search
Back to results

HPV Self-sampling to Improve Access to Cervical Cancer Screening for Persons With HIV and/or Underserved Individuals (ACCESS)

Primary Purpose

Cervical Cancer

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Flocked swab paired with Roche Cobas 4800
Sponsored by
University of Washington
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional screening trial for Cervical Cancer focused on measuring Screening, Self-collection, Self-sampling, Cervical cancer, HPV, HIV

Eligibility Criteria

25 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >=25 and <65 (individuals without diagnosed HIV) or >=30 years (individuals with diagnosed HIV)
  • Female sex at birth
  • Proficient in English or Spanish
  • Refused a Pap smear or are >=6 months overdue for cervical cancer screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current pregnancy
  • Complete hysterectomy
  • History of cervical cancer
  • Unable to provide informed consent

Sites / Locations

  • SHE Clinic
  • Madison Clinic
  • MAX Clinic

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

HPV self-sampling

Arm Description

Participants will be offered self-collection kits for HPV-based cervical cancer screening.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Proportion of eligible individuals who accept self-sampling kits
the proportion of eligible individuals due or overdue for screening who agree to collect a vaginal sample for HPV testing.
Proportion of eligible individuals who submit self-sampled specimens
the proportion of individuals who agree to self-collection who return samples
Satisfaction with self-collection
Participants will use a 5-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree) to respond to the statement, "I was satisfied with the self-collection experience."
Confidence with self-collection
Participants will use a 5-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree) to respond to the statement, "I am sure I got a good sample using the swab."
Recommendation of self-collection
Participants will use a 5-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree) to respond to the statement, "I would recommend self-collection to a friend."
Ease of returning home kits
Participants who collected a sample at home will use a 5-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree) to respond to the statement, "It was easy to return my sample (by mail or to the clinic)."

Secondary Outcome Measures

Proportion of eligible individuals who return samples with adequate specimens
the proportion of returned samples that have valid specimens for HPV testing
Knowledge about HPV and cervical cancer screening
a survey to measure participant's knowledge about HPV and cervical cancer screening
Perceived risk of cervical cancer
a survey to measure participant's perceived risk of cervical cancer
Attitudes and preferences for screening
a survey to measure participant's attitudes and preferences for cervical cancer screening
HPV prevalence checklist
the distribution of HPV results from all individuals who return a self-sampled specimen
Receipt of follow-up care
Among participants who screen positive for hrHPV, measure the proportion who receive indicated follow-up care (cytology and/or colposcopy)
Reflex cytology results checklist
the results of cytology tests following positive self-sampled HPV results
Colposcopy results checklist
the results of colposcopy tests following positive self-sampled HPV results.
Provider and/or clinic barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening survey
focus group discussions with clinic administrators, staff and other HIV and women's health experts. These discussions will cover: barriers to clinician-administered screening (i.e., Pap screening and clinician-collected HPV samples); perceived patient barriers to clinician-administered screening and follow-up procedures; perceived facilitators to cervical cancer screening and follow-up; and feasibility of offering HPV self-sampling kits as a potential primary screening strategy.

Full Information

First Posted
August 29, 2022
Last Updated
September 2, 2022
Sponsor
University of Washington
Collaborators
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05528237
Brief Title
HPV Self-sampling to Improve Access to Cervical Cancer Screening for Persons With HIV and/or Underserved Individuals
Acronym
ACCESS
Official Title
Advancing Cervical Cancer Screening Through Self-Sampling (ACCESS): A Pilot Study of HPV Self-sampling for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Washington State
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Enrolling by invitation
Study Start Date
August 18, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 30, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 7, 2022 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Washington
Collaborators
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate self-collection of vaginal samples for HPV testing as an alternative cervical cancer screening strategy for persons with HIV and/or limited access to care. Self-collection kits will be offered to persons who refuse a Pap smear or are overdue (>=6 months) for cervical cancer screening, with screening uptake recorded as a primary outcome. Kits will be offered in-clinic to individuals who refuse a Pap smear, and individuals overdue for screening will have the option to receive and return kits in the mail. The investigators will additionally administer a phone-based survey to evaluate knowledge about HPV and cervical cancer, barriers and facilitators to screening, and attitudes towards screening. Data from medical records will be abstracted to describe the clinical characteristics of the sample and measure receipt of follow-up procedures. Focus groups will be conducted with clinic administrators, staff, and HIV and women's health experts to evaluate clinic and provider barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening. The investigators hypothesize that HPV self-sampling will result in favorable patient-centered outcomes and could reduce disparities in access to screening.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cervical Cancer
Keywords
Screening, Self-collection, Self-sampling, Cervical cancer, HPV, HIV

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Screening
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
50 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
HPV self-sampling
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will be offered self-collection kits for HPV-based cervical cancer screening.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Flocked swab paired with Roche Cobas 4800
Other Intervention Name(s)
COPAN 552c FLOQSwabs
Intervention Description
Consenting individuals will insert the sterile flocked swab into the vagina, rotate at least once, and store in the provided dry tube. The sample will be stored at ambient temperature and routed to the lab for HPV testing with Roche Cobas 4800.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of eligible individuals who accept self-sampling kits
Description
the proportion of eligible individuals due or overdue for screening who agree to collect a vaginal sample for HPV testing.
Time Frame
Baseline (during clinical and/or study recruitment encounter)
Title
Proportion of eligible individuals who submit self-sampled specimens
Description
the proportion of individuals who agree to self-collection who return samples
Time Frame
3 weeks from enrollment
Title
Satisfaction with self-collection
Description
Participants will use a 5-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree) to respond to the statement, "I was satisfied with the self-collection experience."
Time Frame
Within 2 weeks of sample collection
Title
Confidence with self-collection
Description
Participants will use a 5-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree) to respond to the statement, "I am sure I got a good sample using the swab."
Time Frame
Within 2 weeks of sample collection
Title
Recommendation of self-collection
Description
Participants will use a 5-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree) to respond to the statement, "I would recommend self-collection to a friend."
Time Frame
Within 2 weeks of sample collection
Title
Ease of returning home kits
Description
Participants who collected a sample at home will use a 5-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree) to respond to the statement, "It was easy to return my sample (by mail or to the clinic)."
Time Frame
Within 2 weeks of sample collection
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of eligible individuals who return samples with adequate specimens
Description
the proportion of returned samples that have valid specimens for HPV testing
Time Frame
3 weeks from enrollment
Title
Knowledge about HPV and cervical cancer screening
Description
a survey to measure participant's knowledge about HPV and cervical cancer screening
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Perceived risk of cervical cancer
Description
a survey to measure participant's perceived risk of cervical cancer
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Attitudes and preferences for screening
Description
a survey to measure participant's attitudes and preferences for cervical cancer screening
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
HPV prevalence checklist
Description
the distribution of HPV results from all individuals who return a self-sampled specimen
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Receipt of follow-up care
Description
Among participants who screen positive for hrHPV, measure the proportion who receive indicated follow-up care (cytology and/or colposcopy)
Time Frame
Up to 6 months after self-sampling
Title
Reflex cytology results checklist
Description
the results of cytology tests following positive self-sampled HPV results
Time Frame
Up to 6 months after self-sampling
Title
Colposcopy results checklist
Description
the results of colposcopy tests following positive self-sampled HPV results.
Time Frame
Up to 6 months after self-sampling
Title
Provider and/or clinic barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening survey
Description
focus group discussions with clinic administrators, staff and other HIV and women's health experts. These discussions will cover: barriers to clinician-administered screening (i.e., Pap screening and clinician-collected HPV samples); perceived patient barriers to clinician-administered screening and follow-up procedures; perceived facilitators to cervical cancer screening and follow-up; and feasibility of offering HPV self-sampling kits as a potential primary screening strategy.
Time Frame
During study year 1

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
25 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age >=25 and <65 (individuals without diagnosed HIV) or >=30 years (individuals with diagnosed HIV) Female sex at birth Proficient in English or Spanish Refused a Pap smear or are >=6 months overdue for cervical cancer screening Exclusion Criteria: Current pregnancy Complete hysterectomy History of cervical cancer Unable to provide informed consent
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Darcy Rao, PhD, MPH
Organizational Affiliation
University of Washington
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
SHE Clinic
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Madison Clinic
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98104
Country
United States
Facility Name
MAX Clinic
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98104
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
De-identified study data will be posted on a repository for use in studies on access to healthcare and sexual and reproductive health, including but not limited to cervical cancer services.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data will be available within 6 months of study end date.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Investigators interested in using study data will need to contact the investigator and sign a data use agreement.

Learn more about this trial

HPV Self-sampling to Improve Access to Cervical Cancer Screening for Persons With HIV and/or Underserved Individuals

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs