search
Back to results

Hostile Interpretation Bias Training to Treat Irritability

Primary Purpose

Irritable Mood, Mood Disorders

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
IBT
Sponsored by
University of Colorado, Denver
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional basic science trial for Irritable Mood

Eligibility Criteria

13 Years - 17 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adolescents in mental health treatment, with at least:

    1. mild, clinically significant irritability, and
    2. typical intellectual functioning (IQ>80)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any of the following mental health diagnoses:

    1. current post-traumatic stress
    2. lifetime bipolar I or II disorder
    3. lifetime cyclothymic disorder
    4. lifetime psychotic disorder
    5. lifetime autism spectrum disorder
  • Major medical problems, including head trauma.
  • MRI-specific safety exclusions for the MRI arms.
  • Clinical instability.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Colorado, School of MedicineRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Sham Comparator

Active Comparator

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Active IBT, Out of MRI

Sham IBT, Out of MRI

Active IBT, In MRI

Sham IBT, In MRI

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Interpretation Bias
Interpretation bias is measured by the indifference point of happy-angry judgments of a continuum of morphed images between happy=1 to angry=15 facial expressions. Lower indifference points indicate a higher bias towards hostile (or angry) judgments. Change in interpretation bias is the difference between the post- and pre-IBT indifference points.
Neural response in threat learning system.
Amygdala functional connectivity to ventromedial prefrontal cortex is measured by covariance in fluctuations in blood oxygen-level dependent signal between these regions during functional magnetic resonance imaging during the course of training. These fluctuations are expected to be significantly modulated by interpretation bias training.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Learning Rate
Learning rate as measured by a reinforcement learning computational model during IBT. It measures the average trial-by-trial change in happy or angry judgments in response to feedback during a session of IBT.
Irritability
Tendency towards anger and temper outburst as measured by the Affective Reactivity Index.

Full Information

First Posted
June 26, 2018
Last Updated
November 9, 2022
Sponsor
University of Colorado, Denver
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03592368
Brief Title
Hostile Interpretation Bias Training to Treat Irritability
Official Title
Neurocognitive Targets of Hostile Interpretation Bias Training to Treat Irritability
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
October 15, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
February 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Colorado, Denver

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Device Product Not Approved or Cleared by U.S. FDA
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Hostile interpretation bias may be a feature of severe, chronic irritability in children, one of the most common psychiatric symptoms of childhood. Interpretation bias training (IBT) is a computer-based training program that may reduce irritability in youths. This trial lays the groundwork for a test IBT on irritability.
Detailed Description
This trial lays the foundation for a preliminary test of efficacy of IBT on irritability by establishing IBT's neurocognitive treatment targets: hostile interpretation bias and response in the neural threat-learning system. The design is a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial of IBT on its targets. The study will have four arms, with 25 participants in each arm for all four conditions of training (active versus sham) and scanning (in MRI or out of MRI scanner). During IBT, participants judge as happy or angry facial expressions which are on a continuum between happy and angry. The point at which judgments shift from predominantly happy to angry on this continuum is the indifference point. During training feedback encourages no change in the indifference point or a change in the indifference point towards more happy judgments of ambiguous faces. A shift in indifference point towards more benign judgments is interpreted as a reduction in hostile interpretation. The design will test whether active relative to sham IBT shifts the indifference point towards more benign judgments. Neural response to active versus sham IBT will be measured in half the sample.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Irritable Mood, Mood Disorders

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Active IBT, Out of MRI
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Sham IBT, Out of MRI
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Title
Active IBT, In MRI
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Sham IBT, In MRI
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
IBT
Intervention Description
Interpretation bias training
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Interpretation Bias
Description
Interpretation bias is measured by the indifference point of happy-angry judgments of a continuum of morphed images between happy=1 to angry=15 facial expressions. Lower indifference points indicate a higher bias towards hostile (or angry) judgments. Change in interpretation bias is the difference between the post- and pre-IBT indifference points.
Time Frame
Up to one day before and after the single 1 day training session of Interpretation bias training session.
Title
Neural response in threat learning system.
Description
Amygdala functional connectivity to ventromedial prefrontal cortex is measured by covariance in fluctuations in blood oxygen-level dependent signal between these regions during functional magnetic resonance imaging during the course of training. These fluctuations are expected to be significantly modulated by interpretation bias training.
Time Frame
During the course of the 1 day single session of interpretation bias training session.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Learning Rate
Description
Learning rate as measured by a reinforcement learning computational model during IBT. It measures the average trial-by-trial change in happy or angry judgments in response to feedback during a session of IBT.
Time Frame
During the course of the 1 day single interpretation bias training session.
Title
Irritability
Description
Tendency towards anger and temper outburst as measured by the Affective Reactivity Index.
Time Frame
Within one week prior to Interpretation bias training and one week +/- 3 days after Interpretation bias training.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
13 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
17 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adolescents in mental health treatment, with at least: mild, clinically significant irritability, and typical intellectual functioning (IQ>80) Exclusion Criteria: Any of the following mental health diagnoses: current post-traumatic stress lifetime bipolar I or II disorder lifetime cyclothymic disorder lifetime psychotic disorder lifetime autism spectrum disorder Major medical problems, including head trauma. MRI-specific safety exclusions for the MRI arms. Clinical instability.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Joel Stoddard, MD
Phone
720-777-5702
Email
joel.stoddard@ucdenver.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joel Stoddard, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Colorado, Denver
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Colorado, School of Medicine
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joel Stoddard, MD
Phone
720-777-5702
Email
joel.stoddard@ucdenver.edu

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
IPD Sharing Plan Description
A commitment to data sharing and analytic code has been made. Specifics of the data sharing plan require further work due to the collection of protected health information.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26745832
Citation
Stoddard J, Sharif-Askary B, Harkins EA, Frank HR, Brotman MA, Penton-Voak IS, Maoz K, Bar-Haim Y, Munafo M, Pine DS, Leibenluft E. An Open Pilot Study of Training Hostile Interpretation Bias to Treat Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016 Feb;26(1):49-57. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0100. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Hostile Interpretation Bias Training to Treat Irritability

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs