search
Back to results

High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Cannula Compared to Non-Invasive Ventilation in Adult Patients With AcuTE Respiratory Failure (RENOVATE)

Primary Purpose

Respiratory Insufficiency, Respiratory Failure

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
High Flow Nasal Catheter
Noninvasive ventilation
Sponsored by
Hospital do Coracao
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Respiratory Insufficiency focused on measuring respiratory insufficiency, respiratory failure, non-invasive ventilation, high flow nasal cannula, nasal high flow, trans-nasal insufflation, NIV, HFNC

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

[IMPORTANT NOTE] On April 13th 2021, in the first interim analysis, the DSMB recommended for the interruption of the subgroup Immunocompromised De Novo Hypoxemic ARF due to futility.

Sequential adult patients 18 years of age or older admitted to the ICU or emergency department with acute onset respiratory distress suspected of having De Novo hypoxemic ARF (non-immunocompromised) , Immunocompromised De Novo hypoxemic ARF, COPD ARF, Cardiogenic acute pulmonary edema (APE).

Inclusion criteria for these 4 ARF subgroups are detailed below:

A. Inclusion Criteria for Non-Immunocompromised De Novo Hypoxemic ARF.

Patients must meet criteria 1, 2 and 3:

  1. Hypoxemia evidenced by SpO2 <90% or PaO2 <60 mmHg in room air
  2. Use of accessory muscles, paradoxical breathing, and/or thoracoabdominal asynchrony
  3. RR> 25 per minute

B. Inclusion Criteria for Immunocompromised De Novo Hypoxemic ARF.

Patients must meet criteria 1, 2, 3 and 4:

  1. Immunosuppression diagnosis:

    i. Use of Immunosuppressive drug or long-term [>3 months] or high-dose [>0.5 mg/kg/day] steroids ii. Solid organ transplantation iii. Extensive solid tumor or solid tumor requiring chemotherapy in the last 5 years iv. Hematological malignancy regardless of time since diagnosis and received treatments v. HIV infection vi. Primary immunodefiency

  2. Hypoxemia evidenced by SpO2 <90% or PaO2 <60 mmHg in room air
  3. Use of accessory muscles, paradoxical breathing, and/or thoracoabdominal asynchrony
  4. RR> 25 per minute

C. Inclusion Criteria for COPD exacerbation:

Patients must meet criteria 1 or 2 and 3 and 4:

  1. Previous Diagnosis of COPD based on GOLD guidelines
  2. Strong clinical suspicion of COPD i. Smoker or ex-smoker or other CPOD related exposure ii. Presence of chronic dyspnea on exertion or chronic productive cough iii. Excluded other causes for the chronic symptoms (ex. pulmonary fibrosis, heart failure)
  3. RR> 25 per minute or use of accessory muscles, paradoxical breathing, and/or thoracoabdominal asynchrony
  4. ABG analysis with pH < 7,35 , paCO2> 45 mmHg

D. Inclusion Criteria for ARF secondary to Cardiogenic APE.

Patients must meet criteria numbers 1, 2 and 3:

  1. Diagnosis of Cardiogenic Acute Pulmonary Edema (Nava, 2003):

    i. Dyspnea of sudden onset ii. Widespread rales with or without third heart sound 1 iii. Absent history of pulmonary aspiration, infection or previous history of pulmonary fibrosis iv. Pulmonary edema as the main clinical hypothesis v. Previous heart failure clinical history or acute coronary syndrome vi. If chest X-ray is already available at randomization, it must be suggestive of bilateral pulmonary edema

  2. RR > 25 per minute
  3. SpO2 < 95%

Exclusion Criteria for all subgroups of ARF

  1. Indication of emergency ETI:

    • Prolonged respiratory pauses
    • Cardiorespiratory arrest
    • Glasgow ≤12
    • HR < 50 bpm with decreased level of consciousness
    • pH < 7.15 irrespective of the cause
  2. Psychomotor agitation that prevents adequate medical / nursing care requiring heavy sedation
  3. Persistent hemodynamic instability with MAP <65 mmHg, SBP <90 mmHg after adequate volume resuscitation or requiring norepinephrine> 0.3 microg / kg / min or equivalent.
  4. Contraindications to non-invasive ventilation: face deformities or traumas, recent esophageal surgery, hypersecretion, vomiting with aspiration risk
  5. Presence of pneumothorax or extensive pleural effusion
  6. Severe arrhythmias at risk of hemodynamic instability
  7. Thoracic trauma understood as the main cause of ARF
  8. Asthma attack
  9. Pregnancy
  10. Cardiogenic Shock
  11. Acute Coronary Syndromes with plans to undergo coronary angiography within 24 hs
  12. ARF after orotracheal extubation (up to 72 hours after extubation)
  13. Post-surgical ARF (surgery within 72 hours)
  14. Hypercapnic ARF due to neuromuscular disease or chest deformities
  15. Patients on exclusive palliative care
  16. Do Not Intubate order (DNI)
  17. Chronic pulmonary disease except COPD
  18. Use of more than 6 hours of NIPPV before randomization if hypoxemic ARF in the non-immunosuppressed, in the immunosuppressed hypoxemic, or if exacerbated COPD
  19. Use of NIPPV before randomization in the cardiogenic acute pulmonary edema

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital do CoracaoRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

High Flow Nasal Catheter

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation

Arm Description

The HFNC (AIRVO2 Fisher & Paykel, Auckland, New Zealand) consists of an apparatus that allows adjustable FiO2 from 21 to 100% and delivers flow up to 60 L/ min.

NIPPV will be performed using the devices available on centers. Both a dedicated NIPPV device or invasive mechanical ventilator with NIPPV mode are accepted. The interface should be a oronasal or full face mask.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Endotracheal intubation rate or death
proportion of endotracheal intubation or death

Secondary Outcome Measures

Mortality
Death
Mortality
Death
ICU free days
Days out of ICU
IMV free days
Days without IMV inside of ICU after 48 hours of being extubated

Full Information

First Posted
August 21, 2018
Last Updated
June 28, 2023
Sponsor
Hospital do Coracao
Collaborators
Ministry of Health, Brazil, Berry Consultants
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03643939
Brief Title
High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Cannula Compared to Non-Invasive Ventilation in Adult Patients With AcuTE Respiratory Failure
Acronym
RENOVATE
Official Title
RandomizEd Adaptive Trial of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Cannula Compared to Non-Invasive Ventilation for AcuTE Respiratory Failure
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 30, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hospital do Coracao
Collaborators
Ministry of Health, Brazil, Berry Consultants

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
RENOVATE study aims to investigate if the respiratory support device called High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Cannula (HFNC) acts similarly (non-inferior) to another respiratory support device called Non-Invasive positive-pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) in preventing endotracheal intubation in adult patients with Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF) from different causes. HFNC is a somewhat new method of respiratory support in adults that has been used in neonatal ARF for some years. The reason this study is necessary is that, even though NIPPV has been demonstrated to prevent endotracheal intubation (and its associated complications) in a broad range of ARF patients, HFNC has been proposed to have the same beneficial effect of NIPPV while being easier tolerated, allowing patients to talk, eat and drink through mouth while on HFNC. RENOVATE will recruit between 800 to 2000 patients (adaptive design) with different types of ARF in Brazil. Patients will be randomized to HFNC or NIPPV and the rate of endotracheal intubation will be compared between groups as well as other parameters such as vital status and other health care related complications. [IMPORTANT NOTE] On April 13, 2021, on the first interim analysis, the DSMB recommended the interruption of the immunocompromised hypoxemic ARF subgroup.
Detailed Description
RENOVATE will investigate if High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Cannula (HFNC) is non-inferior to Non-Invasive positive-pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) in preventing endotracheal intubation or death in adult patients with Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF) from different causes in 7 days. HFNC is a somewhat new method of respiratory support in adults that has been used in neonatal ARF for some years. Even though NIPPV has been demonstrated to prevent endotracheal intubation (and its associated complications) in a broad range of ARF patients, HFNC may have beneficial effect over NIPPV because it is easier to be tolerated, allowing patients to talk, eat and drink through mouth while on therapy. RENOVATE will recruit between 800 to 2000 patients (adaptive design) with different types of ARF in Brazil. The main hypothesis is that HFNC is non inferior to NIPPV in reducing intubation rate or death within 7 days. However, as an adaptive study, this non inferiority hypothesis may change to superiority if gathered data during the study is promissing in the interim analysis. Therefore, sample size may increase to 2000 participants. Patients will be randomized to HFNC or NIPPV and the rate of endotracheal intubation will be compared between groups as well as other parameters such as vital status and other health care related complications. [IMPORTANT NOTE] On April 13, 2021, on the first interim analysis, the DSMB recommended the interruption of the immunocompromised hypoxemic ARF subgroup. Trial Update: We have collected Covid 19 information since march 2020 as an added question in the CRF. There are two questions: one in the elegibility criteria form asking if Covid 19 is suspected and another one in the discharge form asking if Covid 19 was laboratory confirmed. Since then, there were considerably change in prevalence of acute respiratory failure subgroups since the beginning of the trial in 2019. Covid 19, nowdays, is responsible for 63% of our sample size, followed by hypoxemic non immunocompromised subgroup with 19%, acute pulmonary edema and hypoxemic immunocompromised with 8% and finally COPD with 2%. These prevalences are completely different from our previous assumptions in 2019 trial simulations as published in our protocol and statistical analysis plan in March 2022 Volume 24 Number 1 at Critical Care Resuscitation journal. Therefore, the Steering Committee decided that all Covid 19 patients, independent of previous subgroup allocation, would be analysed separately in a 5th subgroup. Update in simulations with different scenarios and new statistical models were done by March 13th 2023 to account for the 5th interim analysis which you can access in the document section of ClinicalTrials.gov. No change in inclusion criteria were made. The only change was the introduction of those two questions described before. These updates are aimed at accommodating the presence of COVID-19 patients in the trial as the main subgroup of patients.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Respiratory Insufficiency, Respiratory Failure
Keywords
respiratory insufficiency, respiratory failure, non-invasive ventilation, high flow nasal cannula, nasal high flow, trans-nasal insufflation, NIV, HFNC

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Adaptive, non-inferiority randomized, open-label, controled clinical trial
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
2000 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
High Flow Nasal Catheter
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The HFNC (AIRVO2 Fisher & Paykel, Auckland, New Zealand) consists of an apparatus that allows adjustable FiO2 from 21 to 100% and delivers flow up to 60 L/ min.
Arm Title
Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
NIPPV will be performed using the devices available on centers. Both a dedicated NIPPV device or invasive mechanical ventilator with NIPPV mode are accepted. The interface should be a oronasal or full face mask.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
High Flow Nasal Catheter
Other Intervention Name(s)
Optiflow, Airvo, trans-nasal insufflation, Nasal High Flow, High Flow Nasal Cannula, nasal cannula with high-flow oxygen
Intervention Description
HFNC will deliver through AIRVO2. FiO2 from 21 to 100% and heated humidified gas flow up to 60 l / min with temperature of the circuit maintained at 37 degrees. Oxygen flow will be offered through a humidified nasal catheter. Flow and FiO2 will be titrated according to the protocol to maximize patient´s comfort and SpO2.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Noninvasive ventilation
Other Intervention Name(s)
BiPAP, Non-invasive ventilation, Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation
Intervention Description
NIPPV will be performed using a facial mask (either oronasal or full face). NIPPV will deliver pressures and FiO2 tailored to specific ARF subgroups, according to the protocol. Adjustments of the inspiratory pressure (IPAP) and expiratory pressure (EPAP) and FiO2 according to protocol
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Endotracheal intubation rate or death
Description
proportion of endotracheal intubation or death
Time Frame
in 7 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mortality
Description
Death
Time Frame
in 28 days
Title
Mortality
Description
Death
Time Frame
in 90 days
Title
ICU free days
Description
Days out of ICU
Time Frame
in 28 days
Title
IMV free days
Description
Days without IMV inside of ICU after 48 hours of being extubated
Time Frame
in 28 days
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Length of hospital stay
Description
Time in hospital in days
Time Frame
in 90 days
Title
Length of ICU stay
Description
Time in the ICU in days
Time Frame
in 90 days
Title
Vasopressor free days
Description
Days without use of vasopressor inside of ICU
Time Frame
in 28 days
Title
Proportion of patients who received do-not-intubate-order
Description
Proportion of patients that received DNI order after randomization was done
Time Frame
in 7 days
Title
Patient confort score
Description
Visual scale varying from 0 (no disconfort) to 100 (maximal disconfort)
Time Frame
7 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
[IMPORTANT NOTE] On April 13th 2021, in the first interim analysis, the DSMB recommended for the interruption of the subgroup Immunocompromised De Novo Hypoxemic ARF due to futility. Sequential adult patients 18 years of age or older admitted to the ICU or emergency department with acute onset respiratory distress suspected of having De Novo hypoxemic ARF (non-immunocompromised) , Immunocompromised De Novo hypoxemic ARF, COPD ARF, Cardiogenic acute pulmonary edema (APE). Inclusion criteria for these 4 ARF subgroups are detailed below: A. Inclusion Criteria for Non-Immunocompromised De Novo Hypoxemic ARF. Patients must meet criteria 1, 2 and 3: Hypoxemia evidenced by SpO2 <90% or PaO2 <60 mmHg in room air Use of accessory muscles, paradoxical breathing, and/or thoracoabdominal asynchrony RR> 25 per minute B. Inclusion Criteria for Immunocompromised De Novo Hypoxemic ARF. Patients must meet criteria 1, 2, 3 and 4: Immunosuppression diagnosis: i. Use of Immunosuppressive drug or long-term [>3 months] or high-dose [>0.5 mg/kg/day] steroids ii. Solid organ transplantation iii. Extensive solid tumor or solid tumor requiring chemotherapy in the last 5 years iv. Hematological malignancy regardless of time since diagnosis and received treatments v. HIV infection vi. Primary immunodefiency Hypoxemia evidenced by SpO2 <90% or PaO2 <60 mmHg in room air Use of accessory muscles, paradoxical breathing, and/or thoracoabdominal asynchrony RR> 25 per minute C. Inclusion Criteria for COPD exacerbation: Patients must meet criteria 1 or 2 and 3 and 4: Previous Diagnosis of COPD based on GOLD guidelines Strong clinical suspicion of COPD i. Smoker or ex-smoker or other CPOD related exposure ii. Presence of chronic dyspnea on exertion or chronic productive cough iii. Excluded other causes for the chronic symptoms (ex. pulmonary fibrosis, heart failure) RR> 25 per minute or use of accessory muscles, paradoxical breathing, and/or thoracoabdominal asynchrony ABG analysis with pH < 7,35 , paCO2> 45 mmHg D. Inclusion Criteria for ARF secondary to Cardiogenic APE. Patients must meet criteria numbers 1, 2 and 3: Diagnosis of Cardiogenic Acute Pulmonary Edema (Nava, 2003): i. Dyspnea of sudden onset ii. Widespread rales with or without third heart sound 1 iii. Absent history of pulmonary aspiration, infection or previous history of pulmonary fibrosis iv. Pulmonary edema as the main clinical hypothesis v. Previous heart failure clinical history or acute coronary syndrome vi. If chest X-ray is already available at randomization, it must be suggestive of bilateral pulmonary edema RR > 25 per minute SpO2 < 95% Exclusion Criteria for all subgroups of ARF Indication of emergency ETI: Prolonged respiratory pauses Cardiorespiratory arrest Glasgow ≤12 HR < 50 bpm with decreased level of consciousness pH < 7.15 irrespective of the cause Psychomotor agitation that prevents adequate medical / nursing care requiring heavy sedation Persistent hemodynamic instability with MAP <65 mmHg, SBP <90 mmHg after adequate volume resuscitation or requiring norepinephrine> 0.3 microg / kg / min or equivalent. Contraindications to non-invasive ventilation: face deformities or traumas, recent esophageal surgery, hypersecretion, vomiting with aspiration risk Presence of pneumothorax or extensive pleural effusion Severe arrhythmias at risk of hemodynamic instability Thoracic trauma understood as the main cause of ARF Asthma attack Pregnancy Cardiogenic Shock Acute Coronary Syndromes with plans to undergo coronary angiography within 24 hs ARF after orotracheal extubation (up to 72 hours after extubation) Post-surgical ARF (surgery within 72 hours) Hypercapnic ARF due to neuromuscular disease or chest deformities Patients on exclusive palliative care Do Not Intubate order (DNI) Chronic pulmonary disease except COPD Use of more than 6 hours of NIPPV before randomization if hypoxemic ARF in the non-immunosuppressed, in the immunosuppressed hypoxemic, or if exacerbated COPD Use of NIPPV before randomization in the cardiogenic acute pulmonary edema
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Israel Maia, MD
Phone
+55 11 30536611
Ext
8209
Email
israels.maia@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Leticia Kawano-Dourado, MD
Phone
+55 11 30536611
Ext
8209
Email
ldourado@hcor.com.br
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alexandre B Cavalcanti, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Research Institute - Hospital do Coracao, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Israel Maia, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Research Institute - Hospital do Coracao, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Leticia Kawano-Dourado, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Research Institute - Hospital do Coracao, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laurent Brochard, MD
Organizational Affiliation
St. Michael's Hospital (Toronto, Canada)
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carlos R Carvalho, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Pulmonary Division University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital do Coracao
City
São Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
05435000
Country
Brazil
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marcelo Romano, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Luzia Taniguchi, MSc

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes

Learn more about this trial

High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Cannula Compared to Non-Invasive Ventilation in Adult Patients With AcuTE Respiratory Failure

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs