Hyaluronidase for Trigger Point Injection in Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Primary Purpose
Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
trigger point injection
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults
- Aged 25-75 years
- Diagnosed with myofascial pain syndrome affecting both trapezius muscles
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of allergy to lidocaine or hyaluronidase
- Anticoagulant medication or antiplatelet agent within 5 days before the study
- Analgesic medication, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, tramadol, acetaminophen, or opioids within 5 days of the study
- Pain related to trauma within 6 months before the study
- History of cervical or shoulder surgery
- TPI within 3 months in the same region
- Fibromyalgia
- Cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy
- Obesity, defined as body mass index of 27.5 or higher
- Other medical or psychological conditions (cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, endocrine disease, major depression, schizophrenia)
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Lidocaine
Hyaluronidase
Arm Description
Group L received trigger point injection with a 3.2 ml of a 1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine and 0.9% normal saline
Group H received trigger point injection with the same volume of solution supplemented with hyaluronidase (H-LASE®, 1500 iu, L&H Pharm., Seoul, Korea) 600 iu/ml
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Degree of pain as measured by the verbal numerical rating scale
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02293083
First Posted
November 11, 2014
Last Updated
November 13, 2014
Sponsor
Samsung Medical Center
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02293083
Brief Title
Hyaluronidase for Trigger Point Injection in Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Official Title
Effect of Hyaluronidase Addition to Lidocaine for Trigger Point Injection in Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2011 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Samsung Medical Center
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is the most common cause of persistent regional pain characterized by myofascial trigger points. Trigger point injection (TPI) using local anesthetics is one of the most effective methods for treatment of MPS, and steroids or botulinum toxin can be added to local injections .
Recent study suggested that the hyaluronan (HA) could be the basis of myofascial pain. HA within the deep fascia facilitates the free sliding of two adjacent fibrous fascial layers. If the HA assumes a more packed conformation, or more generally, if the loose connective tissue inside the fascia alters its density, the behavior of the entire deep fascia and the underlying muscle would be compromised.
The investigators anticipated that hyaluronidase could decrease the viscosity of HA near the muscle and fascia of trigger points. Meanwhile, hyaluronidase is thought to promote the spread of local anesthetic solution by hydrolyzing glycosidic bonds within HA. Hyaluronidase was shown to be effective in retro- and peribulbar block for ophthalmologic surgery or reducing tissue edema in dermatology, and adhesiolysis for some interventional pain managements.
However, the effect of the addition of hyaluronidase to local anesthetics during TPI has not been studied. The investigators aimed to compare the efficacy of TPI with the addition of hyaluronidase compared to local anesthetic alone on pain and quality of life in MPS patients.
Detailed Description
Study approval was obtained from Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Samsung medical center, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
The required sample size was determined by power analysis on the basis of a previous study. The primary outcome was pain intensity in the posterior neck and upper back after TPI using verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS). The standard deviation of VNRS was assumed to be 20. Power calculations indicated that detecting 20 points difference in VNRS between the two groups (with α = 0.05 and β = 0.1) would require a sample of 29 subjects for each group. To account for dropouts, 33 subjects were recruited for each group.
Group L received TPI with a 3.2 ml of a 1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine and 0.9% normal saline. Group H received TPI with the same volume of solution supplemented with hyaluronidase (H-LASE®, 1500 iu, L&H Pharm., Seoul, Korea) 600 iu/ml. The investigators monitored vital sign and any signs of complications such as bleeding, hematoma, allergic reactions for 30 minutes. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by one of the authors (J.W.C.) using VNRS. To reduce bias, this evaluator and the participants were not informed of the assigned group.
Patients' characteristics such as age, height, weight, BMI and pretreatment neck disability index (NDI) and brief pain inventory (BPI) were analyzed by independent t-test. The sex distribution was analyzed by the chi-square test. P values were corrected by Bonferroni's method. Pretreatment VNRS and the duration of pain were evaluated by the Wilcoxon two-sample test. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare changes in the VNRS over time between the two groups. Pre- and post-TPI changes in NDI and BPI were compared between the two groups with the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the independent t-test, respectively. All analyses were performed with SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) statistical software. Significance was assumed for P values of less than 0.05.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Myofascial Pain Syndrome
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
61 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Lidocaine
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Group L received trigger point injection with a 3.2 ml of a 1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine and 0.9% normal saline
Arm Title
Hyaluronidase
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Group H received trigger point injection with the same volume of solution supplemented with hyaluronidase (H-LASE®, 1500 iu, L&H Pharm., Seoul, Korea) 600 iu/ml
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
trigger point injection
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Degree of pain as measured by the verbal numerical rating scale
Time Frame
within 2 weeks after intervention
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
25 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Adults
Aged 25-75 years
Diagnosed with myofascial pain syndrome affecting both trapezius muscles
Exclusion Criteria:
History of allergy to lidocaine or hyaluronidase
Anticoagulant medication or antiplatelet agent within 5 days before the study
Analgesic medication, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, tramadol, acetaminophen, or opioids within 5 days of the study
Pain related to trauma within 6 months before the study
History of cervical or shoulder surgery
TPI within 3 months in the same region
Fibromyalgia
Cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy
Obesity, defined as body mass index of 27.5 or higher
Other medical or psychological conditions (cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, endocrine disease, major depression, schizophrenia)
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Hyaluronidase for Trigger Point Injection in Myofascial Pain Syndrome
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs