search
Back to results

Grasping Rehabilitation With Functional Electrical Stimulation Garment (GarmentGrasp)

Primary Purpose

Stroke, Spinal Cord Injuries

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Functional Electrical Stimulation
Sponsored by
Milos Popovic
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring Functional Electrical Stimulation, Neuroprosthesis, Rehabilitation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Complete and Incomplete C4-C7 SCI or brain vascular stroke (hemorrhagic or ischemic)
  • Upper-limb paralysis to the extent that it interferes with the participants ability to perform activities of daily living independently.
  • More than 6 months post injury at the time of recruitment and should have been discharged from initial post-acute rehabilitation
  • Able to communicate verbally and read in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Implanted electronic devices such as: defibrillator, stimulator, insulin pump, baclofen pump, pace maker
  • Contracture and/or pain preventing shoulder elevation above 90 degrees.
  • Body mass index > 30 kg/m2 (severe obesity)
  • Known abdominal or aortic aneurysm
  • Known atrial of ventricular arrhythmia, unstable hypertension,
  • Diabetes with a history of recurrent hypoglycemic episodes
  • Cognitive impairments, such as co-morbid brain injury, depression, and/or mental illness preventing an active participation in the study
  • Known contact allergy to silver
  • Grade three pressure sore or cellulitis in the region intended to be tested
  • Body jewelry or tattoos in the area to be stimulated (between sites of the electrodes and/or at less than 2 inch distance from electrodes).

Specifically for participants with SCI:

  • Recurrent episodes of orthostatic hypotension preventing a prolonged seated position, or recurrent uncontrolled autonomic dysreflexia episodes
  • Prior history of myocardial infarction or stroke

Specifically for participants with Stroke:

  • Hemianopia, body hemineglect and/or aphasia preventing an efficient communication with researcher and interaction with the garment and the objects.
  • Prior history of spinal cord injury

Sites / Locations

  • Toronto Rehabilitation Institute

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

FES-Garment

Arm Description

All participants will take part in 40 sessions of 1 hour of Functional Electrical Stimulation

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Wolf Motor Function Test
For participants who had a stroke. A series of movement and object manipulations video-taped, timed, and rated for their quality of execution and success. The TRI-Hand Function Test is a gross motor function test used to assess upper extremity function in SCI. There are two components of the test an object manipulation component and a strength measurement component. The Wolf Motor Function Test is validated in stroke and it consists of performing 17 tasks (moving the hand on certain spots, handling daily life objects). The evaluator scores the quality of movement (e.g. 0 = does not attempt; 3. = movement with synergy, effort, at low speed; 5 = movement appears to be normal).
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Hand Function Test
For participants who had a spinal cord injury. A series of movement and object manipulations video-taped, timed, and rated for their quality of execution and success.
Wolf Motor Function Test
For participants who had a stroke. A series of movement and object manipulations video-taped, timed, and rated for their quality of execution and success. Re-measured after the participant completed the 40 sessions
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Hand Function Test
For participants who had a spinal cord injury. A series of movement and object manipulations video-taped, timed, and rated for their quality of execution and success. Re-measured after the participant completed the 40 sessions

Secondary Outcome Measures

Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
The FIM is a 12 item ordinal scale used to assess progress during rehabilitation and measures independent performance in various domains of activities of daily living. FIM score ranges from 12 to 84 FIM will be administered only in participants with Stroke.
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
The FIM is a 12 item ordinal scale used to assess progress during rehabilitation and measures independent performance in various domains of activities of daily living. FIM score ranges from 12 to 84 FIM will be administered only in participants with Stroke. Re-measured after the participant completed the 40 sessions
Spinal Cord Independence Measure
SCIM is a disability scale that has been specifically developed to evaluate functional outcomes in patients with SCI. It assess function in three core areas 1. Self care 2.Respiration and 3.Mobility. The SCIM scores range from 0 to 100 points. SCIM will be administered only in participants with SCI.
Spinal Cord Independence Measure
SCIM is a disability scale that has been specifically developed to evaluate functional outcomes in patients with SCI. It assess function in three core areas 1. Self care 2.Respiration and 3.Mobility. The SCIM scores range from 0 to 100 points. SCIM will be administered only in participants with SCI. Re-measured after the participant completed the 40 sessions
Grip strength
Average of the 3 maximal grip strength recorded with a Digital Grip Hand Dynamometer. For both group.
Grip strength
Average of the 3 maximal grip strength recorded with a Digital Grip Hand Dynamometer. Re-measured after the participant completed the 40 sessions For both group.
Set-up time
Record with a stop watch the time required to 1. put on the FES-garment, 2. wet the electrodes, and 3. select the appropriate stimulation intensity.
Execution of the training tasks with FES
Record in the CRF of the weight of bottle lifted at shoulder level while receiving FES.
Execution of the training tasks without FES
Record in the case report form (CRF) of the highest weight of bottle lifted at shoulder level without delivery of FES.

Full Information

First Posted
June 12, 2018
Last Updated
September 12, 2022
Sponsor
Milos Popovic
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03658798
Brief Title
Grasping Rehabilitation With Functional Electrical Stimulation Garment
Acronym
GarmentGrasp
Official Title
Testing the Efficacy of Garment-embedded Electrodes for Functional Electrical Stimulation: Training of Individuals With Upper-limb Paralysis.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Funds have not been received
Study Start Date
October 2, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 12, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 12, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Milos Popovic

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study tests the feasibility, safety and efficacy of garments embedding conductive electrodes (FES-shirt) for the independent delivery of functional electrical stimulation (FES). 12 people with SCI and 12 people with stroke who have some degree of arm paralysis will receive 40 hours of FES with these FES-shirt. The ability to use the FES-shirts and the improvement in function while receiving FES will indicate the immediate benefits. Their functional capabilities will be measured before and after 40 FES sessions to evaluate the carry-over effects.
Detailed Description
Spinal cord injury (SCI) and stroke can result in paralysis of arm and hand muscles preventing people from being able to use them in day to day activities, which can greatly impact quality of life. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) can activate the paralyzed muscles by sending a low energy electrical current through the skin. FES has been shown to improve the ability to control muscles in previous studies.In current simulators individual adhesive gel electrodes are positioned on the appropriate muscles to produce functional movements.This is time consuming and requires a therapist to guide electrode placement,besides the cables interfere with the individuals ability to perform functional movements with the FES.To approach this issue, we designed prototype shirts embedding all the necessary electrodes and wires to stimulate muscles around the hand, elbow and shoulder. 24 individuals with difficulty performing routine day to day activities with their upper extremities will be recruited to the study: 12 people with SCI and 12 people with stroke. Each participant will receive a custom designed FES shirt made based on individual participant body measurements and optimal electrode positions identified with standard gel electrodes.Study participants will receive 40 sessions of intervention, 3 to 5 times a week over 2 to 3 months. Each session will be one hour in duration and participant will receive functional electrical stimulation therapy through this customized shirt. They will have to don, activate, and doff the garment as independently as possible. The exercises conducted will be defined by the investigator based on the functional status of the participant and eventual progress. Participants will be evaluated before and after the intervention using functional tests and questionnaires Participants will be invited to give their opinions on the shirt so that the researchers can improve its features.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke, Spinal Cord Injuries
Keywords
Functional Electrical Stimulation, Neuroprosthesis, Rehabilitation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
Participant will be compared to themselves in a "pre-post" analysis
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
No masking of the intervention to participant or assessor because there is only 1 arm.
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
8 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
FES-Garment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
All participants will take part in 40 sessions of 1 hour of Functional Electrical Stimulation
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Functional Electrical Stimulation
Intervention Description
Study participants will receive 40 sessions of intervention, 3 to 5 times a week over 2 to 3 months. Each session will be one hour in duration and participant will receive functional electrical stimulation therapy with their customized shirt. During therapy participants will be expected to carry out functional movements with assistance from the FES Garment.Participants will be expected to don, activate, and doff the garment as independently as possible. The exercises conducted will be defined by the investigator based on the functional status of the participant and eventual progress.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Wolf Motor Function Test
Description
For participants who had a stroke. A series of movement and object manipulations video-taped, timed, and rated for their quality of execution and success. The TRI-Hand Function Test is a gross motor function test used to assess upper extremity function in SCI. There are two components of the test an object manipulation component and a strength measurement component. The Wolf Motor Function Test is validated in stroke and it consists of performing 17 tasks (moving the hand on certain spots, handling daily life objects). The evaluator scores the quality of movement (e.g. 0 = does not attempt; 3. = movement with synergy, effort, at low speed; 5 = movement appears to be normal).
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Hand Function Test
Description
For participants who had a spinal cord injury. A series of movement and object manipulations video-taped, timed, and rated for their quality of execution and success.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Wolf Motor Function Test
Description
For participants who had a stroke. A series of movement and object manipulations video-taped, timed, and rated for their quality of execution and success. Re-measured after the participant completed the 40 sessions
Time Frame
End study, after 14 weeks on average
Title
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Hand Function Test
Description
For participants who had a spinal cord injury. A series of movement and object manipulations video-taped, timed, and rated for their quality of execution and success. Re-measured after the participant completed the 40 sessions
Time Frame
End study, after 14 weeks on average
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Description
The FIM is a 12 item ordinal scale used to assess progress during rehabilitation and measures independent performance in various domains of activities of daily living. FIM score ranges from 12 to 84 FIM will be administered only in participants with Stroke.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Description
The FIM is a 12 item ordinal scale used to assess progress during rehabilitation and measures independent performance in various domains of activities of daily living. FIM score ranges from 12 to 84 FIM will be administered only in participants with Stroke. Re-measured after the participant completed the 40 sessions
Time Frame
End study, after 14 weeks on average
Title
Spinal Cord Independence Measure
Description
SCIM is a disability scale that has been specifically developed to evaluate functional outcomes in patients with SCI. It assess function in three core areas 1. Self care 2.Respiration and 3.Mobility. The SCIM scores range from 0 to 100 points. SCIM will be administered only in participants with SCI.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Spinal Cord Independence Measure
Description
SCIM is a disability scale that has been specifically developed to evaluate functional outcomes in patients with SCI. It assess function in three core areas 1. Self care 2.Respiration and 3.Mobility. The SCIM scores range from 0 to 100 points. SCIM will be administered only in participants with SCI. Re-measured after the participant completed the 40 sessions
Time Frame
End study, after 14 weeks on average
Title
Grip strength
Description
Average of the 3 maximal grip strength recorded with a Digital Grip Hand Dynamometer. For both group.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Grip strength
Description
Average of the 3 maximal grip strength recorded with a Digital Grip Hand Dynamometer. Re-measured after the participant completed the 40 sessions For both group.
Time Frame
End study, after 14 weeks on average
Title
Set-up time
Description
Record with a stop watch the time required to 1. put on the FES-garment, 2. wet the electrodes, and 3. select the appropriate stimulation intensity.
Time Frame
During the procedure
Title
Execution of the training tasks with FES
Description
Record in the CRF of the weight of bottle lifted at shoulder level while receiving FES.
Time Frame
During the procedure
Title
Execution of the training tasks without FES
Description
Record in the case report form (CRF) of the highest weight of bottle lifted at shoulder level without delivery of FES.
Time Frame
During the procedure

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Complete and Incomplete C4-C7 SCI or brain vascular stroke (hemorrhagic or ischemic) Upper-limb paralysis to the extent that it interferes with the participants ability to perform activities of daily living independently. More than 6 months post injury at the time of recruitment and should have been discharged from initial post-acute rehabilitation Able to communicate verbally and read in English Exclusion Criteria: Implanted electronic devices such as: defibrillator, stimulator, insulin pump, baclofen pump, pace maker Contracture and/or pain preventing shoulder elevation above 90 degrees. Body mass index > 30 kg/m2 (severe obesity) Known abdominal or aortic aneurysm Known atrial of ventricular arrhythmia, unstable hypertension, Diabetes with a history of recurrent hypoglycemic episodes Cognitive impairments, such as co-morbid brain injury, depression, and/or mental illness preventing an active participation in the study Known contact allergy to silver Grade three pressure sore or cellulitis in the region intended to be tested Body jewelry or tattoos in the area to be stimulated (between sites of the electrodes and/or at less than 2 inch distance from electrodes). Specifically for participants with SCI: Recurrent episodes of orthostatic hypotension preventing a prolonged seated position, or recurrent uncontrolled autonomic dysreflexia episodes Prior history of myocardial infarction or stroke Specifically for participants with Stroke: Hemianopia, body hemineglect and/or aphasia preventing an efficient communication with researcher and interaction with the garment and the objects. Prior history of spinal cord injury
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Milos R Popovic, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5H 3V9
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
IPD Sharing Plan Description
This aspect hasn't been discussed with all collaborators of the study.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26193273
Citation
Zhou H, Lu Y, Chen W, Wu Z, Zou H, Krundel L, Li G. Stimulating the Comfort of Textile Electrodes in Wearable Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation. Sensors (Basel). 2015 Jul 16;15(7):17241-57. doi: 10.3390/s150717241.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21401662
Citation
Kapadia NM, Zivanovic V, Furlan JC, Craven BC, McGillivray C, Popovic MR. Functional electrical stimulation therapy for grasping in traumatic incomplete spinal cord injury: randomized control trial. Artif Organs. 2011 Mar;35(3):212-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01216.x. Erratum In: Artif Organs. 2011 Jun;35(6):674. Furlan, Julio [corrected to Furlan, Julio C].
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24381377
Citation
Kawashima N, Popovic MR, Zivanovic V. Effect of intensive functional electrical stimulation therapy on upper-limb motor recovery after stroke: case study of a patient with chronic stroke. Physiother Can. 2013 Winter;65(1):20-8. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2011-36.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28245858
Citation
Eraifej J, Clark W, France B, Desando S, Moore D. Effectiveness of upper limb functional electrical stimulation after stroke for the improvement of activities of daily living and motor function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 28;6(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0435-5.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Grasping Rehabilitation With Functional Electrical Stimulation Garment

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs