search
Back to results

Genetics and Shared Decision Making in Improving Care for Patients With Stage IVA-C Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Primary Purpose

Activating ALK Gene Mutation Negative, Activating EGFR Gene Mutation Negative, Activating ROS1 Gene Mutation Negative

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Counseling
Questionnaire Administration
Medical Chart Review
Sponsored by
Thomas Jefferson University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Activating ALK Gene Mutation Negative

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed with advanced NSCLC (stage IV a-c) that are wild-type for activating genetic alterations (EGFR, ROS 1, and ALK).
  • May or may not be candidates for immune checkpoint therapy.
  • May have had 1-any number of prior systemic therapy regimens.
  • If prior systemic regimen, must have progression disease at time of evaluation.
  • Untreated brain metastases permitted.
  • Completed pathological analysis of tumor tissue.
  • Patients who have exhausted targeting therapy options.
  • Can speak and read English.
  • All participants must be willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study.
  • Providers: Those who treat NSCLC patients as described above.

Exclusion Criteria:

• There are no specific exclusions in this trial for particular medical conditions, comorbidities, or performance status. Any patient deemed appropriate to be considered for evaluation and/or treatment would be appropriate to include in this trial.

Sites / Locations

  • Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Supportive care (treatment decision counseling session)

Arm Description

Patients complete a treatment decision counseling session/interview about genetic testing and supportive/palliative care with a qualified member of the research team in-person or via telephone. Health care providers receive a 1-page summary of session results for use in treatment shared decision making at the next office visit.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Development of materials and methods to adapt an existing decision counseling program (DCP) for use with patients diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer as a standard component of clinical care
Results will be reported descriptively. A Decision Counseling Program (DCP) is a tool that allows patients and physicians to engage shared decision making. The DCP will be created based on genetic tumor diagnostics, provider treatment recommendations, and feedback from patients and providers gathered from interviews.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Feasibility of the adapted DCP in a subset of patients: proportion of consenting patients who complete the DCP
Results will be reported descriptively. The feasibility endpoint will be the proportion of consenting patients who complete the DCP, about which we will estimate an exact 95% confidence interval by the Clopper-Pearson method.
DCP effects on patient treatment knowledge and decisional conflict
Results will be reported descriptively on pre and post surveys that will be completed by patients Survey is the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) Total and subscores have applicable items are a) summed; b) divide by 10; and c) multiplied by 25 Total Score Items 1-10 Score range: 0 [No decisional conflict] to 100 [extremely high decisional conflict]. Uncertainty Sub score Items 9, 10 Score range: 0 [feels extremely certain about best choice] to 100 [feels extremely uncertain about best choice] Informed Sub score Items 1, 2, 3 Score range: 0 [feels extremely informed] to 100 [feels extremely uninformed]. Values Clarity Sub score Items 4, 5 Score range: 0 [feels extremely clear about person; a values for benefits and risks/side effects] to 100 [feels extremely unclear about personal value] Support Sub score Items 6, 7, 8 Score range: 0 [feels extremely supported in decision making] to 100 [feels extremely unsupported in decision making]
Treatment choice of patients after receiving counseling
Results will be reported descriptively. Will be collected on pre and post surveys that will be completed by patients. Overall summary statistics will be computed for the patient surveys. Medical records data will be reviewed in order to determine the patient treatment regimen.

Full Information

First Posted
April 24, 2019
Last Updated
September 7, 2022
Sponsor
Thomas Jefferson University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03944265
Brief Title
Genetics and Shared Decision Making in Improving Care for Patients With Stage IVA-C Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Official Title
Using Genetics and Shared Decision Making to Improve Lung Cancer Care: A Developmental Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 8, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 1, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Thomas Jefferson University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This trial studies the use of genetics and shared decision making in improving care for patients with stage IVA-C non-small cell lung cancer. Developing educational tools may help patients with non-small cell lung cancer to increase patient treatment knowledge, reduce decisional conflict, and promote treatment shared decision making with their health care providers.
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Use the information on genomic tumor diagnostics, provider treatment recommendations, and patient and provider feedback on the treatment decision making process, which will be used to develop materials and methods to adapt an existing decision counseling program (DCP) for use with patients diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) as a standard component of clinical care. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Pilot test the adapted DCP in a subset of patients to determine the feasibility of delivering the DCP session. II. Assess DCP effects on patient treatment knowledge and decisional conflict. III. Assess treatment choice. OUTLINE: PHASE I: Use physician input to develop draft treatment education materials and use patient input to adapt an online decision counseling application for use in helping patients clarify treatment preference. PHASE II: Patients complete a treatment decision counseling session/interview about genetic testing and supportive/palliative care with a qualified member of the research team in-person or via telephone. Health care providers receive a 1-page summary of session results for use in treatment shared decision making at the next office visit. After completion of study, participants are followed up at 30 and 60 days.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Activating ALK Gene Mutation Negative, Activating EGFR Gene Mutation Negative, Activating ROS1 Gene Mutation Negative, Health Care Provider, Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma, Stage IV Lung Cancer AJCC v8, Stage IVA Lung Cancer AJCC v8, Stage IVB Lung Cancer AJCC v8

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
14 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Supportive care (treatment decision counseling session)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients complete a treatment decision counseling session/interview about genetic testing and supportive/palliative care with a qualified member of the research team in-person or via telephone. Health care providers receive a 1-page summary of session results for use in treatment shared decision making at the next office visit.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Counseling
Other Intervention Name(s)
Counseling Intervention
Intervention Description
Participate in treatment decision counseling session
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Questionnaire Administration
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Medical Chart Review
Other Intervention Name(s)
Chart Review
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Development of materials and methods to adapt an existing decision counseling program (DCP) for use with patients diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer as a standard component of clinical care
Description
Results will be reported descriptively. A Decision Counseling Program (DCP) is a tool that allows patients and physicians to engage shared decision making. The DCP will be created based on genetic tumor diagnostics, provider treatment recommendations, and feedback from patients and providers gathered from interviews.
Time Frame
Up to 6 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Feasibility of the adapted DCP in a subset of patients: proportion of consenting patients who complete the DCP
Description
Results will be reported descriptively. The feasibility endpoint will be the proportion of consenting patients who complete the DCP, about which we will estimate an exact 95% confidence interval by the Clopper-Pearson method.
Time Frame
Up to 6 weeks
Title
DCP effects on patient treatment knowledge and decisional conflict
Description
Results will be reported descriptively on pre and post surveys that will be completed by patients Survey is the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) Total and subscores have applicable items are a) summed; b) divide by 10; and c) multiplied by 25 Total Score Items 1-10 Score range: 0 [No decisional conflict] to 100 [extremely high decisional conflict]. Uncertainty Sub score Items 9, 10 Score range: 0 [feels extremely certain about best choice] to 100 [feels extremely uncertain about best choice] Informed Sub score Items 1, 2, 3 Score range: 0 [feels extremely informed] to 100 [feels extremely uninformed]. Values Clarity Sub score Items 4, 5 Score range: 0 [feels extremely clear about person; a values for benefits and risks/side effects] to 100 [feels extremely unclear about personal value] Support Sub score Items 6, 7, 8 Score range: 0 [feels extremely supported in decision making] to 100 [feels extremely unsupported in decision making]
Time Frame
Up to 60 days
Title
Treatment choice of patients after receiving counseling
Description
Results will be reported descriptively. Will be collected on pre and post surveys that will be completed by patients. Overall summary statistics will be computed for the patient surveys. Medical records data will be reviewed in order to determine the patient treatment regimen.
Time Frame
Up to 60 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Newly diagnosed with advanced NSCLC (stage IV a-c) that are wild-type for activating genetic alterations (EGFR, ROS 1, and ALK). May or may not be candidates for immune checkpoint therapy. May have had 1-any number of prior systemic therapy regimens. If prior systemic regimen, must have progression disease at time of evaluation. Untreated brain metastases permitted. Completed pathological analysis of tumor tissue. Patients who have exhausted targeting therapy options. Can speak and read English. All participants must be willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study. Providers: Those who treat NSCLC patients as described above. Exclusion Criteria: • There are no specific exclusions in this trial for particular medical conditions, comorbidities, or performance status. Any patient deemed appropriate to be considered for evaluation and/or treatment would be appropriate to include in this trial.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Neal Flomenberg, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19107
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Genetics and Shared Decision Making in Improving Care for Patients With Stage IVA-C Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs