search
Back to results

HANGZHOU Solution in Bicuspid AS Undergoing TAVR

Primary Purpose

Aortic Stenosis, Aortic Stenosis With Bicuspid Valve

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
TAVR with Venus A plus using supra-annular sizing and THV implantation technique (Hangzhou solution)
TAVR with Venus A plus using annular sizing and THV implantation technique
Sponsored by
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Aortic Stenosis focused on measuring Transcatheter aortic valve replacement, Aortic Stenosis with Bicuspid Valve, supra-annular sizing

Eligibility Criteria

60 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 65 years
  • Age <65 years and age ≥ 60 years with high surgical risk after combing STS Risk Estimate, Katz activities of Daily Living, major Organ System Dysfunction and Procedure-Specific Impediment;
  • Severe, bicuspid aortic stenosis:
  • Mean gradient ≥40 mmHg
  • Maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/sec
  • Aortic valve area ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2)
  • NYHA classification ≥ II;
  • Type 0, type 1 (Sievers classification) by MDCT
  • Perimeter-derived annulus diameter ranges from 20.0 mm to 29.0 mm;
  • Transfemoral TAVR
  • The study patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Ethics Committee (EC) of the respective clinical site.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any contra-indication for Self-expanding bioprosthetic aortic valve deployment
  • Leukopenia (WBC < 3000 cell/mL), acute anemia (Hgb < 9 g/dL), Thrombocytopenia (Plt< 50,000 cell/mL).
  • Active sepsis, including active bacterial endocarditis with or without treatment;
  • Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month (30 days) before the intended treatment [(defined as: Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total CK elevation of CK-MB ≥ twice normal in the presence of MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation (WHO definition)].
  • Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 3 months (90 days) of the procedure.
  • Estimated life expectancy < 12 months (365 days) due to carcinomas, chronic liver disease, chronic renal disease or chronic end stage pulmonary disease.
  • Any Emergent surgery required before TAVR procedure.
  • A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following that cannot be adequately medicated:aspirin or heparin (HIT/HITTS) and bivalirudin, clopidogrel,Nitinol (titanium or nickel),contrast media
  • Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding that would preclude anticoagulation.
  • Subject refuses a blood transfusion.
  • Severe dementia (resulting in either inability to provide informed consent for the study/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits).
  • Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that in the opinion of the investigator precludes the subject from appropriate consent or adherence to the protocol required follow-up exams.
  • Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study (excluding registries).
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM with myocardium more than 1.5cm without an identifiable cause) with obstruction (HOCM).
  • Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
  • Severe mitral stenosis amenable to surgical replacement or repair.
  • Aortic valve type cannot be determined (Sievers classification).
  • Significant aortic disease, including marked tortuosity (hyperacute bend), aortic arch atheroma [especially if thick (> 5 mm), protruding or ulcerated] or narrowing (especially with calcification and surface irregularities) of the abdominal or thoracic aorta, severe"unfolding" and horizontal aorta(Annular Angulation>70°).
  • Ascending aorta diameter > 50 mm.
  • Aortic or iliofemoral vessel characteristics that would preclude safe placement of the introducer sheath.
  • Patient is considered high risk for TAVR by CT corelab, including coronary obstruction, annular rupture and other severe TAVR-Related complications.
  • Previous pacemaker implantation.

Sites / Locations

  • The First affiliated hospital of bengbu medical college
  • The General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army
  • Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
  • Xiamen University Affiliated Cardiovascular Hospital
  • Guangdong People's Hospital
  • Zhengzhou Cardiovascular Hospital
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
  • Hennan Provincial Chest Hospital
  • Union Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyRecruiting
  • The Second XIANGYA Hospital Of Central South University
  • Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
  • The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University
  • Shanxi Cardiovascular Hospital
  • tianjin Chest Hospital
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine.Recruiting
  • Ning Bo First HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Other

Arm Label

TAVR with Supra-annular sizing strategy

TAVR with Annulus based sizing strategy

Arm Description

Experimental: Supra-annular sizing strategy (Hangzhou Solution). Pre-dilation with balloon size (20/23/26mm Z-MED) just below the annular size. Waist sign with less than mild contrast regurgitation: Venus A plus Valve down size and Target implant depth 0-2mm. No waist sign and/or contrast regurgitation or unable to finish supra-annular sizing: annular sizing Venus A plus Valve with implant depth 4-6mm.

Control: Traditional sizing strategy (Annulus based sizing strategy). Pre-dilation with balloon size (20/23/26mm Z-MED) just below the annular size. Annular sizing Venus A plus Valve with implant depth 4-6mm.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Composite of all-cause mortality rate, disabling stroke rate, new permanent pacemaker implantation rate and moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation rate at 1 month
Composite of all-cause mortality, disabling stroke, new permanent pacemaker implantation and moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation at 1 month (per Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 [VARC-2] criteria)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Deaths (all-cause mortality) at 1 month
Number of deaths from any cause mortality at 1 month
Deaths (all-cause mortality) at 1 year
Deaths (all-cause mortality) at 2 years
Deaths (all-cause mortality) at 3 years
Deaths (all-cause mortality) at 4 years
Deaths (all-cause mortality) at 5 years
All Stroke (disabling and non-disabling) at 1 month
duration of a focal or global neurological deficit >24 h; OR <24 h if available neuroimaging documents a new haemorrhage or infarct; OR the neurological deficit results in death
All Stroke (disabling and non-disabling) at 1 year
All Stroke (disabling and non-disabling) at 2 years
All Stroke (disabling and non-disabling) at 3 years
All Stroke (disabling and non-disabling) at 4 years
All Stroke (disabling and non-disabling) at 5 years
Rate of New permanent pacemaker implantation at 1 month
Rate of New permanent pacemaker implantation (e.g. defibrillator, single vs. dual chamber, biventricular)
Rate of New permanent pacemaker implantation at 1 year
Rate of New permanent pacemaker implantation at 2 years
Rate of New permanent pacemaker implantation at 3 years
Rate of New permanent pacemaker implantation at 4 years
Rate of New permanent pacemaker implantation at 5 years
Rate of Moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation at 1 month
Moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation by transthoracic echocardiography, VARC-2 definition
Rate of Moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation at 1 year
Rate of Moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation at 2 years
Rate of Moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation at 3 years
Rate of Moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation at 4 years
Rate of Moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation at 5 years
Re-hospitalization for signs and symptoms of aortic valve disease and/or THV related complications at 1 month
Re-hospitalization for signs and symptoms of aortic valve disease and/or THV related complications by VARC-2 definition
Re-hospitalization for signs and symptoms of aortic valve disease and/or THV related complications at 1 year
Re-hospitalization for signs and symptoms of aortic valve disease and/or THV related complications at 2 years
Re-hospitalization for signs and symptoms of aortic valve disease and/or THV related complications at 3 years
Re-hospitalization for signs and symptoms of aortic valve disease and/or THV related complications at 4 years
Re-hospitalization for signs and symptoms of aortic valve disease and/or THV related complications at 5 years
Rate of alternating valve of prosthetic valve size during TAVR
Alternating valve of prosthetic valve size during TAVR (up size or down size)
Rate of valve malposition
Valve malposition (migration, embolization, and ectopic deployment)
Rate of TAV-in-TAV deployment
TAV-in-TAV deployment (An additional valve prosthesis is implanted within a previously implanted prosthesis because of suboptimal device position and/or function, during the index procedure)
Rate of device recapture or retrieval
Device recapture or retrieval peri-procedural
Rate of conversion to open surgery
Conversion to open surgery (Conversion to open sternotomy during the TAVR procedure secondary to any procedure-related complications)
Rate of unplanned use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for hemodynamic support at any time during the TAVR procedure
Unplanned use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for hemodynamic support at any time during the TAVR procedure
Rate of coronary obstruction
Coronary obstruction (Angiographic or echocardiographic evidence of a new, partial or complete, obstruction of a coronary ostium, either by the valve prosthesis itself, the native leaflets, calcifications, or dissection, occurring during the TAVR procedure)
Major vascular complications (VARC 2)
Major vascular complications by VARC 2 definition
Rate of annulus rupture
Procedural-related injuries occur in the region of the aortic root and the left ventricular outflow tract during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Rate of structural valve deterioration at 1 month
Structural valve deterioration (2017 EAPCI/ESC/EACTS definition)
Rate of structural valve deterioration at 1 year
Rate of structural valve deterioration at 2 years
Rate of structural valve deterioration at 3 years
Rate of structural valve deterioration at 4 years
Rate of structural valve deterioration at 5 years
New onset complete LBBB before discharge
New onset complete LBBB, by 2009 AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part III definition
New onset complete LBBB at 1 month
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) QoL Scores at Baseline
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) QoL Scores at 1 month
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) QoL Scores at 1 year
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) QoL Scores at 2 years
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) QoL Scores at 3 years
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) QoL Scores at 4 years
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) QoL Scores at 5 years
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at baseline
Measure Description: The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity:Class I: No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity Class II: Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity Class III: Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms Class IV: Severe limitations
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at 1 month
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at 1 year
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at 2 years
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at 3 years
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at 4 years
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at 5 years
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD) at baseline
Six-Minute Walk Test is a submaximal exercise test that entails measurement of distance walked over a span of 6 minutes. The 6-minute walk test distance (6 MWD) provides a measure for integrated global response of multiple cardiopulmonary and musculoskeletal systems involved in exercise.
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD) at 1 month
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD) at 1 year
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD) at 2 years
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD) at 3 years
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD) at 4 years
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD) at 5 years
Mini-Mental State Examination score at baseline
The MMSE is scored on a 30-point scale, with items that assess orientation (temporal and spatial; 10 points), memory (registration and recall; 6 points), attention/concentration (5 points), language (verbal and written; 8 points), and visuospatial function (1 point)
Mini-Mental State Examination score at 1 month
The MMSE is scored on a 30-point scale, with items that assess orientation (temporal and spatial; 10 points), memory (registration and recall; 6 points), attention/concentration (5 points), language (verbal and written; 8 points), and visuospatial function (1 point)
Mini-Mental State Examination score at 1 year
The MMSE is scored on a 30-point scale, with items that assess orientation (temporal and spatial; 10 points), memory (registration and recall; 6 points), attention/concentration (5 points), language (verbal and written; 8 points), and visuospatial function (1 point)
Mini-Mental State Examination score at 2 years
The MMSE is scored on a 30-point scale, with items that assess orientation (temporal and spatial; 10 points), memory (registration and recall; 6 points), attention/concentration (5 points), language (verbal and written; 8 points), and visuospatial function (1 point)
Mini-Mental State Examination score at 3 years
The MMSE is scored on a 30-point scale, with items that assess orientation (temporal and spatial; 10 points), memory (registration and recall; 6 points), attention/concentration (5 points), language (verbal and written; 8 points), and visuospatial function (1 point)
Mini-Mental State Examination score at 4 years
The MMSE is scored on a 30-point scale, with items that assess orientation (temporal and spatial; 10 points), memory (registration and recall; 6 points), attention/concentration (5 points), language (verbal and written; 8 points), and visuospatial function (1 point)
Mini-Mental State Examination score at 5 years
The MMSE is scored on a 30-point scale, with items that assess orientation (temporal and spatial; 10 points), memory (registration and recall; 6 points), attention/concentration (5 points), language (verbal and written; 8 points), and visuospatial function (1 point)
Modified Rankin Scale Score at baseline
MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE SCORE DESCRIPTIONS: 0- No symptoms at all; 1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6- Dead
Modified Rankin Scale Score at 1 month
MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE SCORE DESCRIPTIONS: 0- No symptoms at all; 1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6- Dead
Modified Rankin Scale Score at 1 year
MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE SCORE DESCRIPTIONS: 0- No symptoms at all; 1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6- Dead
Modified Rankin Scale Score at 2 years
MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE SCORE DESCRIPTIONS: 0- No symptoms at all; 1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6- Dead
Modified Rankin Scale Score at 3 years
MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE SCORE DESCRIPTIONS: 0- No symptoms at all; 1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6- Dead
Modified Rankin Scale Score at 4 years
MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE SCORE DESCRIPTIONS: 0- No symptoms at all; 1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6- Dead
Modified Rankin Scale Score at 5 years
MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE SCORE DESCRIPTIONS: 0- No symptoms at all; 1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6- Dead

Full Information

First Posted
January 20, 2021
Last Updated
May 28, 2021
Sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Collaborators
Venus MedTech (HangZhou) Inc., First Affiliated Hospital Bengbu Medical College, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Xiamen University Affiliated Cardiovascular Hospital, The Second People's Hospital of GuangDong Province, Zhengzhou Cardiovascular Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Hennan Provincial Chest Hospital, Union Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Central South University, Northern Jiangsu Province People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Shanxi Cardiovascular Hospital, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Ning Bo First Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04722796
Brief Title
HANGZHOU Solution in Bicuspid AS Undergoing TAVR
Official Title
HANGZHOU Solution for Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement by Using Supra-annular Structure Based Balloon Sizing Strategy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
April 12, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 1, 2028 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Collaborators
Venus MedTech (HangZhou) Inc., First Affiliated Hospital Bengbu Medical College, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Xiamen University Affiliated Cardiovascular Hospital, The Second People's Hospital of GuangDong Province, Zhengzhou Cardiovascular Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Hennan Provincial Chest Hospital, Union Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Central South University, Northern Jiangsu Province People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Shanxi Cardiovascular Hospital, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Ning Bo First Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To compare supra-annular sizing and THV implantation technique (Hangzhou solution) versus annular sizing and THV implantation technique (control group) in bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with self-expanding valves (SEVs): a randomized superiority trial
Detailed Description
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a favorable alternative for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) patients from low to high surgical risk. BAV patients treated with TAVR had similar 30-day mortality as well as stroke and new pacemaker implantation rates compared to TAV subjects, but carried higher risk of moderate/severe PVL, conversion to surgery and device failure. Event rates significantly decreased with the use of new-generation devices, but TAVR still showed better procedural results in TAV compared to BAV. Clinical experience in China suggests bicuspid aortic valves and heavy calcium burden are more common among TAVR candidates. Morphological characteristics at supra-annular structure (from annulus to the level of sinotubular junction) are quite complex in bicuspid AS, especially concomitant with heavily calcified leaflets. Because only two leaflet hinge points provide the definition of the annulus plane, current CT-based annulus measurements might not be accurate under these circumstances. From previous single center clinical practice, "waist sign" above the annulus during balloon aortic valvuloplasty in TAVR was often observed in patients with bicuspid AS, indicating that the supra-annular structure may serve a key role in anchoring the THV. Therefore, we developed a balloon based supra-annular sizing strategy (Hangzhou Solution) for SEV implantation in bicuspid AS. From our single center experience, the device success rate and pacemaker implantation rate were relatively low. The aim of this study is to compare supra-annular sizing and THV implantation technique (Hangzhou solution) versus annular sizing and THV implantation technique (control group) in bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with self-expanding valves (SEVs).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Aortic Stenosis, Aortic Stenosis With Bicuspid Valve
Keywords
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement, Aortic Stenosis with Bicuspid Valve, supra-annular sizing

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The participants and ourcome assessor are blind to treatment groups.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
508 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
TAVR with Supra-annular sizing strategy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Experimental: Supra-annular sizing strategy (Hangzhou Solution). Pre-dilation with balloon size (20/23/26mm Z-MED) just below the annular size. Waist sign with less than mild contrast regurgitation: Venus A plus Valve down size and Target implant depth 0-2mm. No waist sign and/or contrast regurgitation or unable to finish supra-annular sizing: annular sizing Venus A plus Valve with implant depth 4-6mm.
Arm Title
TAVR with Annulus based sizing strategy
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Control: Traditional sizing strategy (Annulus based sizing strategy). Pre-dilation with balloon size (20/23/26mm Z-MED) just below the annular size. Annular sizing Venus A plus Valve with implant depth 4-6mm.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
TAVR with Venus A plus using supra-annular sizing and THV implantation technique (Hangzhou solution)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Hangzhou solution
Intervention Description
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with Venus A plus using supra-annular sizing and THV implantation technique (Hangzhou solution)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
TAVR with Venus A plus using annular sizing and THV implantation technique
Other Intervention Name(s)
Traditional sizing strategy (Annulus based sizing strategy)
Intervention Description
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with Venus A plus using annular sizing and THV implantation technique (Traditional sizing strategy)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Composite of all-cause mortality rate, disabling stroke rate, new permanent pacemaker implantation rate and moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation rate at 1 month
Description
Composite of all-cause mortality, disabling stroke, new permanent pacemaker implantation and moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation at 1 month (per Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 [VARC-2] criteria)
Time Frame
1 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Deaths (all-cause mortality) at 1 month
Description
Number of deaths from any cause mortality at 1 month
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Deaths (all-cause mortality) at 1 year
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Deaths (all-cause mortality) at 2 years
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Deaths (all-cause mortality) at 3 years
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Deaths (all-cause mortality) at 4 years
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Deaths (all-cause mortality) at 5 years
Time Frame
5 years
Title
All Stroke (disabling and non-disabling) at 1 month
Description
duration of a focal or global neurological deficit >24 h; OR <24 h if available neuroimaging documents a new haemorrhage or infarct; OR the neurological deficit results in death
Time Frame
1 month
Title
All Stroke (disabling and non-disabling) at 1 year
Time Frame
1 year
Title
All Stroke (disabling and non-disabling) at 2 years
Time Frame
2 years
Title
All Stroke (disabling and non-disabling) at 3 years
Time Frame
3 years
Title
All Stroke (disabling and non-disabling) at 4 years
Time Frame
4 years
Title
All Stroke (disabling and non-disabling) at 5 years
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Rate of New permanent pacemaker implantation at 1 month
Description
Rate of New permanent pacemaker implantation (e.g. defibrillator, single vs. dual chamber, biventricular)
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Rate of New permanent pacemaker implantation at 1 year
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Rate of New permanent pacemaker implantation at 2 years
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Rate of New permanent pacemaker implantation at 3 years
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Rate of New permanent pacemaker implantation at 4 years
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Rate of New permanent pacemaker implantation at 5 years
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Rate of Moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation at 1 month
Description
Moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation by transthoracic echocardiography, VARC-2 definition
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Rate of Moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation at 1 year
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Rate of Moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation at 2 years
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Rate of Moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation at 3 years
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Rate of Moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation at 4 years
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Rate of Moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation at 5 years
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Re-hospitalization for signs and symptoms of aortic valve disease and/or THV related complications at 1 month
Description
Re-hospitalization for signs and symptoms of aortic valve disease and/or THV related complications by VARC-2 definition
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Re-hospitalization for signs and symptoms of aortic valve disease and/or THV related complications at 1 year
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Re-hospitalization for signs and symptoms of aortic valve disease and/or THV related complications at 2 years
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Re-hospitalization for signs and symptoms of aortic valve disease and/or THV related complications at 3 years
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Re-hospitalization for signs and symptoms of aortic valve disease and/or THV related complications at 4 years
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Re-hospitalization for signs and symptoms of aortic valve disease and/or THV related complications at 5 years
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Rate of alternating valve of prosthetic valve size during TAVR
Description
Alternating valve of prosthetic valve size during TAVR (up size or down size)
Time Frame
peri-procedural
Title
Rate of valve malposition
Description
Valve malposition (migration, embolization, and ectopic deployment)
Time Frame
peri-procedural
Title
Rate of TAV-in-TAV deployment
Description
TAV-in-TAV deployment (An additional valve prosthesis is implanted within a previously implanted prosthesis because of suboptimal device position and/or function, during the index procedure)
Time Frame
peri-procedural
Title
Rate of device recapture or retrieval
Description
Device recapture or retrieval peri-procedural
Time Frame
peri-procedural
Title
Rate of conversion to open surgery
Description
Conversion to open surgery (Conversion to open sternotomy during the TAVR procedure secondary to any procedure-related complications)
Time Frame
peri-procedural
Title
Rate of unplanned use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for hemodynamic support at any time during the TAVR procedure
Description
Unplanned use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for hemodynamic support at any time during the TAVR procedure
Time Frame
peri-procedural
Title
Rate of coronary obstruction
Description
Coronary obstruction (Angiographic or echocardiographic evidence of a new, partial or complete, obstruction of a coronary ostium, either by the valve prosthesis itself, the native leaflets, calcifications, or dissection, occurring during the TAVR procedure)
Time Frame
peri-procedural
Title
Major vascular complications (VARC 2)
Description
Major vascular complications by VARC 2 definition
Time Frame
peri-procedural
Title
Rate of annulus rupture
Description
Procedural-related injuries occur in the region of the aortic root and the left ventricular outflow tract during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Time Frame
peri-procedural
Title
Rate of structural valve deterioration at 1 month
Description
Structural valve deterioration (2017 EAPCI/ESC/EACTS definition)
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Rate of structural valve deterioration at 1 year
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Rate of structural valve deterioration at 2 years
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Rate of structural valve deterioration at 3 years
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Rate of structural valve deterioration at 4 years
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Rate of structural valve deterioration at 5 years
Time Frame
5 years
Title
New onset complete LBBB before discharge
Description
New onset complete LBBB, by 2009 AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part III definition
Time Frame
before discharge
Title
New onset complete LBBB at 1 month
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) QoL Scores at Baseline
Description
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) QoL Scores at 1 month
Description
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) QoL Scores at 1 year
Description
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) QoL Scores at 2 years
Description
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) QoL Scores at 3 years
Description
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) QoL Scores at 4 years
Description
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) QoL Scores at 5 years
Description
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Time Frame
5 years
Title
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at baseline
Description
Measure Description: The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity:Class I: No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity Class II: Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity Class III: Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms Class IV: Severe limitations
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at 1 month
Time Frame
1 month
Title
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at 1 year
Time Frame
1 year
Title
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at 2 years
Time Frame
2 years
Title
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at 3 years
Time Frame
3 years
Title
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at 4 years
Time Frame
4 years
Title
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at 5 years
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD) at baseline
Description
Six-Minute Walk Test is a submaximal exercise test that entails measurement of distance walked over a span of 6 minutes. The 6-minute walk test distance (6 MWD) provides a measure for integrated global response of multiple cardiopulmonary and musculoskeletal systems involved in exercise.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD) at 1 month
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD) at 1 year
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD) at 2 years
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD) at 3 years
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD) at 4 years
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD) at 5 years
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Mini-Mental State Examination score at baseline
Description
The MMSE is scored on a 30-point scale, with items that assess orientation (temporal and spatial; 10 points), memory (registration and recall; 6 points), attention/concentration (5 points), language (verbal and written; 8 points), and visuospatial function (1 point)
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Mini-Mental State Examination score at 1 month
Description
The MMSE is scored on a 30-point scale, with items that assess orientation (temporal and spatial; 10 points), memory (registration and recall; 6 points), attention/concentration (5 points), language (verbal and written; 8 points), and visuospatial function (1 point)
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Mini-Mental State Examination score at 1 year
Description
The MMSE is scored on a 30-point scale, with items that assess orientation (temporal and spatial; 10 points), memory (registration and recall; 6 points), attention/concentration (5 points), language (verbal and written; 8 points), and visuospatial function (1 point)
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Mini-Mental State Examination score at 2 years
Description
The MMSE is scored on a 30-point scale, with items that assess orientation (temporal and spatial; 10 points), memory (registration and recall; 6 points), attention/concentration (5 points), language (verbal and written; 8 points), and visuospatial function (1 point)
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Mini-Mental State Examination score at 3 years
Description
The MMSE is scored on a 30-point scale, with items that assess orientation (temporal and spatial; 10 points), memory (registration and recall; 6 points), attention/concentration (5 points), language (verbal and written; 8 points), and visuospatial function (1 point)
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Mini-Mental State Examination score at 4 years
Description
The MMSE is scored on a 30-point scale, with items that assess orientation (temporal and spatial; 10 points), memory (registration and recall; 6 points), attention/concentration (5 points), language (verbal and written; 8 points), and visuospatial function (1 point)
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Mini-Mental State Examination score at 5 years
Description
The MMSE is scored on a 30-point scale, with items that assess orientation (temporal and spatial; 10 points), memory (registration and recall; 6 points), attention/concentration (5 points), language (verbal and written; 8 points), and visuospatial function (1 point)
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Modified Rankin Scale Score at baseline
Description
MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE SCORE DESCRIPTIONS: 0- No symptoms at all; 1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6- Dead
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Modified Rankin Scale Score at 1 month
Description
MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE SCORE DESCRIPTIONS: 0- No symptoms at all; 1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6- Dead
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Modified Rankin Scale Score at 1 year
Description
MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE SCORE DESCRIPTIONS: 0- No symptoms at all; 1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6- Dead
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Modified Rankin Scale Score at 2 years
Description
MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE SCORE DESCRIPTIONS: 0- No symptoms at all; 1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6- Dead
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Modified Rankin Scale Score at 3 years
Description
MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE SCORE DESCRIPTIONS: 0- No symptoms at all; 1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6- Dead
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Modified Rankin Scale Score at 4 years
Description
MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE SCORE DESCRIPTIONS: 0- No symptoms at all; 1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6- Dead
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Modified Rankin Scale Score at 5 years
Description
MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE SCORE DESCRIPTIONS: 0- No symptoms at all; 1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6- Dead
Time Frame
5 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Gender Based
Yes
Gender Eligibility Description
Age ≥ 65 years; Age <65 years and age ≥ 60 years with high surgical risk after combing STS Risk Estimate, Katz activities of Daily Living, major Organ System Dysfunction and Procedure-Specific Impediment;
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 65 years Age <65 years and age ≥ 60 years with high surgical risk after combing STS Risk Estimate, Katz activities of Daily Living, major Organ System Dysfunction and Procedure-Specific Impediment; Severe, bicuspid aortic stenosis: Mean gradient ≥40 mmHg Maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/sec Aortic valve area ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2) NYHA classification ≥ II; Type 0, type 1 (Sievers classification) by MDCT Perimeter-derived annulus diameter ranges from 20.0 mm to 29.0 mm; Transfemoral TAVR The study patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Ethics Committee (EC) of the respective clinical site. Exclusion Criteria: Any contra-indication for Self-expanding bioprosthetic aortic valve deployment Leukopenia (WBC < 3000 cell/mL), acute anemia (Hgb < 9 g/dL), Thrombocytopenia (Plt< 50,000 cell/mL). Active sepsis, including active bacterial endocarditis with or without treatment; Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month (30 days) before the intended treatment [(defined as: Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total CK elevation of CK-MB ≥ twice normal in the presence of MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation (WHO definition)]. Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 3 months (90 days) of the procedure. Estimated life expectancy < 12 months (365 days) due to carcinomas, chronic liver disease, chronic renal disease or chronic end stage pulmonary disease. Any Emergent surgery required before TAVR procedure. A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following that cannot be adequately medicated:aspirin or heparin (HIT/HITTS) and bivalirudin, clopidogrel,Nitinol (titanium or nickel),contrast media Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding that would preclude anticoagulation. Subject refuses a blood transfusion. Severe dementia (resulting in either inability to provide informed consent for the study/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits). Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that in the opinion of the investigator precludes the subject from appropriate consent or adherence to the protocol required follow-up exams. Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study (excluding registries). Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM with myocardium more than 1.5cm without an identifiable cause) with obstruction (HOCM). Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation. Severe mitral stenosis amenable to surgical replacement or repair. Aortic valve type cannot be determined (Sievers classification). Significant aortic disease, including marked tortuosity (hyperacute bend), aortic arch atheroma [especially if thick (> 5 mm), protruding or ulcerated] or narrowing (especially with calcification and surface irregularities) of the abdominal or thoracic aorta, severe"unfolding" and horizontal aorta(Annular Angulation>70°). Ascending aorta diameter > 50 mm. Aortic or iliofemoral vessel characteristics that would preclude safe placement of the introducer sheath. Patient is considered high risk for TAVR by CT corelab, including coronary obstruction, annular rupture and other severe TAVR-Related complications. Previous pacemaker implantation.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jian'an Wang, PhD, MD
Phone
+86057187783777
Email
wja@zju.edu.cn
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jian'an Wang, PhD, MD
Organizational Affiliation
2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The First affiliated hospital of bengbu medical college
City
Bengbu
State/Province
Anhui
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shili Wu
Email
chinawsl@126.com
Facility Name
The General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army
City
Beijing
State/Province
Beijing
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yundai Chen
Facility Name
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
City
Fuzhou
State/Province
Fujian
ZIP/Postal Code
350001
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lianglong Cheng
Email
lianglongchen@126.com
Facility Name
Xiamen University Affiliated Cardiovascular Hospital
City
Xiamen
State/Province
Fujian
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yan Wang
Email
wy@medmail.com.cn
Facility Name
Guangdong People's Hospital
City
Guangzhou
State/Province
Guangdong
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jianfang Luo
Email
jianfangluo@sina.com
Facility Name
Zhengzhou Cardiovascular Hospital
City
Zhengzhou
State/Province
Henan
ZIP/Postal Code
450016
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shenwei Zhang
Email
zhangsw214@163.com
Facility Name
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
City
Zhengzhou
State/Province
Henan
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jianzeng Dong
Email
jz_dong@126.com
Facility Name
Hennan Provincial Chest Hospital
City
Zhengzhou
State/Province
Hennan
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yiqiang Yuan
Email
zzqyuanyiqiang@126.com
Facility Name
Union Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology
City
Wuhan
State/Province
Hubei
ZIP/Postal Code
430022
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Xiaoke Shang
Email
14236338@qq.com
Facility Name
The Second XIANGYA Hospital Of Central South University
City
Changsha
State/Province
Hunan
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Zhengfei Fang
Email
fangzhenfei@csu.edu.cn
Facility Name
Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital
City
Yangzhou
State/Province
Jiangsu
ZIP/Postal Code
225001
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shenghu He
Email
yzhshys@163.com
Facility Name
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
City
Nanchang
State/Province
Jiangxi
ZIP/Postal Code
330006
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Xiaoping Peng
Email
cdyfypxp@163.com
Facility Name
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
City
Nanchang
State/Province
Jiangxi
ZIP/Postal Code
330006
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yanqing Wu
Email
wuyanqing01@sina.com
Facility Name
The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University
City
Qingdao
State/Province
Shandong
ZIP/Postal Code
266000
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lei Jiang
Email
anjianer@126.com
Facility Name
Shanxi Cardiovascular Hospital
City
Taiyuan
State/Province
Shanxi
ZIP/Postal Code
030024
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jian An
Email
anjianer@126.com
Facility Name
tianjin Chest Hospital
City
Tianjing
State/Province
Tianjing
ZIP/Postal Code
300222
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nan Jiang
Email
tjxkcs2@163.com
Facility Name
The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine.
City
Hangzhou
State/Province
Zhejiang
ZIP/Postal Code
310006
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jian'an Wang, MD
Email
wja@zju.edu.cn
Facility Name
Ning Bo First Hospital
City
Ningbo
State/Province
Zhejiang
ZIP/Postal Code
315010
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Xiaomin Cheng
Email
chxmin@hotmail.com

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
undecided

Learn more about this trial

HANGZHOU Solution in Bicuspid AS Undergoing TAVR

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs