Human Milk Fortification With Adjustable Versus Targeted Method (FAT)
Primary Purpose
Growth Failure
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Adjustable Human Milk Fortification
Targeted Human Milk Fortification
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Growth Failure focused on measuring Human milk, Fortification, Preterm infants
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Infants with birth weight <1250 g born at Foothills Medical Centre.
- Appropriate for gestational age (AGA) (according to Fenton's Charts).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Abnormal Newborn Metabolic Screen
- Major congenital anomalies intervention.
- Patients who develop NEC prior to enrollment.
- Patients with confirmed congenital Toxoplasmosis, Syphilis, Rubella, Cytomegalovirus, Herpes simplex virus, Varicella and/or Zika (TORCH infections).
- Patients receiving systemic steroids.
- Patients with acute kidney injury (AKI).
Sites / Locations
- Foothills Medical Centre
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Adjustable Human Milk Fortification
Targeted Human Milk Fortification
Arm Description
Human milk fortification based on blood urea levels
Human milk fortification based on milk analysis
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Average weight gain in infants on Adjustable versus Targeted human milk fortification
Average weight gain measured as g/kg per day
Secondary Outcome Measures
Anthropometrics in infants on Adjustable versus Targeted human milk fortification
Measurement of head circumference and length in centimeters.
BUN concentration in infants on Adjustable versus Targeted human milk fortification
mmol/L
Incidence of extra uterine growth restriction
Defined as weight less than 10th percentile at 36 weeks corrected age (CA)
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04809350
Brief Title
Human Milk Fortification With Adjustable Versus Targeted Method
Acronym
FAT
Official Title
Effect of Adjustable Versus Targeted Human Milk Fortification on Weight Gain in Preterm Infants With Birth Weight <1250 g: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
March 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
May 31, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
May 31, 2025 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Calgary
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Research question: Do preterm infants born <1250 g achieve better weight gain with targeted fortification compared with the adjustable fortification of human milk?
Hypothesis: Targeted fortification of human milk results in better weight gain in infants with birth weight <1250 gr when compared to the adjustable fortification.
Study design: Open-label, pragmatic, parallel randomized controlled trial in appropriate for gestational age infants with birth weight <1250 g.
Detailed Description
Human milk is the ideal diet for neonates. However, it does not provide enough energy, protein, and sodium to meet the nutritional requirements of very preterm infants. Postnatal growth failure is common despite the current use of human milk fortifiers. The main human milk fortification methods include:
standard HM fortification (SF) which assumes an average composition of breast milk and adds fortifiers in a fixed dosage. It does not account for variations of nutrient content in human milk
Individualized human milk fortification which encompasses two methods:
Adjustable HM fortification (AF): Protein supplementation is provided in addition to SF according to blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentration which reflects the infant's metabolic response to protein intake. However, there are clinical scenarios in which the BUN levels are not a reliable marker of protein intake, such as acute kidney injury.
Targeted HM fortification (TF): Based on routine analyses of HM that are used to adjust fortification to meet the recommended requirements for infants. It does not take into consideration that the requirements of infants may vary.
SF has frequently failed to achieve appropriate weight gain, while individualized (AF or TF) fortification seems to have better performance. However, the evidence to support one method over the other is lacking.
The objective of the study is to compare weekly average weight gain between preterm infants on AF versus TF.
Once the written consent is obtained, the infant will be randomized to AF or TF. The sequence code will be kept in sequential numbered sealed envelopes. Infants from multiple births will be included as 1 unit and randomized to the same arm of the study.
For patients allocated to the TF group, breast milk will be analyzed twice weekly for energy, protein, and sodium contents. The daily protein, fat, and sodium intakes will be then calculated and optimized to meet the recommended dietary reference intake (DRI) for preterm infants with birth weight <1250 g.
For patients allocated to the AF group, weekly BUN measurements will be performed. Based on BUN concentrations, the liquid protein will be added to achieve the targeted BUN level. Additional calories will be added using formula if growth is suboptimal or DRI is not met based on the assumed human milk content for protein and energy.
The intervention will last 4-8 weeks. For all patients, the day the first BUN concentration and milk analyses are done will be day 1 of intervention. The following measurements will be performed on days 7-8, 14-16, 21-23, and 28-30 of intervention: Weight (grams), length and head circumference (centimeters), BUN and sodium concentrations.
Data on maternal and neonatal characteristics will be collected from their electronic and physical charts.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Growth Failure
Keywords
Human milk, Fortification, Preterm infants
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
52 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Adjustable Human Milk Fortification
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Human milk fortification based on blood urea levels
Arm Title
Targeted Human Milk Fortification
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Human milk fortification based on milk analysis
Intervention Type
Dietary Supplement
Intervention Name(s)
Adjustable Human Milk Fortification
Intervention Description
BUN and sodium concentrations will be measured every week in infants on full enteral feeds with fortified human milk.
Liquid protein will be added based on serum urea.
Intervention Type
Dietary Supplement
Intervention Name(s)
Targeted Human Milk Fortification
Intervention Description
Human milk will be analyzed twice weekly. Before the day of analysis, each mother will store fresh milk pumped from 10:00 AM until 8:00 AM of the previous day in a refrigerator and bring it to the hospital.
Protein, fat, and sodium supplementation will be added to the human milk to meet the recommended daily intakes.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Average weight gain in infants on Adjustable versus Targeted human milk fortification
Description
Average weight gain measured as g/kg per day
Time Frame
Weekly for 8 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Anthropometrics in infants on Adjustable versus Targeted human milk fortification
Description
Measurement of head circumference and length in centimeters.
Time Frame
Weekly for 8 weeks
Title
BUN concentration in infants on Adjustable versus Targeted human milk fortification
Description
mmol/L
Time Frame
Weekly for 4 weeks
Title
Incidence of extra uterine growth restriction
Description
Defined as weight less than 10th percentile at 36 weeks corrected age (CA)
Time Frame
At 36 weeks CA
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Infants with birth weight <1250 g born at Foothills Medical Centre.
Appropriate for gestational age (AGA) (according to Fenton's Charts).
Exclusion Criteria:
Abnormal Newborn Metabolic Screen
Major congenital anomalies intervention.
Patients who develop NEC prior to enrollment.
Patients with confirmed congenital Toxoplasmosis, Syphilis, Rubella, Cytomegalovirus, Herpes simplex virus, Varicella and/or Zika (TORCH infections).
Patients receiving systemic steroids.
Patients with acute kidney injury (AKI).
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Belal N Alshaikh, MD, MSc
Phone
4039561588
Email
balshaik@ucalgary.ca
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Adriana Reyes Loredo, MD
Email
adriana.reyesloredo@albertahealthservices.ca
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Belal Alshaikh, MD, MSc
Organizational Affiliation
University of Calgary
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Foothills Medical Centre
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T2N2T9
Country
Canada
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Human Milk Fortification With Adjustable Versus Targeted Method
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs