-term follow-up). The difference in accuracy will be compared between readers using kappa statistics.
Time Frame
Participants will receive both Gdfos and EcGd study within 4 weeks of each other. Radiologist reading for the study will be done up to 52 weeks after first MRI has been performed.
Title
Reader diagnostic accuracy of EcGd-enhanced imaging vs. Gdfos-enhanced imaging compared to gold standard (subgroup analysis for small lesions less than or equal to 1cm)
Description
Subgroup analysis for small lesions. The same analysis will be done with only a subgroup of small lesions.
Time Frame
Participants will receive both Gdfos and EcGd study within 4 weeks of each other. Radiologist reading for the study will be done up to 52 weeks after first MRI has been performed.
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
known cancer
referred for MRI of liver to rule out metastases
has focal liver lesions
age > 18 yo
Exclusion Criteria:
contraindication to MRI or MR contrast agents
pregnancy
unable to obtain all sequences and/or acceptable quality imaging
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Helen Cheung
Phone
416-480-6100
Ext
85463
Email
hecheung@sunnybrook.ca
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laurent Milot, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4N 3M5
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laurent Milot, MD
Email
laurent.milot@sunnybrook.ca
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laurent Milot, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Helen Cheung, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Caitlin McGregor, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Calvin Law, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paul Karanicolas, MD
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22488745
Citation
Milot L, Haider M, Foster L, McGregor C, Law C. Gadofosveset trisodium in the investigation of focal liver lesions in noncirrhotic liver: Early experience. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Sep;36(3):738-42. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23650. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Gadofosveset Trisodium (Ablavar, Gdfos) in Distinguishing Hemangiomas and Metastases: A Prospective Trial
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs