search
Back to results

Happy Hands - an E-self-management Intervention for People With Hand Osteoarthritis (HappyHands)

Primary Purpose

Hand Osteoarthritis

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Norway
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
e-self-management intervention (Happy Hands app)
Treatment as usual
Sponsored by
Diakonhjemmet Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hand Osteoarthritis

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • People diagnosed with hand osteoarthritis
  • Possessing a smartphone

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cognitive deficits
  • are scheduled for hand surgery within the next 3 months
  • do not talk or understand Norwegian,
  • have uncontrolled serious comorbidities

Sites / Locations

  • Arendal sykehusRecruiting
  • Haukeland UniversitetssykehusRecruiting
  • Aurskog Fysikalske InstituttRecruiting
  • NordlandssykehusetRecruiting
  • Lærdal SjukehusRecruiting
  • Finnmarkssykehuset, Kirkenes SykehusRecruiting
  • Kongsvinger sykehusRecruiting
  • Kristiansand sykehusRecruiting
  • Levanger sykehusRecruiting
  • Revmatismesykehuset LillehammerRecruiting
  • Meråker kurbadRecruiting
  • Nøtterøy FysioterapiRecruiting
  • Diakonhjemmet HospitalRecruiting
  • Humana HelseRecruiting
  • Universitetssykehuset Nord-NorgeRecruiting
  • St.Olavs HospitalRecruiting
  • Helsehuset StokkeRecruiting
  • Vikersund badRecruiting
  • Ålesund sjukehusRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

e-self-management intervention

Treatment as usual

Arm Description

12-week e-self-management intervention consisting of exercise videos and videos with information about recommended treatment

Treatment as usual

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

OMERACT/OARSI responder criteria
Combined score of change in pain, function and disease activity. Patients are categorized into responders or non-responders according to the following: High improvement on pain or function: ≥50% improvement + absolute change of ≥2 in pain (numeric rating scale, NRS 0-10), OR ≥50% improvement + absolute change of ≥0.6 in function (Measure of Activity Performance of the Hand, MAP-Hand) Improvement in at least two of the three following: ≥20% improvement + absolute change of ≥1 in pain (NRS) ≥20% improvement + absolute change of ≥0.3 in function (MAP-Hand) ≥20% improvement + absolute change of ≥1 in global assessment of disease activity (NRS)

Secondary Outcome Measures

OMERACT/OARSI responder criteria long-term
Combined score of change in pain, function and disease activity. Patients are categorized into responders or non-responders according to the following: High improvement on pain or function: ≥50% improvement + absolute change of ≥2 in pain (numeric rating scale, NRS 0-10), OR ≥50% improvement + absolute change of ≥0.6 in function (Measure of Activity Performance of the Hand, MAP-Hand) Improvement in at least two of the three following: ≥20% improvement + absolute change of ≥1 in pain (NRS) ≥20% improvement + absolute change of ≥0.3 in function (MAP-Hand) ≥20% improvement + absolute change of ≥1 in global assessment of disease activity (NRS)
Pain intensity
Numeric rating scale (0-10), 0=no pain, 10= worst possible pain
Pain intensity (intervention group)
Numeric rating scale (0-10), 0=no pain, 10= worst possible pain, measured after each exercise session
Stiffness
Numeric rating scale (0-10),0=no stiffness, 10= worst possible stiffness
Stiffness (intervention group)
Numeric rating scale (0-10),0=no stiffness, 10= worst possible stiffness, measured after each exercise session
Disease activity
Numeric rating scale (0-10), 0=no disease activity; 10=high disease activity
Disease activity (intervention group)
Numeric rating scale (0-10), 0=no disease activity; 10=high disease activity, measured each month in the intervention period
Measure of Activity performance (MAP-Hand)
18 questions conserning activity performance of the hand (1=no problem, 4=cannot do the activity), mean score from 1-4.
Measure of Activity performance (MAP-Hand) (intervention group)
18 questions conserning activity performance of the hand (1=no problem, 4=cannot do the activity), mean score from 1-4.
Grip strength
Measured with Jamar dynamometer (kg), mean of two measures for each hand
Quality indicators for hand osteoarthritis treatment
Quality indicators based on the OA-QI questionnaire, adopted to fit the treatment recommendations of hand osteoarthritis. 16 questions answered with yes, no or not appriopriate/do not know. Measured as pass rate.
eHealth literacy
Measured with the eHEALS questionnaire, Norwegian version. 8 questions conserning eHealth literacy (strongly disagree - strongly agree)
Number of painful joints
Number of painful joints on left and right hand
Change in condition
Global rating of change scale, likert scale with 7 answer options from much better to much worse
Change in condition (intervention group)
Global rating of change scale, likert scale with 7 answer options from much better to much worse
Motivation for hand exercises
Numeric rating scale (0-10), 0=no motivation, 10=best motivation
Health-related quality of life
Measured with EQ5D-5L, 5 questions used to calculate an utility score (0-1, 1= best health), assessed as a total score across all timepoints
Health care utilization
Costs related to self-reported healthcare use in primary and secondary health care. Patients will be asked if they have been seeking healthcare (yes/no), if yes, they will be asked to specify type of healthcare use and time used.
Medication use
Medication use will be self-reported by the patient
Adverse events
Number of adverse events, serious adverse events, and withdrawals because of adverse events. Will be self-reported
Sickleave
Sickleave due to hand osteoarthritis will be self-reported
Fatigue
Fatigue last week measured on an 11-point NRS (0=no fatigue, 10=worst possible fatigue)
Patient satisfaction with care
1 item with five point response options ranging from "Very satisfied" to "Very dissatisfied", higher value indicate better outcome
System Usability Scale (SUS)
Questionnaire assessing the usability of the Happy Hands app, 10 questions (strongly agree - strongly disagree), index from 0-100 where 100 is best score
Adherence to exercise
Number of exercises performed (0-36 exercise sessions), collected from the app
Adherence to exercise long-term
Number of exercises performed after completion of intervention, collected from the app
Adherence to informational videos
Number of informational videos watched, collected from the app
Adherence to informational videos long-term
Number of informational videos watched, collected from the app
Arthritis self-efficacy scale
Measured by Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES): comprises 11 items addressing pain and symptoms (scored on a 5-point scale ranging from not confident at all to very confident). The scores are summed up to a 0-100 score where higher score indicate better self-efficacy.
Demographic variable
Age, gender, other painful joints, sivil status, education, previous hand surgery, previous treatment, comorbidities

Full Information

First Posted
October 3, 2022
Last Updated
July 31, 2023
Sponsor
Diakonhjemmet Hospital
Collaborators
The Dam Foundation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05568875
Brief Title
Happy Hands - an E-self-management Intervention for People With Hand Osteoarthritis
Acronym
HappyHands
Official Title
Happy Hands - an E-self-management Intervention for People With Hand Osteoarthritis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 8, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 31, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Diakonhjemmet Hospital
Collaborators
The Dam Foundation

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The main aim of this project is to assess the effect, cost-effectiveness and user experiences with using an e-self-management intervention in addition to treatment as usual compared to treatment as usual alone in patients with hand osteoarthritis. The study is an RCT comprising approx 400 participants with hand osteoarthritis recruited from primary and secondary healthcare in all four health regions in Norway.
Detailed Description
Hand osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent rheumatic joint disease, and the number of people living with debilitating hand OA will continue to rise in the coming decades due to increased life expectancy. Research shows that patients with hand OA have poor access to recommended treatment, and in Norway, they are increasingly referred to surgical consultation before having received recommended first-line treatment. Thus, there is a need to develop easily viable models of care for patients with hand OA that make recommended treatment available across different healthcare levels. Our hypotheses are that an e-self-management intervention for people with hand OA will improve pain and function and be more cost-effective compared to treatment as usual, and that this app can easily be implemented in both specialist and primary healthcare. The hypotheses will be tested and explored in a randomized controlled trial, with a qualitative study nested within this trial. The main research questions are: To evaluate whether a 12-week e-self-management intervention is more effective in improving pain and function (according to the OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria26) compared to usual care in patients with hand OA (randomized controlled trial). To determine the cost-effectiveness of the e-self-management intervention compared to usual care after 6 months (randomized controlled trial). To explore patients' experience of barriers and facilitators for adopted and continued use of a e-self-management intervention for treatment of hand OA (qualitative interviews). Secondary research questions will also be assessed. Approx 400 patients will be recruited in this multicenter randomized controlled trial where patients with hand OA are allocated to either usual care or a 12-week e-self-management intervention delivered through a smartphone app (the HAPPY Hands app). Outcome measures are collected at baseline, 3 months (=end of intervention) and 6 months

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hand Osteoarthritis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Multicenter randomized controlled trial with a qualitative study nested within the trial
Masking
Investigator
Masking Description
Only investigator conduction the analyses will be blinded to group allocation
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
400 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
e-self-management intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
12-week e-self-management intervention consisting of exercise videos and videos with information about recommended treatment
Arm Title
Treatment as usual
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Treatment as usual
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
e-self-management intervention (Happy Hands app)
Intervention Description
The 12-week intervention consists of 30 short informational videos addressing the themes prioritized by the patient research partners. These themes are further operationalized into the following categories: "Information on hand OA", "Hand exercises", "Use of assistive devices and orthoses", "Medication and surgical alternatives", and "Self-management of the disease". Additionally, the intervention includes a hand exercise program consisting of 8 videos providing instructions on warm up, exercises to improve mobility, strength and coordination, and a stretching exercise. The intervention group will additionally receive treatment as usual.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Treatment as usual
Intervention Description
Treatment as usual may vary from no treatment at all to referral to a patient education group program, or occupational therapy.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
OMERACT/OARSI responder criteria
Description
Combined score of change in pain, function and disease activity. Patients are categorized into responders or non-responders according to the following: High improvement on pain or function: ≥50% improvement + absolute change of ≥2 in pain (numeric rating scale, NRS 0-10), OR ≥50% improvement + absolute change of ≥0.6 in function (Measure of Activity Performance of the Hand, MAP-Hand) Improvement in at least two of the three following: ≥20% improvement + absolute change of ≥1 in pain (NRS) ≥20% improvement + absolute change of ≥0.3 in function (MAP-Hand) ≥20% improvement + absolute change of ≥1 in global assessment of disease activity (NRS)
Time Frame
Baseline and 3 months follow-up
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
OMERACT/OARSI responder criteria long-term
Description
Combined score of change in pain, function and disease activity. Patients are categorized into responders or non-responders according to the following: High improvement on pain or function: ≥50% improvement + absolute change of ≥2 in pain (numeric rating scale, NRS 0-10), OR ≥50% improvement + absolute change of ≥0.6 in function (Measure of Activity Performance of the Hand, MAP-Hand) Improvement in at least two of the three following: ≥20% improvement + absolute change of ≥1 in pain (NRS) ≥20% improvement + absolute change of ≥0.3 in function (MAP-Hand) ≥20% improvement + absolute change of ≥1 in global assessment of disease activity (NRS)
Time Frame
3 and 6 months follow-up
Title
Pain intensity
Description
Numeric rating scale (0-10), 0=no pain, 10= worst possible pain
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 and 6 months follow-up
Title
Pain intensity (intervention group)
Description
Numeric rating scale (0-10), 0=no pain, 10= worst possible pain, measured after each exercise session
Time Frame
3 times weekly in the intervention period (12 weeks)
Title
Stiffness
Description
Numeric rating scale (0-10),0=no stiffness, 10= worst possible stiffness
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 and 6 months follow-up
Title
Stiffness (intervention group)
Description
Numeric rating scale (0-10),0=no stiffness, 10= worst possible stiffness, measured after each exercise session
Time Frame
3 times weekly in the intervention period (12 weeks)
Title
Disease activity
Description
Numeric rating scale (0-10), 0=no disease activity; 10=high disease activity
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 and 6 months follow-up
Title
Disease activity (intervention group)
Description
Numeric rating scale (0-10), 0=no disease activity; 10=high disease activity, measured each month in the intervention period
Time Frame
Monthly in the intervention period (12 weeks)
Title
Measure of Activity performance (MAP-Hand)
Description
18 questions conserning activity performance of the hand (1=no problem, 4=cannot do the activity), mean score from 1-4.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 and 6 months follow-up
Title
Measure of Activity performance (MAP-Hand) (intervention group)
Description
18 questions conserning activity performance of the hand (1=no problem, 4=cannot do the activity), mean score from 1-4.
Time Frame
Monthly in the intervention period (12 weeks)
Title
Grip strength
Description
Measured with Jamar dynamometer (kg), mean of two measures for each hand
Time Frame
Baseline and 3 months follow-up
Title
Quality indicators for hand osteoarthritis treatment
Description
Quality indicators based on the OA-QI questionnaire, adopted to fit the treatment recommendations of hand osteoarthritis. 16 questions answered with yes, no or not appriopriate/do not know. Measured as pass rate.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 and 6 months follow-up
Title
eHealth literacy
Description
Measured with the eHEALS questionnaire, Norwegian version. 8 questions conserning eHealth literacy (strongly disagree - strongly agree)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Number of painful joints
Description
Number of painful joints on left and right hand
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in condition
Description
Global rating of change scale, likert scale with 7 answer options from much better to much worse
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 and 6 months follow-up
Title
Change in condition (intervention group)
Description
Global rating of change scale, likert scale with 7 answer options from much better to much worse
Time Frame
Monthly in the intervention group (3 months)
Title
Motivation for hand exercises
Description
Numeric rating scale (0-10), 0=no motivation, 10=best motivation
Time Frame
Baseline and 3 monhts follow-up
Title
Health-related quality of life
Description
Measured with EQ5D-5L, 5 questions used to calculate an utility score (0-1, 1= best health), assessed as a total score across all timepoints
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 and 6 months follow-up
Title
Health care utilization
Description
Costs related to self-reported healthcare use in primary and secondary health care. Patients will be asked if they have been seeking healthcare (yes/no), if yes, they will be asked to specify type of healthcare use and time used.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 and 6 months follow-up
Title
Medication use
Description
Medication use will be self-reported by the patient
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 and 6 months follow-up
Title
Adverse events
Description
Number of adverse events, serious adverse events, and withdrawals because of adverse events. Will be self-reported
Time Frame
3 and 6 months follow-up
Title
Sickleave
Description
Sickleave due to hand osteoarthritis will be self-reported
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 and 6 months follow-up
Title
Fatigue
Description
Fatigue last week measured on an 11-point NRS (0=no fatigue, 10=worst possible fatigue)
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 and 6 months follow-up
Title
Patient satisfaction with care
Description
1 item with five point response options ranging from "Very satisfied" to "Very dissatisfied", higher value indicate better outcome
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 and 6 months follow-up
Title
System Usability Scale (SUS)
Description
Questionnaire assessing the usability of the Happy Hands app, 10 questions (strongly agree - strongly disagree), index from 0-100 where 100 is best score
Time Frame
3 month follow-up
Title
Adherence to exercise
Description
Number of exercises performed (0-36 exercise sessions), collected from the app
Time Frame
3 times weekly during the intervention period (3 months)
Title
Adherence to exercise long-term
Description
Number of exercises performed after completion of intervention, collected from the app
Time Frame
3 and 6 months follow-up
Title
Adherence to informational videos
Description
Number of informational videos watched, collected from the app
Time Frame
During the intervention period (3 months)
Title
Adherence to informational videos long-term
Description
Number of informational videos watched, collected from the app
Time Frame
3 and 6 months follow-up
Title
Arthritis self-efficacy scale
Description
Measured by Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES): comprises 11 items addressing pain and symptoms (scored on a 5-point scale ranging from not confident at all to very confident). The scores are summed up to a 0-100 score where higher score indicate better self-efficacy.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Demographic variable
Description
Age, gender, other painful joints, sivil status, education, previous hand surgery, previous treatment, comorbidities
Time Frame
Baseline

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Gender Based
Yes
Gender Eligibility Description
Most women
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: People diagnosed with hand osteoarthritis Possessing a smartphone Exclusion Criteria: cognitive deficits are scheduled for hand surgery within the next 3 months do not talk or understand Norwegian, have uncontrolled serious comorbidities
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Anne Therese Tveter, PhD
Phone
+4791115550
Email
a.t.tveter@medisin.uio.no
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Kristine A Fjeldstad, MSc
Phone
+4795854608
Email
KristineAasness.Fjeldstad@diakonsyk.no
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anne Therese Tveter, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Diakonhjemmet Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Arendal sykehus
City
Arendal
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marit Bjerge
Facility Name
Haukeland Universitetssykehus
City
Bergen
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jorunn Ellingsen
Facility Name
Aurskog Fysikalske Institutt
City
Bjørkelangen
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rikke Munk Killingmo
Facility Name
Nordlandssykehuset
City
Bodø
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Therese Andreassen
Facility Name
Lærdal Sjukehus
City
Førde
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ingrid Festø
Facility Name
Finnmarkssykehuset, Kirkenes Sykehus
City
Kirkenes
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eivor Rasmussen
Facility Name
Kongsvinger sykehus
City
Kongsvinger
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anne Marte Hals
Facility Name
Kristiansand sykehus
City
Kristiansand
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tove Nilsen
Facility Name
Levanger sykehus
City
Levanger
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lena Olden
Facility Name
Revmatismesykehuset Lillehammer
City
Lillehammer
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Elisabeth Hasselknippe
Facility Name
Meråker kurbad
City
Meråker
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hanne Haugan
Facility Name
Nøtterøy Fysioterapi
City
Nøtterøy
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Monica Strand
Facility Name
Diakonhjemmet Hospital
City
Oslo
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kristine Fjeldstad, MSc
Facility Name
Humana Helse
City
Sandvika
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ellen Sauar Norli
Facility Name
Universitetssykehuset Nord-Norge
City
Tromsø
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Berit Solheim
Facility Name
St.Olavs Hospital
City
Trondheim
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jorunn Kvalø Uleberg
Facility Name
Helsehuset Stokke
City
Tønsberg
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jorid Aasebø Lakerveld
Facility Name
Vikersund bad
City
Vikersund
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hilde Storhaug Molenaar
Facility Name
Ålesund sjukehus
City
Ålesund
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anne Guri Pilskog-Lande

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Individual participant data be made available when upon reasonable request to the principal investigator. The data are not available before they can be anonymoused.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Study protocol will be available from 1.11.22. SAP will be available before initation of analyses.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
E-mail the principal investigator for access to supporting information.

Learn more about this trial

Happy Hands - an E-self-management Intervention for People With Hand Osteoarthritis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs