search
Back to results

H-coil TMS to Reduce Pain: A Pilot Study Evaluating Relative Efficacy of the H1 vs H7 Coil

Primary Purpose

Healthy, Chronic Pain, Opioid Use

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Real rTMS to the mPFC using H7 Coil
Real rTMS to the dlPFC using H1 Coil
Sponsored by
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Healthy focused on measuring Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Brain Stimulation, Healthy controls, Treatment

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 - 65 (to maximize participation).
  2. Does not have a history of and is currently not experiencing chronic pain.
  3. Able to read and understand questionnaires and informed consent.
  4. Lives within 50 miles of the study site.
  5. Is not at elevated risk of seizure (i.e., does not have a history of seizures, is not currently prescribed medications known to lower seizure threshold).
  6. Does not have a history of traumatic brain injury, including a head injury that resulted in hospitalization, loss of consciousness for more than 10 minutes, or having ever been informed that they have an epidural, subdural, or subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any psychoactive illicit substance use (except marijuana and nicotine) within the last 30 days by self-report and urine drug screen. For marijuana, no use within the last seven days by verbal report and negative (or decreasing) urine THC levels.
  2. Meets DSM-V criteria for moderate substance dependence, current axis I disorders of major depression, panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post traumatic stress syndrome, bipolar affective disorder, schizophrenia, dissociate disorders, eating disorders, and any other psychotic disorder.
  3. Has current suicidal ideation or homicidal ideation.
  4. Has the need for maintenance or acute treatment with any psychoactive medication including anti-seizure medications and medications for ADHD.
  5. Females of childbearing potential who are pregnant (by urine HCG), nursing, or who are not using a reliable form of birth control.
  6. Has current charges pending for a violent crime (not including DUI related offenses).
  7. Suffers from chronic migraines.

Sites / Locations

  • Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

First H1 coil, then H7 coil

First H7 coil, then H1 coil

Arm Description

There will be 1 screening and 2 TMS visits. The procedures will be identical for each TMS visit, except for the type of TMS delivered (H1 or H7 coil). Each participant will be assigned to both coils, with TMS type. Participants assigned to this arm will receive the H1 coil at TMS visit 1, H7 coil at TMS visit 2

There will be 1 screening and 2 TMS visits. The procedures will be identical for each TMS visit, except for the type of TMS delivered (H1 or H7 coil). Each participant will be assigned to both coils, with TMS type. Participants assigned to this arm will receive the H7 coil at TMS visit 1, H1 coil at TMS visit 2.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Changes in Painfulness Thresholds Using the Quantitative Pain Testing (QST) Task, Which Utilizes Pressure From the Medoc Algomed Device (Measured in kiloPascals).
Based on pilot data, the investigators expect an interaction between treatment (DLPFC or MPFC TMS) and time (Before vs. After rTMS) on reported painfulness using a quantitative sensory testing technique which determines the sensation and pain thresholds of pressure. Painfulness ratings will be assessed and reported before and after rTMS.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Changes in Pain Tolerance Thresholds Using the Quantitative Pain Testing (QST) Task, Which Utilizes Pressure From the Medoc Algomed Device (Measured in kiloPascals).
The investigators do not expect an interaction between treatment (DLPFC or MPFC TMS) and time (Before vs. After rTMS) on pain tolerance thresholds using a quantitative sensory testing technique which determines the sensation and pain thresholds of pressure. Pain tolerance ratings will be assessed and reported before and after rTMS.

Full Information

First Posted
December 16, 2019
Last Updated
August 18, 2023
Sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04203199
Brief Title
H-coil TMS to Reduce Pain: A Pilot Study Evaluating Relative Efficacy of the H1 vs H7 Coil
Official Title
H-coil TMS to Reduce Pain: A Pilot Study Evaluating Relative Efficacy of the H1 vs H7 Coil
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
PI left institution
Study Start Date
January 18, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 6, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 6, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Device Product Not Approved or Cleared by U.S. FDA
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Chronic pain is a serious public health problem with estimates as high as nearly half of the adult population experiencing some form of pain that lasts for more than 6 months. Chronic use of opiates is a rapidly escalating crisis in the United States, with over 4.3 million Americans dependent on opiate analgesics, an escalating rate of opiate overdose deaths, and a resurgence of intravenous heroin use leading to total societal cost exceeding $55 billion. While opiates are effective at treating acute pain, tolerance to the analgesic effects develops quickly, leading to high abuse liability and dependence potential. Consequently, the development of a new, non-pharmacologic intervention to treat pain, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), which would provide analgesic benefit while also directly remodeling the neural circuitry responsible for cognitive control over opiate craving, would fill an increasingly urgent public health need.
Detailed Description
Chronic pain is a serious public health problem with estimates as high as nearly half of the adult population experiencing some form of pain that lasts for more than 6 months. Chronic use of opiates is a rapidly escalating crisis in the United States, with over 4.3 million Americans dependent on opiate analgesics, an escalating rate of opiate overdose deaths, and a resurgence of intravenous heroin use leading to total societal cost exceeding $55 billion. While opiates are effective at treating acute pain, tolerance to the analgesic effects develops quickly, leading to high abuse liability and dependence potential. Consequently, the development of a new, non-pharmacologic intervention to treat pain, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), which would provide analgesic benefit while also directly remodeling the neural circuitry responsible for cognitive control over opiate craving, would fill an increasingly urgent public health need. Acute pain is associated with elevated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal in targets of ascending nociceptive fibers including the insula, dorsal anterior cingulate (dACC), thalamus and somatosensory cortex - the 'Pain Network'. Perceived pain, and corresponding BOLD signal in the Pain Network, is attenuated by 10 Hz rTMS (a form of brain stimulation that results in long term potentiation (LTP) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC, a node of the Executive Control Network). Dr. Borckardt was the first person to demonstrate that when LTP-like dlPFC rTMS was delivered in the postoperative recovery room, patients used less morphine in the hospital and require less morphine long-term. These analgesic effects are now widely known, with over 33 clinical trials utilizing rTMS as a tool to decrease acute and chronic pain in various clinical populations. These data all suggest that LTP-like DLPFC rTMS is a very strong candidate alleviating chronic pain (LTP-like dlPFC rTMS (Strategy 1, Aim 1)). An alternative approach, however, *which may also target opiate craving*, is to attenuate the Pain Network (through long term depression (LTD) of the ventromedial PFC) (LTD-like mPFC rTMS, Strategy 2, Aim 1). In a cohort of 49 individuals with chronic pain, Dr. Hanlon (Primary Investigator) recently demonstrated that LTD-like mPFC rTMS reduced baseline BOLD signal in multiple regions of interest (ROIs) *involved in craving which also overlap with the Pain Network* (e.g. dACC and Insula). To parametrically evaluate these 2 promising treatment strategies, the investigator has developed a 1-visit cross-sectional design wherein a cohort of healthy control individuals will receive Quantitative Sensory Testing before and after rTMS with the H1 and H7-coil for dlPFC stimulation (Strategy 1) and mPFC depression (Strategy 2), respectively. The investigator aims to: Aim 1. Quantify the effects of LTP-like and LTD-like RTMS on Quantitative Sensory Testing Hypothesis: The pressure pain tolerance of individuals in these two groups will increase after one session of rTMS administered by the H1- and H7-coil design. Aim 2. Evaluate the effects of rTMS on subjective experience of discomfort. Hypothesis: Subjective experience of discomfort will decrease in individuals after one session of LTP-like or LTD-like rTMS administered to the dlPFC and mPFC, respectively. The relative efficacy of Strategy 1 vs 2 will directly translate to development of a large clinical trial of rTMS as an innovative, new treatment option for pain in opiate dependent individuals.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Healthy, Chronic Pain, Opioid Use, Pain, Chronic
Keywords
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Brain Stimulation, Healthy controls, Treatment

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
The proposed study will employ a 1-visit cross sectional, double-blind, placebo-controlled design to parametrically evaluate two promising treatment strategies of rTMS using the H1 and H7-coil for dlPFC stimulation (Strategy 1) or mPFC stimulation (Strategy 2), respectively. Participants will be randomized to receive TMS to the dlPFC or mPFC (50% at each site). This will be done in a cohort of healthy control individuals recruited from the local Wake Forest University (WFU) community. Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) and subjective pain ratings will be measured before and after the rTMS session.
Masking
ParticipantCare Provider
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
39 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
First H1 coil, then H7 coil
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
There will be 1 screening and 2 TMS visits. The procedures will be identical for each TMS visit, except for the type of TMS delivered (H1 or H7 coil). Each participant will be assigned to both coils, with TMS type. Participants assigned to this arm will receive the H1 coil at TMS visit 1, H7 coil at TMS visit 2
Arm Title
First H7 coil, then H1 coil
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
There will be 1 screening and 2 TMS visits. The procedures will be identical for each TMS visit, except for the type of TMS delivered (H1 or H7 coil). Each participant will be assigned to both coils, with TMS type. Participants assigned to this arm will receive the H7 coil at TMS visit 1, H1 coil at TMS visit 2.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Real rTMS to the mPFC using H7 Coil
Intervention Description
This will be delivered with the Brainsway H7 coil system; 1200 pulses with the H7 coil helmet. Blinded using active/sham operator cards.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Real rTMS to the dlPFC using H1 Coil
Intervention Description
This will be delivered with the Brainsway H1 coil system; 3000 pulses with the H1 coil helmet. Blinded using active/sham operator cards.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Changes in Painfulness Thresholds Using the Quantitative Pain Testing (QST) Task, Which Utilizes Pressure From the Medoc Algomed Device (Measured in kiloPascals).
Description
Based on pilot data, the investigators expect an interaction between treatment (DLPFC or MPFC TMS) and time (Before vs. After rTMS) on reported painfulness using a quantitative sensory testing technique which determines the sensation and pain thresholds of pressure. Painfulness ratings will be assessed and reported before and after rTMS.
Time Frame
rTMS treatment visit, an average of 2 and a half hours
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Changes in Pain Tolerance Thresholds Using the Quantitative Pain Testing (QST) Task, Which Utilizes Pressure From the Medoc Algomed Device (Measured in kiloPascals).
Description
The investigators do not expect an interaction between treatment (DLPFC or MPFC TMS) and time (Before vs. After rTMS) on pain tolerance thresholds using a quantitative sensory testing technique which determines the sensation and pain thresholds of pressure. Pain tolerance ratings will be assessed and reported before and after rTMS.
Time Frame
rTMS treatment visit, an average of 2 and a half hours

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 18 - 65 (to maximize participation). Does not have a history of and is currently not experiencing chronic pain. Able to read and understand questionnaires and informed consent. Lives within 50 miles of the study site. Is not at elevated risk of seizure (i.e., does not have a history of seizures, is not currently prescribed medications known to lower seizure threshold). Does not have a history of traumatic brain injury, including a head injury that resulted in hospitalization, loss of consciousness for more than 10 minutes, or having ever been informed that they have an epidural, subdural, or subarachnoid hemorrhage. Exclusion Criteria: Any psychoactive illicit substance use (except marijuana and nicotine) within the last 30 days by self-report and urine drug screen. For marijuana, no use within the last seven days by verbal report and negative (or decreasing) urine THC levels. Meets DSM-V criteria for moderate substance dependence, current axis I disorders of major depression, panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post traumatic stress syndrome, bipolar affective disorder, schizophrenia, dissociate disorders, eating disorders, and any other psychotic disorder. Has current suicidal ideation or homicidal ideation. Has the need for maintenance or acute treatment with any psychoactive medication including anti-seizure medications and medications for ADHD. Females of childbearing potential who are pregnant (by urine HCG), nursing, or who are not using a reliable form of birth control. Has current charges pending for a violent crime (not including DUI related offenses). Suffers from chronic migraines.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Colleen Hanlon, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27157
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

H-coil TMS to Reduce Pain: A Pilot Study Evaluating Relative Efficacy of the H1 vs H7 Coil

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs